v0.1.7: export drift clearance — release checklist 7.7 three-leg desktop feed dispatch + verify-feed.ts fail-loud validation (main-repo commit 867502fec), implement SKILL Producer test preflight core-neutral block (main-repo commit 4a149fccf); clears both pending content-drift findings

core/README.md

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
   - `script/check-scaffold-parity.ts` — scaffold-template twin 逐字节
     校验（schema $id owner token 归一化比较）；
   - `script/delink-core.ts` — 去链接化契约执行（#NNNN 活引用 → [org-internal #NNNN]
-    注记，`--strip` 进一步收敛为溯源短注 [TT-NNNN]；幂等；--check 零剩余才过；Inc 6b 字节锁镜像翻转 rewritten 后无递延）；
+    注记；幂等；--check 零剩余才过；Inc 6b 字节锁镜像翻转 rewritten 后无递延）；
   - `script/check-core-p1.ts` — P1 零残留终验（私网 IP / 实例主机名 / 个人
     身份 / 旧 owner token 全树 grep；豁免 id-aliases.json 与历史命名空间
     URL 声明；Inc 6b 起无字节锁递延）；

core/adapters/gitea/patterns.md

@@ -138,31 +138,6 @@ curl -fsS -X PATCH "<gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues/comment
 
 单评论聚合不变量（工件索引、当前状态表等）的执行手段。
 
-## Pattern 7: move-issue-to-column
-
-看板列迁移（Todo → In Progress → Review → Done）。projects/columns
-发现用 REST；「把工单移到列」的操作端点语义复杂，经 swagger 查询后
-调用，不臆造路径：
-
-```bash
-# 列出 repo 级 projects（projects 仅 repo 级，无 org/user 级端点）
-curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
-  "<gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/projects"
-# 列某 project 的 columns
-curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
-  "<gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/projects/{project_id}/columns"
-# 移动工单到列：先经 swagger.v1.json 查询 projects 相关端点后调用
-curl -s <gitea-base-url>/swagger.v1.json -o /tmp/gitea-sw.json
-jq -r '.paths | keys[]' /tmp/gitea-sw.json | grep projects
-```
-
-## Pattern 7.5: move-issue-to-pipeline-stage
-
-管线阶段板列（Pipeline Stages board column）承载阶段迁移——阶段转移
-落到板列，**不落** `## 当前状态` 行（该表只承载 PR / 评审 / CI 行与
-非阶段阻塞项）。列序列按管线阶段定义；移动与 Pattern 7 同款
-（projects/columns 经 REST + swagger 发现，同上）。
-
 ## Pattern 8: post-commit-status
 
 commit status 直发 REST（评审综合的 Tier-2 落点）：
@@ -183,22 +158,6 @@ context 公式：`pipeline/review-{stage}`（`code` / `review-dag` /
 `audit-process`）。token 从实例配置读取（此处 `<token>` 占位）。
 merge 前读回验证：`GET /commits/{PR_SHA}/status`。
 
-## Pattern 9: create-iteration-board
-
-```bash
-# 建 project（board）：先经 swagger 查询 create 端点契约
-curl -s <gitea-base-url>/swagger.v1.json -o /tmp/gitea-sw.json
-jq '.paths["/repos/{owner}/{repo}/projects"].post' /tmp/gitea-sw.json
-# 随后 POST 建板（title="{slug} — Iteration {N}", description="…"）
-# 再对每列（Todo / In Progress / Review / Done）：
-jq '.paths["/repos/{owner}/{repo}/projects/{project_id}/columns"].post' /tmp/gitea-sw.json
-# 随后 POST 建列
-```
-
-projects 仅 repo 级。DAG 聚合 agent 在单门 PASS 后建板；工单正文模板带
-`## Node Reference`（指向 `{epic-slug}/dag`）、`## Acceptance Criteria`、
-`## Parent`。
-
 ## Pattern 10: artifact-index（工单 ↔ 工件索引）
 
 技能发布工件后，在源工单维护 **`## 工件索引` 评论**——单一原位编辑的

core/adapters/gitea/reading.md

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
 
 ## Pattern 4: read-project-column-issues
 
-看板列工单队列。project/column 发现：
+看板列工单队列（只读）。project/column 发现：
 
 ```
 curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
@@ -89,9 +89,7 @@ curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
   "<gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/projects/{project_id}/columns"
 ```
 
-「把工单移到列」等复杂操作：经 `swagger.v1.json`
-（`jq '.paths | keys[]' | grep projects`）查询 projects 相关端点后调用，
-不要臆造具体端点路径。projects 仅 repo 级（无 org/user 级端点）。
+projects 仅 repo 级（无 org/user 级端点）。
 
 ## Pattern 5: read-review-status（CLI）
 

core/checklists/audit-process.md

@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ creating thin wrapper checklist files would add no value.
 
 | #   | 检查项                                                                 | 通过 | 不通过 | 备注 |
 | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------ | ---- |
-| 1.1 | SDLC 流水线各阶段均有对应 skill（analyze-dag→review-dag 单门→implement→review-code→verify→release→retrospective；legacy roadmap/requirements/design/plan 已归档 [TT-3072] phase 3，见 `<instance-root>/archive/`） | ☐ | ☐ | |
+| 1.1 | SDLC 流水线各阶段均有对应 skill（analyze-dag→review-dag 单门→implement→review-code→verify→release→retrospective；legacy roadmap/requirements/design/plan 已归档 [org-internal #3072] phase 3，见 `<instance-root>/archive/`） | ☐ | ☐ | |
 | 1.2 | 每个 `skills/<name>/` 目录恰好包含一个 `SKILL.md`（例外：`_shared/` 目录不含 `SKILL.md`，为共享引用文档目录） | ☐ | ☐ | |
 | 1.3 | 每个产物型 skill 都有配套 `checklists/<name>.md`（无清单的自检要求即为缺口） | ☐ | ☐ | |
 | 1.4 | `checklists/` 中无孤儿清单（存在清单但无任何 skill 引用）                  | ☐ | ☐ | |
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ creating thin wrapper checklist files would add no value.
 | 8.5 | 防范范围收窄：明令禁止「只看重点/从简」类弱化措辞（IEEE 1028-2008 完整性）  | ☐ | ☐ | |
 | 8.6 | 留痕：审计产物落盘到结构化文件，而非仅存于对话                        | ☐ | ☐ | |
 | 8.7 | 闭环：存在重审循环与收敛/审批终止条件（ISO 19011:2018 跟踪与关闭）         | ☐ | ☐ | |
-| 8.8 | 流程自身测试为绿：Orchestrator（bash 可用）在派发审计员**之前**机械运行流程自身的测试套件与守卫门（`bun run test:parallel` 全量分片 + `check:*` 守卫族，如 core-parity / encoding-health / derived-artifacts），并把命令、基线 SHA 与结果摘要落盘到 `<runs-root>/audit/reviews/audit-process/process-tests-green.md`（Tier 1）；审计员（只读，无 bash）核对该记录存在于当前基线且为绿——任何红测试/红守卫本身即流程缺陷，按 findings 登记（缺陷逃逸案例：红测试存活 3 轮审计、无任何维度运行过测试套件，[TT-4787]） | ☐ | ☐ | 运行归 Orchestrator、核对归审计员（角色边界：`core/skills/_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md` §No bash for Explorer sub-agents） |
+| 8.8 | 流程自身测试为绿：Orchestrator（bash 可用）在派发审计员**之前**机械运行流程自身的测试套件与守卫门（`bun run test:parallel` 全量分片 + `check:*` 守卫族，如 core-parity / encoding-health / derived-artifacts），并把命令、基线 SHA 与结果摘要落盘到 `<runs-root>/audit/reviews/audit-process/process-tests-green.md`（Tier 1）；审计员（只读，无 bash）核对该记录存在于当前基线且为绿——任何红测试/红守卫本身即流程缺陷，按 findings 登记（缺陷逃逸案例：红测试存活 3 轮审计、无任何维度运行过测试套件，[org-internal #4787]） | ☐ | ☐ | 运行归 Orchestrator、核对归审计员（角色边界：`core/skills/_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md` §No bash for Explorer sub-agents） |
 
 ---
 

core/checklists/code-review.md

@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@
 | 5.4 | 测试相互独立，可任意顺序运行，无共享可变状态           | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 5.5 | Mock/Stub 的使用合理，模拟的外部行为与真实行为一致     | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 5.6 | 测试命名清晰表达了测试场景和预期结果                   | ☐    | ☐      |      |
-| 5.7  | 本次变更涉及的测试已通过（`test:changed`，由 mechanical-green gate 机器判定，评审员引用 gate 结果即可）。全量套件（`test:parallel`）归 verify，不是代码评审门禁（[TT-2598] 检查分层） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
-| 5.8 | 评审发现的"dummy fixture / harness 默认值漂移"类问题，不能仅凭 `WAIVED` 处置：若漂移值是 harness 对**生产 CLI/配置默认值**的镜像（如 harness 旧 owner 默认 vs CLI 新 owner 默认这类 token 漂移），WAIVED 会把真实漂移放行到 post-merge（[TT-3169] TST-F002 → 后续 [TT-3172] 才修）。处置前确认该值是否被生产路径读取；被读取则必须 FIX 或显式登记 TD | ☐    | ☐      |      |
+| 5.7  | 本次变更涉及的测试已通过（`test:changed`，由 mechanical-green gate 机器判定，评审员引用 gate 结果即可）。全量套件（`test:parallel`）归 verify，不是代码评审门禁（[org-internal #2598] 检查分层） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
+| 5.8 | 评审发现的"dummy fixture / harness 默认值漂移"类问题，不能仅凭 `WAIVED` 处置：若漂移值是 harness 对**生产 CLI/配置默认值**的镜像（如 harness 旧 owner 默认 vs CLI 新 owner 默认这类 token 漂移），WAIVED 会把真实漂移放行到 post-merge（[org-internal #3169] TST-F002 → 后续 [org-internal #3172] 才修）。处置前确认该值是否被生产路径读取；被读取则必须 FIX 或显式登记 TD | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 
 ---
 

core/checklists/dag-single-gate.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 > **权威源**：本文件判据逐行复制 `dag-pipeline/spec-04` §1 三张表
 > （含 `NFR:` 前缀 / 里程碑边 / 里程碑节点豁免与 `estimated_sessions` 判据）。
 > 若本文件与 spec-04 §1 不一致，以 spec-04 §1 为唯一权威源。
-> （`spec-0N` 前身为 `dag-pipeline/03-design-0N-*`，2026-08-21 [TT-3072] phase 3
+> （`spec-0N` 前身为 `dag-pipeline/03-design-0N-*`，2026-08-21 [org-internal #3072] phase 3
 > 升格迁移，旧名仅保留墓碑占位以维持旧 URL 可达。）
 
 ## TOPO — 拓扑维

core/checklists/implementation.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 2. **POST** 项在完成编码和所有验证命令后检查；
 3. 对"不通过"项必须在代码评审前修复；
 4. 无法满足的项标记 `[N/A: <原因>]`；
-5. **DAG 路由产物解析（[TT-3072] phase 3 后唯一管线模式）**：DAG 运行不存在
+5. **DAG 路由产物解析（[org-internal #3072] phase 3 后唯一管线模式）**：DAG 运行不存在
    legacy `{slug}/04-plan-*` / `{slug}/03-design-*` 页面，PRE-1～PRE-7、
    PRE-11、PRE-12、PRE-19、POST-15.1 引用的产物按 `implement`/`verify`
    SKILL 的 DAG-route read map 解析：工作项定义 → 冻结 DAG 副本
@@ -68,17 +68,17 @@
 | ------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------ | --- | ---- |
 | PRE-11 | 设计文档（wiki pages `{slug}/03-design-**`）已存在且包含本工作项涉及的全部组件设计                   | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 | PRE-12 | 迭代计划（plan/）已存在且本工作项有明确的工作项 ID 和验收条件               | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
-| PRE-13 | 评审门已收敛：DAG 路由下为 review-dag 单门收敛（`octopus review status --stage review-dag` 的 state 为 `success`，与 `pipeline-gate.md` DAG 路由变体一致）；standalone 模式（bugfix/refactor/port）无上游评审门，标记 `[N/A: standalone 无上游评审]`（legacy design-space / iteration-plan 双门已随 [TT-3072] phase 3 归档） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
+| PRE-13 | 评审门已收敛：DAG 路由下为 review-dag 单门收敛（`octopus review status --stage review-dag` 的 state 为 `success`，与 `pipeline-gate.md` DAG 路由变体一致）；standalone 模式（bugfix/refactor/port）无上游评审门，标记 `[N/A: standalone 无上游评审]`（legacy design-space / iteration-plan 双门已随 [org-internal #3072] phase 3 归档） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 | PRE-14 | 合并前基准刷新：当前分支已 rebase 到目标分支（`git fetch origin && git rebase origin/main`），无合并冲突。若 rebase 引入新变更，重新运行 `bun typecheck && bun run test:parallel` 后再提交 | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 
 ### 5. UI 组件设计完整性（仅前端/UI 工作项）
 
 | #      | 检查项                                                                     | 通过 | 不通过 | N/A | 备注 |
 | ------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------ | --- | ---- |
-| PRE-15 | 设计文档覆盖了组件的全部四种状态（Loading / Empty / Error / Success），每种状态有明确的渲染内容和触发条件（参见 `.octopus/archive/templates/design.md` §11.1，legacy 设计模板 [TT-3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
-| PRE-16 | 设计文档覆盖了组件所需的全部交互行为：列表导航、焦点管理、键盘快捷键、展开/折叠、实时过滤（参见 `.octopus/archive/templates/design.md` §11.2，legacy 设计模板 [TT-3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
-| PRE-17 | 设计文档覆盖了组件的全部可访问性要求：ARIA role/label、键盘可达、焦点环、对比度、色彩独立性（参见 `.octopus/archive/templates/design.md` §11.3，legacy 设计模板 [TT-3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
-| PRE-18 | 设计文档已逐组件声明测试策略类型（render / source-verification / E2E / manual）。已知测试基础设施限制（Kobalte portal + happydom、路由上下文缺失等）已有对应替代方案标记（参见 `.octopus/archive/templates/design.md` §11.4，legacy 设计模板 [TT-3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
+| PRE-15 | 设计文档覆盖了组件的全部四种状态（Loading / Empty / Error / Success），每种状态有明确的渲染内容和触发条件（参见 `.octopus/archive/templates/design.md` §11.1，legacy 设计模板 [org-internal #3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
+| PRE-16 | 设计文档覆盖了组件所需的全部交互行为：列表导航、焦点管理、键盘快捷键、展开/折叠、实时过滤（参见 `.octopus/archive/templates/design.md` §11.2，legacy 设计模板 [org-internal #3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
+| PRE-17 | 设计文档覆盖了组件的全部可访问性要求：ARIA role/label、键盘可达、焦点环、对比度、色彩独立性（参见 `.octopus/archive/templates/design.md` §11.3，legacy 设计模板 [org-internal #3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
+| PRE-18 | 设计文档已逐组件声明测试策略类型（render / source-verification / E2E / manual）。已知测试基础设施限制（Kobalte portal + happydom、路由上下文缺失等）已有对应替代方案标记（参见 `.octopus/archive/templates/design.md` §11.4，legacy 设计模板 [org-internal #3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 | PRE-19 | 超过 3 个 MANUAL 类型的 AC 已标记为设计风险，并在 plan 中标注更高级测试基础设施依赖 | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 
 ---
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
 | POST-6 | 若不得已偏离设计，有明确的注释标注原因和设计修正建议（含 ADR/amend 引用 — 不可仅写"偏离设计"） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 | POST-6.1 | 已用设计文档中的决策树/状态机/真值表，代入至少 2 组具体输入手工 trace 每条分支，确认代码输出与设计预期一致（尤其条件取反、`===` vs `!==`、状态翻转等易错点） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 | POST-6.2 | 因 API 不兼容、上游限制或测试基础设施不足而延迟的项，已在代码中用 `[OPEN: <short-id>]` 标注（含延迟原因、影响范围、建议解决时机）。verify Phase 5.5 会为每个 `[OPEN]` 项在源票 `## TD 登记` 评论登记一行（registry-first，`ticket-lifecycle.md`；排期后才升格独立票）。禁止仅标注 `[OPEN]` 而不登记 | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
-| POST-6.3 | 邻近配额（[TT-3002] G3）：本迭代触碰的区域（包/模块）若在源票 `## TD 登记` 中有适用行，已带走 ≥1 项一并处置（修复或带理由显式再延迟）；无适用行时在报告记录 `0 applicable` | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
+| POST-6.3 | 邻近配额（[org-internal #3002] G3）：本迭代触碰的区域（包/模块）若在源票 `## TD 登记` 中有适用行，已带走 ≥1 项一并处置（修复或带理由显式再延迟）；无适用行时在报告记录 `0 applicable` | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 
 ### 5. 代码质量
 
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
 | POST-10.4 | 多写操作（INSERT + UPDATE）用 `Database.transaction` 包裹保证原子性 | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 | POST-11 | 无硬编码凭据、密钥、内网地址或环境特定值              | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 | POST-11.1 | 提交前无法跟踪链接检查（单一事实来源：`code-review.md` SEC 3.7.1——`git diff --cached --diff-filter=T` 为空；判据以该条为准）| ☐   | ☐     | ☐  |      |
-| POST-11.2 | 提交前已确认无进程/流程副产品混入暂存区（如 `.claim` 空文件、claim carrier、临时 pid/日志）——`git status` 逐条核对，`git add -A` 前先看 untracked 清单（[TT-3169] 教训：`.claim` 空文件随 iter-0 混入，round-1 九维评审要求 `git rm`） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
+| POST-11.2 | 提交前已确认无进程/流程副产品混入暂存区（如 `.claim` 空文件、claim carrier、临时 pid/日志）——`git status` 逐条核对，`git add -A` 前先看 untracked 清单（[org-internal #3169] 教训：`.claim` 空文件随 iter-0 混入，round-1 九维评审要求 `git rm`） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 | POST-12 | 无注释掉的代码块或 `console.log` 调试语句             | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 | POST-13 | 无 `as any` 类型断言绕过类型检查（生产代码必须保有完整类型安全） | ☐    | ☐      | ☐   |      |
 

core/checklists/pipeline-gate.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Upstream Artifact Existence 与 Upstream Review Convergence 检查
       `success`（替代 design-space + iteration-plan 双门；任务工单
       不重跑单门，只核对其已收敛）
 - [ ] （仅任务工单）票 body `## 父级 / Parent` 指向 DAG 父级
-      （`Kind/Epic` 或 `Kind/Feature`，[TT-3061] 阶段 2），
+      （`Kind/Epic` 或 `Kind/Feature`，[org-internal #3061] 阶段 2），
       Step 0 解析到 `dag.task_route`（entry `implement`），不继承
       `dag.route`
 - [ ] 跨节点依赖由 DAG 拓扑承担：节点 ready 以其全部跨 session 上游
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ review-dag）直至收敛；DAG 副本缺失或未冻结 → 回到 `analyze-dag
 - [ ] standalone bugfix：repro notes wiki page `{slug}/repro-notes` 存在且含环境快照（via `wiki 读写 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）`）
 - [ ] 验收条件可解析：来自请求/工单 body 或节点 AC（等价的验收条件文档，via `wiki 读写 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` / `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）get`）
 
-> Legacy（[TT-3072] phase 3，2026-08-21 归档）：requirements/design/plan baseline
+> Legacy（[org-internal #3072] phase 3，2026-08-21 归档）：requirements/design/plan baseline
 > 页（`{slug}/02-requirements-index` / `{slug}/03-design-index` /
 > `{slug}/04-plan-index` / `{slug}/04-plan-05-acceptance-criteria`）与
 > design-space / iteration-plan 双门收敛检查随 legacy 管线归档
@@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ review-dag）直至收敛；DAG 副本缺失或未冻结 → 回到 `analyze-dag
 
 ## PR 准入（pr-admission）
 
-> 纪律：`core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md` PR 准入节（TD-678 / [TT-3881] / [TT-4425]）。
+> 纪律：`core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md` PR 准入节（TD-678 / [org-internal #3881] / [org-internal #4425]）。
 
 - [ ] PR 标题符合 `[slug][iter-N] type(scope): 描述` 格式
-- [ ] PR 正文含变更清单 + 自测结果 + 关联合规（关联 issue 引用，如 `Closes #N`；数字后须接 ASCII 标点或行尾——紧跟全角标点会破坏 Gitea 自动关闭，PR [TT-3882] 实例）
+- [ ] PR 正文含变更清单 + 自测结果 + 关联合规（关联 issue 引用，如 `Closes #N`；数字后须接 ASCII 标点或行尾——紧跟全角标点会破坏 Gitea 自动关闭，PR [org-internal #3882] 实例）
 - [ ] 交付推送前本地验证已绿：`<harness-package>` 下 `bun run test:changed` 全绿 + `bun typecheck` 0 error（WIP 备份推送不受此门约束——分支裸推零 CI，交付信号是完成回报而非推送）
 - [ ] 分支已推送 origin；PR **未**由本会话自行创建（由编排按容量串行开启，一次一张、双绿并入再开下一张）
 - [ ] 交付报告已发（branch= 分支名 / 改动文件清单 / 自测结果 / verify 与 risk 回执）
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ review-dag）直至收敛；DAG 副本缺失或未冻结 → 回到 `analyze-dag
 > 状态跃迁），不得等到技能退出边界。规则：`core/rules/issue-checklist-sync.md`。
 
 - [ ] 若存在 source issue：其 checklist 已按同步点表渐进勾选（DAG 冻结、iteration commit、PR 创建、review PASS、CI 跃迁、verify 终扫），无陈旧 `- [ ]` 项
-- [ ] 若为 incident / standalone-bugfix 流程：issue 含 `## 当前状态` live-status 小节，且 PR / review / CI 行已随跃迁更新（[TT-1689]）
+- [ ] 若为 incident / standalone-bugfix 流程：issue 含 `## 当前状态` live-status 小节，且 PR / review / CI 行已随跃迁更新（[org-internal #1689]）
 - [ ] 过程性 AC（如"连续 N 次绿"）的进度注记已更新（带 run 编号）
 - [ ] 遗留项（未勾选）均有 `(Deferred: ...)` 或 `(Pending: ...)` 注记
 - [ ] verify PASS 时 `## 当前状态` 小节已折叠进 checklist 注记并移除

core/checklists/refactoring.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 | 2.1 | 重构目标明确（哪种变换，为什么）                      | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 2.2 | 步骤分解 ≤ 10 步                                      | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 2.3 | 不存在范围蔓延（未在同一重构中混入新功能或 Bug 修复） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
-| 2.4 | 若重构涉及身份/owner token 改名（org、账号、邮箱、域名前缀）：已先产出"不改清单"——OS 账号、个人邮箱、历史记录归属、dummy fixture 等非组织身份引用逐类明确保留，再执行机械替换（[TT-3169] 教训：D1 缺此边界 → round-1 15 MAJOR） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
+| 2.4 | 若重构涉及身份/owner token 改名（org、账号、邮箱、域名前缀）：已先产出"不改清单"——OS 账号、个人邮箱、历史记录归属、dummy fixture 等非组织身份引用逐类明确保留，再执行机械替换（[org-internal #3169] 教训：D1 缺此边界 → round-1 15 MAJOR） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 
 ---
 
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
 | 4.4 | 测试覆盖率未下降（±1%）                            | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 4.5 | 无新增或修改的测试（重构不应改变测试中的断言逻辑） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 4.6 | 若重构改变了对外可见字符串（stage 名称、tool description、错误消息等），对应的 snapshot 已通过 `bun test --update-snapshots` 更新 | ☐    | ☐      |      |
-| 4.7 | 若重构变更了身份/owner token：残留扫描守卫（如 `script/verify-urls.ts`）已做**语义正反验证**——搜索模式指向**旧** token（旧 owner 前缀的 URL 形态），且已知新 token（新 owner 前缀的 URL 形态）与真实旧残留各跑一次，确认守卫对"合规新 URL"不误报、对"真实残留"不漏报（[TT-3169] 教训：D5 模式被翻转 → 守卫对新 URL 误报、对旧残留失明） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
+| 4.7 | 若重构变更了身份/owner token：残留扫描守卫（如 `script/verify-urls.ts`）已做**语义正反验证**——搜索模式指向**旧** token（旧 owner 前缀的 URL 形态），且已知新 token（新 owner 前缀的 URL 形态）与真实旧残留各跑一次，确认守卫对"合规新 URL"不误报、对"真实残留"不漏报（[org-internal #3169] 教训：D5 模式被翻转 → 守卫对新 URL 误报、对旧残留失明） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 
 ---
 

core/checklists/release.md

@@ -74,3 +74,24 @@
 | 6.1 | Tagged commit 可构建                | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 6.2 | 测试全部通过                        | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 6.3 | 回到了原始分支                      | ☐    | ☐      |      |
+
+---
+
+## 7. 产物发布（DIST — Artifact Distribution，octopus 项目）
+
+> 对应 `.octopus/skills/release/SKILL.md` Phase 4b（#2003 退役 CI publish
+> 管线后的手工发布流程）。**主仓库 tag + release 对象 ≠ 发布完成**——CLI
+> 二进制、公开镜像、桌面 feed 三层外圈全部就位才算。本清单从磁盘读取，
+> 作为技能注入被截断时的兜底事实源（v0.25.0 发布时技能注入截断恰好切掉
+> Phase 4b，导致外圈整层遗漏——本节由此设立）。
+
+| #   | 检查项                                   | 通过 | 不通过 | 备注 |
+| --- | ---------------------------------------- | ---- | ------ | ---- |
+| 7.1 | 12 平台 CLI 二进制已构建（tag 的干净 checkout，`bun packages/octopus/script/build.ts`），全部 smoke test 输出版本号 | ☐ | ☐ | Windows 无 `python3` 命令，zip 归档需垫 shim 或手动补齐 |
+| 7.2 | 12 个归档已挂到主仓库 release（zip×6 + tar.gz×6） | ☐ | ☐ | |
+| 7.3 | （可选，Gitea-only 口径可跳过）npm/docker/AUR 外部 registry 已发或明确跳过 | ☐ | ☐ | `OCTOPUS_GITEA_ONLY=true` |
+| 7.4 | `sync-public-assets.sh` 已跑：公共镜像 `Octopus/octopus-release` 的 `v{version}` release 有 12 资产 | ☐ | ☐ | 大 POST 出站不通时经服务器 localhost 中继 |
+| 7.5 | `sync-public-install.sh` 已跑：install/install.ps1/README 同步到镜像 main（注意 cp 目标是**根 README.md**，不是 scripts/ 副本） | ☐ | ☐ | |
+| 7.6 | `verify-public-sync.sh` PASSED | ☐ | ☐ | |
+| 7.7 | Desktop feed 三腿已派发（mac 走 `desktop-mac.yml` dispatch；win/linux 各一次 `desktop-feed.yml` dispatch），`bun packages/desktop/script/verify-feed.ts --version <ver> --channel <beta|prod>` PASS（三平台 yml 全量校验：`latest.yml`/`latest-linux.yml`/`latest-mac.yml` 的 `version:` == CLI 版本 + size 对资产逐项核对 + 匿名可达） | ☐ | ☐ | #6378 起以 verify-feed.ts 为准（v0.31.0 漏腿事故 #6375 的 fail-loud 补丁）；concurrency 组已按 platform 分离；stable 通道 feed 缺失见 #6376 |
+| 7.8 | README 下载链接抽查（install 脚本 raw、资产直链、docs 相对链接）匿名可达 | ☐ | ☐ | v0.18 遗留 wiki 坏链由此发现 |

core/checklists/retrospective.md

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 | 1.11 | 已检查 merged workflow/* 分支与关联 worktree 在合并后已清理（本地分支删除 + worktree 移除） | ☐ | ☐ | |
 | 1.12 | 周期时长和团队规模已记录（压缩周期 = 质量风险，单点故障） | ☐ | ☐ | |
 | 1.13 | 范围估算验证：triage/scope 声明前已统计各标签下的 issue 数量（如 `Status/Blocked`、`Kind/*`、`Priority/*`），并与之前声明对比，偏差 >20% 标注为估算偏差 | ☐ | ☐ | |
-| 1.14 | 门缺陷逃逸分析已运行（§2.8 escape-rate 单指标，[TT-3061]）：各 gate 的 clean runs / escapes / escape_rate 已统计，UNDER-POWERED（≥0.3）门已标注并回馈 §2.9 pre-flight（gate-trim 元进程已退役，[TT-3072] phase 3） | ☐ | ☐ | |
+| 1.14 | 门缺陷逃逸分析已运行（§2.8 escape-rate 单指标，[org-internal #3061]）：各 gate 的 clean runs / escapes / escape_rate 已统计，UNDER-POWERED（≥0.3）门已标注并回馈 §2.9 pre-flight（gate-trim 元进程已退役，[org-internal #3072] phase 3） | ☐ | ☐ | |
 
 ---
 

core/checklists/verification.md

@@ -119,9 +119,9 @@
 | #   | 检查项                                                                   | 通过 | 不通过 | 备注 |
 | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------ | ---- |
 | 8.1 | 本迭代全部 UNVERIFIABLE / ACCEPTED_RISK / `[OPEN]` 项均已登记为源票 `## TD 登记` 评论中的行（registry-first，`ticket-lifecycle.md`；`filing.sprint-mode: true` 期间禁止升格独立票） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
-| 8.2 | 每行含 `TD-NNN`、type、Severity、origin、一句话摘要与可客观验证的 Reactivation Trigger；TD-NNN 为注册期分配——经 `script/td-alloc.sh` 从号段台账（TD allocation ledger，常设 tracker）取号，任何分配必须先落台账 td-alloc 评论（[TT-3322] 互斥） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
+| 8.2 | 每行含 `TD-NNN`、type、Severity、origin、一句话摘要与可客观验证的 Reactivation Trigger；TD-NNN 为注册期分配——经 `script/td-alloc.sh` 从号段台账（TD allocation ledger，常设 tracker）取号，任何分配必须先落台账 td-alloc 评论（[org-internal #3322] 互斥） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 8.3 | 两处登记的 `TD-NNN` 标识一致，且每项都有可客观验证的 Reactivation Trigger | ☐    | ☐      |      |
-| 8.4 | 邻近配额复核（[TT-3002] G3）：报告含本迭代触碰区域的登记册带走情况（consumed/applicable，或 `0 applicable`）；与本 run 的债务配额记录一致（legacy roadmap 状态追踪表已归档，[TT-3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
+| 8.4 | 邻近配额复核（[org-internal #3002] G3）：报告含本迭代触碰区域的登记册带走情况（consumed/applicable，或 `0 applicable`）；与本 run 的债务配额记录一致（legacy roadmap 状态追踪表已归档，[org-internal #3072] phase 3） | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 
 ---
 

core/rules/artifact-index-guards.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 ## Artifact-Index Guards (mandatory)
 
-> Check-mechanized (injection-budget batch-3, [TT-3699]): guards
+> Check-mechanized (injection-budget batch-3, [org-internal #3699]): guards
 > 1-3's checkable invariants run in the repo's artifact-index-check script
 > (`<artifact-index-check-cmd> <ticket>`, see the term mapping; exit 4 =
 > violation, `--json` summary; tolerant of wild archive-marker dialects).
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 Before creating a `## 工件索引` comment, scan the issue's existing comments
 for the legacy prefix `## Pipeline 工件追踪表`. If found, UPGRADE it
 in place (edit, not create) and rename. NEVER create a second index comment
-(DEFECT-1 / [TT-1924]). Mechanized: reports the comment_id to edit.
+(DEFECT-1 / [org-internal #1924]). Mechanized: reports the comment_id to edit.
 
 ### 2. Never-duplicate invariant (single-comment)
 

core/rules/auto-approve.md

@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ UI's "auto-accept permissions" toggle (browser-local, not the project
 > fix this table. `merge-pr` is excluded from default/preset `stages` arrays
 > (not structurally blocked; explicitly adding it is not recommended).
 > Legacy stage retirement (12 → 5): the phase-3 retirement ruling doc
-> (instance detail (in the consuming instance)).
+> (Tier-2 reference, reachable via the ticket backend).
 
-Config shape: `"auto_approve": { "stages": ["review-code", "verify"], "stageless": false }` — `stages` empty (`[]`) = all manual; `stageless: true` also auto-approves questions called without a stage. Absent block defaults to `{ stages: ["review-code", "verify", "audit-process"], stageless: false }`; the removed `enabled` field migrates on load (mapping: instance detail page `rules/auto-approve-detail`). Presets (`safe`/`full`/`off`/`show`): same reference page — `full` never includes `merge-pr`.
+Config shape: `"auto_approve": { "stages": ["review-code", "verify"], "stageless": false }` — `stages` empty (`[]`) = all manual; `stageless: true` also auto-approves questions called without a stage. Absent block defaults to `{ stages: ["review-code", "verify", "audit-process"], stageless: false }`; the removed `enabled` field migrates on load (mapping: Tier-2 reference page `rules/auto-approve-detail`). Presets (`safe`/`full`/`off`/`show`): same reference page — `full` never includes `merge-pr`.
 
 ### Stage matching behavior
 
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Config shape: `"auto_approve": { "stages": ["review-code", "verify"], "stageless
 Check logic: the harness 内建的问询与自动批准判定模块
 (resolveAutoApproveDecision).
 
-### Live-gate degradation chain ([TT-3531])
+### Live-gate degradation chain ([org-internal #3531])
 
 An auto-approved question is NOT consumed instantly: L1 — a live human
 watching the session (SSE declaration / fresh presence ping) answers within
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ before the gate runs (iron law).
 
 ### Mandatory destructive list (业务决策类问询强制清单)
 
-Origin: [TT-3223] — a stage whitelist auto-answered two
+Origin: [org-internal #3223] — a stage whitelist auto-answered two
 irreversible production data changes because nothing marked them
 `destructive`. A stage whitelist grants "execution gates may proceed
 uninterrupted"; it must NEVER grant "business decisions may be
@@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ is never a substitute for human confirmation of these categories.**
 1. **Merge / release landing** — merging a PR to main, cutting a tag or
    release, deploying/promoting to production (server-side auto-merge is a
    human-configured policy robot, never agent self-answer latitude; kill
-   switch: the auto-merge-low-risk runbook, instance detail (in the consuming instance)).
+   switch: the auto-merge-low-risk runbook, Tier-2 reference via the ticket
+   backend).
 2. **Production database writes** — upsert/update/delete against production
    data stores, production data migrations, live-data backfills.
 3. **Billing / plan changes** — plan or tier migration, pricing/concurrency

core/rules/claim-discipline.md

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ plausible-looking result to fill the gap.
   contents, API responses, search hits, metrics. If the tool did not return
   it, you do not know it — say so.
 
-Origin: [TT-2115] root cause 5 / [TT-2118] — deepseek-v4-flash reviewers fabricated
+Origin: [org-internal #2115] root cause 5 / [org-internal #2118] — deepseek-v4-flash reviewers fabricated
 full review JSON when the wiki tool surface (MCP tooling at the time, now
 retired) was unavailable to subagents.
 

core/rules/code-graph.md

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ NOT grep + read whole files to reconstruct relationships.
 The main checkout's `.codegraph/` indexes ONLY that tree. A git worktree lives
 outside the repo path, so nearest-`.codegraph/` resolution finds nothing under
 it — graph queries in a workflow worktree silently degrade to grep+read
-(the [TT-2561] / TD-006 gap).
+(the [org-internal #2561] / TD-006 gap).
 
 - `script/session-worktree.sh create` and `script/scratch-worktree.sh create`
   build a per-worktree index automatically: `codegraph init -i <path>` runs in

core/rules/compact.md

@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ Context compaction keeps long pipelines inside the model's context window.
 Two mechanisms exist:
 
 1. **Stage-boundary compaction** (main session / orchestrator) —
-   capacity-driven [TT-2601]: compact at a clean stage boundary
+   capacity-driven [org-internal #2601]: compact at a clean stage boundary
    ONLY when a capacity trigger holds (below), not merely because the
    boundary was reached.
 2. **Round-boundary compaction** (multi-round reviews) — compact at every
    review round ≥ 2, after the round's state is persisted.
 
-### Stage-boundary compaction (capacity-driven, [TT-2601])
+### Stage-boundary compaction (capacity-driven, [org-internal #2601])
 
 The main session orchestrates the whole pipeline while delegating stages to
 subagents, but still accumulates their result summaries, planning reasoning,
@@ -35,16 +35,16 @@ A trigger holding → compact at the NEAREST clean boundary. No trigger → KEEP
 the context: preserved working context is worth more than the tokens it costs.
 
 **Mixed capacity threshold — min(water_level, absolute cap)
-[TT-3321] / TD-434]**: the capacity threshold is
+[org-internal #3321] / TD-434]**: the capacity threshold is
 `min(context × water_level, compaction.max_context_tokens)` — whichever is
 LOWER (`max_context_tokens` default 100_000; `0` restores pure water_level
-semantics [TT-3342]). On large windows the 100k cap binds first.
+semantics [org-internal #3342]). On large windows the 100k cap binds first.
 Measurement basis: the provider's REAL reported usage (input tokens), not
 local estimates; the rendered guidance and the Trigger A/B overflow paths
 resolve the same normalized values (harness 内建的压缩引导模块, see the
 instance term mapping).
 
-**Sub-session posture [TT-3321]**: Explorers compact by returning
+**Sub-session posture [org-internal #3321]**: Explorers compact by returning
 promptly, persisting only what their skill protocol REQUIRES (review findings
 JSON to the run workspace reviews directory). Workers persist outputs to
 Tier 1 BEFORE finishing. The parent context is where the mixed threshold
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ applies. Tier 1 boundary: two-tier-artifacts rule.
 
 **Short runs target zero intra-run compaction** — an implement →
 review-code → verify run fits one window; clean boundaries do not compact
-without a trigger. (Rationale + retired legacy stages: instance detail page `rules/compact-detail`, reachable via the ticket backend.)
+without a trigger. (Rationale + retired legacy stages: Tier-2 reference page
+`rules/compact-detail`, reachable via the ticket backend.)
 
 Clean boundaries where triggers are evaluated (live skills):
 
@@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ DAG-routed runs, the latest review pages, or the DoD matrix
 (`{slug}/05-verify-*`) — to recover the current slug, stage, and outstanding
 items. Do not rely on the compacted summary alone.
 
-**Identity verification precedes re-orientation [TT-2459].**
+**Identity verification precedes re-orientation [org-internal #2459].**
 Every compacted summary opens with a harness-injected `### Session Identity`
 card (agent, role/mode/ticket, CORE artifact rows, role re-read set),
 rendered from role-yaml `compact.preserve` lists and issue CORE rows by the
@@ -98,7 +99,7 @@ The `compact` tool rejects calls made too soon after the previous one
 turns); no boundary type is exempt. Beyond `insufficient_turns` the tool has
 more guard outcomes (`min_interval`, `no_model`, `circuit_breaker_open`,
 `disabled` — rejected; `compaction_in_progress`, `deduplicated` — deferred;
-full table: instance detail page `rules/compact-detail`, reachable via the
+full table: Tier-2 reference page `rules/compact-detail`, reachable via the
 ticket backend). All are accept-and-continue: never retry past a guard,
 never work around the dedup/breaker state. A boundary whose compaction was
 rejected or deferred simply keeps its context; the persisted artifacts still

core/rules/issue-checklist-sync.md

@@ -11,16 +11,16 @@ point and see exactly what is done, in progress, and deferred.
 
 | When | Who | What |
 |------|-----|------|
-| After the DAG artifact is frozen (`review-dag` PASS + freeze confirmation per `analyze-dag/SKILL.md` §Output & Lifecycle step 2, [TT-3379]) | Aggregator agent | Convert the source Epic's draft acceptance criteria into a formal checklist; annotate requirement-covered items `_(DAG frozen: {epic-slug}/dag v1)_` |
+| After the DAG artifact is frozen (`review-dag` PASS + freeze confirmation per `analyze-dag/SKILL.md` §Output & Lifecycle step 2, [org-internal #3379]) | Aggregator agent | Convert the source Epic's draft acceptance criteria into a formal checklist; annotate requirement-covered items `_(DAG frozen: {epic-slug}/dag v1)_` |
 | After each iteration commit (`implement` Phase 4.5) | Developer | Check off items delivered by this iteration |
 | After a PR is created | Developer | Append a `## 当前状态` live-status section (or update it) with PR number + mergeable; in an Epic task list, append the PR reference to the corresponding row |
 | After code review converges (`review-code` PASS, Phase E) | Orchestrator | Check off review-related items; annotate `_(reviewed: round N PASS)_`; update the `## 当前状态` review row; label the PR `ready-to-merge` — keep-mergeable automation takes over (hand-written keep-mergeable commits are retired) |
 | On CI key state transitions (first green / failure / cumulative goal reached) | Verifier or Developer | Update the process-type AC (e.g. "N consecutive green runs") progress note in the issue; record the run number |
 | At `verify` Phase 5.6 (final sweep before PASS) / issue close | Closing agent (Verifier on the primary path; otherwise the last role that closes the issue) | Final sweep — every remaining item gets annotated; **archive-at-close**: fold `## 当前状态`, then mark the `## 工件索引` comment archived per the artifact-index-guards rule guard #3 (see「归档动作」below) |
 
-> Historical ([TT-3072] phase 3): the requirements/design/plan exit sync points
-> were archived with their skills (detail: instance detail page
-> `rules/issue-checklist-sync-detail`, in the consuming instance).
+> Historical ([org-internal #3072] phase 3): the requirements/design/plan exit sync points
+> were archived with their skills (detail: Tier-2 reference page
+> `rules/issue-checklist-sync-detail`, reachable via the ticket backend).
 
 Between sync points the checklist stays as-is. **PR / review / CI
 transitions** MUST also be visible via the live status note below — the
@@ -32,12 +32,12 @@ For flows with externally visible transitions between skill exits —
 standalone bugfix, incident response, long-running reviews — maintain a short
 live status table near the top of the issue body, updated in place via the
 ticket-backend issue-update API at the transition moment (closes the
-stale-issue gap [TT-1668]/[TT-1689]]).
+stale-issue gap [org-internal #1668]/[org-internal #1689]]).
 
 All roles use the literal heading `## 当前状态` (no suffix). If an issue carries
-a legacy variant (e.g. `## 当前状态 (live)` from [TT-1668]), normalize it to
+a legacy variant (e.g. `## 当前状态 (live)` from [org-internal #1668]), normalize it to
 `## 当前状态` at the first transition touched. Example table + legacy-variant
-list: instance detail page `rules/issue-checklist-sync-detail`, reachable
+list: Tier-2 reference page `rules/issue-checklist-sync-detail`, reachable
 via the ticket backend.
 
 Rules:
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ Rules:
   surfaced by checklist annotations alone — do NOT add live-status rows for
   them. PR / review / CI transitions carry BOTH a checklist annotation AND
   a live-status row.
-- **Stage rows live on the board, not here**: pipeline stage transitions are
-  represented by the Pipeline Stages board column (shared write-patterns
-  Pattern 7.5), NOT by `## 当前状态` rows. Keep only the
+- **No stage rows here**: pipeline stage transitions are NOT represented by
+  `## 当前状态` rows — they surface through checklist annotations at skill
+  exits. Keep only the
   status-sync-automated rows (PR / 代码评审 / CI) and non-stage
   blockers/deferrals.
 - Update in place (same section heading `## 当前状态`), never append a second copy.
@@ -57,15 +57,15 @@ Rules:
 - At verify PASS / issue close, fold the table's content into checklist
   annotations and remove the section (see the「归档动作」section below).
 
-### Automated sync ([TT-1833], timer-polled since [TT-2813])
+### Automated sync ([org-internal #1833], timer-polled since [org-internal #2813])
 
 PR / review / CI status-row transitions are automated by the `status-sync`
 poller (deployed as a host timer, every 5 min; event sources + latency table
-on the instance detail page `rules/issue-checklist-sync-detail`, reachable
+on the Tier-2 reference page `rules/issue-checklist-sync-detail`, reachable
 via the ticket backend). Roles do NOT hand-write those three row types. A PR
-body may carry several close refs (batch PRs, [TT-3731]
+body may carry several close refs (batch PRs, [org-internal #3731]
 `land-batch`): rows fan out to EVERY referenced issue
-(`parseClosesFixesWide` — [TT-3867], merged 2026-08-31) — Chinese 关闭/修复 refs
+(`parseClosesFixesWide` — [org-internal #3867], merged 2026-08-31) — Chinese 关闭/修复 refs
 drive rows too, even though the ticket backend never auto-closes those
 keywords. The remaining sync points (checklist annotations at skill exits,
 `## 当前状态` creation, deferral/pending marking, section fold-at-close) are
@@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ deduplicated `[status-sync-cron]` issue.
 Pipeline mode has natural sync points at skill exits; standalone bugfix and
 incident flows do NOT — the only boundaries are commit → PR → review → CI →
 merge, and EACH is a sync point with the same annotations as the progressive
-table above (full table: instance detail page `rules/issue-checklist-sync-detail`, reachable via the ticket backend): fix
+table above (full table: Tier-2 reference page
+`rules/issue-checklist-sync-detail`, reachable via the ticket backend): fix
 commit → tick fix-delivered ACs `_(commit {sha}: file)_`; PR → open/update
 `## 当前状态`; review convergence → tick review ACs + review row; CI
 transitions → process-AC progress with run number; verify PASS / close →
@@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ For tickets routed through the DAG pipeline (see workflow-routing rule
   comment (single-comment invariant). The body aggregator table is kept as a
   historical snapshot at close and does NOT carry ARCHIVE.
 
-### Kind/MVP tickets — exemption ([TT-3061])
+### Kind/MVP tickets — exemption ([org-internal #3061])
 
 `Kind/MVP` tickets run the interactive no-pipeline mode: no stage exits →
 **nothing to sync**, no `## 当前状态` section (no PR/review/CI rows until
@@ -136,7 +137,7 @@ non-checklist content. PR / review / CI transitions ALSO go into the
 
 ### 归档动作（issue 关闭 = 归档）
 
-**生命周期 = 工单生命周期**（[TT-1929]）：文档生命周期与源 issue 绑定 —— verify PASS → issue 关闭 = 归档。Tier-2 工件库无独立生命周期。
+**生命周期 = 工单生命周期**（[org-internal #1929]）：文档生命周期与源 issue 绑定 —— verify PASS → issue 关闭 = 归档。Tier-2 工件库无独立生命周期。
 
 归档是 **显式动作**，由关闭 issue 的 agent 执行：主路径为 Verifier 在 `verify` Phase 5.6；路径跳过 verify 时（audit-only、文档类、standalone/bugfix）由关闭 issue 的 role 代为执行。无论哪个 actor，均遵循 artifact-index-guards 规则 guard #3（机制以共享 write-patterns Pattern 10 为准）。动作序列：
 
@@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ non-checklist content. PR / review / CI transitions ALSO go into the
 3. **标记 `## 工件索引` 归档**：按共享 write-patterns Pattern 10 Archive-at-close 原位 edit（机制以 Pattern 10 为准）。横幅日期以实际关闭日为准。
 4. **关闭 issue**：PR body 的 `Closes #N` 在 merge 时自动关闭；无 PR 的流程由 **关闭 issue 的 agent** 执行工单后端的 issue-close API 完成闭环。
 
-约束（[TT-1928] 设计约束；机制细节以共享 write-patterns Pattern 10 Archive-at-close 为准，此处不重复）：
+约束（[org-internal #1928] 设计约束；机制细节以共享 write-patterns Pattern 10 Archive-at-close 为准，此处不重复）：
 
 - **L 级大件（>~300 行）留 Tier-2 工件库不删除** —— 页面与位置列 URL 保持不动（稳定 URL 供历史与共享契约引用）。
 - **索引/状态/归档判定全部收敛到 issue** —— Tier-2 工件库无独立生命周期；归档标记只落在 `## 工件索引` 评论。

core/rules/issue-cross-linking.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ regression-test follow-up, or any parent/child breakdown — the issues MUST be
 cross-linked:
 
 - **Parent issue**: after creating all children, update the parent body so its
-  task list references each child by `#<number>` (e.g. `- [ ] [TT-1556] — [P0] ...`).
+  task list references each child by `#<number>` (e.g. `- [ ] [org-internal #1556] — [P0] ...`).
   The ticket backend renders these as clickable links and auto-generates a
   back-reference on each child's timeline.
 - **Child issue**: its body MUST contain a `## 父级 / Parent` section referencing
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ cross-linked:
 ### Issue ↔ Tier-2 artifact (pipeline traceability)
 
 When a production skill (`analyze-dag`, publishing the `{epic-slug}/dag`
-artifact; historically the pre-[TT-3072] producer skills) publishes
+artifact; historically the pre-[org-internal #3072] producer skills) publishes
 an artifact to the Tier-2 artifact library, the link to the source issue is
 only **half-built** — the library's index page links forward to the issue,
 but the issue has no link back to the library. A stakeholder opening the
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ After publishing, the skill MUST complete the reverse link on the source issue:
   reads the 工件索引 comment and fetches every CORE row's 位置 (shared
   read-patterns doc Pattern 6), instead of hard-coded library paths. Skills'
   re-read instructions therefore point at the index.
-- **Archive-at-close（归档动作, [TT-1929]/[TT-1928]）** — issue 关闭即归档；Tier-2 工件库无独立
+- **Archive-at-close（归档动作, [org-internal #1929]/[org-internal #1928]）** — issue 关闭即归档；Tier-2 工件库无独立
   生命周期。`ARCHIVE` is not just a per-row re-read priority: at issue close the
   whole index is marked archived by the closing agent (Verifier at `verify`
   Phase 5.6 on the primary path; otherwise the Orchestrator / last-role that
@@ -56,11 +56,11 @@ After publishing, the skill MUST complete the reverse link on the source issue:
 - **Sync the issue's checklist** per the issue-checklist-sync rule for the
   matching exit point (live: the DAG-freeze sync point after `review-dag`
   PASS; the legacy requirements-exit / design-exit / plan-exit points were
-  retired with their skills, [TT-3072] phase 3).
+  retired with their skills, [org-internal #3072] phase 3).
 - Skip if no source issue exists (no `Closes #N` / `Fixes #N` / roadmap chunk
   mapping ties this slug to an issue).
 
-**Size/S & Size/M exception ([TT-1832]) — RETIRED (2026-08-21, [TT-3072]
+**Size/S & Size/M exception ([org-internal #1832]) — RETIRED (2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072]
 phase 3)**: retired with the legacy producer skills and the `sizing:` block.
 Historical indexes pointing at in-issue artifacts (`位置 = #comment-{id}`)
 remain valid, readable locations; new artifacts publish where their live

core/rules/session-scope-guard.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 ## Session Scope Guard (mandatory)
 
 > Enforcement layer: precheck-mechanized (injection-budget batch-2,
-> [TT-3667]) — pre-flight sources 1-3 below live in the repo's
+> [org-internal #3667]) — pre-flight sources 1-3 below live in the repo's
 > session-conflicts script, source 4 in the claim script's compare-and-swap.
 > This file is the normative definition, NOT part of any `agents_md`
 > injection whitelist since 2026-08-29 — do not re-add; the checks run at
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
 
 Standalone and ticket-seeded sessions run without a pipeline around them —
 no plan, no reviewer keeping them inside their work item. When such a
-session hits a test failure NOT caused by its own change ([TT-1803], via [TT-1753]/[TT-1744]), it tends to fix the foreign
+session hits a test failure NOT caused by its own change ([org-internal
+[org-internal #1803]], via [org-internal #1753]/[[org-internal #1744]]), it tends to fix the foreign
 failure in place (drifting off-task), and sessions seeded for the same issue
 collide on the same shared flaky test.
 
@@ -47,17 +48,17 @@ on ANY source → the ticket is already owned: ABORT (or, for a DEAD claim,
 take over via the mechanized channel below; otherwise coordinate on the
 issue), never silently start a second owner.
 
-**Mechanized ([TT-3667])**: the repo's session-conflicts script
+**Mechanized ([org-internal #3667])**: the repo's session-conflicts script
 (`<session-conflicts-cmd> <ticket>`) scans sources 1-3 in one read-only pass
 (exit 4 = conflict, matching the claim script; source 1 fail-opens visibly
-when the app API is down — the backend hard guard [TT-1989]
+when the app API is down — the backend hard guard [org-internal #1989]
 backstops); source 4 IS the claim script's compare-and-swap. Dead-claim
 takeover is mechanized in the claim script (see below); manual recipes:
 the headless-session-ops skill's ticket-recipe reference §0.
 
-**Dead-claim takeover ([TT-3668]).** A claim whose session is
+**Dead-claim takeover ([org-internal #3668]).** A claim whose session is
 gone (404 on the app API) and whose branch was never pushed is a DEAD claim
-— the [TT-3419] shape. Do NOT hand-edit the dead claim comment
+— the [org-internal #3419] shape. Do NOT hand-edit the dead claim comment
 (the retired admin workaround — unauditable); run the claim script's
 takeover subcommand (`<claim-takeover-cmd> <ticket> <branch> --session-id
 <id>`) instead. Evidence rule (the claim script's header is normative): a
@@ -76,7 +77,8 @@ ticket-driven work is to claim the ticket — one atomic action of THREE
 steps, valid ONLY when all complete: (1) set the issue assignee to the
 working account, (2) post a claim comment naming the workflow branch and
 session id, (3) push the workflow branch to remote (even an empty commit —
-a purely local branch is invisible to other sessions, [TT-2280]/[TT-2282]). Use the repo's claim wrappers (staged-transaction claim
+a purely local branch is invisible to other sessions, [org-internal
+[org-internal #2280]/[org-internal #2282]]). Use the repo's claim wrappers (staged-transaction claim
 script; exit codes and CAS semantics in its header; non-zero = NOT claimed)
 and the provision wrapper (adds the worktree + Tier-1 runs scaffold). The
 manual 3-step is the fallback where the scripts are unavailable, same
@@ -86,7 +88,7 @@ re-verification.
 branch's recent commits for `#<ticket>` — surfacing an equivalent
 implementation already on main *before* the merge rejection.
 
-**Merge-time review gate ([TT-2345]).** `pipeline/review-code` is
+**Merge-time review gate ([org-internal #2345]).** `pipeline/review-code` is
 a required status: merge needs it green OR the route-based exemption
 (Kind/* close routes skip review-code — posted by the repo's
 review-gate-exemption script). Read the commit-status endpoint for the PR
@@ -100,7 +102,7 @@ your chunk before starting.
 
 Two sessions owning the same issue or code area is never faster — it is the
 exact collision this rule prevents. If a collision HAS happened, follow the
-failure-path playbook at the ownership-collision runbook (instance detail page
+failure-path playbook at the ownership-collision runbook (Tier-2 reference
 page, reachable via the ticket backend).
 
 ### Scope

core/rules/stash-discipline.md

@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ each other's entries and one session's `pop` returns the other session's
 content — or `drop`/`clear` wipes uncommitted work belonging to a session in
 a different worktree.
 
-This failure mode has already destroyed completed work in production ([TT-1655] /
-[TT-1629] — a finished 25-test implementation overwritten on the shared stack).
+This failure mode has already destroyed completed work in production ([org-internal #1655] /
+[org-internal #1629] — a finished 25-test implementation overwritten on the shared stack).
 
 **Iron Law: NEVER use `git stash` (or `git stash pop` / `push` / `drop` /
 `clear` / `apply`) inside an octopus worktree.**
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ If you must `git checkout <base>` to reproduce a failure but the worktree is
 dirty, do **not** reach for stash. Instead:
 
 - WIP-commit first (option 1), or
-- Use the lifecycle-managed scratch-worktree script ([TT-2790]) to materialise
+- Use the lifecycle-managed scratch-worktree script ([org-internal #2790]) to materialise
   the base commit in a *separate* worktree and run the failing test there:
 
   ```bash
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ dirty, do **not** reach for stash. Instead:
   classification check. The script registers the worktree, symlinks
   `node_modules` from the source checkout when `bun.lock` matches, and the
   `sweep` backstop reclaims worktrees abandoned by dying sessions — bare
-  `git worktree add /tmp/octopus/...` has no such recovery ([TT-2790]).
+  `git worktree add /tmp/octopus/...` has no such recovery ([org-internal #2790]).
 
 ### Exceptions
 
@@ -110,4 +110,4 @@ dirty, do **not** reach for stash. Instead:
 If a parallel-session stash collision happens again despite this rule, treat
 it as a Sev-2 process incident: stop work, recover via
 `git fsck --unreachable` / `git log -g --walk-reflogs stash`, open a follow-up
-referencing [TT-1655].
+referencing [org-internal #1655].

core/rules/testing.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 - Test actual implementation, do not duplicate logic into tests
 - Tests cannot run from repo root (guard: `do-not-run-tests-from-root`); run from package dirs.
 - **Local pre-check: run `<test-cmd:changed>`** from the owning package after editing source. It selects only tests affected by your uncommitted + branch changes (path-mapping ∪ CodeGraph direct dependents) and runs them in a single process — seconds, machine stays responsive. Use `--print` to see the selection without running, `--all` to scan beyond the home package.
-- **Before a delivery push: `<test-cmd:changed>` green + `<typecheck-cmd>` clean** — same selector as CI's PR side (local parity, [TT-4425]). The full suite (`<test-cmd:parallel>`) stays with nightly / `run-full-tests` / manual pre-merge runs. 实例命令绑定见 core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md。
+- **Before a delivery push: `<test-cmd:changed>` green + `<typecheck-cmd>` clean** — same selector as CI's PR side (local parity, [org-internal #4425]). The full suite (`<test-cmd:parallel>`) stays with nightly / `run-full-tests` / manual pre-merge runs. 实例命令绑定见 core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md。
 - Never use the bare single-process test runner for the full suite; `<test-cmd:parallel>` shards it and process-isolates known-corrupting files. Parallelism is controlled by `TEST_SHARDS` (default 3; raise it on beefy CI runners, e.g. `TEST_SHARDS=7`).
 
 ### Pre-existing test failures must be filed, not silently logged
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ problem" and do NOT bury it in a report body.
 
 - Classify it: run the failing test on the base commit (see `verify` Phase 2.6).
   Fails there too → pre-existing (BF); passes there → regression you must fix.
-- De-duplicate BEFORE filing (retro [TT-2696]): search existing
+- De-duplicate BEFORE filing (retro [org-internal #2696]): search existing
   `baseline-failure` tickets — open AND closed — by test/file name to surface
   candidates, then match by **failure signature** (error signature + affected
   surface — one root-cause family may span several tests; see the
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ it is a **flaky test**. Do NOT silently re-run until it passes and move on.
 
 - Detect: re-run the suite (or use the project's flaky detector). Record every
   test that shows intermittent behavior — name, failure rate, and run count.
-- De-duplicate BEFORE filing (retro [TT-2696]): same
+- De-duplicate BEFORE filing (retro [org-internal #2696]): same
   signature-based procedure as baseline failures above, against existing
   `flaky-test` tickets.
 - File it: the Verifier registers every un-tracked flaky test as a
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ it is a **flaky test**. Do NOT silently re-run until it passes and move on.
 NOT fix it in place — classify, file, and return to your task per the
 session-scope-guard rule. A repository-wide flaky test is a shared magnet —
 fixing it in place drifts off-task and collides with its owner
-([TT-1803]).
+([org-internal #1803]).
 
 ### Testing Kobalte components with happydom
 
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ render reliably.
 
 A single component MUST NOT carry both a `.test.ts` and a `.test.tsx` test
 file — the two-file split duplicated ~3300 lines of overlapping assertions
-across one UI package [TT-1712]. Use exactly one file per
+across one UI package [org-internal #1712]. Use exactly one file per
 component, chosen by test style:
 
 | Test style                       | Extension      | When to use                                                    |
@@ -129,17 +129,17 @@ expect(source).not.toContain(`@${NAMESPACE}`)
 Each package MUST have exactly ONE test root — no parallel tracks
 (`src/**/__tests__/`, a `tests/` dir alongside colocated `src/`, or a `test/`
 alongside `tests/`); a second root drifts and breaks test discovery
-([TT-1711], extended to all packages by [TT-1821]).
+([org-internal #1711], extended to all packages by [org-internal #1821]).
 
 Rules:
 
 - New tests: create them at the package's single root from the start.
 - Do NOT create `src/**/__tests__/` directories in any package — parallel
-  tracks drift (residuals eliminated by [TT-1821]).
+  tracks drift (residuals eliminated by [org-internal #1821]).
 - For `test/`-root packages: mirror the `src/` path (`test/<src-relative>.test.ts`);
   type-level tests live alongside the behavioral suites in the config area.
 - For colocated-root packages: keep tests next to the source file; one test
-  file per component [TT-1712].
+  file per component [org-internal #1712].
 
 Per-package root tables live in the instance layer (they name concrete
 package paths); the invariant itself — ONE root per package — is universal.

core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 > Core 中立版（Increment 2 改写）。术语对照见 core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md；本组织实例表述见 dogfood 对应文件。
 
-## Ticket Lifecycle — registry-first filing, claim-to-promote ([TT-3002] G1)
+## Ticket Lifecycle — registry-first filing, claim-to-promote ([org-internal #3002] G1)
 
 Bugs worth fixing start life as a **registry row**, not an independent ticket.
 This extends the two-tier-artifacts philosophy to the ticket queue: a
@@ -25,20 +25,20 @@ is how the 2026-08 backlog formed.)
   ```
 
 - **TD-NNN** is allocated at REGISTRATION via the ledger mutex
-  [TT-3322]: the 配额账本脚本 (`td-alloc` 形态, `bash <alloc-script>
+  [org-internal #3322]: the 配额账本脚本 (`td-alloc` 形态, `bash <alloc-script>
   <count> <source-slug> [--ticket N]`) takes a contiguous range from the TD
   allocation ledger (a standing tracker issue) — append-only `**td-alloc**`
   comments, earliest-comment-id wins on collision. **ANY allocation — manual
   included — must land a td-alloc comment on the ledger BEFORE the registry
   row is written** (script, tool API, or web UI). Hand-computed `max + 1`
   without a ledger comment is FORBIDDEN (parallel-session races,
-  [TT-3322]). The id is **reserved for life**: promotion reuses
+  [org-internal #3322]). The id is **reserved for life**: promotion reuses
   it, never renumbers. Run the alloc script's `--check` (reconciliation)
   when the last check predates this batch, and in retrospectives.
 - **De-duplication** queries the TD index (same-source rows) plus open
   promoted issues (cross-source); index matching replaces title-keyword
   matching (keyword dedup once produced 18 fragments from one source).
-- **Query-failure ruling ([TT-3383]: fail-open, visible)**: if the
+- **Query-failure ruling ([org-internal #3383]: fail-open, visible)**: if the
   dedup query itself errors (backend API failure — NOT "queried and found no
   match"), retry once; on second failure file anyway, marking the comment
   `dedup-unverified` for retro/reconciliation sweep. Fail-closed rejected:
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ source.
 ### PR 准入（pr-admission，TD-678）
 
 会话交付物 = 分支 + 报告；开 PR 属编排职权，按容量串行一次一张、双绿并入
-再开下一张（[TT-3864] 管合并出口、本节管 PR 入口）。交付推送前置
+再开下一张（[org-internal #3864] 管合并出口、本节管 PR 入口）。交付推送前置
 本地验证（`<test-cmd:changed>` + `<typecheck-cmd>` 绿；实例命令绑定见
 core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md）。编排不可达可自开，PR 正文标
 `uncoordinated`。细则与门控项：pipeline-gate 清单 PR 准入节。
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ occurrence: evidence (run, commit, failing output, failure rate) attaches as
 comments on the family's **umbrella ticket** (ticket-backend issue), keyed by
 failure signature (error signature + affected surface, not just
 `file::test-name` — one root-cause family may span several tests; precedents
-[TT-2585], [TT-2925]). Filing a new ticket when the
+[org-internal #2585], [org-internal #2925]). Filing a new ticket when the
 signature already matches an existing family (open or closed) is forbidden —
 attach evidence instead. A family umbrella is closed when its signature no
 longer reproduces.

core/rules/two-tier-artifacts.md

@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ Tier 1 is an optimization an artifact opts INTO, not out of.
 ### Common classifications
 
 Per-artifact table (review findings, prompt files, working drafts, draft/frozen
-contracts, issue checklist, 工件索引, `index.json` …): instance detail page `rules/two-tier-artifacts-detail` (reachable via the ticket backend); the
+contracts, issue checklist, 工件索引, `index.json` …): Tier-2 reference page
+`rules/two-tier-artifacts-detail` (reachable via the ticket backend); the
 decision rule above classifies anything unlisted.
 
 ### Two indexes, parallel not replacement
@@ -73,13 +74,14 @@ Closed by the **Verifier** at verify PASS (or the Orchestrator when no
 verify). The archive step is the ONLY point active-run Tier 1 content enters
 git history:
 
-1. Generate the bundle [TT-3604]:
+1. Generate the bundle [org-internal #3604]:
    the run-bundle generator script with `--slug {slug} [--ticket N] [--pr N]`
    — flips meta to "archived", hashes the workspace into the `sha256_16`
    manifest, writes `archive/{ticket}-{slug}.json`, validates.
 2. Commit the bundle on the workflow branch (rides into main via `--no-ff`).
-   Direct pushes to main stay blocked by branch protection [TT-3604]; do not bypass.
-3. **归档前置校验** [TT-2727]: the generator validates by default
+   Direct pushes to main stay blocked by branch protection [org-internal
+   [org-internal #3604]]; do not bypass.
+3. **归档前置校验** [org-internal #2727]: the generator validates by default
    (`--no-validate` must not reach a merge); red exit = fix before close.
    The L0 merge gate rejects non-compliant bundles at merge anyway.
 
@@ -107,7 +109,7 @@ reproducibility trace — enough to reconstruct what a run produced.
 the designated re-read entry — after `compact`, read `runs/{slug}/index.json`,
 not conversation memory.
 
-### Gate furlough（[TT-3607]）
+### Gate furlough（[org-internal #3607]）
 
 强制门的唯一退出通道是 gate 台账（furlough ledger）的 furlough 条目
 （测量证据 + reopen 条件）；无台账条目的减门/跳过改动一律拒绝，台账

core/rules/workflow-routing.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ On every substantive request that is tied to a ticket, run Step 0:
    `Kind/*` label when known; omit `kind` when not yet read (the tool returns
    the default route plus a read-ticket-then-re-invoke instruction). Agents
    with the route-gate option enabled enforce this mechanically
-   [TT-3328]: other tool calls are dispatch-rejected until the
+   [org-internal #3328]: other tool calls are dispatch-rejected until the
    路由解析工具 runs. Do not hand-read the routing table when the tool is
    available.
 3. **Read the ticket's `Kind/*` label** from the issue body or via the issue
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ On every substantive request that is tied to a ticket, run Step 0:
      `skip` / `keep_gates` downstream. Never drop a gate the route lists in
      `keep_gates`; never add back a stage the route lists in `skip`.
 
-### Degradation — label missing, unknown, or wrong ([TT-1828] AC)
+### Degradation — label missing, unknown, or wrong ([org-internal #1828] AC)
 
 - **No ticket / no `Kind/*` label / label not in the table** → `default`
   route (natural-language matching). State this in one line ("no Kind/\*
@@ -64,14 +64,15 @@ On every substantive request that is tied to a ticket, run Step 0:
 
 ### Runtime growth signals (post-sizing)
 
-Two live growth mechanisms (narrative: instance detail page `rules/workflow-routing-detail`, reachable via the ticket backend; retired
+Two live growth mechanisms (narrative: Tier-2 reference page
+`rules/workflow-routing-detail`, reachable via the ticket backend; retired
 Size/* history: the instance rules-history archive). Canonical key:
 `dag.size_derivation.oversize_signals` (TD/DUP-F009).
 
 - **DAG-routed tickets** (DAG Epic, DAG-routed `Kind/Feature`, their
   `Kind/Task` children — no `Size/*` tier): runtime growth fires the
   oversize signals → response is **re-derivation + review-dag re-run**.
-- **Bug tickets (big-bug relabel rule, [TT-3061])**: a `Kind/Bug`
+- **Bug tickets (big-bug relabel rule, [org-internal #3061])**: a `Kind/Bug`
   hitting a design-level trigger (design-decision root cause, shared-contract /
   public-API change, data migration) has outgrown the bug type — mandatory
   action is **relabel `Kind/Feature`** (Step 0 reroutes into the DAG
@@ -86,10 +87,10 @@ never quietly override.
 
 The DAG ticket pipeline (`analyze-dag` → task DAG → single gate `review-dag`)
 is the **default** route for `Kind/Epic` and `Kind/Feature`
-([TT-3061] Phase 2 / TD-388). Both resolve via the routes table
+([org-internal #3061] Phase 2 / TD-388). Both resolve via the routes table
 directly — **no trigger/marker check** (route rollback = revert PR).
 Authoritative definition: the `dag:` block in the workflow-routing table;
-narrative + history: instance detail page `rules/workflow-routing-detail`.
+narrative + history: Tier-2 reference page `rules/workflow-routing-detail`.
 
 1. **`Kind/Epic` or `Kind/Feature` → `dag.route`**: entry `analyze-dag`,
    single gate `review-dag` (replaces review-design-space +
@@ -125,12 +126,12 @@ rules archive; rulings in the phase-3 retirement ruling doc (Tier-2
 reference, reachable via the ticket backend). Nothing trims gates —
 `never_trim` is structural.
 
-### 立案降档 — filing/sprint-mode（[TT-3002] G5 / [TT-3007]）
+### 立案降档 — filing/sprint-mode（[org-internal #3002] G5 / [org-internal #3007]）
 
 Sprint 期间债务侧显式降档，不靠纪律。开关：routing table `filing.sprint-mode`
 （默认 `false`）。`true`（冲刺期）时 verify Phase 5.5 registry-only 不分严重度
 （登记行照写、零丢失；独立工单创建冻结至开关回 `false`，已登记行按
 ticket-lifecycle 规则正常认领升票；期间 HIGH/MEDIUM 行不被 reaper 触碰，
-[TT-3004]）。BF/FT（5.55/5.56）不受影响。谁翻转：冲刺负责人（人），
+[org-internal #3004]）。BF/FT（5.55/5.56）不受影响。谁翻转：冲刺负责人（人），
 在冲刺跟踪单记一行；开关值即 routing table 当前值，verify 每次运行时读取。
-动机与细节：instance detail page `rules/workflow-routing-detail`。
+动机与细节：Tier-2 参考页（经 ticket backend）`rules/workflow-routing-detail`。

core/schemas/review-status.schema.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
   "$id": "https://eightarms.net/octopus-workflow/schemas/review-status.schema.json",
   "title": "Review Status",
-  "description": "Schema for tracking the lifecycle state of a review session. This file lives at runs/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/status.json: initialized by the Orchestrator at Phase A (step 0.5) with the full required set, appended by the Synthesizer at Phase B (history[] + current_round), and finalized with `converged` by the Orchestrator at Phase E (see skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md). Reader: the retrospective token-telemetry probe (retrospective/scripts/token-telemetry.ts) walks runs/**/reviews/*/status.json (canonical) and the legacy .artifacts/**/reviews/*/status.json, reading `history[]` (code-level legacy alias `rounds[]`, both handled) and `current_round`. For CLOSED runs (active workspace removed at archive-at-close), the probe reconstructs per-stage round counts from reviews/{stage}/round{N}/ artifact paths in the committed archive bundle runs/archive/{slug}.json ([TT-2591]). Since TD/TRC-F006 ([TT-2688]) the archive bundle can also embed an explicit digest of this history[] (top-level review_history: {stage, rounds, final_verdict, per_round[]}) so round counts and verdicts stay verifiable offline, without path reconstruction.",
+  "description": "Schema for tracking the lifecycle state of a review session. This file lives at runs/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/status.json: initialized by the Orchestrator at Phase A (step 0.5) with the full required set, appended by the Synthesizer at Phase B (history[] + current_round), and finalized with `converged` by the Orchestrator at Phase E (see skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md). Reader: the retrospective token-telemetry probe (retrospective/scripts/token-telemetry.ts) walks runs/**/reviews/*/status.json (canonical) and the legacy .artifacts/**/reviews/*/status.json, reading `history[]` (code-level legacy alias `rounds[]`, both handled) and `current_round`. For CLOSED runs (active workspace removed at archive-at-close), the probe reconstructs per-stage round counts from reviews/{stage}/round{N}/ artifact paths in the committed archive bundle runs/archive/{slug}.json ([org-internal #2591]). Since TD/TRC-F006 ([org-internal #2688]) the archive bundle can also embed an explicit digest of this history[] (top-level review_history: {stage, rounds, final_verdict, per_round[]}) so round counts and verdicts stay verifiable offline, without path reconstruction.",
   "type": "object",
   "required": ["slug", "started_at", "current_round", "max_rounds", "converged", "history"],
   "properties": {
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
     "max_rounds": {
       "type": "integer",
       "default": 3,
-      "description": "Per-skill bound: `review-artifact` skill (process target) = 3 (the roadmap/design/plan targets were archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3); `review-code` = 2 default / 3 high-risk (`workflow-routing.yaml` `review.max_rounds`, [TT-3567]). `review-dag` (the review-artifact skill's DAG single-gate target) binds per depth from `dag_metrics.review_depth`: D1 ≤2, D2 ≤3, D3 ≤3, D4 ≤4 — D4 reaches round 4, exceeding the shared `review-artifact` default, so the DAG per-depth cap takes precedence (see review-artifact/SKILL.md review-dag Phase D MAX_ROUNDS). Set explicitly by the skill; default 3 is a fallback only."
+      "description": "Per-skill bound: `review-artifact` skill (process target) = 3 (the roadmap/design/plan targets were archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3); `review-code` = 2 default / 3 high-risk (`workflow-routing.yaml` `review.max_rounds`, [org-internal #3567]). `review-dag` (the review-artifact skill's DAG single-gate target) binds per depth from `dag_metrics.review_depth`: D1 ≤2, D2 ≤3, D3 ≤3, D4 ≤4 — D4 reaches round 4, exceeding the shared `review-artifact` default, so the DAG per-depth cap takes precedence (see review-artifact/SKILL.md review-dag Phase D MAX_ROUNDS). Set explicitly by the skill; default 3 is a fallback only."
     },
     "converged": {
       "type": "boolean"

core/schemas/reviewer-output.schema.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
   "$id": "https://eightarms.net/octopus-workflow/schemas/reviewer-output.schema.json",
   "title": "Reviewer Output",
-  "description": "Schema for a single reviewer's output for one review dimension. Also the Tier 1 review-findings schema ([TT-1988]): migrated skills (review-code) write each dimension's finding as a JSON file at runs/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json validated by this schema; the index.json row for that file carries type=review-findings, schema=this $id. When a dimension has multiple reviewers (dim_split > 1, e.g. D3 TOPO:2 / D4 TOPO:2), each writes its OWN slot file findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}-r{k}.json with reviewer_slot/reviewer_count set. See templates/runs-layout.md and rules/two-tier-artifacts.md.",
+  "description": "Schema for a single reviewer's output for one review dimension. Also the Tier 1 review-findings schema ([org-internal #1988]): migrated skills (review-code) write each dimension's finding as a JSON file at runs/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json validated by this schema; the index.json row for that file carries type=review-findings, schema=this $id. When a dimension has multiple reviewers (dim_split > 1, e.g. D3 TOPO:2 / D4 TOPO:2), each writes its OWN slot file findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}-r{k}.json with reviewer_slot/reviewer_count set. See templates/runs-layout.md and rules/two-tier-artifacts.md.",
   "type": "object",
   "required": ["dimension", "dimension_label", "verdict", "quantitative_summary", "findings", "reviewed_files"],
   "properties": {
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
     "reviewer_slot": {
       "type": "integer",
       "minimum": 1,
-      "description": "1-based slot of this reviewer WITHIN its dimension, when dim_split assigns >1 reviewer to the dimension (e.g. review-dag D3 TOPO:2, D4 TOPO:2 — dim_split per `workflow-routing.yaml` dag.size_derivation.review_depth). Multi-reviewer dimensions write one file per slot: findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}-r{k}.json. Omitted for single-reviewer dimensions (file stays findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json). Preserves per-reviewer attribution for the retrospective overlap analysis ([TT-2996] step 1a)."
+      "description": "1-based slot of this reviewer WITHIN its dimension, when dim_split assigns >1 reviewer to the dimension (e.g. review-dag D3 TOPO:2, D4 TOPO:2 — dim_split per `workflow-routing.yaml` dag.size_derivation.review_depth). Multi-reviewer dimensions write one file per slot: findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}-r{k}.json. Omitted for single-reviewer dimensions (file stays findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json). Preserves per-reviewer attribution for the retrospective overlap analysis ([org-internal #2996] step 1a)."
     },
     "reviewer_count": {
       "type": "integer",
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
     },
     "quantitative_summary": {
       "type": "object",
+      "description": "Every check the reviewer executed this round (PASS and FAIL counted in total_checks; NA reported via na_count). The verdict field must follow these counts per the thresholds documented on verdict — a synthesis consumer recalculates pass_rate from passed/total_checks and treats a mismatch as a malformed artifact.",
       "required": ["total_checks", "passed", "failed", "pass_rate"],
       "properties": {
         "total_checks": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1 },
@@ -74,7 +75,8 @@
           },
           "severity": {
             "type": "string",
-            "enum": ["BLOCKER", "MAJOR", "MINOR", "INFO"]
+            "enum": ["BLOCKER", "MAJOR", "MINOR", "INFO"],
+            "description": "BLOCKER: breaks an acceptance criterion, hangs/leaks, or opens an abuse channel — the artifact must not land as-is. MAJOR: a real defect on a non-blocking path, or a test/lock blind to a plausible regression (a mutation would escape). MINOR: quality/drift issue with a cheap local fix (naming, duplication, small docs gap); no behavioral risk. INFO: observation, accepted-risk note, or follow-up ticket material — no action required this round. Calibration rule: severity grades the FINDING's impact, not the reviewer's confidence; low-confidence suspicions go to INFO with the evidence, never inflated to MAJOR."
           },
           "checklist_ref": {
             "type": "string",

core/schemas/runs-bundle.schema.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "$schema": "https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema",
   "$id": "https://eightarms.net/octopus-workflow/schemas/runs-bundle.schema.json",
   "title": "Tier 1 Run Archive Bundle",
-  "description": "Composite archive bundle committed at close: runs/archive/{slug}.json = {meta, index}. Dual-profile by schema_version: >= 2 strict (closed core field set + free-form context bag), 1 or absent legacy (structural typing only; historical drift normalized by repair-run-bundles.ts, see [TT-2588]). Validated by validate-run-bundles.ts; CI wiring: .gitea/workflows/octopus-schemas.yml. Authoritative layout: templates/runs-layout.md. Boundary rule: rules/two-tier-artifacts.md.",
+  "description": "Composite archive bundle committed at close: runs/archive/{slug}.json = {meta, index}. Dual-profile by schema_version: >= 2 strict (closed core field set + free-form context bag), 1 or absent legacy (structural typing only; historical drift normalized by repair-run-bundles.ts, see [org-internal #2588]). Validated by validate-run-bundles.ts; CI wiring: .gitea/workflows/octopus-schemas.yml. Authoritative layout: templates/runs-layout.md. Boundary rule: rules/two-tier-artifacts.md.",
   "type": "object",
   "additionalProperties": false,
   "required": ["meta", "index"],
@@ -11,11 +11,11 @@
     "index": true,
     "working_notes": {
       "type": "string",
-      "description": "Final content of runs/{slug}/working-notes.md ([TT-2600]), inlined at archive time when the file exists. The one Tier 1 artifact whose CONTENT (not just digest) rides in the bundle — the run's narrative memory (decisions, dead ends, reviewer feedback), consumed by later retro probes and the notes-injection degradation path ([TT-2601]). Absent when the run kept no working notes."
+      "description": "Final content of runs/{slug}/working-notes.md ([org-internal #2600]), inlined at archive time when the file exists. The one Tier 1 artifact whose CONTENT (not just digest) rides in the bundle — the run's narrative memory (decisions, dead ends, reviewer feedback), consumed by later retro probes and the notes-injection degradation path ([org-internal #2601]). Absent when the run kept no working notes."
     },
     "review_history": {
       "type": "array",
-      "description": "Offline-verifiability digest of the run's review rounds (TD/TRC-F006, [TT-2688]): one entry per review stage the run executed, each derived from that stage's live reviews/{stage}/status.json history[] at archive time. Lets closed-run probes reconstruct round counts and verdicts from the bundle alone, without the (removed) live workspace or path reconstruction ([TT-2591]). Absent when the run kept no review rounds.",
+      "description": "Offline-verifiability digest of the run's review rounds (TD/TRC-F006, [org-internal #2688]): one entry per review stage the run executed, each derived from that stage's live reviews/{stage}/status.json history[] at archive time. Lets closed-run probes reconstruct round counts and verdicts from the bundle alone, without the (removed) live workspace or path reconstruction ([org-internal #2591]). Absent when the run kept no review rounds.",
       "items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/reviewHistoryEntry" }
     }
   },

core/schemas/runs-index.schema.json

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
             "browser-evidence",
             "other"
           ],
-          "description": "Artifact category. 'meta'/'index' for the manifest files themselves; stage categories for produced artifacts. 'review-synthesis' marks a synthesis result artifact (round verdict) as distinct from 'synthesis-prompt' (the Phase B task prompt) and 'review-status' (the lifecycle file). 'precondition-gate' marks the review-code mechanical-green gate log. 'working-notes' is the cross-stage narrative memory file ([TT-2600]) — one file per run, appended by every role at close, registered once (stage/produced_by null: multi-stage, multi-role). 'browser-evidence' marks a browser evidence pack manifest ([TT-4497] N-03, browser/{session-id}/manifest.json — shared/pack-manifest-v1)."
+          "description": "Artifact category. 'meta'/'index' for the manifest files themselves; stage categories for produced artifacts. 'review-synthesis' marks a synthesis result artifact (round verdict) as distinct from 'synthesis-prompt' (the Phase B task prompt) and 'review-status' (the lifecycle file). 'precondition-gate' marks the review-code mechanical-green gate log. 'working-notes' is the cross-stage narrative memory file ([org-internal #2600]) — one file per run, appended by every role at close, registered once (stage/produced_by null: multi-stage, multi-role). 'browser-evidence' marks a browser evidence pack manifest ([org-internal #4497] N-03, browser/{session-id}/manifest.json — shared/pack-manifest-v1)."
         },
         "schema": {
           "type": ["string", "null"],

core/schemas/workflow-routing.schema.json

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
   "$defs": {
     "stage": {
       "type": "string",
-      "description": "A pipeline stage identifier — the 5 live gates (post-[TT-3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21): review-dag, review-code, verify, audit-process, merge-pr. Production-phase names (requirements, design, roadmap, implement) and the 7 retired stage ids (roadmap-exit, review-roadmap, requirements-exit, design-exit, review-design-space, review-iteration-plan, plan-iterations) are no longer valid anywhere — the sizing block that consumed the phase names was retired the same ruling.",
+      "description": "A pipeline stage identifier — the 5 live gates (post-[org-internal #3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21): review-dag, review-code, verify, audit-process, merge-pr. Production-phase names (requirements, design, roadmap, implement) and the 7 retired stage ids (roadmap-exit, review-roadmap, requirements-exit, design-exit, review-design-space, review-iteration-plan, plan-iterations) are no longer valid anywhere — the sizing block that consumed the phase names was retired the same ruling.",
       "enum": ["review-dag", "review-code", "verify", "audit-process", "merge-pr"]
     },
     "entry": {
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
         "skill": {
           "type": ["string", "null"],
           "enum": ["implement", "review-artifact", "review-code", "verify", "analyze-dag", null],
-          "description": "Skill name to enter, or null for natural-language routing. The legacy roadmap / requirements-elicitation / design / plan-iterations entries were removed when those skills were archived ([TT-3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21 - the instance archive)."
+          "description": "Skill name to enter, or null for natural-language routing. The legacy roadmap / requirements-elicitation / design / plan-iterations entries were removed when those skills were archived ([org-internal #3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21 - the instance archive)."
         },
         "mode": {
           "type": ["string", "null"],
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
         "preflight": {
           "type": "array",
           "items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/preflightItem" },
-          "description": "Evidence-based producer pre-flight checklist ([TT-2599]) — landed by a human from retrospective PRE-FLIGHT PROPOSAL rows. Absent/empty = no injection. Cap is governed by preflight.max_items (policy), not the schema."
+          "description": "Evidence-based producer pre-flight checklist ([org-internal #2599]) — landed by a human from retrospective PRE-FLIGHT PROPOSAL rows. Absent/empty = no injection. Cap is governed by preflight.max_items (policy), not the schema."
         },
         "notes": { "type": "string" },
         "effort": {
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
     "preflightPolicy": {
       "type": "object",
       "additionalProperties": false,
-      "description": "Thresholds for the retro → routes.{Kind}.preflight evidence loop ([TT-2599]). Authoritative values live here; the retrospective consults this block, it does not restate the numbers.",
+      "description": "Thresholds for the retro → routes.{Kind}.preflight evidence loop ([org-internal #2599]). Authoritative values live here; the retrospective consults this block, it does not restate the numbers.",
       "properties": {
         "max_items": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1 },
         "min_sample": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 0 },
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
         "item": { "type": "string", "description": "One checklist line the Producer verifies before implementing." },
         "evidence": {
           "type": "string",
-          "description": "Retro reference justifying the item, e.g. 'retro [TT-2599]: COR × unhandled-null, 5/8 first-round FAILs on Kind/Bug'."
+          "description": "Retro reference justifying the item, e.g. 'retro [org-internal #2599]: COR × unhandled-null, 5/8 first-round FAILs on Kind/Bug'."
         },
         "added_cycle": {
           "type": "string",
@@ -97,23 +97,23 @@
     "filing": {
       "type": "object",
       "additionalProperties": false,
-      "description": "Filing policy (立案/登记策略). sprint-mode ([TT-3007]): when true, verify Phase 5.5 promotes registry rows to tickets in sprint mode only. work-ticket-wip-cap ([TT-3005] G3): open non-TD work tickets beyond this count require scheduling evidence, else they stay registry rows.",
+      "description": "Filing policy (立案/登记策略). sprint-mode ([org-internal #3007]): when true, verify Phase 5.5 promotes registry rows to tickets in sprint mode only. work-ticket-wip-cap ([org-internal #3005] G3): open non-TD work tickets beyond this count require scheduling evidence, else they stay registry rows.",
       "properties": {
         "sprint-mode": {
           "type": "boolean",
-          "description": "Sprint-mode filing downgrade switch ([TT-3007])."
+          "description": "Sprint-mode filing downgrade switch ([org-internal #3007])."
         },
         "work-ticket-wip-cap": {
           "type": "integer",
           "minimum": 0,
-          "description": "WIP cap on open non-TD work tickets (Kind/* without assignee) before new filings require scheduling evidence ([TT-3005] G3)."
+          "description": "WIP cap on open non-TD work tickets (Kind/* without assignee) before new filings require scheduling evidence ([org-internal #3005] G3)."
         }
       }
     },
     "review": {
       "type": "object",
       "additionalProperties": false,
-      "description": "Review round budget (process-diet P0b, [TT-3567]/TD-564): a tail cut, not the norm — at budget without convergence, STOP; residual findings flow to the TD registry. High risk = a BLOCKER survived a round or the diff touches a frozen cross-session contract.",
+      "description": "Review round budget (process-diet P0b, [org-internal #3567]/TD-564): a tail cut, not the norm — at budget without convergence, STOP; residual findings flow to the TD registry. High risk = a BLOCKER survived a round or the diff touches a frozen cross-session contract.",
       "required": ["max_rounds"],
       "properties": {
         "max_rounds": {
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@
         "preflight": {
           "type": "array",
           "items": { "$ref": "#/$defs/preflightItem" },
-          "description": "Evidence-based pre-flight checklist for the DAG route ([TT-2905] 方案 3) — same item shape as routes.{Kind}.preflight ([TT-2599]). Landed by a human from retrospective PRE-FLIGHT PROPOSAL rows, including the 'REQ × late-discovery' root cause (requirements found only after the DAG froze: DAG oversize signals, demo-period feedback). Consumed by analyze-dag (the route's entry skill) before decomposition. Absent/empty = no injection. Optional — deliberately NOT in dagRoute.required (spec-02 §2.8 frozen required array unchanged). Cap governed by preflight.max_items (policy), not the schema."
+          "description": "Evidence-based pre-flight checklist for the DAG route ([org-internal #2905] 方案 3) — same item shape as routes.{Kind}.preflight ([org-internal #2599]). Landed by a human from retrospective PRE-FLIGHT PROPOSAL rows, including the 'REQ × late-discovery' root cause (requirements found only after the DAG froze: DAG oversize signals, demo-period feedback). Consumed by analyze-dag (the route's entry skill) before decomposition. Absent/empty = no injection. Optional — deliberately NOT in dagRoute.required (spec-02 §2.8 frozen required array unchanged). Cap governed by preflight.max_items (policy), not the schema."
         }
       }
     },
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
         "replaces": {
           "type": "array",
           "items": { "type": "string" },
-          "description": "Historical documentation of which legacy gates the single gate replaced ([TT-3072] phase 3 retired them) — free-form strings, not the live stage vocabulary."
+          "description": "Historical documentation of which legacy gates the single gate replaced ([org-internal #3072] phase 3 retired them) — free-form strings, not the live stage vocabulary."
         },
         "depth_from": { "type": "string", "enum": ["size_derivation"] },
         "never_trim": { "type": "boolean" }
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
           "items": { "type": "string", "enum": ["Kind/Epic", "Kind/Feature"] },
           "uniqueItems": true,
           "minItems": 1,
-          "description": "Ticket kinds whose DAG children reference them as ## 父级 / Parent ([TT-3061] Phase 2 / TD-388: Kind/Feature added alongside Kind/Epic)."
+          "description": "Ticket kinds whose DAG children reference them as ## 父级 / Parent ([org-internal #3061] Phase 2 / TD-388: Kind/Feature added alongside Kind/Epic)."
         },
         "parent_aggregator": { "type": "boolean" }
       }

core/skills/_shared/large-prompts.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 > - `frontend/SKILL.md`
 >
 > (The `roadmap`, `requirements-elicitation`, `design`, and `plan-iterations`
-> referencing skills were archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3 — see
+> referencing skills were archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3 — see
 > `.octopus/archive/skills/`; their copies of this directive moved with them.)
 >
 > **When editing:** update this file only. Each skill references this file via a

core/skills/_shared/review-final-report-template.md

@@ -70,6 +70,6 @@
   `review-dag` (review-artifact targets — same id feeds the
   `pipeline/{REVIEW_TYPE}` commit-status context; see review-artifact Phase
   Bindings). (The design-space/plan targets were archived 2026-08-21,
-  [TT-3072] phase 3.)
+  [org-internal #3072] phase 3.)
 - `{DIMENSION_COUNT}` — 10 (code review; 9 in standalone-bugfix mode), 3 (review-dag single gate), or 10 (process audit); used in
   the skill's SKILL.md reference text, not inside this template body

core/skills/_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md

@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Each skill references this base template via `core/skills/_shared/review-orchest
 rather than inlining the JSON array. This centralization ensures the base
 permission surface stays consistent across all review/audit skills.
 
-**Tier-1 local exception** ([TT-1988]): migrated skills that write raw per-dimension
+**Tier-1 local exception** ([org-internal #1988]): migrated skills that write raw per-dimension
 findings to `<runs-root>/**` (e.g. `review-code`) add ONE scoped `edit` allow
 to the base set — `{ permission: "edit", pattern: "<runs-root>/**", action:
 "allow" }` — so the reviewer can write its OWN finding file. This is a
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ edit on the code under review, so rule #7 (auditor independence) holds. See
 `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` Phase A step 4 and `review-code/SKILL.md`
 Phase A step 3 for the inline extended array.
 
-Residual risk — accepted trade-off (TD/STD-F004, [TT-2688]): the grant is scoped
+Residual risk — accepted trade-off (TD/STD-F004, [org-internal #2688]): the grant is scoped
 to `<runs-root>/**`, wider than the reviewer's own findings file. Per-file
 narrowing was considered and rejected: findings paths are round- and
 dimension-dependent (`{slug}/reviews/{stage}/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json`),
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ residual exposure — a misbehaving reviewer could overwrite a sibling stage's
 Tier 1 files — is recorded here as accepted; auditor independence is
 unaffected (code under review lives outside `runs/`).
 
-### No bash for Explorer sub-agents (deliberate boundary, [TT-2115] RC4 / [TT-2126])
+### No bash for Explorer sub-agents (deliberate boundary, [org-internal #2115] RC4 / [org-internal #2126])
 
 Explorer sub-agents (Reviewer / auditor / Tool roles) have **no bash**. The
 `explorer` agent is built deny-by-default at
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ Synthesizer / Verifier's job (Worker sub-agents, which DO have bash via the
 `worker` agent defaults) — not the Reviewer's. Report the need in findings
 instead of attempting bash.
 
-> **[TT-2126] Task 2 conclusion — keep + document.** The `deny **` pushed per-tool
+> **[org-internal #2126] Task 2 conclusion — keep + document.** The `deny **` pushed per-tool
 > at `<harness-package>/src/session/prompt.ts` is the **session tool-enable /
 > disable map** (it disables `todowrite` / `task` / `experimental.primary_tools`
 > for subagents and allows forwarded MCP tools). It is NOT the source of the
@@ -165,4 +165,4 @@ instead of attempting bash.
 - `{REVISION_ROLE}` — "Developer" (code review), "Analyst" (review-dag single
   gate), or "Remediator" (process audit). The Worker role that revises
   artifacts between rounds. (The Architect/Planner revision roles belonged to
-  the archived design-space / iteration-plan targets, [TT-3072] phase 3.)
+  the archived design-space / iteration-plan targets, [org-internal #3072] phase 3.)

core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md

@@ -9,14 +9,14 @@ parameters and reference this doc rather than duplicating the shared mechanics.
 legitimately uses "auditor"/"Re-audit" terminology. All generic descriptions
 use `{REVIEWER_OR_AUDITOR}`.
 
-**Output model — two findings sinks** ([TT-1988] Tier 1 migration): raw per-dimension
+**Output model — two findings sinks** ([org-internal #1988] Tier 1 migration): raw per-dimension
 reviewer findings have ONE of two sinks, chosen per skill. The **synthesis**
 (human gate) and **commit status** are ALWAYS Tier 2 (Gitea) regardless of the
 findings sink.
 
 | Sink | Skills | Reviewer writes findings to | Synthesizer reads findings from |
 |---|---|---|---|
-| `tier1-local` (migrated) | `review-code`, `review-artifact` (live targets: review-dag, audit-process; the roadmap/design-space/plan targets were archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3) | `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json` (validated by `core/schemas/reviewer-output.schema.json`) | the local finding files (no Gitea call) |
+| `tier1-local` (migrated) | `review-code`, `review-artifact` (live targets: review-dag, audit-process; the roadmap/design-space/plan targets were archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3) | `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json` (validated by `core/schemas/reviewer-output.schema.json`) | the local finding files (no Gitea call) |
 | `tier2-comment` (fallback) | _(none — all targets migrated)_ | Gitea PR/issue comment via `工单评论 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` (Pattern 5) | `工单评论 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` (Pattern 3) |
 
 Migration complete — every review/audit skill now outputs `tier1-local`; the
@@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
 
 **Orchestrator actions**:
 
-0. **Move the source issue to the `review` column** on the Pipeline Stages
-   board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5. Skip if no
-   source issue exists. The review stage is a single board column covering
-   all review targets (DAG single gate / code review / audit-process).
-
 0.5. **Initialize the review-status file** (round 1 only). The Orchestrator
    creates `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/status.json` before dispatching
    round 1, with the full schema-required field set
@@ -61,7 +56,7 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
    `stage` = `{REVIEW_TYPE}`, `produced_by` = `Orchestrator`, `schema` = the
    review-status `$id`).
 
-1. **Tool-availability probe** (defense-in-depth, [TT-2115] RC1 / [TT-2126]). Before
+1. **Tool-availability probe** (defense-in-depth, [org-internal #2115] RC1 / [org-internal #2126]). Before
    dispatching any {REVIEWER_OR_AUDITOR}, verify reviewers will be able to read
    wiki artifacts (requirements / design / plan / prior-review reports). A
    reviewer that cannot read its inputs aborts or hallucinates — catch this ONCE
@@ -74,7 +69,7 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
       reachable; anything else — timeout, connection refused, 5xx — is
       unreachable). If reachable → continue to step 2.
     - **Fallback path** (when REST is unreachable, e.g. a
-      cross-repo scenario [TT-2115]): verify the **local wiki clone** at
+      cross-repo scenario [org-internal #2115]): verify the **local wiki clone** at
      `<wiki-clone-root>/{repo}-wiki/` is readable —
      `glob(pattern="*.md", path="<wiki-clone-root>/{repo}-wiki/")`. If the clone
      is readable → continue to step 2; reviewers use the local clone (see
@@ -111,6 +106,13 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
      `core/skills/_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md` — Default
      Explorer Permissions).
    - Temperature: 0.1 (deterministic output).
+   - StructuredOutput mount ([org-internal #5658]): pass `format: { type:
+     "json_schema", schema: <the reviewer-output.schema.json contents you
+     read at prompt build time> }` on the task dispatch — the reviewer's
+     final emission is schema-enforced (malformed verdict/severity/summary
+     args are rejected with field-path repair feedback inside the reviewer's
+     own loop). The findings FILE remains the canonical Tier-1 artifact; the
+     structured output mirrors it as a self-check.
 
 4. Wait for all {REVIEWER_OR_AUDITOR}s to complete. Each reviewer writes its
    dimension result to the skill's configured findings sink:
@@ -171,6 +173,11 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
      `tier1-local` skills; `/tmp/octopus/...` for `tier2-comment` skills)
    - `permissions`: read + write + edit + bash + glob + grep (all allow)
    - `temperature`: 0.1
+   - `format` ([org-internal #5658]): `{ type: "json_schema", schema: <the
+     synthesis.schema.json contents you read> }` — the Synthesizer's final
+     emission is schema-enforced (malformed verdict/dimension args rejected
+     with field-path repair feedback in-loop). The posted fenced JSON block
+     remains the canonical artifact; the structured output mirrors it.
    - Foreground (the Orchestrator waits for completion).
 
 3. The Synthesizer:
@@ -266,7 +273,7 @@ Otherwise:
    - The {REVISION_ROLE} MUST NOT receive the full text of all findings inline —
      use finding-file path / comment references only to avoid context explosion.
    - Convergence status: blockers/majors remaining vs. previous round.
-   - **Revision survival ([TT-2601]) — primary path**: the task tool's completion
+   - **Revision survival ([org-internal #2601]) — primary path**: the task tool's completion
      output includes a `task_id`; passing it back resumes the SAME
      {REVISION_ROLE} subagent session instead of creating a fresh one. Round 1:
      persist the returned `task_id` with the round's working-notes entry (it
@@ -322,24 +329,24 @@ After the {REVISION_ROLE} completes revision:
   `core/schemas/review-status.schema.json`).
 - `review-code` skill: **2** default / **3** high-risk (a BLOCKER survived a
   round, or the diff touches a frozen cross-session contract) —
-  `<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `review.max_rounds` ([TT-3567], process-diet
+  `<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `review.max_rounds` ([org-internal #3567], process-diet
   P0b). At budget without convergence: STOP, register the remaining
   BLOCKER/MAJOR findings as TD registry rows, then compute the verdict
   with the shared three-tier ladder (`core/schemas/synthesis.schema.json`
   `overall_verdict` + `core/skills/_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md`
   rule 3): FAIL if any BLOCKER or FAIL dimension remains, else WARN,
-  PASS only if every remaining dimension is PASS ([TT-4786]:
+  PASS only if every remaining dimension is PASS ([org-internal #4786]:
   the prior binary "else PASS" wording silently upgraded WARN-eligible
   outcomes to PASS; a PASS round has already stopped at the convergence
   table above, so the residual tail lands WARN or FAIL). The debt is
   carried by those TD registry rows
   (see `review-code/SKILL.md` Phase D). This
-  supersedes the 2026-08-25 [TT-3380] calibration (p50=2, p95=5, n=66): the runs
+  supersedes the 2026-08-25 [org-internal #3380] calibration (p50=2, p95=5, n=66): the runs
   past round 3 are the marathon tail this budget exists to cut; their residue
   flows to the TD registry instead of reviewer rounds. Ledger:
   `docs/workflow-refactor/thresholds-ledger.md`.
 
-Rationale for `review-artifact` = 3 (evaluated in [TT-1969], replacing the prior blanket
+Rationale for `review-artifact` = 3 (evaluated in [org-internal #1969], replacing the prior blanket
 default of 5): (1) the Round-3 Escalation Guardrail below already detects
 non-convergence at the start of round 3; (2) the INFO-disposition rule below
 removes spurious WARN rounds previously caused by non-blocking INFO findings;
@@ -350,8 +357,8 @@ reaches round 4 — its round budget is 2/3, see the binding above.)
 
 **Provisional, not empirically validated**: the four safeguards make `review-artifact`=3
 defensible, but it has no fresh run-data yet. Treat it as a hypothesis to
-confirm via the retrospective signal ([TT-1834]; gate-trim's landing machinery was
-retired, [TT-3072] phase 3 — the check is observational, not a trim proposal): if
+confirm via the retrospective signal ([org-internal #1834]; gate-trim's landing machinery was
+retired, [org-internal #3072] phase 3 — the check is observational, not a trim proposal): if
 live `review-artifact` runs frequently hit round 3 still improving yet are
 forced to stop at WARN/FAIL, bump it back to 4.
 
@@ -379,8 +386,8 @@ block convergence and NEVER drive a reviser round.
 **Round-3 Escalation Guardrail** (applies to the `review-artifact` skill's
 live targets — the process audit target AND the review-dag single-gate
 target; the roadmap / design / plan targets were archived 2026-08-21,
-[TT-3072] phase 3). `review-code` does NOT use this guardrail; it uses its round
-budget ([TT-3567], see the `{MAX_ROUNDS}` binding above).
+[org-internal #3072] phase 3). `review-code` does NOT use this guardrail; it uses its round
+budget ([org-internal #3567], see the `{MAX_ROUNDS}` binding above).
 
 At the start of round 3, if the combined blocker+major count is still >50% of
 round 1's count, STOP the loop and surface to the user:
@@ -391,7 +398,7 @@ round 1's count, STOP the loop and surface to the user:
 > (a) Return to upstream — for the `process` audit target, escalate to the
 > octopus maintainer for a process-level redesign (the legacy producer skills
 > `roadmap` / `requirements-elicitation` / `design` / `plan-iterations` were
-> archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3 — `<instance-root>/archive/`), then restart this
+> archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3 — `<instance-root>/archive/`), then restart this
 > review at round 1.
 > (b) Continue iterating — accept that more rounds may be needed (capped by
 > `{MAX_ROUNDS}`).
@@ -406,7 +413,7 @@ review and escalate to a human, or (b) continue into round 4 — via the
 `question` tool. The guard means "escalate with a choice", NOT "force-stop".
 The choice is UNCONDITIONAL at the round-3→4 transition — instance skills may
 narrow when an escalation *variant* (e.g. a design-level decision) fires, but
-never narrow the choice gate itself. The call MUST be optionized ([TT-3378]):
+never narrow the choice gate itself. The call MUST be optionized ([org-internal #3378]):
 two options — `Stop & escalate to a human` (first, when recommended) /
 `Continue into round 4` — with `stage` set to the running skill's stage so
 auto-approval applies in autonomous mode; free-text asking is a spec
@@ -414,12 +421,12 @@ violation.
 Instance: review-dag D4 option-b (`review-artifact/SKILL.md` §"Round-3
 Escalation Guardrail interaction") — the sole live instance, its D4 round cap
 (≤4) being the only budget that reaches round 4 (`review-code` is capped 2/3,
-[TT-3567]).
-Rationale (retro 2026-08-21 / [TT-3050]): unattended late-round loops drift into
+[org-internal #3567]).
+Rationale (retro 2026-08-21 / [org-internal #3050]): unattended late-round loops drift into
 review marathons — the choice forces the design-level stall to surface to a
 human at round 4 instead of round 6.
 
-**Efficiency optimization**: From round 2 onward ([TT-2598]), only spawn
+**Efficiency optimization**: From round 2 onward ([org-internal #2598]), only spawn
 {REVIEWER_OR_AUDITOR}s for dimensions that had FAIL, WARN, or UNRESOLVED in
 the previous round. Every 2 rounds, run a full {DIMENSION_COUNT}-reviewer
 sweep to catch regressions. From round 2 onward reviewer input is also
@@ -486,7 +493,7 @@ not the round-1 full set.
     `REQUEST_REVIEW` registration to be recorded, and only THEN ask the human
    to approve. Approving before the reviewer is registered produces
    `official: false` on the approval — the gate treats the PR as unapproved
-   and the approval must be re-done. ([TT-1931]: audit R2→R3 re-loop + re-approve,
+   and the approval must be re-done. ([org-internal #1931]: audit R2→R3 re-loop + re-approve,
    ~30min wasted on exactly this ordering.)
 
 4. Present the final report to the user and obtain approval via the `question`

core/skills/_shared/review-reviewer-prompt.md

@@ -32,6 +32,18 @@ Label: {DIMENSION_NAME}
 
 ## Instructions
 
+### Gate records are deterministic inputs ([org-internal #5656] N-04)
+
+When the work item carries gate records (`gate` tool results — metadata
+`exit_code`, `duration_ms`, `ci_run_id`), those records ARE the command
+outcomes for mechanical questions (tests/typecheck/lint): cite the exit code
+verbatim (`gate <id> (<tier>): exit_code=<n> -> green|red` — canonical block
+in `packages/octopus/src/gate/consume.ts`) and never substitute a model's
+narration of command output. A claim that disagrees with a record's
+exit_code is a finding (record wins); a mechanical claim with no record is
+unverifiable — request the citation. A green verdict-cache hit
+(`metadata.verdict_cache.key`) counts the same as a fresh run.
+
 {READ_FIRST_STEPS}
 4. For each checklist item, determine whether the {ARTIFACT_NOUN} satisfies it.
    Every checklist item must receive a PASS or FAIL verdict.
@@ -46,6 +58,21 @@ Label: {DIMENSION_NAME}
    (reviewer_count > 1), use the slot-prefixed form {DIM}R{k}-F{NNN} with your
    1-based slot k (e.g. TOPOR1-F001) so parallel slot files never collide on id.
 {CONTRADICTION_RULE}
+6b. Code graph availability (worktree sessions): if `codegraph_status` is
+   unavailable or reports no index for the tree under review (typical when
+   reviewing from a session worktree whose per-worktree `.codegraph/` index
+   has not finished building — see `<instance-root>/rules/code-graph.md`), do NOT
+   silently substitute grep+read for structural questions ("who calls /
+   what depends on / where defined"). Instead:
+   - For symbols on the MAIN branch side (baselines, design refs, cross-session
+     frozen contracts), you MAY query the main checkout's index (path given in
+     your dispatch preamble) and cite `main:<path>:<line>`.
+   - If no index is reachable at all, mark the affected checklist items NA
+     with reason "codegraph unavailable — structural check degraded to grep"
+     and emit one INFO finding (id `{DIM}-F001`-style, in your dimension's own
+     code) recording the degradation, so the Synthesizer can surface it.
+   Findings derived purely from grep+read when a graph query was required are
+   treated as low-confidence and may be waived in synthesis.
 7. Assign severity strictly:
 {SEVERITY_DEFINITIONS}
 8. Count every PASS and FAIL. Compute pass_rate = passed / total_checks.

core/skills/_shared/review-revision-prompt.md

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ After revising, report a summary of changes made:
 - Findings waived as cosmetic MINOR (round 2+): {WAIVED-{id} → reason}
 
 Persist that summary to `{RETURN_FILE}` as your LAST action, BEFORE
-returning it — worker-report persistence ([TT-2847], see
+returning it — worker-report persistence ([org-internal #2847], see
 `.octopus/skills/_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`). The persisted copy
 is the report of record; if your completion notification is lost, the
 Orchestrator recovers the revision outcome from this file.

core/skills/_shared/roles/coordinator.yaml

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Coordinator
 purpose: >
-  Pool dispatch coordinator (billing-v2 [TT-4041] §7, REQ-F-012): a wake-driven,
+  Pool dispatch coordinator (billing-v2 [org-internal #4041] §7, REQ-F-012): a wake-driven,
   STATELESS decision-maker session living in the pool pod alongside workers.
   List eligible issues (Gitea API, scoped token) → produce DAG-aware dispatch
   proposals → commit each dispatch through the N-16 assignment API
@@ -62,14 +62,14 @@ agents_md:
 #
 # Security posture (AC-5, see docs/security/threat-model.md §自治批处理):
 # the coordinator authenticates with a workspace-level API token
-# (TD-687/[TT-3898] owner-minted, jti-revocable, role claim org_role). TODAY'S
+# (TD-687/[org-internal #3898] owner-minted, jti-revocable, role claim org_role). TODAY'S
 # mint shape hardcodes org_role=viewer — read-capable only (assignment table
 # + pool surfaces); the editor-capable mint needed for dispatch submission is
-# an explicit deployment-time decision on the [TT-3898] channel (not landed with
+# an explicit deployment-time decision on the [org-internal #3898] channel (not landed with
 # N-19). Either way the token can NOT mint tokens, touch wallet internals, or
 # merge PRs — the merge gate stays human (E-4).
 #
-# Worker-report persistence ([TT-2847] — see
+# Worker-report persistence ([org-internal #2847] — see
 # core/skills/_shared/worker-report-persistence.md): a Coordinator
 # sub-agent persists its FINAL RETURN REPORT to disk as its LAST action,
 # before returning — <runs-root>/{slug}/workers/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md

core/skills/_shared/roles/producer.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Producer
 purpose: >
   Write production artifacts — requirements, design, plans, code, fixes,
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ agents_md:
   - claim-discipline
   - compact
 
-# Worker-report persistence ([TT-2847], retro-2696 AI#2 — see
+# Worker-report persistence ([org-internal #2847], retro-2696 AI#2 — see
 # core/skills/_shared/worker-report-persistence.md): every Producer
 # sub-agent persists its FINAL RETURN REPORT to disk as its LAST action,
 # before returning — <runs-root>/{slug}/workers/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ agents_md:
 # else /tmp/octopus/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md. The persisted copy is the
 # report of record; the task notification is a convenience copy.
 #
-# Working-notes contract ([TT-2600] — see core/templates/runs-layout.md §
+# Working-notes contract ([org-internal #2600] — see core/templates/runs-layout.md §
 # working-notes.md): at stage exit the Producer appends ONE entry (≤30 lines:
 # decisions and why, dead ends, reviewer feedback that changed the work, hints
 # for the next stage) to <runs-root>/{slug}/working-notes.md, and registers

core/skills/_shared/roles/reviewer.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Reviewer
 purpose: >
   Review one dimension of an artifact against its checklist, read-only.
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ agents_md:
   - ticket-lifecycle
   - compact
 
-# Working-notes contract ([TT-2600] — see core/templates/runs-layout.md §
+# Working-notes contract ([org-internal #2600] — see core/templates/runs-layout.md §
 # working-notes.md): the Reviewer side appends ONE distilled entry via the
 # Synthesizer at review convergence — never per dimension dispatch (9
 # dimension dispatches = 1 entry) — to <runs-root>/{slug}/working-notes.md.

core/skills/_shared/roles/tool.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Tool
 purpose: >
   Specialized tool agent for image interpretation and other vision/utility
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ agents_md:
   - claim-discipline
   - compact
 
-# Working-notes contract ([TT-2600] — see core/templates/runs-layout.md §
+# Working-notes contract ([org-internal #2600] — see core/templates/runs-layout.md §
 # working-notes.md): Tool agents append to <runs-root>/{slug}/working-notes.md
 # ONLY when the task produced a load-bearing finding (e.g. image evidence that
 # changed a decision) — not for routine single-shot output.

core/skills/_shared/roles/verifier.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Verifier
 purpose: >
   Run the iteration's DoD matrix, integration tests, NFR validation, and
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ agents_md:
   - claim-discipline
   - compact
 
-# Worker-report persistence ([TT-2847], retro-2696 AI#2 — see
+# Worker-report persistence ([org-internal #2847], retro-2696 AI#2 — see
 # core/skills/_shared/worker-report-persistence.md): the Verifier
 # persists its FINAL RETURN REPORT (DoD verdict + evidence pointers) to disk
 # as its LAST action, before returning —
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ agents_md:
 # else /tmp/octopus/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md. The persisted copy is the
 # report of record; the task notification is a convenience copy.
 #
-# Working-notes contract ([TT-2600] — see core/templates/runs-layout.md §
+# Working-notes contract ([org-internal #2600] — see core/templates/runs-layout.md §
 # working-notes.md): the Verifier appends ONE entry at verify exit (what the
 # DoD sweep caught, flaky/deferral context the next run should know). The
 # Phase 5.5 archive step additionally inlines the final working-notes.md

core/skills/_shared/synthesis_task.md

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
 - **Commit SHA**: `{SHA}` (the HEAD commit being reviewed).
 - **Review type**: `{REVIEW_TYPE}` — one of `review-code`, `review-dag`,
   `audit-process` (the `review-design-space` / `review-iteration-plan` /
-  `review-roadmap` targets were archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3 — their
+  `review-roadmap` targets were archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3 — their
   historical synthesis data remains readable).
 
 ## Your Job
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@
 9. Persist your return summary (the exact text from the Return Format
    below) to `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/round{N}/synthesis-return.md`
    (Tier 1) as your LAST action, BEFORE returning it — worker-report
-   persistence ([TT-2847], `_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`). The persisted
+   persistence ([org-internal #2847], `_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`). The persisted
    copy is the report of record; if your completion notification is lost, the
    Orchestrator recovers the round verdict from this file.
 
@@ -198,6 +198,14 @@
 - **Rule 4 — Aggregation, not reinterpretation**: You MUST NOT soften, rephrase,
   or downgrade reviewer findings. If a reviewer writes "BLOCKER", it stays
   "BLOCKER" in synthesis.
+
+1c. **Pass-rate recalc post-check (MANDATORY, [org-internal #5658])**: for
+   every dimension, recompute `pass_rate = passed / total_checks` from its
+   `quantitative_summary` and compare with the reported value. On a mismatch:
+   keep the raw file unchanged, use the RECOMPUTED value in the synthesis
+   digest, and note the mismatch — a reviewer-output whose `pass_rate` does
+   not match its own counts is a malformed artifact (the schema description
+   says exactly this; this step is the enforcement).
 - **Rule 5 — Anonymous findings preservation**: If two reviewers independently
   flag the same issue from different dimensions, preserve both entries. Do not
   deduplicate by discarding one — cross-dimension agreement is itself a signal.
@@ -209,9 +217,14 @@
 Return ONLY this summary as your final message. Do NOT include the full
 synthesis JSON — it is already posted to the pipeline PR / source issue
 comment (for audit-process runs, the wiki page `audit/{date}/round{N}/synthesis`).
+
+When your dispatch carries `format` (StructuredOutput mount, [org-internal
+[org-internal #5658]]): the structured output is the MIRROR self-check of this summary (same
+schema, schema-enforced), not a second artifact — the posted fenced JSON block
+and this summary remain canonical.
 Persist this summary verbatim to
 `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/round{N}/synthesis-return.md` before
-returning (step 9 above — worker-report persistence [TT-2847]).
+returning (step 9 above — worker-report persistence [org-internal #2847]).
 
 ```
 ## Synthesis Complete

core/skills/_shared/worker-report-persistence.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 > Canonical convention for every worker sub-agent dispatch (roles whose
 > `agent:` is `worker` — Producer sub-roles, Verifier, Synthesizer, …),
 > foreground or background (`task background=true`). Origin: retro WWW#5 /
-> [TT-2696] action item #2 ([TT-2847]) — at least one confirmed case where a
+> [org-internal #2696] action item #2 ([org-internal #2847]) — at least one confirmed case where a
 > background worker's completion report reached the orchestrating session
 > only via the task-tool notification; the notification was lost and the
 > report evaporated, leaving nothing but reverse-engineering from artifacts.

core/skills/analyze-dag/SKILL.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ name: analyze-dag
 description: >
   Use ONLY when an Epic is routed to the DAG ticket pipeline (Kind/Epic or
   Kind/Feature — both resolve to analyze-dag via the routes table directly,
-  [TT-3072] phase 3 / [TT-3061] Phase 2). The
+  [org-internal #3072] phase 3 / [org-internal #3061] Phase 2). The
   Analyst decomposes the Epic into a single task-DAG artifact — merging
   roadmap+requirements+design+plan into one graph (nodes = acceptance
   criteria, edges = contracts, topology = plan).
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ role: Producer
 analyze-dag is the **entry skill** of the DAG ticket pipeline
 (`dag.route.entry.skill`, spec-07 §2). For a DAG-routed Epic
 (`Kind/Epic`, or `Kind/Feature` — both resolve here via the routes table
-directly, [TT-3072] phase 3 / [TT-3061] Phase 2 / TD-388 —
+directly, [org-internal #3072] phase 3 / [org-internal #3061] Phase 2 / TD-388 —
 including BACKFILL mode for MVP graduates and big-bug relabels), it
 **replaces** `roadmap` + `requirements-elicitation` + `design` +
 `plan-iterations` and produces **ONE artifact**: the task DAG, published as
@@ -66,12 +66,12 @@ a topological order (the plan), then publishes the single graph.
 | 设计主导 | 主要风险是一个有 ≥2 个可行选项的架构/平台决策，而非任务分解；需要先做一次探索 | 将开放问题转 `prototype`（THROWAWAY spike）或设计探索；决策记录后重入 |
 | 外部契约未决 | scope 依赖未决的外部契约（第三方 schema、上游 API 未定） | 按 External-System Rule（见下文）解析或围栏；不可拆的残余隔离后再重入 |
 
-**反向拦截（Kind/MVP 降级建议，[TT-3061]）**：一个 `Kind/Feature` 工单在分解预检中
+**反向拦截（Kind/MVP 降级建议，[org-internal #3061]）**：一个 `Kind/Feature` 工单在分解预检中
 暴露"概念未稳"（scope 仍在探索、成功标准未定、决策日志会推翻节点划分）时，
 正确出口不是硬分解，而是建议改标签 `Kind/MVP` 先行交互式验证——概念稳定后
 经 backfill 模式（见下文）带着决策日志重入。
 
-### Phase 0 需求澄清（disqualifier 的结构化扩展，[TT-3061]）
+### Phase 0 需求澄清（disqualifier 的结构化扩展，[org-internal #3061]）
 
 预检不止于"能否分解"，还须证明"需求已澄清到可分解"。两项强制检查：
 
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ Rules:
 - `refs_by` is derived from the REQMAP "every requirement ≥1 node" criterion
   (missing coverage = a requirement with no node).
 
-## Breadth Coverage — 类目覆盖矩阵 + 排除账本 ([TT-2905] 方案 1)
+## Breadth Coverage — 类目覆盖矩阵 + 排除账本 ([org-internal #2905] 方案 1)
 
 The four-stage fold that produced the single DAG artifact kept requirement
 **depth** (REQMAP three-path coverage + falsifiable AC) but dropped legacy
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ sub-page `{epic-slug}/dag-coverage` using the same mechanics as AC sinking
 frozen copy) — purely organizational, NOT an oversize signal, no
 re-derivation.
 
-### Breadth probe nodes (P2, [TT-2905] 方案 2)
+### Breadth probe nodes (P2, [org-internal #2905] 方案 2)
 
 When a 待确认 category is cheapest to resolve empirically, a **probe node**
 is a legal task node at the granularity floor:
@@ -306,12 +306,12 @@ is a legal task node at the granularity floor:
   冻结副本（新增需求必然改变节点集合或 `req_refs`；需要新节点时全额按
   node_split 建单传播）。
 
-### Data layer — read `dag.route.preflight` BEFORE decomposition ([TT-2905] 方案 3)
+### Data layer — read `dag.route.preflight` BEFORE decomposition ([org-internal #2905] 方案 3)
 
 Before starting decomposition, analyze-dag MUST read
 `<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `dag.route.preflight` and, when the list is
 non-empty, verify each item as a producer self-check (the same injection
-contract `implement` applies for `routes.{Kind}.preflight`, [TT-2599] — landed
+contract `implement` applies for `routes.{Kind}.preflight`, [org-internal #2599] — landed
 items carry their retro evidence in `evidence`):
 
 1. Read the `dag:` block's `route.preflight` array (live yaml, repo root).
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ external contract). This is what lets the REQMAP "需求覆盖" (requirement
 coverage) check mechanically verify that external-integration requirements map
 to nodes. (The `ARCH 1.1` system-context diagram is discarded only for
 process-infrastructure-type Epics; product Epics get this alternative rule
-instead.) [TT-2905]: this rule is the 外部系统集成 category of the breadth
+instead.) [org-internal #2905]: this rule is the 外部系统集成 category of the breadth
 coverage matrix held at its original strength — see Breadth Coverage above.
 
 ## Exec-Resource Configuration (spec-07 §4 — mechanical destination of folded checklist rows)
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ observe:
    `> DAG 工件状态: draft`.
 2. After the single-gate (`review-dag`) PASS, the **aggregator agent** (main
    session / Orchestrator — not analyze-dag) asks the freeze confirmation
-   question ([TT-3379]), then on confirmation flips the page to
+   question ([org-internal #3379]), then on confirmation flips the page to
    `> DAG 工件状态: frozen` and stamps version `v1`. The confirmation is an
    OPTIONIZED `question` call (stage `review-dag`, never `destructive` —
    freeze is a process gate, not a business decision): options
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ observe:
    the version stamp `vN → vN+1` (no re-confirmation — only the initial
    freeze gates on a decision).
 
-## Backfill Input Mode (Kind/MVP graduation & big-bug relabels, [TT-3061])
+## Backfill Input Mode (Kind/MVP graduation & big-bug relabels, [org-internal #3061])
 
 When a `Kind/MVP` ticket graduates (relabel → `Kind/Feature` → Step 0 → this
 skill), the DAG is derived from **what was actually built**, not from greenfield
@@ -500,4 +500,4 @@ decomposition:
 - `dag-pipeline/spec-06` — dag_metrics derivation + thresholds
 - `dag-pipeline/spec-07` — dag.route landing row (entry skill, skip set, single-gate) + §4 landing list
 - `dag-pipeline/spec-08` — DAG artifact lifecycle / version stamp
-- `<instance-root>/archive/skills/roadmap/SKILL.md` — legacy route (archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3; this skill replaces it for all Epics)
+- `<instance-root>/archive/skills/roadmap/SKILL.md` — legacy route (archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3; this skill replaces it for all Epics)

core/skills/browser-debug/SKILL.md

@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ When a `verify` work item has an E2E or UI DoD entry:
 ## Session cleanup (mandatory)
 
 A Playwright MCP browser is a real Chrome with a `/tmp` user-data-dir — its
-mode follows `mcp.playwright.headless` (`headless-field-v1`, [TT-4393]): the repo
+mode follows `mcp.playwright.headless` (`headless-field-v1`, [org-internal #4393]): the repo
 default `auto` spawns headed on desktop (win32/darwin; linux only with
 DISPLAY/WAYLAND_DISPLAY set) and headless otherwise; an explicit `true`/`false`
 or `OCTOPUS_MCP_HEADLESS=1|0` pins it. The mode is fixed per new session —
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ stays alive as long as its MCP server runs, and the MCP server stays alive as
 long as its parent octopus backend runs. When a browser-debug session ends
 without an explicit `browser_close`, OR the octopus session times out mid-task,
 the Chrome + its MCP server are orphaned and accumulate across sessions —
-burning CPU and leaving dead profile dirs (issue [TT-1315]); in headed mode the
+burning CPU and leaving dead profile dirs (issue [org-internal #1315]); in headed mode the
 orphan is a visible stray window.
 
 **Iron rule: every browser-debug session MUST close its browser before ending.**

core/skills/codegraph-setup/SKILL.md

@@ -1,33 +1,14 @@
 ---
 name: codegraph-setup
 description: >
-  Use ONLY when installing, configuring, initializing, or troubleshooting CodeGraph
-  (@colbymchenry/codegraph — https://github.com/colbymchenry/codegraph) in the
-  octopus environment. Covers global CLI install, per-project `.codegraph/`
-  indexing, and maintenance commands (status, sync, upgrade, uninstall). MCP
-  wiring into octopus.jsonc is handled by the kickoff pipeline
-  (`octopus kickoff` or `/kickoff`). Also use when a project session reports a
-  missing/stale `.codegraph/` index.
+  Use ONLY when installing, configuring, initializing, or troubleshooting
+  CodeGraph (@colbymchenry/codegraph) in the octopus environment.
 triggers:
   - codegraph
   - code graph
-  - codegraph setup
-  - codegraph install
-  - codegraph init
-  - .codegraph
-  - codegraph_explore
-  - codegraph_node
-  - codegraph_callers
-  - codegraph_status
-  - install codegraph
-  # Chinese — bare nouns for code-graph concepts. The English "codegraph" brand
-  # name above already covers mixed-language phrasings; these cover pure Chinese.
   - 代码图
-  - 代码图谱
   - 代码索引
   - 索引代码
-  - 装代码图
-  - 初始化代码图
 role: Producer
 ---
 
@@ -171,7 +152,7 @@ Disable the watcher on slow filesystems (WSL2 `/mnt` drives, network mounts):
 codegraph serve --mcp --no-watch
 ```
 
-### Workflow worktrees get their own index ([TT-2561] / TD-006)
+### Workflow worktrees get their own index ([org-internal #2561] / TD-006)
 
 The main checkout's `.codegraph/` does NOT cover git worktrees — they live
 outside the repo path, so nearest-`.codegraph/` resolution finds nothing under

core/skills/frontend/SKILL.md

@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ Present the report to the user. Route to code review if > 20 lines or ≥ 3 file
 - `core/checklists/frontend.md` — Frontend self-check checklist
 - `core/skills/implement/SKILL.md` — General + pipeline implementation workflow
 - `core/skills/review-code/SKILL.md` — Code review (next step)
-- `<instance-root>/archive/skills/design/SKILL.md` — Design document production (legacy upstream, archived [TT-3072] phase 3)
+- `<instance-root>/archive/skills/design/SKILL.md` — Design document production (legacy upstream, archived [org-internal #3072] phase 3)
 - `core/skills/browser-debug/SKILL.md` — Interactive browser verification (invoke during Phase 3 / 4 for visual + interaction evidence)
 - `core/rules/testing.md`, `core/rules/type-checking.md` — Repository conventions (test commands, typecheck)
 - `core/rules/code-graph.md` — Code graph first

core/skills/gitea-rest/SKILL.md

@@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ history. If a token leaks into a remote URL, rewrite the remote
 
 **Create a release** — `POST .../releases {"tag_name":"v1.2.0","target":"main",...}`
 
-**Create a wiki page** — `POST .../wiki/new {"title":"My Page","content_base64":"<b64>","message":"add page"}`. **`content_base64` is the ONLY field that writes body text** — this fork **silently ignores** the upstream-style `content` field on wiki create/update (no error, `201` returned, page saved 0 bytes; evidence [TT-3944]: commits f5eaf18/4f0217d/bad5880). `content` is valid only on the file API, never on wiki.
+**Create a wiki page** — `POST .../wiki/new {"title":"My Page","content_base64":"<b64>","message":"add page"}`. **`content_base64` is the ONLY field that writes body text** — this fork **silently ignores** the upstream-style `content` field on wiki create/update (no error, `201` returned, page saved 0 bytes; evidence [org-internal #3944]: commits f5eaf18/4f0217d/bad5880). `content` is valid only on the file API, never on wiki.
 
-**Read / edit / delete a wiki page** — `GET|PATCH|DELETE .../wiki/page/{pageName}`. **Read by the mangled name, not the logical title**: this fork rewrites stored filenames for titles containing `/`, spaces, or `:` (slash percent-encoded into the filename + a `.-` suffix — see [TT-3218]), so `GET /wiki/page/bugfix-3204/bugfix-report` 404s. Always `GET .../wiki/pages` first and use the returned `sub_url` **verbatim** (it already carries the `%2F` encoding and `.-` suffix). PATCH/DELETE take the same mangled `pageName`. For PATCH, **omit `title` to keep the page name** and send only `content_base64`+`message` (fixed in gitea `dev-421-g7ff56aec08`, [TT-3510] — before that a title-less PATCH silently renamed the page to `unnamed.md` and later edits deleted target pages). Same trap as create: a PATCH carrying `content` instead of `content_base64` returns `200` with a **0-byte page** ([TT-3944]) — always base64-encode the body and verify non-empty via a follow-up `GET`.
+**Read / edit / delete a wiki page** — `GET|PATCH|DELETE .../wiki/page/{pageName}`. **Read by the mangled name, not the logical title**: this fork rewrites stored filenames for titles containing `/`, spaces, or `:` (slash percent-encoded into the filename + a `.-` suffix — see [org-internal #3218]), so `GET /wiki/page/bugfix-3204/bugfix-report` 404s. Always `GET .../wiki/pages` first and use the returned `sub_url` **verbatim** (it already carries the `%2F` encoding and `.-` suffix). PATCH/DELETE take the same mangled `pageName`. For PATCH, **omit `title` to keep the page name** and send only `content_base64`+`message` (fixed in gitea `dev-421-g7ff56aec08`, [org-internal #3510] — before that a title-less PATCH silently renamed the page to `unnamed.md` and later edits deleted target pages). Same trap as create: a PATCH carrying `content` instead of `content_base64` returns `200` with a **0-byte page** ([org-internal #3944]) — always base64-encode the body and verify non-empty via a follow-up `GET`.
 
 ## This fork's specifics
 
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ history. If a token leaks into a remote URL, rewrite the remote
   GET/PATCH/DELETE, `pages`, `revisions/{pageName}`). This fork has **no**
   upstream `raw/{pageName}` or `pages/{pageName}` single-page endpoints, and
   `page/{pageName}` only matches the mangled filename (see the wiki recipe
-  above and [TT-3218]) — clone the wiki git repo (default branch `main`) only if
+  above and [org-internal #3218]) — clone the wiki git repo (default branch `main`) only if
   you need history beyond `/wiki/revisions` or bulk filename surgery.
 - The authoritative route table is `routers/api/v1/api.go` in the Gitea
   source; the human-readable docs UI is `<BASE>/api/swagger`.

core/skills/headless-session-ops/SKILL.md

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ triggers:
   - launch session for issue
   - launch session for ticket
   - spawn session for ticket
-  # English — patrol mode (delayed self-wake polling loops, [TT-3937]).
+  # English — patrol mode (delayed self-wake polling loops, [org-internal #3937]).
   - patrol loop
   - patrol mode
   - delayed wake
@@ -42,28 +42,28 @@ triggers:
   - 拉起会话
   - 自治会话
   - 无头会话
-  # Chinese — patrol mode ([TT-3937]).
+  # Chinese — patrol mode ([org-internal #3937]).
   - 巡检模式
   - 延迟唤醒
   - 会话不生成
   - 会话卡死
   - 为工单拉起会话
   - 工单拉起会话
-  # English — lifecycle (hung rescue, stale-worldview correction, [TT-2459]).
+  # English — lifecycle (hung rescue, stale-worldview correction, [org-internal #2459]).
   - abort session
   - revive session
   - session rescue
   - fact baseline
-  # English — quota-wall recovery ([TT-3669]): worker killed by provider usage limit.
+  # English — quota-wall recovery ([org-internal #3669]): worker killed by provider usage limit.
   - quota wall
   - usage limit reached
   - quota exhausted
   - switch provider
-  # Chinese — lifecycle ops ([TT-2459]).
+  # Chinese — lifecycle ops ([org-internal #2459]).
   - 唤醒会话
   - 会话挂死
   - 事实基线
-  # Chinese — quota-wall recovery ([TT-3669]).
+  # Chinese — quota-wall recovery ([org-internal #3669]).
   - 配额墙
   - 配额耗尽
   - 用量上限
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ and worktree discipline are **orthogonal**: this skill only opens a session
 record pointed at a directory; whether the launched session later creates its
 own worktree is a _workflow_ decision (per the worktree-discipline rule) it
 makes when it starts actual work — not something the launcher does. One
-exception: the **ticket-driven recipe** below, where claim-first ([TT-2297])
+exception: the **ticket-driven recipe** below, where claim-first ([org-internal #2297])
 requires the launcher to push the workflow branch before launch, making a
 pre-built worktree the claim carrier + ready workspace (see Pitfall #10
 carve-out). So, unless a different repo / path is specifically targeted,
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ carve-out). So, unless a different repo / path is specifically targeted,
   seed prompt, not the directory field (sidebar visibility, see bullet 1). The
   owner-check (`GET /session?directory=$DIR`) is scoped per directory, so
   rooting the session at the correct code checkout is also what makes the
-  duplicate-session guard meaningful. Server-side backstop ([TT-3190]): creating a
+  duplicate-session guard meaningful. Server-side backstop ([org-internal #3190]): creating a
   session whose directory IS a linked git worktree answers with an
   `X-Session-Directory-Warning` response header and a server warn log naming
   the owning main repo — if you see that header, the session will be invisible
@@ -131,8 +131,8 @@ carve-out). So, unless a different repo / path is specifically targeted,
 
 > **Authoritative reference:** `rules/headless-session-ops` wiki page
 > (<<instance-base-url>/Octopus/octopus/wiki/rules%2Fheadless-session-ops>).
-> This skill is its runtime carrier. Provenance: issue **[TT-1695]** (which
-> corrected the misdiagnosed [TT-1691], see comment 9205). Code citations below were
+> This skill is its runtime carrier. Provenance: issue **[org-internal #1695]** (which
+> corrected the misdiagnosed [org-internal #1691], see comment 9205). Code citations below were
 > verified against `<harness-package>` at HEAD.
 
 ## The `model` field — always provide a known-good model (read this first)
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ section). Two reasons:
    `handlers/session.ts`) and never reaches the HTTP
    caller — so the session looks healthy (HTTP 204, user message persisted) yet
    **never generates**. This is exactly the "silent stall" observed empirically
-   in [TT-1695]: a session with a 1-message transcript (user only) and frozen
+   in [org-internal #1695]: a session with a 1-message transcript (user only) and frozen
    `time.updated`.
 
 | payload                                      | result                                                                                                                               |
@@ -280,10 +280,10 @@ curl -s -X POST "$BASE/session/$SID/prompt_async?directory=$DIR" \
   queued behind a session that is generating with no live runner in this
   process (wedge/zombie shape — stored and re-driven on restart drain or the
   next runner), **202** when `delay_sec` defers delivery to an in-memory
-  delayed wake ([TT-3937] A — see "巡检模式 / Patrol mode" below), and **409**
+  delayed wake ([org-internal #3937] A — see "巡检模式 / Patrol mode" below), and **409**
   when the session is paused (message NOT stored) or the maintenance-mode
   hold queue is full.
-- **Global route alternative ([TT-4307]):** when the client only knows the
+- **Global route alternative ([org-internal #4307]):** when the client only knows the
   sessionID (no `?directory=` routing), `POST /prompt_async` (no path prefix)
   resolves the instance from the app database by the body's `sessionID` and
   delegates to the same delivery core — same 204/202/409 semantics, same
@@ -294,17 +294,17 @@ curl -s -X POST "$BASE/session/$SID/prompt_async?directory=$DIR" \
 - `delay_sec` (optional, integer 0..86400, else 400) schedules the prompt for
   a one-shot delayed self-wake: the server holds the prompt in memory and
   fires it exactly once after `delay_sec` seconds, only for an idle session
-  at intake. **Precedence ([TT-3937] review):** `delay_sec` applies only when the
+  at intake. **Precedence ([org-internal #3937] review):** `delay_sec` applies only when the
   intake would otherwise start processing now (immediate class). For the
   queued-behind-wedge 202 member and under maintenance queue mode it is
   stripped — retention semantics win (the server logs the drop; the delay is
   NOT honored). Pending wakes are **in-memory only — a server restart abandons
   them**; a patrol loop must therefore tolerate a missed wake and re-arm.
   Never use `sleep <big>; curl ...` in a bash tool call to wait — that blocks
-  the turn with zero output (the [TT-3937] incident shape); the bash tool now
-  warns on bare sleeps > 120s (long-sleep guard, [TT-3937] C).
+  the turn with zero output (the [org-internal #3937] incident shape); the bash tool now
+  warns on bare sleeps > 120s (long-sleep guard, [org-internal #3937] C).
 - `model` is `{ providerID, modelID }` or the shorthand string
-  `"providerID/modelID"` (split on the FIRST `/`; accepted since [TT-4307] — 
+  `"providerID/modelID"` (split on the FIRST `/`; accepted since [org-internal #4307] — 
   e.g. `"zai-coding-plan/glm-5.2"`). **Do not omit it.** Fill the values from
   your own session's model (see "Reuse the current session's model" above) — 
   never hardcode a specific model. A string without a `/` is rejected with
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ curl -s "$BASE/session/$SID/message?directory=$DIR&limit=1" \
 Verdict: `latest_role == "assistant"` → the first generation completed (the
 seed is `user`; the newest message flips to `assistant` only once the model
 answered — an errored turn also persists an assistant message carrying the ⚠️
-usage-limit part, [TT-2912], so check the tail text before declaring success).
+usage-limit part, [org-internal #2912], so check the tail text before declaring success).
 Stays `user` across 2–3 polls spaced 10–30 s → **apparent silent stall**;
 almost certainly the model did not resolve to a usable one (fallback landed
 badly, or you omitted `model`). Redeliver Step 2 with an explicit known-good
@@ -351,33 +351,33 @@ just never omit `limit`.
 
 The common case: an agent (or cron/CI) spins up a fresh main session to work a
 tracked issue — seed prompt composed **from the issue body**, launched on the
-current session's model. **Step-0 owner check is MANDATORY ([TT-1803])**: four data
+current session's model. **Step-0 owner check is MANDATORY ([org-internal #1803])**: four data
 sources (session-title scan, assignee/claim, open PRs, remote branches); any
 live claim → ABORT the launch (`session-scope-guard.md` points here for that
 pre-step). Full recipe — owner-check scan script with `X-Total-Count` /
-`X-Has-More` pagination handling ([TT-3190]), claim-first atomic 3-step ([TT-2297],
-+ one-command provisioning via `script/claim-provision.sh`, [TT-3642]),
-seed-prompt MUSTs, backend duplicate-ticket hard guard ([TT-1989], on by default
-[TT-2350]), launch + poll commands: `reference/ticket-recipe.md` (read BEFORE
+`X-Has-More` pagination handling ([org-internal #3190]), claim-first atomic 3-step ([org-internal #2297],
++ one-command provisioning via `script/claim-provision.sh`, [org-internal #3642]),
+seed-prompt MUSTs, backend duplicate-ticket hard guard ([org-internal #1989], on by default
+[org-internal #2350]), launch + poll commands: `reference/ticket-recipe.md` (read BEFORE
 creating any ticket-driven session).
 
-## Completion-report protocol (完成回报协议, [TT-2374])
+## Completion-report protocol (完成回报协议, [org-internal #2374])
 
 `prompt_async` is fire-and-forget **for the launcher too**: without this
-protocol the orchestrator has NO push channel and must poll forever ([TT-2366]).
+protocol the orchestrator has NO push channel and must poll forever ([org-internal #2366]).
 The worker actively reports `status=done|blocked|handoff` back into the
 orchestrator's session via `prompt_async`, with an issue-comment fallback.
 Default report format is `branch=<ref>`-based — workers never open PRs
-(TD-678/[TT-4425]); `pr=#N` appears only on `uncoordinated` self-opens.
+(TD-678/[org-internal #4425]); `pr=#N` appears only on `uncoordinated` self-opens.
 Hard constraints: a headless worker MUST NOT call the `question` tool
-([TT-2378] — directional/irreversible decisions are `status=blocked` reports,
+([org-internal #2378] — directional/irreversible decisions are `status=blocked` reports,
 then STOP), and MUST NOT self-merge its PR / self-close the issue / touch
-`main` ([TT-2386] — keep the PR open; the orchestrator merges and closes). Full
+`main` ([org-internal #2386] — keep the PR open; the orchestrator merges and closes). Full
 protocol — orchestrator-side seed block (verbatim template), worker-side
 steps, decision-authority layering: `reference/completion-report.md` (read
 BEFORE composing a seed prompt for any worker you need to hear back from).
 
-## Post-launch lifecycle: health check, hung rescue, stale-worldview correction ([TT-2459])
+## Post-launch lifecycle: health check, hung rescue, stale-worldview correction ([org-internal #2459])
 
 Launching is half the job — a headless worker can hang silently or wake with
 a stale worldview. Health check = two polls 30–60 s apart (`.state` + `progress`
@@ -386,19 +386,19 @@ samples = hung → abort FIRST (`POST /session/:id/abort`), then re-wake with a
 known-good model + the anti-re-hang clause. Stale worldview → fact-baseline
 injection (only the CURRENT authority injects; if YOU might be the stale one,
 verify identity against the durable record first). Full runbooks — verdict
-table + [TT-3215] dual-sample rule, abort + re-wake sequence, fact-baseline
+table + [org-internal #3215] dual-sample rule, abort + re-wake sequence, fact-baseline
 structure, authorization asymmetry: `reference/lifecycle-ops.md` (read when
 managing a launched session). Quota wall — the worker's turn killed by a
 terminal usage-limit error (looks like silent completion: no report, ticket
 stalled) — has its own runbook: detection signals (finish=error ⚠️ tail,
 provider quota markers), provider-switch re-wake, fact-baseline template,
-pre-dispatch provider check: `reference/quota-wall-recovery.md` ([TT-3669], evidence
-[TT-3627]; read when a worker goes silent mid-task).
+pre-dispatch provider check: `reference/quota-wall-recovery.md` ([org-internal #3669], evidence
+[org-internal #3627]; read when a worker goes silent mid-task).
 
-## 巡检模式 / Patrol mode (delayed self-wake, [TT-3937])
+## 巡检模式 / Patrol mode (delayed self-wake, [org-internal #3937])
 
 A patrol loop periodically nudges a headless session without holding a
-connection or burning a turn on a blocking sleep. Since [TT-3937] A the server
+connection or burning a turn on a blocking sleep. Since [org-internal #3937] A the server
 supports this natively via `delay_sec` on `prompt_async`.
 
 ```sh
@@ -427,16 +427,16 @@ Rules of the road:
 - **Restart abandons pending wakes.** They are in-memory server fibers — no
   persistence, no drain. After any server restart the patrol driver owns
   re-arming the next wake; treat a missed wake as expected, not as an error.
-- **Latest wake wins, per session ([TT-4069]).** Arming `delay_sec` on a session
+- **Latest wake wins, per session ([org-internal #4069]).** Arming `delay_sec` on a session
   that already has a pending wake SUPERSEDES it: the previous countdown is
   cancelled, only the latest wake fires. Re-arming each turn is the intended
   patrol pattern — a superseded wake never delivers its prompt and publishes
-  no error. (Pre-[TT-4069] stacks both FIFO — on old binaries, re-arm only after
+  no error. (Pre-[org-internal #4069] stacks both FIFO — on old binaries, re-arm only after
   the previous wake fired.)
 - **Never emulate a delay with the bash tool.** `sleep 900; curl ...` blocks
-  the turn with zero output and gets manually aborted as a hang (the [TT-3937]
+  the turn with zero output and gets manually aborted as a hang (the [org-internal #3937]
   incident). The bash tool now prepends a `<shell_warning>` on bare sleeps
-  beyond 120s ([TT-3937] C) — treat that warning as a redirect to this section.
+  beyond 120s ([org-internal #3937] C) — treat that warning as a redirect to this section.
 
 ## Do NOT use this skill when
 
@@ -461,15 +461,15 @@ Rules of the road:
 | 6   | Using synchronous `prompt` for headless launch                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | `prompt` blocks until done — wrong for fire-and-forget; use `prompt_async`                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
 | 7   | Shell-escaping errors in a multi-line seed prompt                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | Build the payload with `jq -n --rawfile` from a file                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
 | 8   | Verifying models via `GET /model` — no such endpoint (404)                                                                                                                                                                                                                  | Use `GET /provider` → `.connected` (provider live check); `list-models` tool also works. `GET /config/providers` lists _configured_ models only                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
-| 9   | Launching a session for a ticket another live session already owns → conflicting diffs, duplicate work ([TT-1744]/[TT-1753])                                                                                                                                                        | Run the Step-0 owner check (`GET /session` title scan + worktree/branch/PR scan); ABORT and report on conflict                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
-| 10  | Creating a worktree / fresh checkout for the new session (unnecessary `bun install` + `.codegraph/` rebuild cost)                                                                                                                                                           | Don't — for _general_ launches: a session is a conversation pointed at a directory, so reuse the current workspace; worktree creation is a separate _workflow_ decision the launched session makes if/when it starts a workflow. **Ticket-recipe carve-out ([TT-2297]):** the ticket's work happens in a dedicated worktree anyway (worktree discipline), and claim-first pushes the workflow branch before launch — so the launcher pre-builds the worktree as the claim carrier + ready workspace, and the session reuses it (cost is front-loaded, not wasted). The worktree path goes in the claim comment + seed prompt; `?directory=` stays on the creator's workspace |
-| 11  | Launching a worker and never hearing back — orchestrator polls a few times, stops, loses visibility ([TT-2374])                                                                                                                                                                 | Append the completion-report block to the seed prompt (Completion-report protocol section): worker `prompt_async`s a one-line status back into the orchestrator session on done/blocked/handoff, with issue-comment fallback                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
-| 12  | Headless worker calls the `question` tool → no attached client: the question deadlocks in a queue, or `auto_approve` silently auto-approves a direction-setting decision ([TT-2378])                                                                                            | NEVER call `question` from a headless worker. Decision boundary (Completion-report protocol section): directional/irreversible decision → `status=blocked` report + one-line decision point, then STOP; the orchestrator is the sole human-decision entry point                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
-| 13  | Headless worker self-merges its PR / self-closes the issue once the PR looks ready, despite a seed instruction to keep it open ([TT-2386]; N-02 [TT-2367] / N-03 [TT-2368], commits `d1565c99` / `040f21b7`)                                                                            | Self-merge / self-close / touching `main` are irreversible directional actions → blocked by the Decision boundary. PR ready → keep it OPEN, report `status=done branch=<ref>`; the orchestrator opens/admits the PR, merges and closes uniformly                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
+| 9   | Launching a session for a ticket another live session already owns → conflicting diffs, duplicate work ([org-internal #1744]/[org-internal #1753])                                                                                                                                                        | Run the Step-0 owner check (`GET /session` title scan + worktree/branch/PR scan); ABORT and report on conflict                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
+| 10  | Creating a worktree / fresh checkout for the new session (unnecessary `bun install` + `.codegraph/` rebuild cost)                                                                                                                                                           | Don't — for _general_ launches: a session is a conversation pointed at a directory, so reuse the current workspace; worktree creation is a separate _workflow_ decision the launched session makes if/when it starts a workflow. **Ticket-recipe carve-out ([org-internal #2297]):** the ticket's work happens in a dedicated worktree anyway (worktree discipline), and claim-first pushes the workflow branch before launch — so the launcher pre-builds the worktree as the claim carrier + ready workspace, and the session reuses it (cost is front-loaded, not wasted). The worktree path goes in the claim comment + seed prompt; `?directory=` stays on the creator's workspace |
+| 11  | Launching a worker and never hearing back — orchestrator polls a few times, stops, loses visibility ([org-internal #2374])                                                                                                                                                                 | Append the completion-report block to the seed prompt (Completion-report protocol section): worker `prompt_async`s a one-line status back into the orchestrator session on done/blocked/handoff, with issue-comment fallback                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
+| 12  | Headless worker calls the `question` tool → no attached client: the question deadlocks in a queue, or `auto_approve` silently auto-approves a direction-setting decision ([org-internal #2378])                                                                                            | NEVER call `question` from a headless worker. Decision boundary (Completion-report protocol section): directional/irreversible decision → `status=blocked` report + one-line decision point, then STOP; the orchestrator is the sole human-decision entry point                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
+| 13  | Headless worker self-merges its PR / self-closes the issue once the PR looks ready, despite a seed instruction to keep it open ([org-internal #2386]; N-02 [org-internal #2367] / N-03 [org-internal #2368], commits `d1565c99` / `040f21b7`)                                                                            | Self-merge / self-close / touching `main` are irreversible directional actions → blocked by the Decision boundary. PR ready → keep it OPEN, report `status=done branch=<ref>`; the orchestrator opens/admits the PR, merges and closes uniformly                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
 | 14  | Trusting `state=generating` as "alive" — a hung stream goes unrescued (session A, 2026-08-16: `generating` 6+ min, count frozen at 478)                                                                                                                                     | Poll state AND message count twice 30–60 s apart; frozen count = hung → abort + re-wake (Post-launch lifecycle section)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
 | 15  | Re-sending a wake prompt to a hung session and waiting — queued prompts are never consumed while the stream is dead                                                                                                                                                         | Abort FIRST (`POST /session/:id/abort` → 200, verify `idle`), THEN re-send; a prompt queued before the abort may still never fire — always re-deliver                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
 | 16  | A worker woken from restart / long idle acts on its stale worldview — re-dispatches superseded work or claims authority it no longer holds (2026-08-16: revived worker re-ran an already-published FAIL verify; ops session announced an inherited "orchestrator" takeover) | Fact-baseline injection (Post-launch lifecycle section): authoritative facts + invalidated assumptions + one concrete re-assignment. Only the CURRENT authority injects; a session that suspects IT is stale verifies identity against the durable record first (`rules/compact.md` identity clause)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
-| 17  | Worker goes silent mid-task: provider quota wall killed the turn (usage limit / 429) — no completion-report, no blocked report; from the issue side indistinguishable from silent completion (2026-08-29 [TT-3627]: opencode-go `weekly usage limit reached` after the 13:18 Round-1 FAIL; ticket stalled until manually re-woken) | Detect via tail probe (`finish=error` + ⚠️ usage-limit part, `metadata.reason` in the quota family) + `GET /provider` quota markers; re-wake on a known-good provider with the fact-baseline template — `reference/quota-wall-recovery.md` ([TT-3669]). Prevent: pre-dispatch provider check + the seed's 配额自报 clause (`reference/completion-report.md`, [TT-3669]) — quota exhaustion is a `status=blocked reason=quota-exhausted` report, not a silent death |
+| 17  | Worker goes silent mid-task: provider quota wall killed the turn (usage limit / 429) — no completion-report, no blocked report; from the issue side indistinguishable from silent completion (2026-08-29 [org-internal #3627]: opencode-go `weekly usage limit reached` after the 13:18 Round-1 FAIL; ticket stalled until manually re-woken) | Detect via tail probe (`finish=error` + ⚠️ usage-limit part, `metadata.reason` in the quota family) + `GET /provider` quota markers; re-wake on a known-good provider with the fact-baseline template — `reference/quota-wall-recovery.md` ([org-internal #3669]). Prevent: pre-dispatch provider check + the seed's 配额自报 clause (`reference/completion-report.md`, [org-internal #3669]) — quota exhaustion is a `status=blocked reason=quota-exhausted` report, not a silent death |
 
 ## Known limitation (separate from this workaround)
 
@@ -482,9 +482,9 @@ catches that cause (`forkPromptDelivery` in `handlers/session.ts`) so the HTTP
 caller never sees it. The proper fix is to surface the error (or reject unusable
 models at the boundary) so a stalled session is diagnosable. Until then, **always
 provide an explicit known-good `model`** — this skill is the documented
-workaround (see [TT-1695] "遗留 minor").
+workaround (see [org-internal #1695] "遗留 minor").
 
-**Update ([TT-2912], 2026-08-20)**: usage-limit turn failures (HTTP 429 /
+**Update ([org-internal #2912], 2026-08-20)**: usage-limit turn failures (HTTP 429 /
 FreeUsageLimitError / GoUsageLimitError) are no longer silent shells. When such
 a turn terminates (retry schedule ends or the spin is aborted), the errored
 assistant message persists `finish=error` plus a human-readable ⚠️ text part
@@ -494,23 +494,23 @@ the web UI like any assistant text. Pitfall #14's double-poll is still the
 liveness check while a 429 retry spin is IN progress (the spin itself retries
 with backoff until interrupted); the explicit error part only appears once the
 turn ends. The general async-path observability gap above remains tracked by
-[TT-1695].
+[org-internal #1695].
 
 ## See also
 
-- Source issue / full manual: **[TT-1695]** (this skill adds the ticket-driven recipe
+- Source issue / full manual: **[org-internal #1695]** (this skill adds the ticket-driven recipe
   - current-model reuse, and corrects the endpoint/claim against current code).
-- Completion-report protocol: **[TT-2374]** (worker-side active report back to the
+- Completion-report protocol: **[org-internal #2374]** (worker-side active report back to the
   launching orchestrator session; fallback to issue comment).
-- Quota-wall recovery recipe: **[TT-3669]** (evidence instance [TT-3627]) — detect a
+- Quota-wall recovery recipe: **[org-internal #3669]** (evidence instance [org-internal #3627]) — detect a
   worker killed by a provider usage limit, re-wake on a known-good provider,
   pre-dispatch prevention.
-- Decision boundary: **[TT-2378]** (headless worker MUST NOT call `question`;
+- Decision boundary: **[org-internal #2378]** (headless worker MUST NOT call `question`;
   directional decisions go through `status=blocked` reports to the
-  orchestrator) and **[TT-2386]** (the worker MUST NOT self-merge its PR,
+  orchestrator) and **[org-internal #2386]** (the worker MUST NOT self-merge its PR,
   self-close the issue, or touch `main` — the orchestrator merges and closes
   uniformly).
-- Correction of the prior misdiagnosis: **[TT-1691]** (closed Invalid), comment 9205.
+- Correction of the prior misdiagnosis: **[org-internal #1691]** (closed Invalid), comment 9205.
 - Synchronous client always sends `model`:
   `packages/app/src/components/prompt-input/submit.ts:158-165`.
 - Code citations: `<harness-package>/src/session/prompt.ts:858,804-822,1399`,
@@ -525,15 +525,15 @@ turn ends. The general async-path observability gap above remains tracked by
 specific ticket (#N)`): read BEFORE creating any session for issue #N — 
   Step-0 owner check, seed-prompt composition, launch + poll commands.
 - `reference/completion-report.md` — completion-report protocol (完成回报协议,
-  [TT-2374]): read BEFORE composing a seed prompt for a worker you need to hear
+  [org-internal #2374]): read BEFORE composing a seed prompt for a worker you need to hear
   back from — orchestrator block template, worker-side report steps, decision
-  boundary ([TT-2378] / [TT-2386]), quota self-report clause ([TT-3669]).
-- `reference/lifecycle-ops.md` — post-launch lifecycle ([TT-2459]): read when
+  boundary ([org-internal #2378] / [org-internal #2386]), quota self-report clause ([org-internal #3669]).
+- `reference/lifecycle-ops.md` — post-launch lifecycle ([org-internal #2459]): read when
   managing a launched session — health-check polling, hung-stream diagnosis
   (state=generating + frozen counters), abort + re-wake rescue,
   fact-baseline injection, authorization asymmetry.
-- `reference/quota-wall-recovery.md` — quota-wall recovery ([TT-3669], evidence
-  [TT-3627]): read when a worker goes silent mid-task (suspected provider usage
+- `reference/quota-wall-recovery.md` — quota-wall recovery ([org-internal #3669], evidence
+  [org-internal #3627]): read when a worker goes silent mid-task (suspected provider usage
   limit) or BEFORE dispatching a long-running worker — detection signals
   (finish=error ⚠️ tail, provider quota markers, log grep patterns),
   provider-switch re-wake + fact-baseline template, pre-dispatch provider

core/skills/headless-session-ops/reference/completion-report.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-> Extracted from headless-session-ops/SKILL.md (Completion-report protocol (完成回报协议, [TT-2374])) — moved verbatim 2026-08-26, ticket [TT-3480].
+> Extracted from headless-session-ops/SKILL.md (Completion-report protocol (完成回报协议, [org-internal #2374])) — moved verbatim 2026-08-26, ticket [org-internal #3480].
 
-## Completion-report protocol (完成回报协议, [TT-2374])
+## Completion-report protocol (完成回报协议, [org-internal #2374])
 
 `prompt_async` is fire-and-forget **for the launcher too**: once the worker
 session starts generating, the orchestrator receives NO event when it finishes
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ or blocks. The `task` tool auto-returns `task_result` for subagents; a
 `prompt_async`-launched independent main session has no equivalent — the
 orchestrator's only built-in channel is bare polling of
 `GET /session/:id/message?limit=1` (tail probe — the no-`limit` form loads the
-whole transcript server-side), which it eventually stops doing ([TT-2366]: worker ran
-~1h past the orchestrator's last poll, merged PR [TT-2371] and closed [TT-2366] while
+whole transcript server-side), which it eventually stops doing ([org-internal #2366]: worker ran
+~1h past the orchestrator's last poll, merged PR [org-internal #2371] and closed [org-internal #2366] while
 the orchestrator had zero visibility).
 
 The protocol below closes that gap WITHOUT changing server semantics: the
@@ -24,21 +24,21 @@ parallel chunk work, any long-running delegated ticket), append a
 completion-report block to the seed prompt. It MUST state:
 
 - the orchestrator's **session id** (`$LAUNCHER_SID`) and **directory**;
-- the report endpoint: `POST $BASE/session/$LAUNCHER_SID/prompt_async?directory=$DIR` (or, when the directory is unknown to the worker, the global route `POST $BASE/prompt_async` with the sessionID in the body — [TT-4307]);
+- the report endpoint: `POST $BASE/session/$LAUNCHER_SID/prompt_async?directory=$DIR` (or, when the directory is unknown to the worker, the global route `POST $BASE/prompt_async` with the sessionID in the body — [org-internal #4307]);
 - the exact report format (one-line, machine-greppable);
 - the fallback (issue comment) if the report call fails.
 
 Template (include verbatim in `seed.txt` when you are the launcher):
 
 ```text
-## 完成回报协议 (mandatory, [TT-2374])
+## 完成回报协议 (mandatory, [org-internal #2374])
 
 你由编排会话 (orchestrator) 启动。完成、阻塞、或将工单移交他人时，必须向编排会话回报：
   POST <BASE>/session/<LAUNCHER_SID>/prompt_async?directory=<DIR>
   body: {"agent":"builder","model":{...},"parts":[{"type":"text","text":"<report>"}]}
 <report> 格式（单行，machine-greppable）：
   [#<ticket>] [<node-or-slug>] status=done|blocked|handoff branch=<ref> [pr=#<N>] verify=<changed+typecheck> risk=<high|low> summary=<one line>
-默认（TD-678 / [TT-4425]）：worker 只推分支不开 PR——交付推送前置本地验证
+默认（TD-678 / [org-internal #4425]）：worker 只推分支不开 PR——交付推送前置本地验证
 （<harness-package> 下 test:changed 全绿 + typecheck 0 error，verify 字段回执）；
 risk 按 risk-classifier 冻结表（HIGH_RISK_GLOBS）自报。PR 由编排按容量串行开
 1:1（正文携 worker 报告），或 batch 模式 epic 经 land-batch 技能按迭代统一合成
@@ -46,15 +46,15 @@ risk 按 risk-classifier 冻结表（HIGH_RISK_GLOBS）自报。PR 由编排按
 若回报调用失败（HTTP 非 2xx / 连接拒绝 — orchestrator 会话可能已结束或实例重启），
 退而在源 issue（或父 Epic）发同内容评论作为兜底（fallback, 非主通道）。
 回报是你的 mandatory step，与 issue-checklist-sync 并列；不得静默结束。
-决策边界（[TT-2378]）：headless worker 禁止调用 `question` 工具 —— 遇方向性/不可逆
+决策边界（[org-internal #2378]）：headless worker 禁止调用 `question` 工具 —— 遇方向性/不可逆
 决策点 → `status=blocked` + 一行决策点描述后 STOP，勿调 question（无人应答死锁 /
 被 auto_approve 静默自动批准）。
-配额自报（[TT-3669]）：若收到配额/用量上限错误（usage limit / 429 / 402
+配额自报（[org-internal #3669]）：若收到配额/用量上限错误（usage limit / 429 / 402
 insufficient_quota），立即回报 status=blocked reason=quota-exhausted
 summary=<provider 与 ⚠️ 部分中的重置提示>（branch=<ref> 必带）后停止
 ——勿自行换模型重试；换供应商重唤醒由编排者执行
 （reference/quota-wall-recovery.md）。
-PR 就绪后保持 open：不自行合并 PR、不关闭 issue、不动 main（[TT-2386]）；
+PR 就绪后保持 open：不自行合并 PR、不关闭 issue、不动 main（[org-internal #2386]）；
 合并与 issue 关闭由编排者统一执行。
 ```
 
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ final step (before idling):
    done); `pr=#N` only for an `uncoordinated` self-open; use
    `status=blocked` + the blocker description when stuck; use
    `status=handoff` when deliberately transferring the ticket.
-   1. **Quota exhaustion is a blocked report, not a silent death ([TT-3669]).** A
+   1. **Quota exhaustion is a blocked report, not a silent death ([org-internal #3669]).** A
       worker whose turn is killed by a usage-limit error (429 / 402 quota
       family) cannot finish the turn — but per the seed's 配额自报 clause it
       reports `status=blocked reason=quota-exhausted summary=<provider +
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ final step (before idling):
    remains the stakeholder-facing record; the report is the
    orchestrator-facing wake-up signal.
 
-### Orchestrator side — serial PR admission on done reports ([TT-4425])
+### Orchestrator side — serial PR admission on done reports ([org-internal #4425])
 
 On a `status=done branch=<ref> verify=… risk=…` report:
 
@@ -103,16 +103,16 @@ On a `status=done branch=<ref> verify=… risk=…` report:
    code; keep the queue shallow.
 2. Open the 1:1 PR (title from the ticket node, body carrying the worker
    report: branch / files / self-test / verify), apply the `Risk/*` label
-   from the report's `risk=` hint, merge via `script/pr-merge.sh` ([TT-3864]).
-   Batch-mode epics: one `land-batch` PR per iteration instead ([TT-3731]).
+   from the report's `risk=` hint, merge via `script/pr-merge.sh` ([org-internal #3864]).
+   Batch-mode epics: one `land-batch` PR per iteration instead ([org-internal #3731]).
 3. A first red on the opened PR goes back through the report fallback
    channel (issue comment) — the worker may already be idle; the issue
    comment is the durable re-entry point.
 
 Prose discipline on the orchestrator session only — no new daemon, no
-mergeable-state automation (merge-coordinator retired, [TT-4385]).
+mergeable-state automation (merge-coordinator retired, [org-internal #4385]).
 
-### Decision boundary (决策边界, [TT-2378])
+### Decision boundary (决策边界, [org-internal #2378])
 
 The report channel defines how the worker *answers*; this subsection defines
 the boundary of what it may *ask*. A headless worker session has NO attached
@@ -134,15 +134,15 @@ authority is layered instead:
   point, then STOPs. The orchestrator is the sole human-decision entry point:
   it interacts with the user, then replies to the worker (or acts on its
   behalf).
-- **No self-merge / no self-close / never touch main ([TT-2386])**: a headless
+- **No self-merge / no self-close / never touch main ([org-internal #2386])**: a headless
   worker MUST NOT merge its own PR, close the source issue, or rebase /
   force-push `main`. These are irreversible directional actions of exactly
   the class this boundary blocks — even when the seed prompt's instruction
   to "keep the PR open" is absent or the worker judges the PR ready. When
   the PR is ready the worker keeps it OPEN and reports
   `status=done pr=#N` to the orchestrator; the orchestrator performs the
-  merge and the issue close uniformly. (Counter-example: N-02 [TT-2367] /
-  N-03 [TT-2368] self-merged their PRs — commits `d1565c99` / `040f21b7` —
+  merge and the issue close uniformly. (Counter-example: N-02 [org-internal #2367] /
+  N-03 [org-internal #2368] self-merged their PRs — commits `d1565c99` / `040f21b7` —
   despite a seed instruction to keep them open.)
 - **Local implementation decisions within the AC scope** (pattern choice,
   helper extraction, test shape) → the worker decides autonomously and notes
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ authority is layered instead:
 
 Rule of thumb: the worker's only way to "ask" is a `status=blocked` report.
 A genuine ambiguity left by the seed prompt that would change scope is a
-blocked report, NOT a `question` call. (Field sample: N-04 [TT-2369] — the
+blocked report, NOT a `question` call. (Field sample: N-04 [org-internal #2369] — the
 worker spontaneously did NOT merge its own PR and left merging to the
 orchestrator; this subsection codifies that behavior.)
 

core/skills/headless-session-ops/reference/lifecycle-ops.md

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-> Extracted from headless-session-ops/SKILL.md (Post-launch lifecycle: health check, hung rescue, stale-worldview correction ([TT-2459])) — moved verbatim 2026-08-26, ticket [TT-3480].
+> Extracted from headless-session-ops/SKILL.md (Post-launch lifecycle: health check, hung rescue, stale-worldview correction ([org-internal #2459])) — moved verbatim 2026-08-26, ticket [org-internal #3480].
 
-## Post-launch lifecycle: health check, hung rescue, stale-worldview correction ([TT-2459])
+## Post-launch lifecycle: health check, hung rescue, stale-worldview correction ([org-internal #2459])
 
 Launching is half the job — a headless worker can hang silently or wake up
 with an outdated worldview. All three failure modes below were observed in
-production on 2026-08-16 during Epic [TT-2459] (ops-restart window); the runbooks
+production on 2026-08-16 during Epic [org-internal #2459] (ops-restart window); the runbooks
 are extracted from that incident record.
 
 ### Health check — three states, one poll pattern
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ server-side:
 | idle | `state=idle` AND `progress` absent-or-stale across both polls | turn ended — read the LAST message (same `limit=1` fetch): task unfinished → wake prompt; `status=done` report → harvest |
 | **hung** | `state=generating` AND `progress.stepCount`/`lastStepAt` AND newest message id ALL frozen across both polls | the generation stream is dead; queued prompts will NEVER be consumed — rescue required |
 
-`state` alone lies in BOTH directions ([TT-3215]): a hung session still reports
+`state` alone lies in BOTH directions ([org-internal #3215]): a hung session still reports
 `generating` (field sample: session A, 2026-08-16 — `state=generating` for 6+
 minutes with the message count frozen at 478), and a healthy mid-step worker
 can read `idle`/empty message tails in a single snapshot (2026-08-23 W3 wave:
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ can read `idle`/empty message tails in a single snapshot (2026-08-23 W3 wave:
 discriminator; a single snapshot is NEVER an abort basis.**
 
 `progress` (`stepCount` cumulative LLM-round counter, `lastStepAt` epoch-ms
-heartbeat — [TT-3215]) moves on every round even when message tails are
+heartbeat — [org-internal #3215]) moves on every round even when message tails are
 transiently empty or `state` flickers; it is absent for sessions that never
 ran since instance start (treat absent = no signal, fall back to count
 deltas). `lastStepAt` freshness alone does NOT prove liveness (a long tool
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ claim authority it does not hold (field samples, 2026-08-16: a revived worker
 re-ran an M-01 verify another session had already published as FAIL —
 deduplicated via flag #comment-21590; an ops-notification session inherited an
 "orchestrator" identity from a compaction summary and announced a takeover —
-corrected via 勘误 #comment-21654/[TT-21668]).
+corrected via 勘误 #comment-21654/[org-internal #21668]).
 
 When you detect a stale-worldview session, do not wait for it to finish being
 wrong — inject a fact-baseline prompt immediately (regular `prompt_async`),

core/skills/headless-session-ops/reference/quota-wall-recovery.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 > Added from headless-session-ops/SKILL.md (triggers `quota wall` / `配额墙`,
 > Post-launch lifecycle section, pitfall #17, References) — new runbook
-> 2026-08-29, ticket [TT-3669] (evidence instance [TT-3627]). Companion runbooks:
+> 2026-08-29, ticket [org-internal #3669] (evidence instance [org-internal #3627]). Companion runbooks:
 > `lifecycle-ops.md` (hung rescue, fact-baseline structure) and
 > `completion-report.md` §"Orchestrator side" (the quota self-report clause);
 > §Prevention is this file's own closing section.
@@ -14,15 +14,15 @@ it looks EXACTLY like silent completion: no completion-report, no
 equals the orchestrator's polling interval, and without this runbook the
 recovery was improvised.
 
-**Evidence instance ([TT-3627], 2026-08-29)** — the shapes below are field-verified:
+**Evidence instance ([org-internal #3627], 2026-08-29)** — the shapes below are field-verified:
 
 |时刻 (+08)| 事件 |
 |---|---|
-| 08-29 13:18 | review-code Round-1 synthesis (FAIL) posted on [TT-3627]; worker session `ses_fb46e705bffe9kYbSoHayoJ1OQ` (builder, opencode-go model, branch `workflow/session/3627-wedge-promptasync`) entered its revision loop |
+| 08-29 13:18 | review-code Round-1 synthesis (FAIL) posted on [org-internal #3627]; worker session `ses_fb46e705bffe9kYbSoHayoJ1OQ` (builder, opencode-go model, branch `workflow/session/3627-wedge-promptasync`) entered its revision loop |
 | ~13:18–16:00 | worker hit the provider's `weekly usage limit reached` mid-revision — turn killed, **no** completion-report, **no** blocked report; issue side silent |
-| detection | orchestrator noticed the `/session` state stall, then confirmed via the quota error in the session log (message tail carries the ⚠️ usage-limit part, [TT-2912]) |
+| detection | orchestrator noticed the `/session` state stall, then confirmed via the quota error in the session log (message tail carries the ⚠️ usage-limit part, [org-internal #2912]) |
 | recovery | re-wake via `prompt_async` on a known-good provider (`zhipuai-coding-plan`/glm-5.3 — since renamed `zai-coding-plan`) **plus a fact-baseline injection** (what happened / what is done / where to resume) |
-| 16:26 / 16:51 | Round-2 synthesis PASS; `status=done pr=[TT-3675]` report received |
+| 16:26 / 16:51 | Round-2 synthesis PASS; `status=done pr=[org-internal #3675]` report received |
 
 ## Detection — three signals, in this order
 
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ SID=<worker session id>
 ```
 
 **Signal 1 — tail probe (primary; survives restarts, lives in the DB).** Since
-[TT-2912]/[TT-3190] a quota-killed turn persists an assistant message with
+[org-internal #2912]/[org-internal #3190] a quota-killed turn persists an assistant message with
 `finish=error` plus a human-readable ⚠️ text part whose metadata names the
 quota family. Probe the TAIL (`limit=1`, never the no-`limit` full transcript):
 
@@ -52,10 +52,10 @@ rate_limit}` (metadata also carries `provider`). The ⚠️ text is one of — a
 strings observed in this repo's runtime (`session/retry.ts`):
 
 - `` `weekly usage limit` reached. It will reset in … `` / `Go limit reached`
-  (GoUsageLimitError — the [TT-3627] shape; `weekly` is the body's `limitName`)
+  (GoUsageLimitError — the [org-internal #3627] shape; `weekly` is the body's `limitName`)
 - `Free limit reached` (FreeUsageLimitError)
 - `Account-level usage limit — switching API keys does not reset it. You can
-  continue after HH:mm.` ([TT-3407], zhipu/zai code 1308 — account-level)
+  continue after HH:mm.` ([org-internal #3407], zhipu/zai code 1308 — account-level)
 - `Provider <id> rate limited (HTTP 429)` (generic 429)
 - `Generation failed — …` with a 402 `insufficient_quota` body (balance, not
   window — recovery is top-up, not provider switch)
@@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ curl -s "$BASE/session?directory=$DIR" | jq -r --arg s "$SID" \
   30–60 s apart → the 429 retry spin is still running (it retries with backoff
   until the schedule ends) OR the stream is hung — treat exactly like the hung
   shape in `lifecycle-ops.md`: abort FIRST, then re-wake. A single snapshot is
-  never an abort basis ([TT-3215]).
+  never an abort basis ([org-internal #3215]).
 
-**Signal 3 — provider-level confirmation ([TT-2911] quota markers).** `GET
+**Signal 3 — provider-level confirmation ([org-internal #2911] quota markers).** `GET
 /provider` overlays active usage-limit cooldowns, so the dead provider is
 visible without reading logs:
 
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ date -d @$(($(curl -s "$BASE/provider?directory=$DIR" | jq '[.all[].quota.resetA
 ```
 
 **Log grep (fallback; the dev log is restart-truncated).** Patterns actually
-seen in the wild — [TT-3627] produced the first:
+seen in the wild — [org-internal #3627] produced the first:
 
 ```sh
 grep -E "usage limit reached|Go limit reached|Free limit reached|Account-level usage limit|GoUsageLimitError|FreeUsageLimitError|rate limited \(HTTP 429\)|insufficient_quota" \
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ grep -E "usage limit reached|Go limit reached|Free limit reached|Account-level u
 ```
 
 The wall is only terminal after failover has exhausted the same-name pools
-([TT-2911] failover); the `retrying … on …` WARNs above tell you the pool was
+([org-internal #2911] failover); the `retrying … on …` WARNs above tell you the pool was
 already draining before it died.
 
 ## Recovery — abort (only if needed), re-wake on a known-good provider, inject facts
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ curl -s "$BASE/provider?directory=$DIR" | jq -r \
 # own current model — it is generating by definition).
 ```
 
-([TT-3627]: opencode-go dead → re-woken on zhipuai-coding-plan/glm-5.3, since
+([org-internal #3627]: opencode-go dead → re-woken on zhipuai-coding-plan/glm-5.3, since
 renamed `zai-coding-plan`. Do NOT "wait for reset" as the default — weekly
 windows mean days.)
 
@@ -159,9 +159,9 @@ curl -s "$BASE/provider?directory=$DIR" | jq -r \
 **Step 3 — re-wake with a fact-baseline prompt.** Build the payload from a file
 (`jq --rawfile`, SKILL.md pitfall #7), same wake shape as
 `lifecycle-ops.md` but with the quota facts. The template also restates the
-completion-report protocol ([TT-2374]) so the recovery is self-contained: it
+completion-report protocol ([org-internal #2374]) so the recovery is self-contained: it
 assumes the original seed still contains the protocol block — if you are
-unsure it does (e.g. the worker was dispatched before [TT-3669] added the quota
+unsure it does (e.g. the worker was dispatched before [org-internal #3669] added the quota
 clause), the template's own block below carries it; fill
 `<BASE>`/`<LAUNCHER_SID>`/`<DIR>` with the orchestrator session's values:
 
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ cat > wake.txt <<'EOF'
 3. 从哪继续：<一件具体的下一步任务>。
 4. 证据规则：逐条到引用来源（issue 评论 / PR / 工件）核实后再行动，
    勿仅凭本基线行动。
-## 完成回报协议（重申 [TT-2374]/[TT-3669]；不确定原始 seed 是否含协议块时以本节为准）
+## 完成回报协议（重申 [org-internal #2374]/[org-internal #3669]；不确定原始 seed 是否含协议块时以本节为准）
 完成、阻塞或移交时，必须回报编排会话（你的唤醒者）：
   POST <BASE>/session/<LAUNCHER_SID>/prompt_async?directory=<DIR>
   body: {"agent":"builder","model":{...},"parts":[{"type":"text","text":"<report>"}]}
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ jq -n --rawfile p wake.txt '{agent:"builder",
 Then poll the tail (`limit=1`) until an assistant message appears, and keep
 expecting the completion-report per protocol — the re-woken worker owes you
 `status=done|blocked` like any other (the restated block in the template
-makes this hold even when the original seed predates [TT-3669]).
+makes this hold even when the original seed predates [org-internal #3669]).
 
 ## Prevention — before dispatch, and in the seed
 
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ If the intended provider is already quota-marked, dispatch on a different one
 
 **Quota self-report clause (turns a silent death into a harvestable
 blocked).** The canonical clause text lives in `completion-report.md`
-§"Orchestrator side" (配额自报, [TT-3669]) — append it VERBATIM to the seed
+§"Orchestrator side" (配额自报, [org-internal #3669]) — append it VERBATIM to the seed
 prompt's completion-report block. Single source of truth: do not fork or
 restate the clause here; its blocked payload already follows the one-line
 key=value spec (`status=blocked reason=quota-exhausted summary=<provider +

core/skills/headless-session-ops/reference/ticket-recipe.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Extracted from headless-session-ops/SKILL.md (Launch a session for a specific ticket (#N)) — moved verbatim 2026-08-26, ticket [TT-3480].
+> Extracted from headless-session-ops/SKILL.md (Launch a session for a specific ticket (#N)) — moved verbatim 2026-08-26, ticket [org-internal #3480].
 
 ## Launch a session for a specific ticket (#N)
 
@@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ work a tracked issue. Compose the seed prompt **from the issue itself** so the
 new session starts with real context, and launch it on **the current session's
 model**.
 
-0. **Owner check (MANDATORY pre-step, [TT-1803]).** Before creating anything,
+0. **Owner check (MANDATORY pre-step, [org-internal #1803]).** Before creating anything,
    verify no other live session already owns this ticket or code area —
-   duplicate ownership is how [TT-1744]/[TT-1753] collided. The check spans four
+   duplicate ownership is how [org-internal #1744]/[org-internal #1753] collided. The check spans four
    data sources; any live claim → **ABORT the launch and report the
    conflict**.
 
-   **Mechanized ([TT-3667])**: `bash script/session-conflicts.sh <N>` runs the
+   **Mechanized ([org-internal #3667])**: `bash script/session-conflicts.sh <N>` runs the
    session-title scan (a), the branch scan (d), and the open-PR check (c)
    in one read-only pass (exit 4 = conflict, `--json` for a machine
    summary); the assignee/claim check (b) is `claim.sh`'s compare-and-swap
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ model**.
    **a. Session-title scan (live session check).** The listing endpoint
    returns at most `limit` (default 100) sessions — on busy repos (300+ live
    sessions in one directory) that silently truncates and the scan misses
-   owners ([TT-3190]). Non-range listing responses carry `X-Total-Count` (full
+   owners ([org-internal #3190]). Non-range listing responses carry `X-Total-Count` (full
    filter population, untruncated) and `X-Has-More: true` (only when the
    page is truncated). Scan procedure: fetch page 1, and when
    `X-Has-More: true` is present re-fetch once with `limit=$TOTAL` — treat
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ model**.
      the launch and report the conflict** (issue comment naming the owning
      session id). Do not launch a second session for the same ticket.
 
-   **b. Assignee / claim check ([TT-2297]).** Read the issue via
+   **b. Assignee / claim check ([org-internal #2297]).** Read the issue via
    `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）get(owner, repo, index: N)` (or `GET /api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/issues/$N`):
    - If `assignee` is set and is **not** the launching agent → **ABORT** and
      report (the ticket is already claimed).
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ model**.
    `GET <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/issues/search?q="#N"&type=pulls&state=open`
    (API source) — and **ABORT** if an open PR already covers the ticket.
 
-   **d. Remote branch check ([TT-2297]).** A local branch is invisible to other
+   **d. Remote branch check ([org-internal #2297]).** A local branch is invisible to other
    sessions — check the remote too:
    `git ls-remote origin 'workflow/*'` and scan for a branch tail covering `#N`.
    Also check the repo side locally: `git worktree list` +
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ model**.
 
    - A stale hit (session idle for hours / clearly abandoned) → do NOT
      hand-post a takeover comment (retired admin workaround — unauditable);
-     dead-claim takeover is mechanized ([TT-3668]): `bash script/claim.sh
+     dead-claim takeover is mechanized ([org-internal #3668]): `bash script/claim.sh
      takeover <ticket> <branch> --session-id <id>`. It enforces the
      evidence gate (branch ABSENT on origin AND (session 404 OR comment at
      least CLAIM_TAKEOVER_STALE_DAYS old)) and exits 10 when the evidence
@@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ model**.
      §"Dead-claim takeover" (claim.sh header is normative).
      The runtime counterpart of this check is `core/rules/session-scope-guard.md`
      ("One task, one owner"), injected into every session's prompt.
-   - **Backend hard guard ([TT-1989]):** `POST /session` hard-rejects duplicate-ticket
-     session creation with HTTP 400. The backend guard is **on by default ([TT-2350])**;
+   - **Backend hard guard ([org-internal #1989]):** `POST /session` hard-rejects duplicate-ticket
+     session creation with HTTP 400. The backend guard is **on by default ([org-internal #2350])**;
      set `enabled: false` in config to opt out. It fails open ONLY on defect
      paths (DB / config errors), never as a configured disable. The front-end
      soft check above is now backed by this backend hard check for defense in
      depth.
-   - **Claim-first ([TT-2297]).** Claiming a ticket is one atomic 3-step action:
+   - **Claim-first ([org-internal #2297]).** Claiming a ticket is one atomic 3-step action:
      (1) set the issue assignee to the working account, (2) post a claim comment
      naming the workflow branch and session id, (3) push the workflow branch to
      remote (`git push -u origin workflow/...`). The claim is valid ONLY when all
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ model**.
      session until all three steps are done (see
      `core/rules/session-scope-guard.md` §"Claim-first"). If a collision HAS
      already happened, follow `rules/ownership-collision-runbook` (wiki, L2 on-demand).
-   - **Provisioning after claim ([TT-3642]) is ONE command** — claim + worktree +
+   - **Provisioning after claim ([org-internal #3642]) is ONE command** — claim + worktree +
      Tier-1 runs scaffold:
      `bash script/claim-provision.sh <N> workflow/<branch>` (runs claim.sh with
      exit codes passed through, attaches the session worktree to the claimed
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ model**.
    - restate the **goal** in one sentence;
    - list the **constraints** and **acceptance criteria**;
    - cite every **wiki artifact path** / related issue referenced in the body
-     (e.g. `{epic-slug}/dag`, `{epic-slug}/dag-nodes/{node-id}`, `[TT-1691]`);
+     (e.g. `{epic-slug}/dag`, `{epic-slug}/dag-nodes/{node-id}`, `[org-internal #1691]`);
    - tell the new agent to follow the right pipeline skill for the work type
      (implement / bugfix / design / …).
      Write it to a file (handles newlines):
@@ -141,16 +141,16 @@ your change — classify (pre-existing/flaky), file a BF/FT issue per
 core/rules/session-scope-guard.md, and continue this task. Do NOT fix
 unrelated failing tests in place.
 
-## 完成回报协议 (mandatory, [TT-2374])
+## 完成回报协议 (mandatory, [org-internal #2374])
 
 完成、阻塞、或移交时，向编排会话回报：
   POST <BASE>/session/<LAUNCHER_SID>/prompt_async?directory=<DIR>
-  （编排目录未知时可用全局路由 POST <BASE>/prompt_async，body 携 sessionID，[TT-4307]）
+  （编排目录未知时可用全局路由 POST <BASE>/prompt_async，body 携 sessionID，[org-internal #4307]）
   body: {"agent":"builder","model":{...},"parts":[{"type":"text","text":"<report>"}]}
 <report>: [#N] [<node-or-slug>] status=done|blocked|handoff branch=<ref> [pr=#<PR>] verify=<changed+typecheck> risk=<high|low> summary=<one line>
 约束：worker 只推分支不开 PR（PR 由编排串行开）；交付推送前 test:changed+typecheck 须绿。若再遇配额/用量上限错误，立即回报 status=blocked reason=quota-exhausted summary=<provider 与重置提示>（branch=<ref> 必带）后停止，勿自行换模型重试。
 回报失败（非 2xx / 连接拒绝）→ 在本 issue（或父 Epic）发同内容评论兜底。
-决策边界（[TT-2378]）：遇方向性决策点 → status=blocked 回报，勿调 question。
+决策边界（[org-internal #2378]）：遇方向性决策点 → status=blocked 回报，勿调 question。
 EOF
    ```
 
@@ -179,4 +179,4 @@ EOF
 
 6. **Add the completion-report block to the seed prompt** (see next section) so
    the worker reports back when it finishes or blocks — without it, this
-   orchestrator has no push channel and must poll forever ([TT-2374]).
+   orchestrator has no push channel and must poll forever ([org-internal #2374]).

core/skills/implement/SKILL.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ description: >
   self-checks against the relevant checklist before handing off to code
   review.
 # `stage` is intentionally omitted: `implement` is a production-phase name the
-# stage registry rules invalid post-[TT-3072] phase 3 (see
+# stage registry rules invalid post-[org-internal #3072] phase 3 (see
 # core/schemas/workflow-routing.schema.json stage enum — production-phase
 # names are "no longer valid anywhere"). The implement skill has no registry
   # gate id; the gates it feeds into are `review-code` and `verify`.
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ In **pipeline mode** (work item from iteration plan), follow the standard precon
 
 **On-demand references**: each mode's phase-by-phase detail (templates, prompts, orchestration flows, historical notes) lives in `reference/{mode}-mode.md`, NOT injected — read it at mode entry. Full read-timing table: References section.
 
-> **Progressive disclosure ([TT-3734])**: when dispatching a Developer scoped to
+> **Progressive disclosure ([org-internal #3734])**: when dispatching a Developer scoped to
 > one mode, pass `skills: ["implement:mode-bugfix"]` (preamble + that
 > mode's workflow only) instead of the full body; pipeline-mode dispatches
 > should also carry `pipeline-detection`
@@ -97,12 +97,12 @@ The Developer is responsible for:
 - Writing code that faithfully implements the design.
 - Running typecheck, lint, and tests to self-verify.
 - Self-checking against the relevant checklist before handoff.
-- Persisting the final report to disk before returning — worker-report persistence ([TT-2847], see `../_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`).
+- Persisting the final report to disk before returning — worker-report persistence ([org-internal #2847], see `../_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`).
 - Writing no more and no less than the work item scope — no opportunistic refactoring of unrelated code.
 
 The Builder's role is to validate the implementation output and pass it to code review. The Builder MUST NOT write or revise implementation code.
 
-### Pre-flight checklist injection ([TT-2599])
+### Pre-flight checklist injection ([org-internal #2599])
 
 Before dispatching ANY Developer (or Tester) sub-agent — in every mode (implement / bugfix / refactor / port; pipeline or standalone) — the orchestrator resolves the ticket's route (the Process Assessment Gate Step 0 already resolves the Kind/* route) and reads `<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `routes.{Kind}.preflight`. When the list is non-empty, prepend it to the sub-agent's task prompt as:
 
@@ -127,6 +127,20 @@ Rules:
 
 Each execution mode below defines its own Tester focus and any mode-specific orchestration overrides.
 
+**Producer test preflight** (before writing any test):
+
+1. **No absolute-path targets outside the test's own fixture/instance dir** — target fixtures or instance-relative paths instead. Where behavior is
+   platform-dependent (path resolution differs Windows/Linux), assert the
+   platform-specific expectation explicitly; a platform mismatch must fail,
+   never pass by accident.
+2. **Polling/wait-for loops must be bounded AND non-vacuous** — bound the
+   loop AND assert the body executed at least once (e.g. an iteration
+   counter asserted after the loop), so a timeout-cut never yields a false
+   green.
+
+Anchor: CI job 112302 (PR [org-internal #6409] first head red — nonexistent absolute path
+drill + 15s-bound vacuous loop).
+
 ## Greenfield vs. Brownfield
 
 **Greenfield** (new project): Create new files following the design. Project conventions are defined by the design document.
@@ -162,7 +176,7 @@ Standard workflow for work items from an approved iteration plan. Full phase det
 >
 > At Phase 6 handoff, pass `mode: "dag-task"` to review-code (its DAG Task Mode keys off the same frozen-DAG-copy detection).
 
-> **Legacy pipeline preconditions retired ([TT-3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: tiered artifact-existence and review-convergence checks belonged to the archived legacy pipeline. Live input modes: DAG task mode (above) and standalone modes (the request itself is the spec). Historical tiered publish targets: `reference/implement-mode.md` § Legacy notes.
+> **Legacy pipeline preconditions retired ([org-internal #3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: tiered artifact-existence and review-convergence checks belonged to the archived legacy pipeline. Live input modes: DAG task mode (above) and standalone modes (the request itself is the spec). Historical tiered publish targets: `reference/implement-mode.md` § Legacy notes.
 
 Before starting implementation, confirm:
 
@@ -186,13 +200,13 @@ Every gate below is hard — agents rationalize skipping exactly these. Full det
 4. **Phase 4 — Self-Check** (all mandatory):
    1. `bun typecheck` (or project-equivalent) — zero errors.
    2. `bun oxlint --deny-warnings` (repo root — the review-code mechanical gate's canonical lint invocation; `bun lint` is the package-script alias) — zero errors.
-   3. `bun run test:changed` (or project-equivalent; full suite `bun run test:parallel` is verify's job, not a per-revision gate, [TT-2598]) — all tests pass.
+   3. `bun run test:changed` (or project-equivalent; full suite `bun run test:parallel` is verify's job, not a per-revision gate, [org-internal #2598]) — all tests pass.
    4. Post-deletion cleanup (when any code was removed): re-run lint + typecheck to catch orphaned imports/variables/type references.
    Then self-check `core/checklists/implementation.md`; every new function/method/exported API has ≥ 1 test; interface promises cross-checked against the node's edge contracts. **Review-readiness GATE**: self-attest `core/checklists/code-review.md` (COR, DGN, SEC, PERF, TST, STY, DBT, A11Y, DOC, TRC), record pass/fail per dimension in the Phase 5 report; handoff requires **0 BLOCKERs and 0 MAJORs** — if you can find a MAJOR, the formal review will too; fix it now.
 5. **Phase 4.5 — Iteration Completion Commit**: after ALL work items in the iteration pass Phase 4, commit with format `[{chunk-id}][{iteration}] {summary}`; commit body REQUIRED for non-trivial commits (> 1 file or > 20 LOC): What (files + purpose + the `WI-{NNN}` ID — code-review TRC 10.1), Why (design/REQ motivation), Evidence (test names / verification commands). Full rules: `reference/implement-mode.md` § Phase 4.5.
 6. **Phase 4.6 — Issue Checklist Sync (progressive)**: after committing, mark items this iteration delivered `- [x]` + `_(commit {sha}: file/component)_` per the `issue-checklist-sync` L1 rule; do NOT touch items outside this iteration's scope.
-7. **Phase 4.7 — PR-Creation Sync**: the session pushes its branch and reports `status=done branch=<ref> verify=… risk=…` — the orchestrator opens the PR (serially per TD-678/[TT-4425]) and applies the `Risk/*` label from the report's `risk=` hint, computed per the risk-classifier frozen table (`HIGH_RISK_GLOBS` in `.gitea/scripts/risk-classifier.ts`: core/migrations/deploy/`core/rules/**`/`.gitea/workflows/**` → `Risk/High`, else `Risk/Low`); `Risk/High` PRs merge manually by design. Once the PR exists, ensure `## 当前状态` exists (PR / 代码评审 / CI rows are written by the `status-sync` poller, NOT by hand); append the PR reference to the matching Epic task-list row. **Never hand-sync main into the PR branch** — that is the keep-mergeable workflow's job. Detail: `reference/implement-mode.md` § Phase 4.6 / § Phase 4.7.
-8. **Phase 5 — Report**: implementation report with AC → test traceability (template: `reference/implement-mode.md` § Phase 5). **Persist before returning ([TT-2847])** — the Developer's LAST action before returning the report: write it to `<runs-root>/{slug}/workers/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md` (Tier 1 run workspace) else `/tmp/octopus/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md` (`../_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`). The persisted copy is the report of record — applies to EVERY mode's report phase.
+7. **Phase 4.7 — PR-Creation Sync**: the session pushes its branch and reports `status=done branch=<ref> verify=… risk=…` — the orchestrator opens the PR (serially per TD-678/[org-internal #4425]) and applies the `Risk/*` label from the report's `risk=` hint, computed per the risk-classifier frozen table (`HIGH_RISK_GLOBS` in `.gitea/scripts/risk-classifier.ts`: core/migrations/deploy/`core/rules/**`/`.gitea/workflows/**` → `Risk/High`, else `Risk/Low`); `Risk/High` PRs merge manually by design. Once the PR exists, ensure `## 当前状态` exists (PR / 代码评审 / CI rows are written by the `status-sync` poller, NOT by hand); append the PR reference to the matching Epic task-list row. **Never hand-sync main into the PR branch** — that is the keep-mergeable workflow's job. Detail: `reference/implement-mode.md` § Phase 4.6 / § Phase 4.7.
+8. **Phase 5 — Report**: implementation report with AC → test traceability (template: `reference/implement-mode.md` § Phase 5). **Persist before returning ([org-internal #2847])** — the Developer's LAST action before returning the report: write it to `<runs-root>/{slug}/workers/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md` (Tier 1 run workspace) else `/tmp/octopus/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md` (`../_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`). The persisted copy is the report of record — applies to EVERY mode's report phase.
 9. **Phase 6 — Handoff to Code Review**: present the report; signal readiness via `signal_stage_done`. Do NOT mark the work item complete until code review passes.
 
 #### Tester focus & Common Rationalizations
@@ -216,7 +230,7 @@ The regression test MUST fail before the fix — the Tester dispatches between P
 2. **Phase 2 — Isolate Root Cause**: trace symptom → proximate cause → root cause (RCA template: `reference/bugfix-mode.md` § Phase 2); fixing a symptom → stop, go deeper; not found after 3 levels of indirection → pause and report, no surface-level patch. Then evaluate routing (below).
 3. **Phase 3 — Write a Regression Test**: exercise the exact bug path with the failing inputs; it MUST fail with the bug's symptom NOW, before the fix (already passing → the test does not cover the bug, rewrite it; no failing test possible → most targeted test, marked `[flaky]`).
 4. **Phase 4 — Fix**: minimum change resolving the root cause; one conceptual change per fix — no bundled refactoring, style changes, or "while I'm here" improvements (root cause in a different file → fix it there). Run the regression test (MUST pass) + relevant unit tests.
-5. **Phase 5 — Self-Check & Report**: `bun typecheck`; `bun oxlint --deny-warnings`; `bun run test:changed` (all pass; full suite belongs to verify); verify `core/checklists/bugfix.md`; publish the bugfix report as wiki page `{slug}/bugfix-report` (template: `reference/bugfix-mode.md` § Bugfix Report); persist per the Phase 5 persistence rule (Mode: implement, [TT-2847]).
+5. **Phase 5 — Self-Check & Report**: `bun typecheck`; `bun oxlint --deny-warnings`; `bun run test:changed` (all pass; full suite belongs to verify); verify `core/checklists/bugfix.md`; publish the bugfix report as wiki page `{slug}/bugfix-report` (template: `reference/bugfix-mode.md` § Bugfix Report); persist per the Phase 5 persistence rule (Mode: implement, [org-internal #2847]).
 6. **Phase 5.5 — Issue Checklist Sync (standalone bugfix)**: sync the source issue at each transition (commit / PR / review / CI / close) per the `issue-checklist-sync` L1 rule and its standalone-flow table.
 7. **Phase 6 — Approval**: present the report (prompt: `reference/bugfix-mode.md` § Phase 6 — Approval).
 
@@ -224,14 +238,14 @@ The regression test MUST fail before the fix — the Tester dispatches between P
 
 Full escalate/stay criteria: `reference/bugfix-mode.md` § Routing Decision. In short — **escalate to pipeline** on ANY of: ≥ 5 files · ≥ 2 modules/components · design-level root cause · data migration / schema change · public-API / contract change · dependency change · > 50 lines · user requests full-process; **stay standalone** only when ALL the opposites hold. If uncertain, escalate — a false escalation costs review rounds; a false standalone decision skips quality gates.
 
-**Big-bug relabel rule ([TT-3061])** — before the generic escalation above, split the triggers by kind:
+**Big-bug relabel rule ([org-internal #3061])** — before the generic escalation above, split the triggers by kind:
 
 - **Design-level triggers** (root cause is a design decision — protocol / schema / architecture; shared-contract or public-API change; data migration): do NOT push through bugfix — **relabel the ticket `Kind/Feature`** and reroute via Step 0 (DAG route; 1–3 node small DAG expected); repro + root-cause notes become node input.
 - **Mechanical size triggers only** (many files / lines, same design): stay in bugfix — batch into iterations, keep review-code + verify. Scale alone never justifies a relabel.
 
 #### Pipeline Mode (bugfix)
 
-> **Legacy path retired ([TT-3072] phase 3)**: the requirements → design → review → plan front-end was archived; a big bug needing a design-level decision relabels `Kind/Feature` into the DAG route (big-bug relabel rule above).
+> **Legacy path retired ([org-internal #3072] phase 3)**: the requirements → design → review → plan front-end was archived; a big bug needing a design-level decision relabels `Kind/Feature` into the DAG route (big-bug relabel rule above).
 
 When a bugfix escalates beyond standalone scope, the bug report becomes a pipeline input; the bugfix phases (reproduce, root cause, regression test, fix) are embedded within the implement stage, and review-code + verify remain mandatory. On the DAG route the node spec lives in `{epic-slug}/dag`; the Developer follows bugfix Phases 1–6 as the implementation method, then produces the standard implementation report (Mode: implement, Phase 5).
 
@@ -259,7 +273,7 @@ Restructure existing code without changing observable behavior — the existing
 1. **Phase 1 — Scope & Baseline**: map exact files + dependents; run `bun run test:parallel` (the refactor baseline legitimately needs the full suite) — ANY pre-existing failure → stop ("Cannot begin refactoring with failing tests. Fix them first."). Capture baseline: test count, coverage, optional complexity (template: `reference/refactor-mode.md` § Baseline).
 2. **Phase 2 — Define Target Pattern**: Extract / Inline / Rename / Move / Replace / Simplify / Upgrade, with one-sentence goal + success criteria (all tests pass unchanged; structural goal met; coverage does not decrease). Pipeline mode: align with the node spec + contracts, or justify in the report.
 3. **Phase 3 — Decompose into Steps**: smallest individually-verifiable steps (each reversible, suite-passing, ONE conceptual transformation); present the plan before executing (user may approve / reorder / reject). **If > 10 steps, the scope is too large — split into multiple sessions.**
-4. **Phase 4 — Incremental Execution**: per step — transform, run `bun run test:changed` (ALL pass; per-step scoped reruns — full suite is verify's job, [TT-2598]), commit `refactor: {what} from {where}`. **If FAIL: revert immediately** — do NOT fix the test or code within the same step; find a smaller decomposition (exception: fix a flaky test first as a prerequisite step, then retry).
+4. **Phase 4 — Incremental Execution**: per step — transform, run `bun run test:changed` (ALL pass; per-step scoped reruns — full suite is verify's job, [org-internal #2598]), commit `refactor: {what} from {where}`. **If FAIL: revert immediately** — do NOT fix the test or code within the same step; find a smaller decomposition (exception: fix a flaky test first as a prerequisite step, then retry).
 5. **Phase 5 — Final Validation**: `bun run test:parallel` all pass; `bun typecheck` zero errors; `bun oxlint --deny-warnings` zero errors; coverage MUST NOT decrease vs baseline (±1% noise).
 6. **Phase 6 — Report**: before/after metrics, steps executed, verification results, design deviations (template: `reference/refactor-mode.md` § Refactor Report).
 7. **Phase 7 — Approval**: present the report (prompt: `reference/refactor-mode.md` § Phase 7 — Approval). Route to code review if > 50 lines or ≥ 5 files.
@@ -336,7 +350,7 @@ Not all work items involve writing new code — some are refactoring, bugfix, or
 - `core/skills/browser-debug/SKILL.md` — Interactive browser verification (for frontend work items) and UI bug reproduction (bugfix Phase 1)
 - `core/skills/review-code/SKILL.md` — Code review (next step after implementation)
 - `core/skills/verify/SKILL.md` — Integration + fidelity verification (pipeline-mode bugfix, large port)
-- `<instance-root>/archive/skills/` — Legacy requirements/design/plan/roadmap skills (archived [TT-3072] phase 3; their templates moved to `<instance-root>/archive/templates/`)
+- `<instance-root>/archive/skills/` — Legacy requirements/design/plan/roadmap skills (archived [org-internal #3072] phase 3; their templates moved to `<instance-root>/archive/templates/`)
 - `reference/source-analysis.md` — Port Phase A1, A1.5, A1.7, A1.8 detailed processes & templates
 - `reference/mapping-and-design.md` — Port Phase A2, A3, A4 detailed processes & templates
 - `reference/large-port-pipeline.md` — Port Phase B1–B4 detailed processes

core/skills/implement/reference/bugfix-mode.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Mode: bugfix) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [TT-3381].
+> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Mode: bugfix) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [org-internal #3381].
 
 ### Mode: bugfix
 
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ If the Developer is uncertain, escalate. A false pipeline escalation costs a few
 extra review rounds. A false standalone decision risks missing a quality gate on
 a complex change.
 
-**Big-bug relabel rule ([TT-3061])** — before the generic escalation below, split
+**Big-bug relabel rule ([org-internal #3061])** — before the generic escalation below, split
 the triggers by kind:
 
 - **Design-level triggers** (root cause is a design decision — protocol /
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ resolves it by permitting triage but forbidding deferral.
 
 #### Pipeline Mode (bugfix)
 
-> **Legacy path retired ([TT-3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: the full
+> **Legacy path retired ([org-internal #3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: the full
 > requirements-elicitation → design → review-artifact(design-space) →
 > plan-iterations → review-artifact(plan) front-end was archived
 > (`<instance-root>/archive/skills/`). A big bug that needs a design-level decision

core/skills/implement/reference/implement-mode.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Mode: implement) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [TT-3381].
+> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Mode: implement) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [org-internal #3381].
 
 ### Mode: implement (default)
 
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ and self-verify before passing to code review.
 
 #### Pre-flight
 
-The pre-flight self-check prompt format ([TT-2599]), prepended to the Developer
+The pre-flight self-check prompt format ([org-internal #2599]), prepended to the Developer
 sub-agent's task prompt when `routes.{Kind}.preflight` is non-empty:
 
 ```
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Developer is structurally biased to miss.
 
 #### Preconditions
 
-> **Publish target (tiered targeting retired, [TT-3072] phase 3)**: the
+> **Publish target (tiered targeting retired, [org-internal #3072] phase 3)**: the
 > `Size/*`-tiered publish rule (`rules/workflow-routing.md` §"Publish target
 > by Size/* tier — RETIRED") was retired with the legacy producer skills.
 > Artifacts publish where the live mode puts them: DAG task mode → node spec
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ Developer is structurally biased to miss.
 
 Before starting implementation, confirm:
 
-> **Legacy pipeline preconditions retired ([TT-3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: the
+> **Legacy pipeline preconditions retired ([org-internal #3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: the
 > tier-dependent requirements/design/plan artifact-existence checks and the
 > design-space / iteration-plan review-convergence checks that used to head
 > this list belonged to the archived legacy pipeline (`<instance-root>/archive/`).
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ the work-item list from the frozen DAG copy: the ready/pending task nodes in
 `{epic-slug}/dag` (via `wiki 读写 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）`), cross-checked against the
 node tickets on the Epic's `## DAG 状态` table. (Legacy tier-based resolution
 via `{slug}/04-plan-04-iteration-assignment` was archived 2026-08-21,
-[TT-3072] phase 3.) Present the current ready nodes for selection:
+[org-internal #3072] phase 3.) Present the current ready nodes for selection:
 
 ```
 Current iteration: Iteration {N}: {Goal}
@@ -179,10 +179,6 @@ Available work items:
 
 #### Phase 1 — Parse Context
 
-> **Pipeline stage**: if the source issue exists, move it to the `implement`
-> column on the Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`
-> Pattern 7.5. Skip if no source issue exists.
-
 Read the upstream artifacts to build a complete implementation context.
 Resolve inputs per the DAG-route read map (Preconditions above); standalone
 modes read the request/bug report instead:
@@ -346,7 +342,7 @@ a one-pass implementation into a multi-round review.
 | "Design is ambiguous here, I'll pick the obvious option" | Inventing a design decision is a Phase 2 abort condition. Flag the gap; do not guess. |
 | "Already manually verified it works" | Manual ≠ systematic — no record, can't re-run, can't bisect. `bun run test:changed` is the evidence the report demands. |
 | "Report is busywork, the diff speaks for itself" | No report → review-code cannot trace AC→test. Phase 5 is the handoff contract; skip it and the review stalls. |
-| "X× improvement — assumed, no measurement" | Quick-measure before it becomes an AC. Unverified assumptions in ACs waste framing cost ([TT-1932]: YAML token density assumed 2-3×, measured 0.95 — hypothesis rejected by data). |
+| "X× improvement — assumed, no measurement" | Quick-measure before it becomes an AC. Unverified assumptions in ACs waste framing cost ([org-internal #1932]: YAML token density assumed 2-3×, measured 0.95 — hypothesis rejected by data). |
 
 ---
 
@@ -463,14 +459,14 @@ waiting for the final verify gate.
 
 The session pushes its branch and reports `status=done branch=<ref> verify=…
 risk=…`; the orchestrator admits the PR (serially, one open at a time) —
-workers never open PRs (TD-678/[TT-4425]; `uncoordinated` self-open only when
+workers never open PRs (TD-678/[org-internal #4425]; `uncoordinated` self-open only when
 the orchestrator is unreachable). Once that PR exists, update the source
 issue so stakeholders see the mergeable state without waiting for code
 review. Mandated by the `issue-checklist-sync` L1 rule; skip if no source
 issue exists.
 
 > PR shape per mode: default = one 1:1 PR per task (body carries the worker
-> report); batch-mode epics ([TT-3731], per-epic opt-in) = the orchestrator
+> report); batch-mode epics ([org-internal #3731], per-epic opt-in) = the orchestrator
 > composes ONE batch PR per iteration via the `land-batch` skill. This phase
 > then runs per member issue as usual (N times), each pointing at its PR
 > (batch: the single batch PR); the poller writes the PR/CI/review rows
@@ -499,11 +495,6 @@ issue exists.
    retired — each one re-triggered the full CI surface for near-zero re-tested
    risk.
 
-> **Kanban column lifecycle**: automated (`POST <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues` → Backlog,
-> `POST .../pulls` → Review; no manual moves). Single shared reference:
-> `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5; column semantics: wiki
-> `kanban-lifecycle`.
-
 ---
 
 #### Phase 5 — Report
@@ -549,7 +540,7 @@ Produce an implementation report:
 **Handoff**: Ready for `core/skills/review-code/SKILL.md`
 ```
 
-**Persist before returning ([TT-2847])**: the Developer MUST write the final
+**Persist before returning ([org-internal #2847])**: the Developer MUST write the final
 report above to disk as its LAST action, BEFORE returning it —
 `<runs-root>/{slug}/workers/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md` when the Tier 1
 run workspace exists, else `/tmp/octopus/{chunk-id}-worker-{seq}.md`
@@ -582,7 +573,7 @@ To notify workflow completion, call the `signal_stage_done` tool.
 
 #### Legacy notes
 
-> **Publish target (tiered targeting retired, [TT-3072] phase 3)**: the
+> **Publish target (tiered targeting retired, [org-internal #3072] phase 3)**: the
 > `Size/*`-tiered publish rule (`rules/workflow-routing.md` §"Publish target
 > by Size/* tier — RETIRED") was retired with the legacy producer skills.
 > Artifacts publish where the live mode puts them: DAG task mode → node spec

core/skills/implement/reference/large-port-pipeline.md

@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ analysis:
 
 ## Phase B3 — Handoff to DAG Decomposition
 
-> Legacy note ([TT-3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21): this handoff used to target the
+> Legacy note ([org-internal #3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21): this handoff used to target the
 > archived `roadmap` skill; it now targets `analyze-dag`.
 
 Present the source analysis and request task-DAG decomposition:
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ core/skills/implement/SKILL.md
 
 (The legacy per-chunk `requirements-elicitation` → `design` →
 `review-artifact(design-space)` → `plan-iterations` → `review-artifact(plan)`
-front-end was archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3 — `<instance-root>/archive/`.)
+front-end was archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3 — `<instance-root>/archive/`.)
 
 ### implement
 

core/skills/implement/reference/port-mode.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Mode: port) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [TT-3381].
+> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Mode: port) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [org-internal #3381].
 
 ### Mode: port
 
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ port (source analysis)
     → verify (integration + fidelity)
 ```
 
-> Legacy diagram (archived [TT-3072] phase 3): the former per-chunk pipeline ran
+> Legacy diagram (archived [org-internal #3072] phase 3): the former per-chunk pipeline ran
 > requirements-elicitation → design → review (target: design-space) →
 > plan-iterations → review (target: plan) → implement → review-code. Those
 > skills/targets are archived (`<instance-root>/archive/`); the live path is the
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ port (source analysis)
 | B1.5 | **GATE** — 10-dimensional peer review of source analysis | `reference/large-port-pipeline.md` |
 | B1.7+B1.8 | Target surface & capability boundary as formal artifacts for peer review | `reference/large-port-pipeline.md` |
 | B2 | Self-check source analysis against port checklist | `reference/large-port-pipeline.md` |
-| B3 | Handoff to analyze-dag — decompose by source module into DAG nodes (legacy: roadmap skill, archived [TT-3072] phase 3) | `reference/large-port-pipeline.md` |
+| B3 | Handoff to analyze-dag — decompose by source module into DAG nodes (legacy: roadmap skill, archived [org-internal #3072] phase 3) | `reference/large-port-pipeline.md` |
 | B4 | Per-node DAG task route: implement → review-code (the review-dag single gate replaces the legacy design-space + plan reviews at the Epic level) | `reference/large-port-pipeline.md` |
 | B5 | Verify — integration + fidelity, every `FID-*` traced to a passing test | `reference/fidelity-verification.md` |
 | B6 | **Final Approval** — consolidated port report | *(inline below)* |
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ Present source analysis summary and request task-DAG decomposition. The
 Builder routes to `core/skills/analyze-dag/SKILL.md` with slug
 `port-{name}` (nodes per source module; the source analysis supplies node
 ACs and edge contracts). (Legacy: this handed off to the archived `roadmap`
-skill — `<instance-root>/archive/skills/roadmap/`, [TT-3072] phase 3.) See
+skill — `<instance-root>/archive/skills/roadmap/`, [org-internal #3072] phase 3.) See
 `reference/large-port-pipeline.md` for the handoff format.
 
 ##### Phase B4 — Per-Node Pipeline

core/skills/implement/reference/refactor-mode.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Mode: refactor) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [TT-3381].
+> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Mode: refactor) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [org-internal #3381].
 
 ### Mode: refactor
 

core/skills/implement/reference/work-item-detection.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Pipeline Work Item Detection) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [TT-3381].
+> Extracted from implement/SKILL.md (Pipeline Work Item Detection) — moved verbatim 2026-08-25, ticket [org-internal #3381].
 
 ## Pipeline Work Item Detection
 

core/skills/land-batch/SKILL.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 name: land-batch
 description: >
   Use ONLY when the orchestrator lands the finished task branches of one DAG
-  iteration as a single batch PR ([TT-3731] batch-landing pilot). Composes
+  iteration as a single batch PR ([org-internal #3731] batch-landing pilot). Composes
   path-disjoint member branches via the deterministic batch-compose script,
   pre-validates locally, opens ONE PR for N tasks (one CI fan-out instead of
   N on the single-runner pool), pastes each member's review synthesis into
@@ -27,18 +27,18 @@ role: Producer
 (single writer at iteration close — the same role that already owns uniform
 merge/close). `workflow/batch/*` branches are NOT claim branches: no
 `claim.sh` interaction, no assignee; the orchestrator is the only composer.
-Pilot charter: the decision comment on [TT-3731] (scope, opt-in protocol, cap,
+Pilot charter: the decision comment on [org-internal #3731] (scope, opt-in protocol, cap,
 success criteria) — this skill implements that charter, not the epic's
 frozen DAG v1 (which covers only the merge-coordinator nodes N-01..04).
 
 ## Applicability: post-hoc composition only (topology B)
 
-Two batch shapes exist ([TT-3731] charter addendum, comment 39347):
+Two batch shapes exist ([org-internal #3731] charter addendum, comment 39347):
 
 - **Topology A — single-session mono-branch batch**: one session owns every
-  ticket from inception and writes them on ONE branch (instance: PR [TT-3861],
+  ticket from inception and writes them on ONE branch (instance: PR [org-internal #3861],
   audit-h1). Hand composition is natural there — do NOT force this skill on
-  it; record the outcome on [TT-3731] as a manual-batch datum instead.
+  it; record the outcome on [org-internal #3731] as a manual-batch datum instead.
 - **Topology B — parallel workers, post-hoc composition**: workers finish on
   SEPARATE branches at different times; the orchestrator composes at
   iteration close. This is the skill's ONLY applicability — cross-branch
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ Do NOT hand-merge, do NOT hand-sync main into the batch branch.
 
 Member issues auto-close via the English keywords; their `## 当前状态`
 PR/代码评审/CI rows fan out to EVERY close ref (status-sync poller Wide
-behavior — requires [TT-3867], merged 2026-08-31). `task done ≡ PR merged`
+behavior — requires [org-internal #3867], merged 2026-08-31). `task done ≡ PR merged`
 still holds, transitively
 through the batch PR; verify milestones fire unchanged.
 
@@ -189,15 +189,15 @@ through the batch PR; verify milestones fire unchanged.
 Any fallback preserves today's behavior — batch landing is an optimization,
 never a dependency.
 
-## Measurement (pilot duty — revised per [TT-3731] charter addendum 39347)
+## Measurement (pilot duty — revised per [org-internal #3731] charter addendum 39347)
 
 Per-iteration attribution only; the global 7-day ratio is trend context,
-never a pass/fail judge (same-window confounders: test-slim [TT-3855] /
-test-dedupe [TT-3854] / the pilot's own PRs). On the server,
+never a pass/fail judge (same-window confounders: test-slim [org-internal #3855] /
+test-dedupe [org-internal #3854] / the pilot's own PRs). On the server,
 `bun .gitea/scripts/ci-run-stats.ts --days 7 --json /tmp/<slug>-ci-stats.json`
 (the `--json` flag takes a filename — bare, it is a silent no-op; the human
 summary still prints). Same methodology as the checklist-merge-gate.yml
-2026-08-27 note. Record on [TT-3731]: (a) this batch iteration's per-workflow
+2026-08-27 note. Record on [org-internal #3731]: (a) this batch iteration's per-workflow
 trigger counts vs a historically similar 1:1 iteration, and (b) one
 fallback drill (construct a path-overlap group → exit-3 split executed).
 Baseline, trend only: 2026-08-31, 5,081 runs / TOTAL 2.75x single runner.

core/skills/project-kickoff/SKILL.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ description: >
   project scaffolding. Do not use for application-level configuration —
   this skill covers the octopus project lifecycle, not user application code.
 triggers:
-  # High-discrimination phrases only ([TT-4525]): bare "setup"/"init"/"配置" fire
+  # High-discrimination phrases only ([org-internal #4525]): bare "setup"/"init"/"配置" fire
   # on any configuration mention, and the skill gate folds the previous
   # assistant turn on approval turns — one stray "配置" in a reply re-fires
   # the gate every turn. Keep triggers to phrases that name THIS workflow;
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ This skill activates when the user's text matches any of the trigger keywords:
 - `project setup` — asking how to set up a project in octopus
 - `项目初始化` / `项目配置` — asking how to initialize or configure an octopus project (Chinese)
 
-Generic "setup"/"init"/"配置" mentions are deliberately NOT triggers ([TT-4525]): they collide with everyday configuration talk, and the hard skill gate folds the previous assistant turn into its match text on approval turns — a passing "或配置x: false" in a reply would re-fire the gate every turn. `/init` note: `/init` generates AGENTS.md via LLM; kickoff uses the managed template from `octopus setup` — the Builder distinguishes based on context.
+Generic "setup"/"init"/"配置" mentions are deliberately NOT triggers ([org-internal #4525]): they collide with everyday configuration talk, and the hard skill gate folds the previous assistant turn into its match text on approval turns — a passing "或配置x: false" in a reply would re-fire the gate every turn. `/init` note: `/init` generates AGENTS.md via LLM; kickoff uses the managed template from `octopus setup` — the Builder distinguishes based on context.
 
 Typical user intents include: encountering a readiness prompt at session start, wondering how to initialize a project, or wanting to understand the kickoff workflow steps.
 
@@ -74,14 +74,14 @@ The kickoff workflow runs in four automated steps:
    - [2/5] **Scaffold** — Creates the `<instance-root>/` skeleton (`core/skills/` directory + default `octopus.jsonc` template if absent); domain skills content arrives via the [5/5] overlay pull
    - [3/5] **Config stub + MCP wiring** — Writes the `mcp.codegraph` block into `octopus.jsonc`
    - [4/5] **Codegraph init** — Initializes and builds the per-project `.codegraph/` index
-   - [5/5] **Skills remote + overlay pull** — Opt-in semantics ([TT-4370]); branches by flags when no `overlay.remotes` entry is configured:
+   - [5/5] **Skills remote + overlay pull** — Opt-in semantics ([org-internal #4370]); branches by flags when no `overlay.remotes` entry is configured:
      - no flags (interactive run) — **safe default**: nothing is written; a remediation hint is printed (pass `--skills-remote`, or edit `overlay.remotes`), and the readiness skills item stays not-ready
      - `--yes` — legacy behavior kept: writes the default skills remote, then pulls domain skills content (`octopus skills pull` equivalent)
      - `--skills-remote <owner/repo>` (+ optional `--skills-remote-base-url <url>`) — writes the specified remote instead (ref `main`; base URL defaults to `<instance-base-url>`), then pulls from it
      - `overlay.remotes` already configured — the write is skipped (idempotent; an explicit `--skills-remote` is ignored with a warning)
 4. **Post-kickoff verification** — Run `octopus kickoff --check-only` again. After a `--yes` or `--skills-remote` run it reports all 5 items as ready; after a no-flag interactive run it reports 4 of 5 — the skills item stays not-ready until a remote is configured (`--skills-remote`, `--yes`, or a manual `overlay.remotes` edit + `octopus skills pull`).
 
-### First-ticket hint ([TT-3061])
+### First-ticket hint ([org-internal #3061])
 
 For a brand-new project still validating its concept, open the FIRST ticket as
 `Kind/MVP` — the interactive no-pipeline mode (decision log + debt register in

core/skills/release/SKILL.md

@@ -63,14 +63,14 @@ Run each check against the live project. Stop and report failures.
    - No new HIGH or CRITICAL CVEs block the release.
    - Pre-existing HIGH/CRITICAL CVEs do NOT block but **MUST be filed as
      tech-debt** before the release lands. File them in TWO TIERS (batching
-     rule, [TT-3846] — a single release audit once fanned out to 14 TDs → 14 PRs →
+     rule, [org-internal #3846] — a single release audit once fanned out to 14 TDs → 14 PRs →
      56-84 CI runs on a saturated runner pool): Tier A below is the general
      mechanical-change batching rule; Tier B and the escape hatch follow it.
 
 <a id="phase-1-tier-a"></a>
 ### Tier A — 通用机械变更并单规则 / Universal mechanical-change batching rule
 
-Origin [TT-3846] (audit-batch pilot, generalized in place): the rule covers ANY
+Origin [org-internal #3846] (audit-batch pilot, generalized in place): the rule covers ANY
 single-source fan-out of mechanical changes, not just dependency audits.
 Two source types today: (a) dependency bump audits; (b) docs 批量修订
 (batch docs revisions).
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Two source types today: (a) dependency bump audits; (b) docs 批量修订
   source are filed as ONE batch issue + ONE batch PR — never N×issue +
   N×PR. The batch body keeps one row per item (per-CVE / per-doc mapping),
   so per-item traceability is unchanged; work the batch as a single PR.
-- **(a) Dependency bump audits** (the [TT-3846] origin case): advisories whose
+- **(a) Dependency bump audits** (the [org-internal #3846] origin case): advisories whose
   remediation is a plain version bump (lockfile-only diff, no semver-major
   jump, no overrides/catalog surgery, no API or adapter fallout) are filed
   together via REST `POST .../issues` with
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Two source types today: (a) dependency bump audits; (b) docs 批量修订
   along the reported pairs (or land the overlapping member 1:1) and re-run
   per group; `4` merge conflict / `5` transport/git error → fall back to
   1:1 PRs for the whole batch.
-- **Preflight hedge ([TT-3846])**: run `bun install --dry-run` before opening
+- **Preflight hedge ([org-internal #3846])**: run `bun install --dry-run` before opening
   a dependency-batch PR — the resolver accepting the composed version set
   is a cheap pre-CI rejection of impossible bump combinations.
 
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ Write to root `CHANGELOG.md` (prepend section).
 > the goal is identical (turn the tag into downloadable assets).
 
 The CI publish pipeline (`.gitea/workflows/publish.yml`) was **retired by
-[TT-2003]** (138/138 historical runs cancelled; the pipeline sat unused for 35+
+[org-internal #2003]** (138/138 historical runs cancelled; the pipeline sat unused for 35+
 days). Releasing octopus is now a **manual local process**. All former CI
 steps live in repo scripts, runnable from a maintainer machine with the right
 credentials in the environment.
@@ -358,11 +358,11 @@ credentials in the environment.
 ### Notes
 
 - **Windows code-signing** is not provisioned (no Windows runner / Azure
-  Trusted Signing); the CLI ships unsigned, as before ([TT-252]).
+  Trusted Signing); the CLI ships unsigned, as before ([org-internal #252]).
 - **Rollback**: if a step fails mid-release, the draft release + tag can be
   deleted and re-run; every script above is idempotent or safely re-runnable.
 - If a future CI pipeline replaces this manual flow, update this section and
-  reference [TT-2003] for the retirement rationale.
+  reference [org-internal #2003] for the retirement rationale.
 
 ---
 

core/skills/retrospective/SKILL.md

@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ review findings not actionable upstream]`.
    archive-at-close; (b) the committed archive bundles
    `<runs-root>/archive/{slug}.json`, where per-review round counts are
    reconstructed from the documented `reviews/{stage}/round{N}/` layout in
-   `index.artifacts[].path` ([TT-2591] — the archive source is what makes M3
+   `index.artifacts[].path` ([org-internal #2591] — the archive source is what makes M3
    durable instead of structurally emptying as runs close). Available once
    any run has closed.
    - Rework fraction: 🟢 <15% / 🟡 15–30% / 🔴 >30%.
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ or upstream design unclear]`.
    - 🟢 cache_read/input > 10:1 / 🟡 3–10:1 / 🔴 < 3:1.
    - < 3:1 → `[SIGNAL: cache hit <3:1 — context re-read, code-graph-first
 not followed]`.
-   - **Compact frequency ([TT-2601] pilot data)**: report the token-telemetry
+   - **Compact frequency ([org-internal #2601] pilot data)**: report the token-telemetry
      "Compactor Activity" line (compactor messages/tokens in window) and the
      zero-compact share of short runs (bugfix / DAG task) — the capacity-driven compaction
      pilot metrics. A rising zero-compact share with NO late-stage
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ not followed]`.
    - < 1:1 → `[SIGNAL: explore/execute <1:1 — workers doing explorers' job,
 exploration skipped or under-delegated]`.
 
-### 2.8 Gate defect-escape analysis (single metric, [TT-3061])
+### 2.8 Gate defect-escape analysis (single metric, [org-internal #3061])
 
 Gates earn their cost by what they CATCH, and the honest test is what slips
 past them: a gate that runs clean while the same defect resurfaces downstream
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ status` CLI or commit-status inspection. Final reports at
    downstream sources for an escape.
 3. Tally per `gate_id`: `clean_runs`, `escapes`, `escape_rate`.
 4. Reading (thresholds are this skill's own policy — the `gate_trim:` block
-   they once deferred to was retired 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3; nothing
+   they once deferred to was retired 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3; nothing
    trims gates anymore, so the trim-candidate branch below is gone):
    - `escape_rate ≥ 0.3` → the gate is
      **UNDER-POWERED**: route the escape causes into §2.9 pre-flight
@@ -305,12 +305,12 @@ status` CLI or commit-status inspection. Final reports at
      propose trimming it.
    - `escape_rate < 0.3` → healthy; report the numbers, no further verdict.
 
-**DAG single-gate exclusion ([TT-2267])**: `review-dag` is structurally
+**DAG single-gate exclusion ([org-internal #2267])**: `review-dag` is structurally
 non-trimmable (`dag.route.single_gate.never_trim: true` — self-contained in
 the `dag:` block); `verify` and `merge-pr` were `never_trim` in the retired
 `gate_trim` block and stay untouchable by convention.
 
-**keep_gates exclusion (TD-390, [TT-3061]) — RETIRED with gate_trim**: the
+**keep_gates exclusion (TD-390, [org-internal #3061]) — RETIRED with gate_trim**: the
 rule that a trim candidate's gate must not be a member of the target route's
 `keep_gates` guarded a landing field (`sizing.tiers.*.additional_skip`)
 that no longer exists. Historical record: wiki `rules/gate-trim`.
@@ -331,10 +331,10 @@ runs for a gate → report the raw numbers with
 - [NOTE: insufficient sample for gate X] where clean runs < 5.
 - UNDER-POWERED gates (escape_rate ≥ 0.3) feed §2.9 pre-flight — never a
   unilateral trim: the only exit is a furlough entry in
-  `<instance-root>/gate-ledger.yaml` (evidence + reopen condition, [TT-3607]).
+  `<instance-root>/gate-ledger.yaml` (evidence + reopen condition, [org-internal #3607]).
 ```
 
-### 2.9 Pre-flight defect-prevention analysis ([TT-2599])
+### 2.9 Pre-flight defect-prevention analysis ([org-internal #2599])
 
 First-round FAIL/WARN findings are the pipeline's cost multiplier: every
 multi-round review pays for them twice (review round + revision round).
@@ -348,13 +348,13 @@ code.
 reports for the cycle's tickets (`{slug}/reviews/{stage}/final/report` —
 round-1 findings with severity FAIL/WARN, their dimension codes, and the
 finding text for root-cause categorization) + the source issues'
-`Kind/*` labels. For DAG-routed Epics ([TT-2905] 方案 3), two further
+`Kind/*` labels. For DAG-routed Epics ([org-internal #2905] 方案 3), two further
 read-only sources feed the `REQ × late-discovery` root cause (step 1):
 (a) **DAG oversize-signal events** — `node_split` / registry-row additions
 recorded on the Epic's issue timeline / `## DAG 状态` whose trigger is a NEW
 requirement rather than a refactor; (b) **demo-period feedback** —
 stakeholder comments naming functionality the frozen DAG never covered. For browser-evidence
-cycles ([TT-4499], contract `browser-evidence-4486/shared/evidence-ref-v1` §3), a
+cycles ([org-internal #4499], contract `browser-evidence-4486/shared/evidence-ref-v1` §3), a
 third read-only
 source: (c) **browser session rows** — per browser-debug session
 `{session_id, outcome: evidence-captured | env-unavailable | replay-failed,
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ Rows are currently Task-DAG cycle products by default (the helper's
 Bug- or Feature-cycle session to its own landing slot). The replay
 success-rate baseline (N-03 BENCH) is exposed as a consumable metric — a SEEDED CONVENTION (fixture-authored outcomes, channel health),
 NOT a live-browser trend baseline. Mechanical helper:
-`<harness-package>/scripts/browser-retro-tally.ts`. Boundary rules ([TT-4499]
+`<harness-package>/scripts/browser-retro-tally.ts`. Boundary rules ([org-internal #4499]
 AC-3): out-of-enum or empty categories fall into an explicit `other` bucket
 with provenance (recorded, never silently swallowed, never a crash); rows
 missing replay/attribution fields yield structured errors in the tally
@@ -395,10 +395,10 @@ late-discovery` — 冻结后才被发现的需求 (a requirement that surfaced
    oversize signal or demo comment — count it from sources (a)/(b) above,
    not only from review findings.
 2. Tally per **route-class** — `Bug`, `Feature-DAG`, `Epic-DAG-route`,
-   `Task-DAG` (Kind/Feature routes to the DAG pipeline since [TT-3061] Phase 2 /
+   `Task-DAG` (Kind/Feature routes to the DAG pipeline since [org-internal #3061] Phase 2 /
    TD-388 — `Feature-legacy` survives only as a historical bucket for tickets
    closed before 2026-08-20; the Size dimension is retired from retro keying,
-   [TT-3061]: DAG-routed tickets derive depth instead of carrying `Size/*`
+   [org-internal #3061]: DAG-routed tickets derive depth instead of carrying `Size/*`
    (spec-06), and `Kind/Bug` carries no ladder). First-round hit count
    and distinct-ticket count per cause per class.
 3. A cause is a **pre-flight candidate** when ALL hold (thresholds from
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ late-discovery` — 冻结后才被发现的需求 (a requirement that surfaced
      A qualifying `Epic × DAG-route` cause (e.g. `REQ × late-discovery`) lands
      on `<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `dag.route.preflight` — NOT
      `routes.Kind/Epic.preflight` (legacy-roadmap-era landing; the legacy route
-     was archived [TT-3072] phase 3) ([TT-2905] 方案 3). The analyze-dag skill reads
+     was archived [org-internal #3072] phase 3) ([org-internal #2905] 方案 3). The analyze-dag skill reads
      `dag.route.preflight` before decomposition.
 4. Aging: for causes ALREADY landed in `routes.{Kind}.preflight` or
    `dag.route.preflight`, count
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ Sample-sufficiency guard mirrors 2.8: zero qualifying tickets → emit
 
 | route-class    | Cause (checklist-qualified dim × root-cause) | 1st-round hits | tickets                     | qualify?                         |
 | -------------- | ------------------------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------- | -------------------------------- |
-| Bug            | code-review.md COR × unhandled-null         | 5              | 4 ([TT-2400] [TT-2429] [TT-2471] [TT-2488]) | ✅ PROPOSE                       |
+| Bug            | code-review.md COR × unhandled-null         | 5              | 4 ([org-internal #2400] [org-internal #2429] [org-internal #2471] [org-internal #2488]) | ✅ PROPOSE                       |
 | Bug            | code-review.md STY × wrong-import-order     | 6              | 2                           | ⛔ tickets <3                    |
 | Feature-DAG    | code-review.md TST × missing-boundary-test  | 3              | 3                           | ⛔ hits <5                       |
 | Epic-DAG-route | REQ × late-discovery        | 5              | 3 (#27xx #28xx #29xx)       | ✅ PROPOSE → dag.route.preflight |
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ Sample-sufficiency guard mirrors 2.8: zero qualifying tickets → emit
 - Landed-item aging: `cor-unhandled-null clean streak 5 ≥ aging 5` → REMOVAL row.
 ```
 
-### 2.10 Derived-ticket health ([TT-3061])
+### 2.10 Derived-ticket health ([org-internal #3061])
 
 Derived tickets (TD promotions, BF umbrellas, FT tickets) are the pipeline's
 exhaust. Unmanaged they accumulate into flush cycles (2026-08 evidence: 122
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ this probe checks whether the system DIGESTS what it records:
 - rows marked [COLD] this cycle: {list or "none"}
 ```
 
-### 2.11 Threshold calibration tally ([TT-3380])
+### 2.11 Threshold calibration tally ([org-internal #3380])
 
 Process prose constants (round caps, D1–D4 thresholds, preflight knobs,
 escape-rate cutoffs, quotas — full index:
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ Each item MUST specify:
 - Action items that modify SKILLs or templates are applied immediately (the
   Retrospective Lead can edit `<instance-root>/` files).
 - Action items MUST NOT be vague ("try harder", "be more careful").
-- **Layering question** (injection-budget ruling item 3, [TT-3547]): every action
+- **Layering question** (injection-budget ruling item 3, [org-internal #3547]): every action
   item that encodes a lesson as a process constraint MUST answer **"which
   layer carries this lesson?"** — options in ascending per-turn cost, pick
   the cheapest that actually enforces it:
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ Each item MUST specify:
      corpus — do not casually re-grow it; the rule-GC report in that same check
      flags aging L1 rules for L2 retirement).
 
-**TRIM PROPOSAL rows — RETIRED ([TT-3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: the
+**TRIM PROPOSAL rows — RETIRED ([org-internal #3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: the
 gate-trim landing machinery (`gate_trim.action` →
 `sizing.tiers.{Size}.additional_skip` / `routes.{Kind}.skip` /
 `auto_approve.stages`) was removed with the `gate_trim:` and `sizing:`
@@ -691,12 +691,12 @@ Gate health findings flow exclusively through §2.8's escape-rate verdict
 (UNDER-POWERED → §2.9 pre-flight) and ordinary action items. Historical
 spec: wiki `rules/gate-trim` (L2).
 
-**PRE-FLIGHT PROPOSAL rows** (from Phase 2.9 defect-prevention, [TT-2599]): format
+**PRE-FLIGHT PROPOSAL rows** (from Phase 2.9 defect-prevention, [org-internal #2599]): format
 the What cell as
 `Add pre-flight '{id}' to {Kind} ({hits} first-round FAIL/WARN hits, {tickets} tickets — {evidence})`
 and the Where cell as
 `<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `routes.{Kind}.preflight` — or, for causes
-keyed `Epic × DAG-route` (e.g. `REQ × late-discovery`, [TT-2905] 方案 3),
+keyed `Epic × DAG-route` (e.g. `REQ × late-discovery`, [org-internal #2905] 方案 3),
 `<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `dag.route.preflight` (consumed by
 analyze-dag before decomposition).
 Aging removal rows: `Remove pre-flight '{id}' from {Kind} (clean streak {N} ≥ aging threshold)`.

core/skills/review-artifact/SKILL.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 ---
 name: review-artifact
 description: >-
-  Use ONLY after analyze-dag has produced the DAG artifact — review the task DAG (review-dag single gate) — OR when auditing the <instance-root>/ process infrastructure itself (audit-process).   Spawns N parallel Explorer reviewers (1 dimension each) against the matching checklist, synthesizes findings with a Worker Synthesizer, and iterates with a Worker reviser until convergence. The legacy roadmap / design-space / iteration-plan targets were archived 2026-08-21 ([TT-3072] phase 3, <instance-root>/archive/). Do NOT use for code review — use the review-code skill for that.
+  Use ONLY after analyze-dag has produced the DAG artifact — review the task DAG (review-dag single gate) — OR when auditing the <instance-root>/ process infrastructure itself (audit-process).   Spawns N parallel Explorer reviewers (1 dimension each) against the matching checklist, synthesizes findings with a Worker Synthesizer, and iterates with a Worker reviser until convergence. The legacy roadmap / design-space / iteration-plan targets were archived 2026-08-21 ([org-internal #3072] phase 3, <instance-root>/archive/). Do NOT use for code review — use the review-code skill for that.
 triggers:
   - audit-process
   - review-dag
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ role: Reviewer
 ## Tool Availability & Path Resolution
 
 This skill's reviewers (parallel Explorer subagents) read two kinds of files.
-Some runs cannot reach the Gitea REST API (cross-repo scenario, [TT-2115]); the
+Some runs cannot reach the Gitea REST API (cross-repo scenario, [org-internal #2115]); the
 fallbacks below keep reviews working without it.
 
 The Orchestrator probes REST reachability **before dispatching reviewers** (Phase A
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ This skill reviews different artifact types. Identify the target from the pipeli
 | **review-dag** | `review-dag` | `core/checklists/dag-single-gate.md` | 3 | Analyst | `{epic-slug}/reviews/review-dag/` |
 
 > **Retired targets (historical)**: the `roadmap`, `design-space`, and `plan`
-> targets were archived on 2026-08-21 per [TT-3072] phase 3 (ruling:
+> targets were archived on 2026-08-21 per [org-internal #3072] phase 3 (ruling:
 > `docs/workflow-refactor/phase3-retirement-ruling.md`) — the legacy
 > production skills they gated no longer exist (see `<instance-root>/archive/`).
 > Their stage ids (`review-roadmap`, `review-design-space`,
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ This skill reviews different artifact types. Identify the target from the pipeli
 
 The stage IDs remain as-is — they are used by the stage registry and auto-approve system. The skill name is `review-artifact`, but the stage IDs do not change.
 
-> **Progressive disclosure ([TT-3734])**: this skill has two disjoint live
+> **Progressive disclosure ([org-internal #3734])**: this skill has two disjoint live
 > targets — dispatch an auditor/reviewer with
 > `skills: ["review-artifact:target-process"]` or
 > `["review-artifact:target-review-dag"]` (preamble + that target only)
@@ -97,10 +97,7 @@ The stage IDs remain as-is — they are used by the stage registry and auto-appr
 This skill follows the standardized parallel-review pipeline. The full mechanics are in:
 
 - `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md -->` — Phase A through Phase E
-  - **Phase A step 0**: move the source issue to the `review` column on the
-    Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5
-    (see `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` for the canonical orchestrator
-    actions — step 0 is now part of the shared flow).
+  (canonical orchestrator actions for the shared flow)
 - `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md -->` — mandatory orchestrator rules
 - `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-final-report-template.md -->` — final report format
 - `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-revision-prompt.md -->` — Phase C revision prompt template
@@ -148,7 +145,7 @@ Before launching any review, confirm:
 
 Each target adds specific preconditions listed in its section below. If any precondition is unmet, abort and inform the user.
 
-> ## Retired targets (historical, [TT-3072] phase 3)
+> ## Retired targets (historical, [org-internal #3072] phase 3)
 
 The three legacy production-review targets — **roadmap** (stage
 `review-roadmap`, checklist `roadmap.md`, revision role Analyst),
@@ -187,7 +184,7 @@ The audit target is the **SDLC factory itself** — the set of skills, checklist
 - [ ] `core/skills/` exists and contains at least one `SKILL.md`.
 - [ ] `core/checklists/audit-process.md` is accessible.
 - [ ] `core/schemas/` contains the shared review schemas (`reviewer-output`, `synthesis`, `review-status`).
-- [ ] **Process-tests-green gate ([TT-4787] STD 8.8)**: before dispatching
+- [ ] **Process-tests-green gate ([org-internal #4787] STD 8.8)**: before dispatching
   auditors, the Orchestrator (bash-capable; Explorer auditors have none by
   construction) runs the process's own suite and guards — from
   `<harness-package>`: `bun run test:parallel`, plus the repo-root `check:*`
@@ -366,9 +363,9 @@ from `Size/*` labels.
 | D1 | 1 | `all` |
 | D2 | 3 | `TOPO:1 REQMAP:1 RELEASE:1` |
 | D3 | 5 | `TOPO:2 REQMAP:2 RELEASE:1` |
-| D4 | 5 ([TT-3061] cap) | `TOPO:2 REQMAP:2 RELEASE:1` |
+| D4 | 5 ([org-internal #3061] cap) | `TOPO:2 REQMAP:2 RELEASE:1` |
 
-> **D4 cap ([TT-3061])**: D4 keeps its own rounds budget (4) but its fanout is
+> **D4 cap ([org-internal #3061])**: D4 keeps its own rounds budget (4) but its fanout is
 > capped at D3 level (5 reviewers) — under the 3-dimension + checklist-bound
 > review the marginal coverage of 9 reviewers was redundancy, and round
 > iteration is the backstop.
@@ -390,7 +387,7 @@ file (concurrent write race):
   `core/schemas/reviewer-output.schema.json`. Finding ids inside slot
   files MUST be slot-prefixed (`{DIM}R{k}-F{NNN}`, e.g. `TOPOR1-F001`) so ids
   stay unique across a dimension's slot files. This preserves per-reviewer
-  attribution (retrospective overlap analysis, [TT-2996] step ①a) and makes the
+  attribution (retrospective overlap analysis, [org-internal #2996] step ①a) and makes the
   write race impossible by construction.
 - Synthesis input for a dimension = ALL `findings-{DIM}*.json` in the round
   directory — the synthesizer already globs every `findings-*.json`; the slot

core/skills/review-code/SKILL.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ description: >
   ticket under a DAG-routed parent) against the node spec + frozen
   cross-session contracts of the frozen DAG copy (`{epic-slug}/dag`), or in
   standalone-bugfix mode without a design baseline. (The legacy
-  approved-design pipeline mode was archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3.) Spawns up to 10 parallel Explorer reviewers (risk-tier scaled;
+  approved-design pipeline mode was archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3.) Spawns up to 10 parallel Explorer reviewers (risk-tier scaled;
   fewer in standalone-bugfix mode where DGN may be skipped) against core/checklists/code-review.md, synthesizes
   findings with a Worker Synthesizer (the main-session Orchestrator aggregates), and iterates with a Worker developer until
   convergence.
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ abstract best practices.
 
 Before launching this review, confirm:
 
-> **Legacy pipeline preconditions retired ([TT-3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: the
+> **Legacy pipeline preconditions retired ([org-internal #3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21)**: the
 > design-document / design-space-convergence / iteration-plan-convergence
 > checks that used to head this list belonged to the archived legacy pipeline
 > (`design` / `plan-iterations` skills — `<instance-root>/archive/`). Live entry
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Before launching this review, confirm:
 > runs' design pages stay readable via `_shared/gitea-read-patterns.md`.
 
 - [ ] Code files to review are specified (list of file paths or use `git diff`).
-- [ ] Mechanical-green gate PASSED (L0-enforced, [TT-2598]): run
+- [ ] Mechanical-green gate PASSED (L0-enforced, [org-internal #2598]): run
       `bun core/skills/review-code/scripts/precondition-gate.ts {slug}` —
       CI-aligned checks (`bun oxlint --deny-warnings` + `bun turbo typecheck`
       + `test:changed` with `CI=true TEST_SHARDS=3`, mirroring ci.yml).
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ Before launching this review, confirm:
 - [ ] 跨阶段门控清单: `core/checklists/pipeline-gate.md` is accessible and
       its Upstream Review Convergence section has been confirmed item by item.
 
-**Kind/MVP graduation chokepoint ([TT-3061])**: when this skill is invoked ad hoc
+**Kind/MVP graduation chokepoint ([org-internal #3061])**: when this skill is invoked ad hoc
 on a `Kind/MVP` ticket's changes (no mode, no pipeline), the mechanical-green
 gate applies, and the Orchestrator additionally checks the diff for
 **graduation triggers** — changes crossing ≥2 modules, touching a shared
@@ -110,9 +110,9 @@ no design doc exists at `.artifacts/{slug}/design/index.md`（存量只读，不
 
 **Weakened preconditions** for standalone mode:
 
-- Design doc existence → NOT required (the legacy design pipeline is archived, [TT-3072] phase 3).
+- Design doc existence → NOT required (the legacy design pipeline is archived, [org-internal #3072] phase 3).
 - **Instead require**: `.artifacts/{slug}/repro-notes.md`（存量只读，不迁移；Gitea 等效：wiki page `{slug}/repro-notes`，`_shared/gitea-read-patterns.md` Pattern 1）exists (bugfix Phase 1-2 output: reproduction steps + root cause) OR `.artifacts/{slug}/impl-notes.md`（存量只读，不迁移；Gitea 等效：wiki page `{slug}/impl-notes`，`_shared/gitea-read-patterns.md` Pattern 1）exists (post-fix behavior contract).
-- All other Preconditions (code files specified, mechanical-green gate green ([TT-2598]), checklist accessible) STILL APPLY.
+- All other Preconditions (code files specified, mechanical-green gate green ([org-internal #2598]), checklist accessible) STILL APPLY.
 - The `core/checklists/pipeline-gate.md` cross-stage gate (Upstream Review Convergence section) → NOT required; the bugfix-specific Pre-Design Falsification Gate section still applies if relevant.
 
 **DGN dimension handling**: In standalone-bugfix mode, the DGN (Design Compliance & Dependencies) reviewer is SKIPPED because there is no design to comply with. The Orchestrator dispatches 9 reviewers (all 10 dimensions except DGN).
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ no design doc exists at `.artifacts/{slug}/design/index.md`（存量只读，不
 **What standalone bugfix review focuses on**: code correctness, error handling & compatibility (COR), regression coverage (TST), security (SEC), performance (PERF), style & conventions (STY), database & data (DBT), accessibility & browser compatibility (A11Y), documentation (DOC), traceability (TRC) — everything that does not depend on a design baseline.
 
 **Historical**: the legacy pipeline mode (design doc + design-space/plan
-review convergence as preconditions) was archived 2026-08-21 ([TT-3072] phase 3).
+review convergence as preconditions) was archived 2026-08-21 ([org-internal #3072] phase 3).
 Historical design pages remain readable via `_shared/gitea-read-patterns.md`.
 
 ### DAG Task Mode
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ table and implement's §"DAG-mode input path"):
 | Iteration-plan review converged (`--stage iteration-plan`) | REMOVED (DAG has no plan review; the single review-dag gate replaces both) |
 | `slug` matches the design slug | N/A (review is scoped to the node ticket; run slug = `{epic-slug}-task-{node-id}` — the same node-task run namespace verify's task mode archives to — so review outputs are node-scoped and never clobber sibling nodes' reports. Note: this namespace covers review + verify runs only; the node's implement report below lives in the Epic run workspace `{epic-slug}/workers/` — implement worker runs keep the Epic run slug (implement §Preconditions: "DAG: `{epic-slug}`"), a different run from this review run) |
 | `core/checklists/pipeline-gate.md` Upstream Review Convergence | NOT required — the review-dag convergence check above stands in its place |
-| All other preconditions (code files specified, mechanical-green gate green ([TT-2598]), checklist accessible) | KEEP — unconditional; plus the implement report (AC → test traceability) present — Tier 1 at `<runs-root>/{epic-slug}/workers/{node-id}-worker-{seq}.md` (implement Phase 5 persistence; `{chunk-id}` = the node id) |
+| All other preconditions (code files specified, mechanical-green gate green ([org-internal #2598]), checklist accessible) | KEEP — unconditional; plus the implement report (AC → test traceability) present — Tier 1 at `<runs-root>/{epic-slug}/workers/{node-id}-worker-{seq}.md` (implement Phase 5 persistence; `{chunk-id}` = the node id) |
 
 The `{BASELINE_SECTION}` for DAG-task mode uses the node spec + cross-session
 edge contracts from `{epic-slug}/dag` instead of the design index; the 5-Check
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ file is a test file.
 - Design-space review convergence → NOT required.
 - Iteration-plan review convergence → NOT required.
 - All Preconditions from the pipeline checklist are bypassed.
-- Only requires: the mechanical-green gate ([TT-2598]) — same script as the full
+- Only requires: the mechanical-green gate ([org-internal #2598]) — same script as the full
   mode; on a test-only changeset `test:changed` selects exactly the changed
   tests, so the gate cost stays proportional to the diff.
 
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ fall back to the appropriate full mode (pipeline or standalone-bugfix).
 
 ## Agent Roles
 
-> **Progressive disclosure ([TT-3722])**: when dispatching a Reviewer /
+> **Progressive disclosure ([org-internal #3722])**: when dispatching a Reviewer /
 > Synthesizer / Developer scoped to one phase, pass
 > `skills: ["review-code:phase-a"]` (preamble — incl. dimensions, JSON
 > schema, prompt template — plus that phase only) instead of the full body;
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ audit (`review-artifact` targets):
 | `core/schemas/synthesis.schema.json`       | Orchestrator round synthesis (Tier 2 — synthesis comment)       |
 | `core/schemas/review-status.schema.json`   | Review lifecycle tracking       |
 
-> **Findings sink: `tier1-local`** ([TT-1988]). `review-code` writes raw
+> **Findings sink: `tier1-local`** ([org-internal #1988]). `review-code` writes raw
 > per-dimension findings to Tier 1 local files (`<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/`),
 > not Gitea issue comments. The synthesis comment + commit status stay Tier 2.
 > See `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` "Output model — two findings sinks"
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ table).
 - `{REVIEWER_ROLE}`: code reviewer
 - `{BASELINE_SECTION}`:
 
-  **Legacy pipeline mode** (archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3 — the design
+  **Legacy pipeline mode** (archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3 — the design
   doc at `{slug}/03-design-*` / `{slug}/02-03-req-design` it read is
   historical; live modes use the two baselines below):
 
@@ -458,13 +458,13 @@ table).
 <!-- section:phase-a -->
 ## Phase A — Parallel Review
 
-> **Canonical mechanics**: `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` — keep this section in sync with the canonical Phase A–E flow. This section adds review-code-specific constants (10 dimensions, severity definitions, risk tiers, output mode, standalone-bugfix mode). Step 0 (move source issue to `review` column on Pipeline Stages board per Pattern 7.5) is inherited from the shared Phase A orchestrator actions; see `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md`.
+> **Canonical mechanics**: `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` — keep this section in sync with the canonical Phase A–E flow. This section adds review-code-specific constants (10 dimensions, severity definitions, risk tiers, output mode, standalone-bugfix mode); orchestrator actions are inherited from the shared Phase A flow.
 
 ### Standalone Bugfix Mode — Orchestrator Dispatch
 
 When invoked from the `implement` skill in bugfix mode (caller passes
 `mode: "standalone-bugfix"` — the legacy "detect absence of a design doc"
-fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
+fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [org-internal #3072] phase 3):
 
 1. The Orchestrator dispatches **9 reviewers** (all 10 dimensions **except DGN** — Design Compliance & Dependencies), because there is no design baseline to audit compliance against.
 2. For any dimension that would normally receive design reference files (COR, DGN, SEC, PERF, TST, DBT, A11Y, DOC, TRC), substitute the bugfix baseline docs:
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
    ```
 5. The `{CONTRADICTION_RULE}` is weakened: code that contradicts repro-notes/impl-notes is a MAJOR — there is no design to elevate to BLOCKER.
 6. All other Phase A dispatch rules (reviewer comment posting, commit status, reviewer prompt template, temperature, permissions, worktree-path rule) apply unchanged.
-7. Efficiency optimization (round 2+, [TT-2598]): follows the shared Phase D rule (`_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` Phase D "Efficiency optimization") with no standalone-mode deviation — partial re-dispatch, full sweep every 2 rounds, delta-scoped reviewer input.
+7. Efficiency optimization (round 2+, [org-internal #2598]): follows the shared Phase D rule (`_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` Phase D "Efficiency optimization") with no standalone-mode deviation — partial re-dispatch, full sweep every 2 rounds, delta-scoped reviewer input.
 
 **Orchestrator actions**:
 
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
 
 2. Initialize or update review status by posting a commit status via `POST /api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/statuses/{sha}` (`_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 8) with context `pipeline/review-code`. The commit-status payload carries `state` and `description`; the full review lifecycle state is documented in `core/schemas/review-status.schema.json` and tracked by the `octopus review status` CLI.
 
-2.5. **Mechanical-green gate (mandatory, [TT-2598])** — before spawning ANY reviewer,
+2.5. **Mechanical-green gate (mandatory, [org-internal #2598])** — before spawning ANY reviewer,
     run `bun core/skills/review-code/scripts/precondition-gate.ts {slug} --round {N}`
     from the worktree root. Exit 0 → continue to step 3. Exit 1 → the script has
     appended a PRECONDITION-BLOCK record (Tier 1,
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
 
 3. Spawn **all reviewers in parallel** (10 in pipeline mode at Large tier; fewer at Small/Medium tiers; DGN skipped in standalone-bugfix mode). Each reviewer receives:
    - The standardized prompt (above) with dimension-specific values filled in.
-   - For round ≥ 2 ([TT-2598] delta scoping): `{FILE_SECTIONS}` lists ONLY the
+   - For round ≥ 2 ([org-internal #2598] delta scoping): `{FILE_SECTIONS}` lists ONLY the
      files revised since the previous round plus their 3–5 convention-comparison
      neighbors — not the round-1 full file set. Round 1 keeps the full set.
    - Agent type: Explorer.
@@ -530,6 +530,13 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
      emits the reviewer's output; it does NOT touch the code under review, so
      rule #7 auditor independence holds.)
    - Temperature: 0.1 (deterministic output).
+   - StructuredOutput mount ([org-internal #5658]): pass `format: { type: "json_schema",
+     schema: <the reviewer-output.schema.json contents you read at prompt
+     build time> }` on the Task dispatch — the reviewer's final emission is
+     schema-enforced (malformed verdict/severity/summary args are rejected
+     with field-path repair feedback inside the reviewer's own loop). The
+     findings FILE remains the canonical Tier-1 artifact; the structured
+     output mirrors it as a self-check.
 
    **Worktree-path rule (mandatory)**: Every file path in the reviewer prompt
    (`{FILE_SECTIONS}`, design reference paths, artifact paths) MUST be the
@@ -545,6 +552,21 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
    observed in the 2026-07 auto-approve retrospective (5-round convergence,
    67.7% rework fraction).
 
+   **Code-graph availability preamble (worktree sessions, [org-internal #4187])**: the main
+   checkout's `.codegraph/` index does NOT cover a session worktree
+   ([org-internal #2561]/TD-006). Before dispatch, the Orchestrator checks the worktree's
+   own index: run `codegraph_status` against the worktree root, or check for
+   `<worktree-root>/.codegraph/codegraph.db` (a bare `init.log` without the
+   db means the background `session-worktree.sh create` init is still running).
+   Include in each reviewer's dispatch preamble: (a) the worktree index state
+   (ready / building / absent), and (b) when absent or still building, the
+   ABSOLUTE path of the main checkout (which has its own `.codegraph/`) so
+   DGN/COR reviewers can query MAIN-side symbols (design baselines, frozen
+   cross-session contracts) from the main checkout's index and cite them as
+   `main:<path>:<line>`. Reviewers apply rule 6b of
+   `_shared/review-reviewer-prompt.md` (NA + INFO finding) when no index is
+   reachable at all — grep-only structural claims must never pass silently.
+
 4. Wait for all reviewers to complete. Each reviewer writes its finding JSON to
    `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json`
     (Tier 1 local, validated by `core/schemas/reviewer-output.schema.json`). After all
@@ -607,7 +629,7 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
    - Updates review status by posting a commit status via `POST /api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/statuses/{sha}` （`_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 8）with context `pipeline/review-code`.
    - Persists its return summary to
      `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/synthesis-return.md` (Tier 1,
-     worker-report persistence [TT-2847] — see
+     worker-report persistence [org-internal #2847] — see
      `_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`) BEFORE returning, and registers
      the `index.json` row (type `other`, schema null, stage `review-code`,
      produced_by `Synthesizer`). The persisted copy is the report of record —
@@ -633,14 +655,240 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
 ---
 
 <!-- section:phase-c -->
-### Phase C+D — Developer Revision & Re-review Loop — see `reference/revision-loop.md`
+## Phase C — Developer Revision
 
-> Phase C (Developer revision: task-file preparation, revision survival via
-> `task_id` resume, convergence tracking) and Phase D (re-review loop until
-> convergence or round budget exhaustion) live in
-> `reference/revision-loop.md`. Read it when `overall_verdict` is not PASS.
-> On PASS, skip both phases and proceed to Phase E.
+If `overall_verdict` is PASS, skip to Phase E.
 
+Otherwise:
+
+**Orchestrator actions**:
+
+1. Prepare the Developer's input as a structured task file,
+   created as a wiki page via `wiki 读写 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` （`_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 1）with page_name `{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/task-developer`.
+
+   This file must contain:
+   - Paths to all code files that need revision.
+   - Reference to the synthesis comment on the ticket (posted via `工单评论 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` in Phase B — Tier 2).
+   - References to the Tier 1 finding files for dimensions that have FAIL or WARN
+     verdicts (`<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json`).
+   - The Developer MUST NOT receive the full text of all reviewer findings
+     inline — use finding-file path references only to avoid context explosion.
+   - Convergence status: blockers/majors remaining vs. previous round.
+   - **Revision survival ([org-internal #2601]) — primary path**: the task tool's completion
+     output includes a `task_id`; passing it back resumes the SAME Developer
+     subagent session instead of creating a fresh one. Round 1: persist the
+     returned `task_id` with the round's working-notes entry (it must survive
+     round-boundary compaction). Round ≥ 2: dispatch with `task_id` set to the
+     previous revision round's — the Developer continues in-session with its
+     prior diff/context; the round's task page then carries only the findings
+     delta, not a full re-derivation. Reviewers are NEVER resumed — per-round
+     freshness is their independence.
+   - **Revision survival — fallback** (task_id lost to compaction before it
+     was persisted): prepend the current `<runs-root>/{slug}/working-notes.md`
+     content (run narrative memory — prior decisions, dead ends, reviewer
+     feedback from earlier rounds) and reference the previous round's revision
+     summary (`{slug}/reviews/code/round{N-1}/revision-summary`), stating
+     explicitly that this revises code a prior round already wrote — do NOT
+     re-read the full design/acceptance artifacts unless a finding requires
+     them.
+
+2. Spawn the Developer (Worker) with the prompt
+   template at `core/skills/_shared/review-revision-prompt.md`, substituting:
+
+   - `{ROLE}`: Developer
+   - `{TASK_FILE}`: task-developer
+   - `{REVISION_SCOPE}`: Apply the Developer Revision Protocol (see Protocol
+      subsection below) — evaluate each finding against codebase reality:
+      Explorer reviewers are automated LLM sub-agents that can hallucinate
+      citations, misapply rules, or miss design context. Verify cited code
+      exists, the rule applies, and the fix does not break existing
+      functionality. WAIVE technically-incorrect findings with justification
+      (`WAIVED-{finding-id}` → one-line reason; canonical definition of the
+      `WAIVED-{id}` convention, incl. the round-2+ cosmetic-MINOR waiver
+      rule: `_shared/review-revision-prompt.md`). Revise code minimally and
+      surgically — do NOT refactor unrelated code or introduce new behavior.
+   - `{RESOLUTION_RULE}`: Do NOT silently deviate from the approved baseline
+     (DAG task mode: the node spec + frozen cross-session contracts in
+     `{epic-slug}/dag`; the legacy `{slug}/03-design-*` baseline is archived
+     historical, [org-internal #3072] phase 3). If a finding exposes a design flaw, mark it
+     as deferred with justification and suggest a design amendment — do not
+     change the code against the baseline.
+   - `{COSMETIC_MINOR_EXAMPLES}`: naming, comments, dead code, import
+     ordering, style
+   - `{WAIVED_EXAMPLE}`: `WAIVED-COR-R2-001`
+    - `{CHECKLIST_REF}`: `core/checklists/code-review.md`
+    - `{FILES_MODIFIED_LINE}`: {list}
+    - `{RETURN_FILE}`:
+      `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/revision-return.md`
+      (Tier 1 return persistence — [org-internal #2847],
+      `_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`)
+
+3. The Developer revises the code files in place. The Developer creates a
+   revision summary as a wiki page via `wiki 读写 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` （`_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 1）with page_name `{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/revision-summary`,
+   and persists its final return summary to
+   `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/revision-return.md` (Tier 1,
+   worker-report persistence [org-internal #2847] — see
+   `_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`) BEFORE returning. If the
+   completion notification is lost, the Orchestrator recovers the revision
+   outcome from the persisted return (wiki page for the full summary,
+   Tier 1 file for the conclusion of record).
+
+4. **Pre-handoff gate** — before reporting completion, the Developer MUST run
+   the same mechanical gate the Orchestrator will re-run at Phase D re-entry
+   (the tree-fingerprint cache turns the re-run into a cache hit — one real
+   execution per tree state, no double-paying):
+   - Run `bun core/skills/review-code/scripts/precondition-gate.ts {slug} --round {N}`
+     from the worktree root (oxlint + typecheck + `test:changed`, CI-aligned —
+     `bun run test:parallel` is verify's job, not a per-revision
+     requirement ([org-internal #2598])).
+   - Exit 0 required; a new test failure, lint error, or type error introduced
+     by the revision must be fixed before the Orchestrator proceeds to Phase D.
+   - Report the gate's per-check results in the revision summary.
+
+---
+
+### Phase C — Developer Revision: Protocol
+
+The Developer applies this cognitive protocol before implementing any finding.
+**Core principle:** reviewer findings are claims to evaluate, not orders to
+execute. Verify before implementing. Technical correctness over performative
+agreement.
+
+#### Response Pattern
+
+1. **READ** — Load every FAIL/WARN dimension finding file
+   (`<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json`,
+   Tier 1 local). Do not react item-by-item.
+2. **UNDERSTAND** — Restate each finding's requirement in your own words.
+   If you cannot, the finding is unclear — see STOP rule below.
+3. **VERIFY** — Check the finding against codebase reality: does the cited
+   code exist at the given file:line? Does the cited rule apply?
+4. **EVALUATE** — Is the finding technically correct for THIS codebase?
+   Does the proposed fix break existing functionality? Does it conflict
+   with the approved baseline (DAG task mode: the node spec + contracts in
+   `{epic-slug}/dag`)?
+5. **RESPOND** — Fix it (correct), WAIVE it (`WAIVED-{finding-id}` →
+   one-line reason), or flag it (unclear / design-level question).
+6. **IMPLEMENT** — One verified finding at a time, test each individually.
+
+#### Evaluating Findings — 5-Check Gate
+
+Before implementing any finding, run these checks:
+
+1. **Cited code is real** — Open the file:line. Does the code exist and say
+   what the finding claims?
+2. **Rule applies** — Does the cited checklist rule actually match this issue?
+3. **Reason for current implementation** — Is the flagged behavior
+   intentional? Check the baseline (node spec + contracts in
+   `{epic-slug}/dag` for DAG task mode) for rationale.
+4. **Fix does not break existing functionality** — Will the proposed change
+   cause a regression?
+5. **Reviewer has full context** — Did the reviewer see the baseline (node
+   spec + acceptance criteria) and the diff context? An isolated diff review
+   can miss architectural intent.
+
+```
+IF a finding seems wrong:
+  WAIVE it: WAIVED-{finding-id} → <one-line technical reason>
+
+IF you cannot easily verify a finding:
+  State the limitation in revision_summary.md and request direction.
+
+IF a finding conflicts with the approved design:
+  Flag as a design-level question — do NOT silently change code against the design.
+```
+
+#### Unclear Findings — STOP Rule
+
+```
+IF any finding is unclear:
+  STOP — do not implement ANY finding yet.
+  Flag the unclear items in revision_summary.md and request clarification.
+
+WHY: findings may be related. Partial understanding produces wrong
+     implementation across multiple items.
+```
+
+**Example:** The synthesis lists findings F1–F6. You understand F1, F2, F3, F6.
+F4 and F5 are ambiguous about what change is expected.
+- **WRONG:** implement F1, F2, F3, F6 now; ask about F4, F5 later.
+- **RIGHT:** "Understand F1, F2, F3, F6. Need clarification on F4, F5 before
+  proceeding — they may interact with the same module."
+
+#### YAGNI Check
+
+```
+IF a reviewer suggests "implementing this properly" (full abstraction,
+generic API, configurable layer):
+  Check actual usage (codegraph callers / grep) BEFORE expanding scope.
+
+  IF unused:  WAIVE — "No call sites found. Leaving as-is (YAGNI)."
+  IF used:    Then implement properly.
+```
+
+#### Forbidden Responses in revision_summary.md
+
+**NEVER** write:
+- "You're absolutely right!" / "Great point!" / "Excellent catch!" — performative.
+- "Thanks for catching that!" / any gratitude expression.
+- "Let me implement that now" — before verification.
+
+**INSTEAD:**
+- Restate the technical requirement concisely.
+- State the fix factually: `Fixed {finding-id}: <what changed> at <file:line>`.
+- Just fix it and show the result in the diff.
+
+#### Gracefully Correcting a WAIVE
+
+If you WAIVEd a finding and were wrong:
+```
+"Verified {finding-id} — the reviewer is correct. My initial read missed
+ <reason>. Implementing now."
+```
+State the correction factually. No lengthy apology.
+
+#### Implementation Order
+
+For multi-finding revisions, after clarifying all unclear items:
+1. **Blocking issues** — security, data loss, breaks existing functionality.
+2. **Simple fixes** — typos, imports, naming, dead code.
+3. **Complex fixes** — logic changes, refactoring within minimal-surgical scope.
+Test each fix individually.
+
+#### Rationalization-Anticipation Quick Reference
+
+| Trap | Hold to |
+|------|---------|
+| "The reviewer flagged it as BLOCKER, so it must be real." | VERIFY cited code exists and rule applies before any edit. |
+| "Just fix everything to avoid a re-review round." | EVALUATE each finding; WAIVE the wrong ones with reasoning. |
+| "This finding looks plausible — I'll fix it without checking." | Open the file:line, confirm the behavior. |
+| "I'll implement the clear findings and ask about unclear ones later." | STOP. Clarify ALL unclear items before implementing any. |
+| "The reviewer wants it done 'properly' — full abstraction." | Check call sites first. If unused, WAIVE (YAGNI). |
+| "I shouldn't push back — the reviewer is probably right." | Push back with technical reasoning. The diff is the acknowledgment. |
+
+---
+
+<!-- section:phase-d -->
+## Phase D — Re-review Loop
+
+After the Developer completes revision:
+
+1. Increment the round counter (the Synthesizer updates the commit status in Phase B
+   with the new round's results).
+2. Re-enter Phase A at step 2.5 — the mechanical-green gate re-runs on the
+   revised tree before any reviewer spawn (a red gate blocks dispatch exactly
+   as on round-1 entry) — then spawn the new round of reviewers against the
+   revised files.
+
+**Convergence criteria**: see `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` Phase D for the canonical table (stop conditions). `{MAX_ROUNDS}` is per-skill — code review binds the routing budget: **2** rounds default, **3** for high risk (a BLOCKER survived a round, or the diff touches a frozen cross-session contract) — `<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `review.max_rounds` ([org-internal #3567]). The code-review-specific addition is inheritance of the shared INFO-disposition rule. The shared Round-3 Escalation Guardrail is scoped to the `review-artifact` skill targets only and does not apply here.
+
+**Round budget (mandatory, [org-internal #3567])**: when `current_round` reaches the budget (2; 3 for high risk) without convergence, do NOT enter another round. STOP: register every remaining BLOCKER/MAJOR finding as TD registry rows (`rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`), record the verdict with the shared three-tier ladder (`core/schemas/synthesis.schema.json` `overall_verdict` + `core/skills/_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md` rule 3): FAIL if any BLOCKER or FAIL dimension remains, else WARN, PASS only if every remaining dimension is PASS ([org-internal #4786]: the prior binary "else PASS" wording silently upgraded WARN-eligible outcomes to PASS), and close the loop. The debt is carried by the TD registry rows just registered, not by the recorded verdict. A review that cannot converge within budget is a design-level stall wearing review clothes (retro 2026-08-21 / [org-internal #3050]): in DAG task mode, map it to the DAG oversize signals (`<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `dag.size_derivation.oversize_signals`) and let the aggregator agent drive re-derivation + a `review-dag` re-run; otherwise record the design-level finding on the Epic, or open `{slug}/03-design-amendments` via `wiki 读写 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` (`_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 1).
+
+**Efficiency optimization**: see `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` Phase D (same rule — from round 2 onward ([org-internal #2598]), only spawn reviewers for FAIL/WARN/UNRESOLVED dimensions; full sweep every 2 rounds). Round ≥2 reviewer input is delta-scoped to the revised files + their neighbors.
+
+<!-- inject: ../_shared/compaction-round-boundary.md -->
+
+---
 
 <!-- section:phase-e -->
 ## Phase E — Final Report & Approval
@@ -686,11 +934,11 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
      the findings JSONs are deleted at Tier 1 archive-at-close, so the final
      report is the ONLY durable carrier of round-1 findings — retrospective
      M7 (§2.9 first-round root-cause analysis) reads this table instead of
-     relying on commit messages (retro 2026-08-21 / [TT-3120]).
+     relying on commit messages (retro 2026-08-21 / [org-internal #3120]).
 
 2.56. **Inline-ization — post the final round's findings as PR inline
       comments** (consumer of frozen contract
-      `{epic-slug}/shared/review-inline-v1`, epic [TT-3533]; REQ-F-001/002/004).
+      `{epic-slug}/shared/review-inline-v1`, epic [org-internal #3533]; REQ-F-001/002/004).
       After the final report page exists (step 1), post the FINAL round's
       findings as Gitea PR inline comments so review conclusions land
       line-level on the diff. Run the runner from the repo root:
@@ -754,7 +1002,7 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [TT-3072] phase 3):
       > THEN ask the human to approve. Approving before the reviewer is
       > registered produces `official: false` on the approval — the gate
       > treats the PR as unapproved and the approval must be re-done. See
-      > `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` Phase E step 3.5. ([TT-1931]: audit
+      > `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` Phase E step 3.5. ([org-internal #1931]: audit
       > R2→R3 re-loop + re-approve, ~30min wasted on exactly this ordering.)
 
       ```
@@ -832,7 +1080,7 @@ To notify workflow completion, call the `signal_stage_done` tool.
 - Legacy design path (historical note, FLOW-F001 / audit-20260901): the
   design-document precondition row formerly in the DAG task-mode table
   (legacy `{slug}/03-design-index` / `{slug}/02-03-req-design` → node spec + frozen DAG
-  copy) referenced the legacy design pipeline, archived 2026-08-21 with [TT-3072]
+  copy) referenced the legacy design pipeline, archived 2026-08-21 with [org-internal #3072]
   phase 3 (see `<instance-root>/archive/skills/design/`); the live design baseline is
   the node spec + cross-session edge contracts in the frozen DAG copy
   `{epic-slug}/dag`.

core/skills/review-code/reference/review-artifact-tree.md

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # Code Review Output Artifacts
 
 > Output tree for code review artifacts. Read on-demand for reference.
-> Output model ([TT-1988] Tier 1 migration): Tier 1 local files (raw dimension findings) + Tier 2 wiki pages (task prompts, revision summaries, final reports) + Tier 2 synthesis comment. Status tracking via commit status `pipeline/review-code`.
+> Output model ([org-internal #1988] Tier 1 migration): Tier 1 local files (raw dimension findings) + Tier 2 wiki pages (task prompts, revision summaries, final reports) + Tier 2 synthesis comment. Status tracking via commit status `pipeline/review-code`.
 
 ```
 <runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/

core/skills/review-code/reference/revision-loop.md

@@ -1,240 +0,0 @@
-> Extracted from review-code/SKILL.md (Phase C — Developer Revision +
-> Phase D — Re-review Loop) — moved verbatim; read on-demand when
-> `overall_verdict` is not PASS (skipped entirely on PASS, which jumps
-> straight to Phase E).
-
-<!-- section:phase-c -->
-## Phase C — Developer Revision
-
-If `overall_verdict` is PASS, skip to Phase E.
-
-Otherwise:
-
-**Orchestrator actions**:
-
-1. Prepare the Developer's input as a structured task file,
-   created as a wiki page via `wiki 读写 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` （`_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 1）with page_name `{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/task-developer`.
-
-   This file must contain:
-   - Paths to all code files that need revision.
-   - Reference to the synthesis comment on the ticket (posted via `工单评论 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` in Phase B — Tier 2).
-   - References to the Tier 1 finding files for dimensions that have FAIL or WARN
-     verdicts (`<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json`).
-   - The Developer MUST NOT receive the full text of all reviewer findings
-     inline — use finding-file path references only to avoid context explosion.
-   - Convergence status: blockers/majors remaining vs. previous round.
-   - **Revision survival ([TT-2601]) — primary path**: the task tool's completion
-     output includes a `task_id`; passing it back resumes the SAME Developer
-     subagent session instead of creating a fresh one. Round 1: persist the
-     returned `task_id` with the round's working-notes entry (it must survive
-     round-boundary compaction). Round ≥ 2: dispatch with `task_id` set to the
-     previous revision round's — the Developer continues in-session with its
-     prior diff/context; the round's task page then carries only the findings
-     delta, not a full re-derivation. Reviewers are NEVER resumed — per-round
-     freshness is their independence.
-   - **Revision survival — fallback** (task_id lost to compaction before it
-     was persisted): prepend the current `<runs-root>/{slug}/working-notes.md`
-     content (run narrative memory — prior decisions, dead ends, reviewer
-     feedback from earlier rounds) and reference the previous round's revision
-     summary (`{slug}/reviews/code/round{N-1}/revision-summary`), stating
-     explicitly that this revises code a prior round already wrote — do NOT
-     re-read the full design/acceptance artifacts unless a finding requires
-     them.
-
-2. Spawn the Developer (Worker) with the prompt
-   template at `core/skills/_shared/review-revision-prompt.md`, substituting:
-
-   - `{ROLE}`: Developer
-   - `{TASK_FILE}`: task-developer
-   - `{REVISION_SCOPE}`: Apply the Developer Revision Protocol (see Protocol
-      subsection below) — evaluate each finding against codebase reality:
-      Explorer reviewers are automated LLM sub-agents that can hallucinate
-      citations, misapply rules, or miss design context. Verify cited code
-      exists, the rule applies, and the fix does not break existing
-      functionality. WAIVE technically-incorrect findings with justification
-      (`WAIVED-{finding-id}` → one-line reason; canonical definition of the
-      `WAIVED-{id}` convention, incl. the round-2+ cosmetic-MINOR waiver
-      rule: `_shared/review-revision-prompt.md`). Revise code minimally and
-      surgically — do NOT refactor unrelated code or introduce new behavior.
-   - `{RESOLUTION_RULE}`: Do NOT silently deviate from the approved baseline
-     (DAG task mode: the node spec + frozen cross-session contracts in
-     `{epic-slug}/dag`; the legacy `{slug}/03-design-*` baseline is archived
-     historical, [TT-3072] phase 3). If a finding exposes a design flaw, mark it
-     as deferred with justification and suggest a design amendment — do not
-     change the code against the baseline.
-   - `{COSMETIC_MINOR_EXAMPLES}`: naming, comments, dead code, import
-     ordering, style
-   - `{WAIVED_EXAMPLE}`: `WAIVED-COR-R2-001`
-    - `{CHECKLIST_REF}`: `core/checklists/code-review.md`
-    - `{FILES_MODIFIED_LINE}`: {list}
-    - `{RETURN_FILE}`:
-      `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/revision-return.md`
-      (Tier 1 return persistence — [TT-2847],
-      `_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`)
-
-3. The Developer revises the code files in place. The Developer creates a
-   revision summary as a wiki page via `wiki 读写 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` （`_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 1）with page_name `{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/revision-summary`,
-   and persists its final return summary to
-   `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/revision-return.md` (Tier 1,
-   worker-report persistence [TT-2847] — see
-   `_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`) BEFORE returning. If the
-   completion notification is lost, the Orchestrator recovers the revision
-   outcome from the persisted return (wiki page for the full summary,
-   Tier 1 file for the conclusion of record).
-
-4. **Pre-handoff gate** — before reporting completion, the Developer MUST run
-   the same mechanical gate the Orchestrator will re-run at Phase D re-entry
-   (the tree-fingerprint cache turns the re-run into a cache hit — one real
-   execution per tree state, no double-paying):
-   - Run `bun core/skills/review-code/scripts/precondition-gate.ts {slug} --round {N}`
-     from the worktree root (oxlint + typecheck + `test:changed`, CI-aligned —
-     `bun run test:parallel` is verify's job, not a per-revision
-     requirement ([TT-2598])).
-   - Exit 0 required; a new test failure, lint error, or type error introduced
-     by the revision must be fixed before the Orchestrator proceeds to Phase D.
-   - Report the gate's per-check results in the revision summary.
-
----
-
-### Phase C — Developer Revision: Protocol
-
-The Developer applies this cognitive protocol before implementing any finding.
-**Core principle:** reviewer findings are claims to evaluate, not orders to
-execute. Verify before implementing. Technical correctness over performative
-agreement.
-
-#### Response Pattern
-
-1. **READ** — Load every FAIL/WARN dimension finding file
-   (`<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json`,
-   Tier 1 local). Do not react item-by-item.
-2. **UNDERSTAND** — Restate each finding's requirement in your own words.
-   If you cannot, the finding is unclear — see STOP rule below.
-3. **VERIFY** — Check the finding against codebase reality: does the cited
-   code exist at the given file:line? Does the cited rule apply?
-4. **EVALUATE** — Is the finding technically correct for THIS codebase?
-   Does the proposed fix break existing functionality? Does it conflict
-   with the approved baseline (DAG task mode: the node spec + contracts in
-   `{epic-slug}/dag`)?
-5. **RESPOND** — Fix it (correct), WAIVE it (`WAIVED-{finding-id}` →
-   one-line reason), or flag it (unclear / design-level question).
-6. **IMPLEMENT** — One verified finding at a time, test each individually.
-
-#### Evaluating Findings — 5-Check Gate
-
-Before implementing any finding, run these checks:
-
-1. **Cited code is real** — Open the file:line. Does the code exist and say
-   what the finding claims?
-2. **Rule applies** — Does the cited checklist rule actually match this issue?
-3. **Reason for current implementation** — Is the flagged behavior
-   intentional? Check the baseline (node spec + contracts in
-   `{epic-slug}/dag` for DAG task mode) for rationale.
-4. **Fix does not break existing functionality** — Will the proposed change
-   cause a regression?
-5. **Reviewer has full context** — Did the reviewer see the baseline (node
-   spec + acceptance criteria) and the diff context? An isolated diff review
-   can miss architectural intent.
-
-```
-IF a finding seems wrong:
-  WAIVE it: WAIVED-{finding-id} → <one-line technical reason>
-
-IF you cannot easily verify a finding:
-  State the limitation in revision_summary.md and request direction.
-
-IF a finding conflicts with the approved design:
-  Flag as a design-level question — do NOT silently change code against the design.
-```
-
-#### Unclear Findings — STOP Rule
-
-```
-IF any finding is unclear:
-  STOP — do not implement ANY finding yet.
-  Flag the unclear items in revision_summary.md and request clarification.
-
-WHY: findings may be related. Partial understanding produces wrong
-     implementation across multiple items.
-```
-
-**Example:** The synthesis lists findings F1–F6. You understand F1, F2, F3, F6.
-F4 and F5 are ambiguous about what change is expected.
-- **WRONG:** implement F1, F2, F3, F6 now; ask about F4, F5 later.
-- **RIGHT:** "Understand F1, F2, F3, F6. Need clarification on F4, F5 before
-  proceeding — they may interact with the same module."
-
-#### YAGNI Check
-
-```
-IF a reviewer suggests "implementing this properly" (full abstraction,
-generic API, configurable layer):
-  Check actual usage (codegraph callers / grep) BEFORE expanding scope.
-
-  IF unused:  WAIVE — "No call sites found. Leaving as-is (YAGNI)."
-  IF used:    Then implement properly.
-```
-
-#### Forbidden Responses in revision_summary.md
-
-**NEVER** write:
-- "You're absolutely right!" / "Great point!" / "Excellent catch!" — performative.
-- "Thanks for catching that!" / any gratitude expression.
-- "Let me implement that now" — before verification.
-
-**INSTEAD:**
-- Restate the technical requirement concisely.
-- State the fix factually: `Fixed {finding-id}: <what changed> at <file:line>`.
-- Just fix it and show the result in the diff.
-
-#### Gracefully Correcting a WAIVE
-
-If you WAIVEd a finding and were wrong:
-```
-"Verified {finding-id} — the reviewer is correct. My initial read missed
- <reason>. Implementing now."
-```
-State the correction factually. No lengthy apology.
-
-#### Implementation Order
-
-For multi-finding revisions, after clarifying all unclear items:
-1. **Blocking issues** — security, data loss, breaks existing functionality.
-2. **Simple fixes** — typos, imports, naming, dead code.
-3. **Complex fixes** — logic changes, refactoring within minimal-surgical scope.
-Test each fix individually.
-
-#### Rationalization-Anticipation Quick Reference
-
-| Trap | Hold to |
-|------|---------|
-| "The reviewer flagged it as BLOCKER, so it must be real." | VERIFY cited code exists and rule applies before any edit. |
-| "Just fix everything to avoid a re-review round." | EVALUATE each finding; WAIVE the wrong ones with reasoning. |
-| "This finding looks plausible — I'll fix it without checking." | Open the file:line, confirm the behavior. |
-| "I'll implement the clear findings and ask about unclear ones later." | STOP. Clarify ALL unclear items before implementing any. |
-| "The reviewer wants it done 'properly' — full abstraction." | Check call sites first. If unused, WAIVE (YAGNI). |
-| "I shouldn't push back — the reviewer is probably right." | Push back with technical reasoning. The diff is the acknowledgment. |
-
----
-
-<!-- section:phase-d -->
-## Phase D — Re-review Loop
-
-After the Developer completes revision:
-
-1. Increment the round counter (the Synthesizer updates the commit status in Phase B
-   with the new round's results).
-2. Re-enter Phase A at step 2.5 — the mechanical-green gate re-runs on the
-   revised tree before any reviewer spawn (a red gate blocks dispatch exactly
-   as on round-1 entry) — then spawn the new round of reviewers against the
-   revised files.
-
-**Convergence criteria**: see `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` Phase D for the canonical table (stop conditions). `{MAX_ROUNDS}` is per-skill — code review binds the routing budget: **2** rounds default, **3** for high risk (a BLOCKER survived a round, or the diff touches a frozen cross-session contract) — `<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `review.max_rounds` ([TT-3567]). The code-review-specific addition is inheritance of the shared INFO-disposition rule. The shared Round-3 Escalation Guardrail is scoped to the `review-artifact` skill targets only and does not apply here.
-
-**Round budget (mandatory, [TT-3567])**: when `current_round` reaches the budget (2; 3 for high risk) without convergence, do NOT enter another round. STOP: register every remaining BLOCKER/MAJOR finding as TD registry rows (`rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`), record the verdict with the shared three-tier ladder (`core/schemas/synthesis.schema.json` `overall_verdict` + `core/skills/_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md` rule 3): FAIL if any BLOCKER or FAIL dimension remains, else WARN, PASS only if every remaining dimension is PASS ([TT-4786]: the prior binary "else PASS" wording silently upgraded WARN-eligible outcomes to PASS), and close the loop. The debt is carried by the TD registry rows just registered, not by the recorded verdict. A review that cannot converge within budget is a design-level stall wearing review clothes (retro 2026-08-21 / [TT-3050]): in DAG task mode, map it to the DAG oversize signals (`<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` `dag.size_derivation.oversize_signals`) and let the aggregator agent drive re-derivation + a `review-dag` re-run; otherwise record the design-level finding on the Epic, or open `{slug}/03-design-amendments` via `wiki 读写 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）` (`_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 1).
-
-**Efficiency optimization**: see `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` Phase D (same rule — from round 2 onward ([TT-2598]), only spawn reviewers for FAIL/WARN/UNRESOLVED dimensions; full sweep every 2 rounds). Round ≥2 reviewer input is delta-scoped to the revised files + their neighbors.
-
-<!-- inject: ../_shared/compaction-round-boundary.md -->
-
----

core/skills/verify/SKILL.md

@@ -60,10 +60,10 @@ digraph verify {
 
 ## Agent Role
 
-> **Progressive disclosure ([TT-3722], [TT-3734], [TT-3745])**: when dispatching a Verifier
+> **Progressive disclosure ([org-internal #3722], [org-internal #3734], [org-internal #3745])**: when dispatching a Verifier
 > scoped to one phase, pass `skills: ["verify:phase-2"]` (preamble + that
 > phase only) instead of the full body; multi-phase dispatches may union.
-> Phase 5 is subdivided ([TT-3734]): `phase-5` covers the report template only;
+> Phase 5 is subdivided ([org-internal #3734]): `phase-5` covers the report template only;
 > each mandatory filing subsection carries its own marker (`phase-5.5` tech
 > debt, `phase-5.55` baseline failures, `phase-5.56` flaky tests,
 > `phase-5.6` checklist sync, `phase-5.7` CI sync). Dispatch recipes:
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ digraph verify {
 > / `phase-5.56` when baseline failures / flaky tests are present); PASS
 > close-out →
 > `"verify:phase-5,phase-5.5,phase-5.55,phase-5.56,phase-5.6,phase-5.7,phase-6"`.
-> The DAG branch is separately marked ([TT-3745]): `phase-6` narrows to
+> The DAG branch is separately marked ([org-internal #3745]): `phase-6` narrows to
 > Approval + Commit Gate, and the tail References rides `dag-branch` (same
 > tail rule as review-code's phase-e). Non-DAG dispatches thereby drop the
 > ~175-line DAG branch; DAG milestone/task verify → union `dag-branch` onto
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ Before starting verification, confirm:
       node spec, its `acceptance_criteria` + `test_id` declarations, and the
       DoD slice. (Legacy tier rule — `{slug}/04-plan-*` wiki pages / issue
       comment, and the design-space + iteration-plan convergence checks that
-      used to follow here — was archived 2026-08-21, [TT-3072] phase 3; historical
+      used to follow here — was archived 2026-08-21, [org-internal #3072] phase 3; historical
       plan/AC pages stay readable via `_shared/gitea-read-patterns.md`.)
 - [ ] `core/checklists/verification.md` is accessible.
 - [ ] `slug` matches the run's slug (DAG: `{epic-slug}`).
@@ -196,10 +196,6 @@ each missing item.
 <!-- section:phase-1 -->
 ## Phase 1 — Load Verification Context
 
-> **Pipeline stage**: if the source issue exists, move it to the `verify`
-> column on the Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`
-> Pattern 7.5. Skip if no source issue exists.
-
 Read the upstream artifacts. DAG task/milestone mode (the live path — see
 the DAG branch below for its read map):
 
@@ -223,7 +219,7 @@ the DAG branch below for its read map):
    (The legacy `Size/*`-tiered locations — `{slug}/04-plan-*`,
    `{slug}/02-requirements-index`, `{slug}/02-03-req-design`,
    `{slug}/03-design-06-non-functional-design` — were archived 2026-08-21,
-   [TT-3072] phase 3; historical pages stay readable for legacy-run verification
+   [org-internal #3072] phase 3; historical pages stay readable for legacy-run verification
    via `_shared/gitea-read-patterns.md`.)
 
 5. **Code review final report** — `{slug}/reviews/code/final/report`
@@ -277,7 +273,7 @@ before. This section saves redundant typecheck/lint/security re-runs; it
 never weakens a gate.
 
 **Second evidence source — the review-code precondition-gate cache
-(eff-gate-cache [TT-2598] / [TT-2990])**. The mechanical checks this phase would re-run
+(eff-gate-cache [org-internal #2598] / [org-internal #2990])**. The mechanical checks this phase would re-run
 (oxlint / typecheck / `test:changed`) are exactly the precondition-gate's
 check-set, and the gate caches GREEN results keyed on a tree fingerprint
 (HEAD + tracked diff + untracked contents) in
@@ -310,6 +306,20 @@ gate fingerprint is keyed on the working tree (SHA + uncommitted state +
 untracked), so it covers pre-push/headless states the same-SHA CI clauses
 cannot.
 
+### 2.0b — Gate Records as Deterministic Inputs ([org-internal #5656] N-04)
+
+Mechanical checks MUST be grounded in gate records (`gate` tool result
+metadata), never in a model's transcription of command output:
+
+- Cite `exit_code` verbatim — canonical block from
+  `packages/octopus/src/gate/consume.ts`: `gate <id> (<tier>):
+  exit_code=<n> -> green|red`, plus `duration_ms` / `ci_run_id` when present.
+- `exit_code === null` (timeout/abort) is NO verdict — rerun required; a
+  pass claim cannot stand on it.
+- A green verdict-cache hit (`metadata.verdict_cache.key`) satisfies the
+  check the same as a fresh run (content-addressed, same fingerprint).
+- Narration drift (claim != record) is itself a verification finding.
+
 ### 2.1 Full Test Suite
 
 ```bash
@@ -394,8 +404,8 @@ For each DoD entry with verification method "Security scan":
    every failing test, run it on the last known-green commit (or the base
    branch) in isolation. **Never use `git stash` for this** — the stash stack
    is shared across all worktrees of this repo and a parallel session can
-   overwrite your entry mid-flight (issue [TT-1655]). Instead, use the
-   lifecycle-managed scratch-worktree script ([TT-2790]) — it registers the
+   overwrite your entry mid-flight (issue [org-internal #1655]). Instead, use the
+   lifecycle-managed scratch-worktree script ([org-internal #2790]) — it registers the
    worktree for the sweep backstop, symlinks `node_modules` from the source
    checkout when `bun.lock` matches (dropping the per-instance cost from
    ~170k inodes to ~7k), and deregisters on removal:
@@ -435,7 +445,7 @@ For each DoD entry with verification method "Security scan":
 ### 2.7 — Browser Evidence Reference Validation (UI-touching PR)
 
 For DoD entries of the「UI 主张 ↔ 可复现浏览器证据」type — contract
-`browser-evidence-4486/shared/evidence-ref-v1` (frozen 2026-09-10, [TT-4498]).
+`browser-evidence-4486/shared/evidence-ref-v1` (frozen 2026-09-10, [org-internal #4498]).
 Applicable ONLY to UI-touching PRs (changes under `packages/app`,
 `packages/ui`, or `packages/console/*` frontend surfaces):
 
@@ -493,7 +503,7 @@ Browser-evidence rows (UI-touching PRs only, Phase 2.7): ✅ PASS requires a
 mechanically validated, replayable pack-ref; `unregistered` / `manifest-missing` /
 `manifest-corrupt` / `not-replayable` / `over-limit` references are
 ⚠️ UNVERIFIABLE at best — the reference channel fails explicitly, never
-silently green ([TT-4498] AC-4).
+silently green ([org-internal #4498] AC-4).
 
 ### Iteration Verdict
 
@@ -619,20 +629,501 @@ issue close) is performed later in Phase 5.6 — see
 `rules/issue-checklist-sync.md` § 归档动作.
 
 <!-- section:phase-5.5 -->
-### Phase 5.5–5.6 — Issue Filing Protocols (TD registry / baseline / flaky / checklist sync)
+### Phase 5.5 — Tech Debt Registry Filing (mandatory before PASS)
 
-> The four mandatory-before-PASS filing protocols — Phase 5.5 Tech-Debt
-> registry filing (sprint-mode override), Phase 5.55 baseline-failure
-> registration, Phase 5.56 flaky-test registration, Phase 5.6 issue
-> checklist final sweep — live in `reference/issue-filing.md`. Read each at
-> its boundary during Phase 5; PASS is blocked until all applicable filings
-> report completion. Phase 5.7 (CI state sync) stays inline below.
+Tech debt is filed **registry-first** (`core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`,
+[org-internal #3002] G1): new items become ROWS in the source ticket's `## TD 登记` comment;
+an independent ticket is created only at **promotion** (claim/schedule). There
+is no `tech-debt.md` file and no `{slug}/tech-debt` wiki page — both remain
+retired. The registry preserves the three guarantees of the old
+one-issue-per-item model: visible (the comment lives on a tracker ticket),
+individually closeable (row-level checkbox), de-duplicated across sessions
+(the TD index is stronger than title-keyword matching).
+
+**Sprint-mode override ([org-internal #3002] G5/[org-internal #3007])**: read `filing.sprint-mode` from
+`<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` at the START of this phase (no caching). When
+`true`, ALL severities file registry-only — registration rows are written as
+normal (severity included, nothing lost) but promotion to standalone tickets
+is FROZEN until the switch returns to `false`. Rationale: the 2026-08-12
+sprint zeroed fix capacity while filing kept running (the 125-fragment
+backlog's direct trigger); an explicit debt-side downshift beats hoping for
+discipline. BF/FT phases 5.55/5.56 are NOT covered by this switch — failure
+evidence must stay immediately visible. Flipping the switch is a human
+decision recorded on the sprint tracker; semantics in
+`rules/workflow-routing.md` §立案降档.
+
+**Adjacency quota ([org-internal #3002] G3/[org-internal #3005])**: while collecting inputs, also check the
+AREAS this iteration touched (packages/modules with commits this iteration).
+If the source tickets for those areas carry applicable `## TD 登记` rows, at
+least ONE row must be taken along and disposed this iteration (fixed, or
+explicitly re-deferred with a reason — silence is not a disposition). Record
+`consumed X / applicable Y` (or `0 applicable`) in the TD report section;
+verification checklist §8.4 cross-checks it against the run's debt-quota
+record (historically the roadmap's per-chunk debt-quota line). This gives debt digestion a steady capacity source tied to
+touch, not to cleanup campaigns.
+
+**Promotion quota + pull event ([org-internal #3061])**: promotion to a standalone ticket
+requires (a) a **pull event** — the row's Reactivation Trigger fired (state
+the observed event) OR a named claimer/schedule; "it seemed important" is not
+a pull event — recorded in the promotion body's `## 拉动事件 / Pull Event`
+section; and (b) the origin module's OPEN promoted-TD count is below the
+quota (**default 10** — counted **per origin module**: resolve the row's
+module from the ticket body's `Origin` field, then count that module's OPEN
+`tech-debt` tickets; retro §2.10 reports breaches). At or above quota →
+register-only until the count drops; before each Phase 5.5 promotion
+re-check the owning module's count, and a row whose module is at or above
+quota is NOT promoted — defer it and annotate the registry row with
+`quota-held` (re-checked on the next verify run, retro 2026-08-21). A row
+marked `[COLD]` by retrospective §2.10
+(unclaimed >3 retro cycles) promotes only after the pull event clears the
+mark.
+
+**Collect inputs** — every tech-debt item to register this iteration:
+
+1. Every UNVERIFIABLE row in the DoD matrix (Phase 3), with its Reactivation
+   Trigger.
+2. Every ACCEPTED_RISK finding in the code-review final report
+   (`{slug}/reviews/code/final/report`), with its Recommended Reactivation
+   Trigger.
+3. Every `[OPEN: <short-id>]` marker the Developer left in code this iteration
+   (per implementation checklist POST-6.2).
+
+If the code-review final report does not exist, warn the user — ACCEPTED_RISK
+items cannot be captured. This is itself a process gap that must be flagged.
+
+**Step 1 — De-duplicate against the registry index and promoted issues.**
+
+1. Read the source ticket's `## TD 登记` comment (create the comment if this
+   is its first row) and match each candidate against existing rows by
+   `TD-NNN` and reactivation trigger. Same-source re-reporting is the
+   anti-pattern this step exists to prevent (the visual-cluster incident: 18
+   fragments from one source under the old keyword matching).
+2. Query OPEN promoted tech-debt issues for cross-source duplicates:
+
+```
+工单 API 检索（见 TERMINOLOGY）
+  （owner/repo 按实例绑定，labels="tech-debt", state="open")
+```
+
+**Step 2 — Assign `TD-NNN` via the ledger mutex ([org-internal #3322]).** One script call
+per batch: `bash script/td-alloc.sh <count = new items> <source-slug>
+[--ticket N]` returns a contiguous range from the TD allocation ledger
+(append-only comments, earliest-comment-id wins; the seed comment pins the
+historical floor). Split the returned range across the Step 3 rows in order.
+**Any allocation — manual included — must land a `**td-alloc**` comment on
+the ledger before the registry row is written; hand-computed `max + 1` is
+forbidden** (the 2026-08-24 three-way collision). On exit 5 (retry
+exhaustion) abort this phase's filing and retry — never hand-assign. The id is **reserved for life**: promotion reuses it, never
+renumbers. Run `--check` (reconciliation) here if the last check predates
+this batch.
+
+**Step 3 — Append one registry row per new item.** Append to the source
+ticket's `## TD 登记` comment (no source ticket → the owning Epic's tracker
+ticket; no Epic → the standing `TD 冷存档` tracker):
+
+```markdown
+- [ ] TD-{NNN} · {UNVERIFIABLE | ACCEPTED_RISK | DEFERRED} · {HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW}
+  · {origin chunk-id/iter-N} — {one-line summary}
+  · trigger: {objectively verifiable reactivation condition — never "when ready";
+    if no trigger can be defined this is NOT tech debt and the iteration verdict
+    becomes FAIL}
+```
+
+**Step 4 — Cross-link (adapted).** The registry comment already lives on the
+source issue — the source → debt navigation the old body-edit provided. When
+filing went to an Epic tracker or the 冷存档 (no source ticket), reference the
+originating slug in each row so the trail survives.
+
+**Step 5 — Record the mapping in the verification report.** The report's
+"Tech Debt" section records `TD-NNN → registry row` (source `#NNNN` +
+`## TD 登记` comment); promoted items record `TD-NNN → #NNNN` as before.
+
+**Promotion (认领升票) — when a row is scheduled or picked up.** Create the
+independent ticket THEN, carrying the reserved `TD-NNN`:
+
+```
+POST <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues
+  body: {"title":"[{origin}] Tech debt: {short description} (TD-{NNN})",
+         "body":<promotion template below>,
+         "labels":[tech_debt_label_id, severity_label_id]}
+```
+
+- **Severity → label** (reuse the existing exclusive Priority set):
+
+  | Severity | Label             |
+  | -------- | ----------------- |
+  | HIGH     | `Priority/High`   |
+  | MEDIUM   | `Priority/Medium` |
+  | LOW      | `Priority/Low`    |
+
+- **Promotion body template** (the pre-[org-internal #3002] issue template, now used only at
+  promotion):
+
+  ```markdown
+  ## Parent / 父级
+
+  {#source_issue carrying the ## TD 登记 row}
+
+  ## Summary
+
+  {one-paragraph description of the debt}
+
+  | Field    | Value                                       |
+  | -------- | ------------------------------------------- |
+  | TD ID    | TD-{NNN} (reserved at registration)         |
+  | Type     | {UNVERIFIABLE \| ACCEPTED_RISK \| DEFERRED} |
+  | Origin   | {chunk-id/iter-N/phase or slug}             |
+  | Severity | {HIGH \| MEDIUM \| LOW}                     |
+
+  ## Reactivation Trigger
+
+  {from the registry row}
+
+  ## 拉动事件 / Pull Event
+
+  {trigger fired: {observed event} | claimed by {who} for {when}}
+
+  ## Acceptance Criteria (how to close this issue)
+
+  - [ ] {specific action that resolves the debt}
+
+  ## Context
+
+  - Verification report: `{slug}/05-verify-iteration-{N}`
+  - Code review report: `{slug}/reviews/code/final/report` (if ACCEPTED_RISK)
+  ```
+
+- After creating the promoted ticket: tick the registry row (`- [x]`) and
+  append `→ #NNNN` to it.
+
+If no new tech-debt items were found this iteration, the phase is a no-op —
+record "0 tech-debt items" in the report and proceed.
+
+<!-- section:phase-5.55 -->
+### Phase 5.55 — Baseline-Failure Issue Registration (mandatory before PASS when pre-existing failures exist)
+
+Pre-existing test failures (BF) are tracked as **root-cause family umbrella
+tickets** (`core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`, [org-internal #3002] G1; precedents [org-internal #2585]
+umbrella + [org-internal #2925] cluster) — one `BF-NNN` ticket per failure-signature family,
+labeled `baseline-failure`, with each occurrence's evidence attached as
+comments. There is no `baseline-failures.md` file and no
+`{slug}/baseline-failures` wiki page. A pre-existing failure does not block
+the iteration that _discovered_ it (it pre-dates that work), but it MUST be
+filed against (or into) a family; an un-filed baseline failure is a process
+gap and the iteration is NOT Done.
+
+**Birth triage SLA ([org-internal #3061])**: a BF umbrella is born with `Kind/Bug` (it IS a
+bug — of the baseline) and must be triaged the SAME DAY it is filed:
+assigned, scheduled, or explicitly deferred with a reason on the ticket.
+Untriaged-next-day BF umbrellas are named individually in retro §2.10
+(compliance %), not averaged away.
+
+**Collect inputs** — every pre-existing failure to register this iteration:
+
+1. Every failure classified **pre-existing** in Phase 2.6 (fails on the base
+   branch / last-green commit too).
+2. Any baseline-run failures noted in the brownfield pre-check (Greenfield vs.
+   Brownfield section).
+
+**Step 1 — De-duplicate by failure SIGNATURE against existing families (open
+AND closed), per `core/rules/testing.md`** (de-duplicate BEFORE filing,
+retro [org-internal #2696]). Query `baseline-failure` issues in ALL states:
+
+```
+GET <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues?labels=baseline-failure&state=all&page=N&limit=50
+```
+
+Match each candidate by **failure signature** — the error/assertion signature
+plus the affected surface, not just `file::test-name` (one root-cause family
+may span several tests; several tests failing with the same assertion shape
+are ONE family). On a signature hit, do NOT create a new ticket: attach the
+new run evidence (run, commit, failing output, sibling tests observed) as a
+comment on the FAMILY umbrella ticket. Filing a second ticket inside a known
+root-cause family is the anti-pattern this phase exists to prevent. If a
+tracked family is now FIXED by this iteration's work, close its umbrella with
+a comment citing the fixing commit (a bonus, not a requirement). If the query
+itself errors (API failure — not "no matches"), retry once; on the second
+failure proceed to file with the literal marker `dedup-unverified` in the
+umbrella's first evidence comment (query-failure ruling, [org-internal #3383] — fail-open,
+visible; rationale in `core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`).
+
+**Step 2 — Assign the next `BF-NNN`** per `core/rules/testing.md`
+§ "Pre-existing test failures must be filed, not silently logged" (the L1 rule
+owns the repo-wide sequential numbering invariant — `max + 1`, duplicate ids
+forbidden incl. closed tickets). `BF-NNN` names the FAMILY; the Gitea issue
+number `#NNNN` is the tracker handle.
+
+**Step 3 — Create one umbrella ticket per NEW root-cause family.** Only when
+no existing family matches the signature:
+
+```
+POST <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues
+  body: {"title":"[{origin}] Baseline failure: {test identifier} (BF-{NNN})",
+         "body":<issue body template below>,
+         "labels":[baseline_failure_label_id, severity_label_id, kind_bug_label_id]}
+```
+
+- **Title**: `[{origin}] Baseline failure: {signature summary} (BF-{NNN})`
+  where `{origin}` is `chunk-{id}/iter-{N}` or the bugfix slug, and
+  `{signature summary}` is the family's error/assertion shape (not a single
+  test name — sibling tests observed later join this umbrella as evidence
+  comments).
+- **Severity → label** (reuse the existing exclusive Priority set; a failing
+  test defaults to at least MEDIUM, HIGH if on a critical path):
+
+  | Severity | Label             |
+  | -------- | ----------------- |
+  | HIGH     | `Priority/High`   |
+  | MEDIUM   | `Priority/Medium` |
+  | LOW      | `Priority/Low`    |
+
+- Also attach `Kind/Bug` so the failure is discoverable in the bug tracker
+  alongside manually-reported bugs.
+- **Issue body template**:
+
+  ````markdown
+  ## Parent / 父级
+
+  {#source_issue, or "no source issue — discovered during iteration baseline"}
+
+  ## Summary
+
+  A test was already failing before this iteration's work began. It does not
+  block the discovering iteration but must be tracked to closure.
+
+  | Field          | Value                                          |
+  | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------- |
+  | BF ID          | BF-{NNN} (family)                              |
+  | Signature      | {error/assertion shape}                        |
+  | Tests affected | `{file::test-name}`, … (initial members)       |
+  | Origin         | {chunk-id/iter-N or slug}                      |
+  | Severity       | {HIGH \| MEDIUM \| LOW}                        |
+  | First observed | {base commit / date the failure reproduces on} |
+
+  ## Reproduction
+
+  ```
+  git checkout {base commit}
+  (cd <harness-package> && bun test --timeout 120000 {test file})   # or project-equivalent
+  ```
+
+  Failing output:
+
+  ```
+  {paste the relevant assertion / error}
+  ```
+
+  ## Acceptance Criteria (how to close this issue)
+
+  - [ ] The named test passes on a clean checkout of the target branch.
+  - [ ] If the test is deleted/renamed, the replacement covers the same
+        behavior and passes.
+
+  ## Context
+
+  - Verification report: `{slug}/05-verify-iteration-{N}`
+  ````
+
+**Step 4 — Cross-link to the source issue (mandatory).** Per the
+issue-cross-linking rule, every baseline-failure issue MUST link back to its
+source:
+
+- The issue body already carries `## Parent` (above).
+- Update the source/parent issue body to reference each new baseline-failure
+  issue by `#NNNN` in its task list (e.g.
+  `- [ ] #NNNN — BF-{NNN} {test identifier}`), so reviewers can navigate from
+  source → failure.
+
+**Step 5 — Record the mapping in the verification report.** The
+`BF-NNN → #NNNN` mapping is written ONLY in the Phase 5 verification report's
+"Baseline Failures" section (and in the issue title itself). There is no local
+file to update.
+
+If no new baseline failures were found this iteration, the phase is a no-op —
+record "0 baseline failures" in the report and proceed.
+
+<!-- section:phase-5.56 -->
+### Phase 5.56 — Flaky-Test Issue Registration (mandatory before PASS when flaky tests are unfixed)
+
+Flaky tests (intermittent pass/fail) are tracked as **root-cause family
+umbrella tickets** (`core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`, [org-internal #3002] G1) — one
+`FT-NNN` ticket per failure-signature family, labeled `flaky-test`, with each
+occurrence's evidence (run count, failure rate, commit) attached as comments.
+A flaky test that is not fixed within this iteration MUST be filed against
+(or into) a family; otherwise it evaporates at iteration end and the
+"compare flaky count against baseline" check (TST-2.5) has no persistent
+register to compare against. Filing does not block the verdict, but an unfixed
+flaky test left un-filed is a process gap and the iteration is NOT Done.
+
+**Expiry SLA ([org-internal #3061])**: an FT umbrella is born with `Kind/Testing` and a
+**fix-or-isolate window** (default 7 days) recorded in its body (isolating =
+quarantining/skipping the test with the family id in the skip reason, which
+keeps the register comparable). Past the window without fix or isolation, the
+umbrella is escalated on the ticket (comment naming the owner); retro §2.10
+reports fix-or-isolate compliance per cycle.
+
+**Collect inputs** — every flaky test to register this iteration:
+
+1. Every flaky test surfaced in Phase 2.1 (intermittent pass/fail across
+   reruns) that was NOT fixed by the Developer this iteration.
+2. Any flaky test carried over from a prior iteration's report that is still
+   intermittently failing.
+
+**Step 1 — De-duplicate by failure SIGNATURE against existing families (open
+AND closed), per `core/rules/testing.md`** (de-duplicate BEFORE filing,
+retro [org-internal #2696]). Query `flaky-test` issues in ALL states:
+
+```
+GET <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues?labels=flaky-test&state=all&page=N&limit=50
+```
+
+Match each candidate by **failure signature** — the flakiness mode (timeout /
+race / order-dependence / env-leak) plus the affected surface, not just
+`file::test-name` (one root cause may flake several tests). On a signature
+hit, do NOT create a new ticket: attach the new run evidence (run count,
+failure rate, commit, sibling tests) as a comment on the FAMILY umbrella
+ticket. Filing a second ticket inside a known root-cause family is the
+anti-pattern this phase exists to prevent. If a tracked family now passes
+deterministically, close its umbrella citing the fixing commit. If the query
+itself errors (API failure — not "no matches"), retry once; on the second
+failure proceed to file with the literal marker `dedup-unverified` in the
+umbrella's first evidence comment (query-failure ruling, [org-internal #3383] — fail-open,
+visible; rationale in `core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`).
+
+**Step 2 — Assign the next `FT-NNN`** per `core/rules/testing.md`
+§ "Flaky tests must be filed, not silently tolerated" (the L1 rule owns the
+repo-wide sequential numbering invariant — `max + 1`, duplicate ids forbidden
+incl. closed tickets). `FT-NNN` names the FAMILY.
+
+**Step 3 — Create one umbrella ticket per NEW root-cause family.** Only when
+no existing family matches the signature:
+
+```
+POST <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues
+  body: {"title":"[{origin}] Flaky test: {test identifier} (FT-{NNN})",
+         "body":<issue body template below>,
+         "labels":[flaky_test_label_id, severity_label_id, kind_testing_label_id]}
+```
+
+- **Title**: `[{origin}] Flaky test: {signature summary} (FT-{NNN})` — the
+  family's flakiness mode + surface (sibling tests join later as evidence
+  comments, not new tickets).
+- **Severity** → a flaky test defaults to MEDIUM (HIGH if on a critical path
+  or blocking CI); reuse the exclusive Priority set.
+- Also attach `Kind/Testing` so it is discoverable in the testing tracker.
+- **Issue body template**:
+
+  ````markdown
+  ## Parent / 父级
+
+  {#source_issue, or "no source issue — discovered during iteration verification"}
+
+  ## Summary
+
+  A test passes and fails intermittently across runs. It undermines the
+  reliability of the suite and must be stabilized or quarantined.
+
+  | Field        | Value                     |
+  | ------------ | ------------------------- |
+  | FT ID        | FT-{NNN} (family)          |
+  | Signature    | {flakiness mode + surface} |
+  | Tests affected | `{file::test-name}`, … (initial members) |
+  | Origin       | {chunk-id/iter-N or slug}  |
+  | Severity     | {HIGH \| MEDIUM \| LOW}   |
+  | Failure rate | {e.g. 3/10 runs}          |
+
+  ## Reproduction
+
+  ```
+  for i in $(seq 1 10); do (cd <harness-package> && bun test --timeout 120000 {test file}) || echo "run $i FAILED"; done
+  ```
+
+  ## Acceptance Criteria (how to close this issue)
+
+  - [ ] The test passes deterministically across 10 consecutive runs.
+  - [ ] If it cannot be stabilized, it is quarantined (`test.skip` /
+        `test.todo` with a comment citing FT-{NNN}) and a stable replacement
+        is filed as tech-debt (TD-NNN).
+
+  ## Context
+
+  - Verification report: `{slug}/05-verify-iteration-{N}`
+  ````
+
+**Step 4 — Cross-link to the source issue (mandatory).** Every flaky-test
+issue links back to its source via `## Parent`, and the source/parent issue
+task list references each by `#NNNN`
+(`- [ ] #NNNN — FT-{NNN} {test identifier}`).
+
+**Step 5 — Record the mapping in the verification report.** The
+`FT-NNN → #NNNN` mapping is written ONLY in the Phase 5 report's "Flaky Tests"
+section (and the issue title). No local file.
+
+If no unfixed flaky tests exist this iteration, the phase is a no-op — record
+"0 flaky tests" in the report and proceed.
+
+<!-- section:phase-5.6 -->
+### Phase 5.6 — Issue Checklist Sync (final sweep, mandatory before PASS)
+
+This is the **final** checklist sync — the last of the progressive sync
+points (requirements exit, design exit, plan exit, each iteration commit, PR
+creation, review convergence, CI transitions, and here — per the sync-point
+table in `core/rules/issue-checklist-sync.md`). Earlier syncs may have
+already checked off completed items; this phase catches everything remaining
+and ensures no `- [ ]` item is left without an annotation.
+
+1. **Identify the source issue** per `core/rules/issue-checklist-sync.md`
+   § "How to sync (each point)" step 1 (find `Closes #N` / `Fixes #N` in the
+   PR body or commit messages). If no source issue exists (e.g. standalone
+   bugfix with no tracking issue), skip this phase.
+2. **Fetch the issue body** via `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）get` (rule step 2).
+3. **Map every remaining `- [ ]` checklist item** to one of three states:
+   - **Done** (missed by earlier syncs) → mark `- [x]` and append
+     `_(PR #NNN: <file/component>)_`.
+   - **Deferred** → keep `- [ ]` and append `_(Deferred: TD-NNN <reason>)_`.
+   - **Pending** → keep `- [ ]` and append `_(Pending: <blocker>)_`.
+4. **Fold the `## 当前状态` live-status section** (if present). Rows that have
+   a checklist counterpart (review, process-ACs) are already reflected as
+   checklist annotations at their sync points. Rows with no checklist
+   counterpart in a non-Epic issue (PR opened/merged) are folded as follow-up
+   evidence on the issue narrative (e.g. `_(PR #NNN merged: <summary>)_` on the
+   item it delivered, or in the report). Once every row is accounted for,
+   remove the section from the issue body.
+5. **archive-at-close: mark the `## 工件索引` comment archived** (归档动作 — [org-internal #1929]). Issue
+   closing IS the archive-at-close action; it is explicit, not implicit. Edit the index
+   comment in place per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 10 Archive-at-close
+   (mechanism — banner + every row's 重读 → ARCHIVE + invariants — is defined there,
+   do not restate; sequence/actor per `rules/issue-checklist-sync.md` § 归档动作).
+   - Skip if no source issue exists.
+   - **Tier 1 run archive** ([org-internal #1988] two-tier artifacts — only if a Tier 1 run
+     workspace exists): if `<runs-root>/{slug}/` exists (a stage in this run
+     produced Tier 1 local artifacts, e.g. review-code findings), archive the
+     run workspace per `core/rules/two-tier-artifacts.md` § Archive-at-close
+     (the L1 rule is authoritative — do NOT restate its steps here).
+     The archived bundle must pass
+     `core/schemas/runs-bundle.schema.json` validation (the generator
+     validates by default; a red exit blocks close).
+     Verify deltas only: skip in milestone/task DAG mode (the aggregator agent
+     performs it at Epic/task-ticket close — see the DAG branch below).
+6. **Update the issue body** via `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）update` with the annotated
+   checklist. Preserve all non-checklist content unchanged.
+7. **Verify**: re-read the issue and confirm no `- [ ]` item lacks an
+   annotation. Every unchecked item MUST have a `(Deferred: ...)` or
+   `(Pending: ...)` note explaining why it is not done.
+8. **Close the issue** (completes the archive-at-close loop): if the flow has
+   no PR (no `Closes #N` on merge), the Verifier closes the issue after PASS
+   approval via `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）update(state="closed")` — the banner date is
+   corrected to the actual close date if it differs from today. If a PR carries
+   `Closes #N`, the merge closes it; no further action.
+
+If a checklist item cannot be mapped to evidence, deferral, or pending
+status, the iteration is NOT Done — the item represents untracked scope.
 
 <!-- section:phase-5.7 -->
 ### Phase 5.7 — CI State Transition Sync (progressive)
 
 Process-type acceptance criteria (e.g. "ci.yml passes N consecutive runs",
-AC#3 in [TT-1668]) have no single moment of completion — their progress lives on
+AC#3 in [org-internal #1668]) have no single moment of completion — their progress lives on
 the issue. The `CI` row in `## 当前状态` is written by the `status-sync` poller
 (`.gitea/scripts/status-sync-poll.ts`), NOT this skill — do NOT manually
 `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）update` it. When verification observes a CI state transition
@@ -640,7 +1131,7 @@ the issue. The `CI` row in `## 当前状态` is written by the `status-sync` pol
 process-AC's progress note in place via `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）update` (per the
 `issue-checklist-sync` L1 rule § Automated sync — the poller owns the CI row;
 the checklist annotation remains manual). Do NOT wait for Phase 5.6: a
-transition left unsynced for tens of minutes is exactly the staleness [TT-1689]
+transition left unsynced for tens of minutes is exactly the staleness [org-internal #1689]
 targets. Skip if no source issue exists.
 
 ---
@@ -722,24 +1213,188 @@ If the user confirms, invoke the commit workflow per
 
 An iteration is NOT Done until all code is committed in git history.
 
-After the commit gate passes, move the source issue to the `done` column on
-the Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5.
-Skip if no source issue exists. `done` is a stage column marker; issue
-closing follows the lifecycle per `issue-checklist-sync.md` 归档动作.
+Issue closing follows the lifecycle per `issue-checklist-sync.md` 归档动作.
 
 To notify workflow completion, call the `signal_stage_done` tool.
 
 ---
 
 <!-- section:dag-branch -->
-## DAG branch (milestone + task modes) — see `reference/dag-branch.md`
+## DAG branch (milestone + task modes)
 
-> This branch (milestone mode / task mode / no-milestone Epic gate) lives in
-> `reference/dag-branch.md`, read it on-demand when the Epic is DAG-shaped:
-> frozen DAG at `{epic-slug}/dag` + `task_route.keep_gates` includes `verify`.
-> Legacy iteration verify (the sections above) remains authoritative for
-> non-DAG iterations. Spec: `dag-pipeline/spec-05` §5.
+> This branch OVERRIDES the Preconditions table, Phase 1 read inputs, Phase 5
+> report index, Phase 5.5 ACCEPTED_RISK source, Phase 5.6 final sweep, and
+> Phase 6.5 commit gate for a DAG-ticket-pipeline Epic. It applies when the
+> routed Epic is DAG-shaped: a frozen DAG copy exists at `{epic-slug}/dag` and
+> the DAG's `task_route.keep_gates` includes `verify`. Legacy iteration verify
+> (the sections above) remains authoritative for non-DAG iterations. Spec:
+> `dag-pipeline/spec-05` §5. commit status stays
+> `pipeline/verify` in both modes.
 
+### Milestone mode (verify runs on a milestone M when `all_incoming_done_and_green`)
+
+A milestone node (`type: milestone`) has no implementation work and no ticket;
+its verify is the integration verification welded at a DAG convergence point
+(`cross_session_in ≥ 2`). Trigger: the aggregator agent (main
+session/Orchestrator) detects `all_incoming_done_and_green` — every fan-in
+source node at its terminal state (task source `done` / milestone source
+`green`) — and initiates this verify run; the milestone never self-triggers.
+
+**Precondition replacements** (vs legacy iteration verify):
+
+| Legacy verify precondition                                                   | Milestone-mode replacement                                                                                                              |
+| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| design-space review converged (`review status --stage design-space` success) | review-dag converged (`review status --stage review-dag` success)                                                                       |
+| iteration-plan review converged                                              | REMOVED (DAG has no plan review; the single review-dag gate replaces it)                                                                |
+| legacy iteration plan at `{slug}/04-plan-index`                              | DAG artifact + milestone fan-in slice (no `04-plan-*` page)                                                                             |
+| legacy NFR targets from `{slug}/03-design-06-non-functional-design`          | REMOVED (product NFRs live in node AC, handled by per-task review-code)                                                                 |
+| upstream roadmap chunk done+verified                                         | all milestone fan-in source nodes at terminal state (task source `done` / milestone source `green`, i.e. `all_incoming_done_and_green`) |
+| code review converged (`pipeline/review-code` success)                       | ALL fan-in node tickets review-code PASS + PR merged (implied by `done`)                                                                |
+| code review final report exists                                              | REMOVED (no Epic-level final report; per-node review-code reports live on task tickets)                                                 |
+| carried items from previous iteration closed                                 | REMOVED (vacuous — no iteration)                                                                                                        |
+| `core/checklists/verification.md` accessible                             | KEEP (unconditional)                                                                                                                    |
+| Acceptance criteria exist                                                    | from DAG-slice-generated DoD matrix (fan-in node AC + integration/contract-conformance/regression/NFR-coverage items)                   |
+| `slug` matches the plan slug                                                 | N/A (output naming frozen to `{epic-slug}`)                                                                                             |
+
+**Phase 1 read inputs** → the DAG slice: read the milestone's fan-in subgraph
+(fan-in nodes + their cross-session edges + contracts) from the frozen DAG copy
+`{epic-slug}/dag`, and generate the DoD matrix from it (integration items,
+contract-conformance items, regression items, NFR-coverage items) instead of
+reading `04-plan-*` pages.
+
+**Output naming**: `{epic-slug}/05-verify-milestone-{M-id}` (distinct from
+iteration verify `05-verify-iteration-{N}`).
+
+**Phase 5 report index**: append a `VERIFY-M-{M-id}` row to the `## 工件索引`
+comment with 重读 = `ON-DEMAND` (NOT `ARCHIVE`). The milestone verify does NOT
+edit the comment directly — it reports the row-payload to the aggregator agent
+(main session/Orchestrator), which is the SINGLE WRITER appending in place
+(`工单评论 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）`). `ARCHIVE` is never written by milestone verify
+(Epic close is the sole archive point).
+
+**Phase 5.5 ACCEPTED_RISK source**: fan-in node task-ticket review-code reports
+(located in each task ticket's review annotations / `## 当前状态` review row),
+not an Epic-level final report. A missing Epic-level final report does NOT
+trigger the "code-review final report does not exist" warn (that warn is
+legacy-iteration-only). tech-debt / baseline-failure / flaky-test registration
+proceeds as usual, sourced from the milestone DoD matrix's regression /
+baseline-classification results.
+
+**Phase 5.6 milestone mode** (restricted semantics — skip archive-at-close and
+issue close):
+
+1. **Checklist final sweep** only — object = each fan-in task ticket's row 6
+   (`verify里程碑`) + the milestone DoD matrix, NOT the Epic body checklist.
+   Verify each fan-in node's row 6 is checked or annotated
+   `_(Pending: M-{M-id} 未 green)_`. Do NOT flip a still-Pending row 6 — that
+   flip belongs to the aggregator agent (main session/Orchestrator), which
+   performs the node-ticket close action. Write the milestone DoD matrix final
+   sweep to `{epic-slug}/05-verify-milestone-{M-id}`.
+2. **Do NOT fold/remove any Epic-body `## 当前状态` / `## DAG 状态` section** —
+   milestone verify is read-only on Epic body state.
+3. **SKIP archive-at-close** (the `## 工件索引` archive banner + row-level
+   `ARCHIVE`) and **SKIP issue close** — both belong to the aggregator agent at
+   Epic close.
+4. **SKIP Tier 1 run archive** (Phase 5.6 step 5, Tier 1 run archive sub-bullet) — the aggregator agent
+   performs it at Epic close.
+
+**Milestone verify execution context (pinned)**: run the
+integration/regression/contract-conformance/NFR suite on a checkout CONTAINING
+all fan-in nodes' merged code — the aggregator agent syncs main (containing the
+merged fan-in PRs) into the execution worktree, or builds a temp verify worktree
+from main HEAD, before triggering; the verify report
+`{epic-slug}/05-verify-milestone-{M-id}` records the actual execution commit
+SHA.
+
+**M→green status transition**: NOT done by milestone verify (read-only on Epic
+body). The aggregator agent (main session/Orchestrator) reads the verify report
+and sets the aggregator table M row 状态 = `green`, 重读 = `ON-DEMAND`, and
+syncs the frozen DAG copy `{epic-slug}/dag` node `status` to `green`.
+
+**Phase 6.5 milestone mode**: vacuous skip — a milestone has no implementation
+commit. Commit existence is evidenced by the fan-in node verify PASS + PR
+merged (already implied by `all_incoming_done_and_green`).
+
+**Milestone verify FAIL recovery**: FAIL → M `status` = `blocked`. Fix
+responsibility = the fan-in node owning the failing integration/regression item
+(the last-done fan-in node's session) or the Epic-level session (DAG author) if
+un-attributable. Re-run is triggered ONLY by a "fix-landed event" (fix commit
+merged + CI green, or an explicit re-done report from the owning session) —
+NOT status polling (done nodes are never reset; `all_incoming_done_and_green`
+stays true after FAIL). M stays `blocked` until a fix event, then returns to
+`pending` and verify re-runs. No review-dag re-run unless the fix changes a
+cross-session contract or the node/edge set.
+
+### Task mode (verify on a task node ticket, because `task_route.keep_gates` includes `verify`)
+
+Each task ticket closes only after its own verify run, but legacy verify
+preconditions do not hold in DAG mode — this node-level branch reuses the
+`verify` skill with the following node-scoped semantics (so the `verify` gate is
+not silently downgraded to CI-only).
+
+**Verification object**: the node's own `acceptance_criteria` → the `test_id`
+suite (`file-path::test-name` / `MANUAL` / `BENCH:`) all passing fresh + that
+node's review-code PASS recorded + CI green. NOT milestone fan-in
+integration/contract/regression items (those are milestone verify's). Spec
+authority = the node in the frozen DAG copy `{epic-slug}/dag`.
+
+**Precondition replacements** (task mode — mirror the milestone table, scoped to
+the node):
+
+| Legacy verify precondition                                   | Task-mode replacement                                                                                            |
+| ------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| design-space review converged                                | review-dag converged (this Epic already passed the single gate; do NOT re-run it)                                |
+| iteration-plan review converged                              | REMOVED (DAG has no plan review)                                                                                 |
+| legacy iteration plan at `{slug}/04-plan-index`              | the node in the frozen DAG copy `{epic-slug}/dag` (no `04-plan-*` page)                                           |
+| legacy NFR targets from `{slug}/03-design-06-non-functional-design` | REMOVED (product NFRs live in node AC, handled by per-task review-code)                                            |
+| upstream roadmap chunk done+verified                         | this node's cross-session in-edge source nodes at terminal state (task source `done` / milestone source `green`) |
+| code review converged (`pipeline/review-code` success)       | this node's ticket review-code PASS + PR merged                                                                  |
+| code review final report exists                              | REMOVED (this node's review-code report lives on the task ticket)                                                |
+| carried items from previous iteration closed                 | REMOVED (vacuous — no iteration)                                                                                 |
+| `core/checklists/verification.md` accessible             | KEEP                                                                                                             |
+| Acceptance criteria exist                                    | from node AC + `test_id` suite                                                                                   |
+| `slug` matches the plan slug                                 | N/A (Tier 1 run slug = `{epic-slug}-task-{node-id}` — the same node-task run namespace review-code runs in and this mode's archive bundle uses below; the Phase 2 precondition-gate cache read MUST use this slug. Only the wiki output naming stays Epic-scoped: `{epic-slug}/05-verify-task-{node-id}`) |
+
+**Phase 1 read inputs** → the node's AC + `test_id` suite from the frozen DAG
+copy `{epic-slug}/dag`, generating the DoD matrix.
+
+**Output naming**: `{epic-slug}/05-verify-task-{node-id}`.
+
+**Phase 5 report index**: append a `VERIFY-TASK-{node-id}` row, 重读 =
+`ON-DEMAND` (NOT `ARCHIVE`), via the aggregator agent as single writer (task
+verify does not edit the comment directly).
+
+**Phase 5.5 task mode**: ACCEPTED_RISK source = this node's task-ticket
+review-code report (no Epic-level final report → no "does not exist" warn).
+tech-debt / baseline-failure / flaky-test registration proceeds as usual.
+
+**Phase 5.6 task mode**: only checklist final sweep — object = this ticket's
+5-row checklist (NOT row 6 `verify里程碑` — row 6 is flipped ONLY by the
+aggregator agent). SKIP archive-at-close (`## 工件索引` row-level `ARCHIVE`) and
+issue close (both belong to the aggregator agent). SKIP Tier 1 run archive — the
+aggregator agent collects it cross-worktree at task-ticket close (archive to
+`<runs-root>/archive/{epic-slug}-task-{node-id}.json` and commit to the
+workflow branch). Do NOT fold Epic body status sections.
+
+**Phase 6.5 task mode**: object = this node ticket's commit; semantics = "node
+implementation commit exists". Baseline = the task worktree's creation-commit
+SHA (`git log {creation-SHA}..HEAD`), NOT a generic base-branch (post-merge
+there are no new commits vs base). The task worktree is retained until ticket
+close (the aggregator agent removes it after collecting task-level Tier 1
+archive); the task session must NOT remove its own worktree.
+
+**commit status**: still `pipeline/verify` in both modes.
+
+### No-milestone DAG Epic-level verify gate
+
+When the routed Epic's DAG has NO milestone (no `cross_session_in ≥ 2`
+convergence point), the Epic-level `keep_gates: verify` is satisfied
+AGGREGATELY by all task-ticket verify runs (each with commit status
+`pipeline/verify` success) — NO independent Epic-level verify run, NO
+`{epic-slug}/05-verify-milestone-{M-id}` artifact, NO `VERIFY-M-{M-id}` index
+row. The Epic close condition degenerates to "all task nodes `done`".
+
+---
 
 ## References
 

core/skills/verify/reference/dag-branch.md

@@ -1,180 +0,0 @@
-> Extracted from verify/SKILL.md (section:dag-branch) — moved verbatim; read
-> on-demand ONLY when the routed Epic is DAG-shaped (frozen DAG at
-> `{epic-slug}/dag` and `task_route.keep_gates` includes `verify`).
-
-<!-- section:dag-branch -->
-## DAG branch (milestone + task modes)
-
-> This branch OVERRIDES the Preconditions table, Phase 1 read inputs, Phase 5
-> report index, Phase 5.5 ACCEPTED_RISK source, Phase 5.6 final sweep, and
-> Phase 6.5 commit gate for a DAG-ticket-pipeline Epic. It applies when the
-> routed Epic is DAG-shaped: a frozen DAG copy exists at `{epic-slug}/dag` and
-> the DAG's `task_route.keep_gates` includes `verify`. Legacy iteration verify
-> (the sections above) remains authoritative for non-DAG iterations. Spec:
-> `dag-pipeline/spec-05` §5. commit status stays
-> `pipeline/verify` in both modes.
-
-### Milestone mode (verify runs on a milestone M when `all_incoming_done_and_green`)
-
-A milestone node (`type: milestone`) has no implementation work and no ticket;
-its verify is the integration verification welded at a DAG convergence point
-(`cross_session_in ≥ 2`). Trigger: the aggregator agent (main
-session/Orchestrator) detects `all_incoming_done_and_green` — every fan-in
-source node at its terminal state (task source `done` / milestone source
-`green`) — and initiates this verify run; the milestone never self-triggers.
-
-**Precondition replacements** (vs legacy iteration verify):
-
-| Legacy verify precondition                                                   | Milestone-mode replacement                                                                                                              |
-| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
-| design-space review converged (`review status --stage design-space` success) | review-dag converged (`review status --stage review-dag` success)                                                                       |
-| iteration-plan review converged                                              | REMOVED (DAG has no plan review; the single review-dag gate replaces it)                                                                |
-| legacy iteration plan at `{slug}/04-plan-index`                              | DAG artifact + milestone fan-in slice (no `04-plan-*` page)                                                                             |
-| legacy NFR targets from `{slug}/03-design-06-non-functional-design`          | REMOVED (product NFRs live in node AC, handled by per-task review-code)                                                                 |
-| upstream roadmap chunk done+verified                                         | all milestone fan-in source nodes at terminal state (task source `done` / milestone source `green`, i.e. `all_incoming_done_and_green`) |
-| code review converged (`pipeline/review-code` success)                       | ALL fan-in node tickets review-code PASS + PR merged (implied by `done`)                                                                |
-| code review final report exists                                              | REMOVED (no Epic-level final report; per-node review-code reports live on task tickets)                                                 |
-| carried items from previous iteration closed                                 | REMOVED (vacuous — no iteration)                                                                                                        |
-| `core/checklists/verification.md` accessible                             | KEEP (unconditional)                                                                                                                    |
-| Acceptance criteria exist                                                    | from DAG-slice-generated DoD matrix (fan-in node AC + integration/contract-conformance/regression/NFR-coverage items)                   |
-| `slug` matches the plan slug                                                 | N/A (output naming frozen to `{epic-slug}`)                                                                                             |
-
-**Phase 1 read inputs** → the DAG slice: read the milestone's fan-in subgraph
-(fan-in nodes + their cross-session edges + contracts) from the frozen DAG copy
-`{epic-slug}/dag`, and generate the DoD matrix from it (integration items,
-contract-conformance items, regression items, NFR-coverage items) instead of
-reading `04-plan-*` pages.
-
-**Output naming**: `{epic-slug}/05-verify-milestone-{M-id}` (distinct from
-iteration verify `05-verify-iteration-{N}`).
-
-**Phase 5 report index**: append a `VERIFY-M-{M-id}` row to the `## 工件索引`
-comment with 重读 = `ON-DEMAND` (NOT `ARCHIVE`). The milestone verify does NOT
-edit the comment directly — it reports the row-payload to the aggregator agent
-(main session/Orchestrator), which is the SINGLE WRITER appending in place
-(`工单评论 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）`). `ARCHIVE` is never written by milestone verify
-(Epic close is the sole archive point).
-
-**Phase 5.5 ACCEPTED_RISK source**: fan-in node task-ticket review-code reports
-(located in each task ticket's review annotations / `## 当前状态` review row),
-not an Epic-level final report. A missing Epic-level final report does NOT
-trigger the "code-review final report does not exist" warn (that warn is
-legacy-iteration-only). tech-debt / baseline-failure / flaky-test registration
-proceeds as usual, sourced from the milestone DoD matrix's regression /
-baseline-classification results.
-
-**Phase 5.6 milestone mode** (restricted semantics — skip archive-at-close and
-issue close):
-
-1. **Checklist final sweep** only — object = each fan-in task ticket's row 6
-   (`verify里程碑`) + the milestone DoD matrix, NOT the Epic body checklist.
-   Verify each fan-in node's row 6 is checked or annotated
-   `_(Pending: M-{M-id} 未 green)_`. Do NOT flip a still-Pending row 6 — that
-   flip belongs to the aggregator agent (main session/Orchestrator), which
-   performs the node-ticket close action. Write the milestone DoD matrix final
-   sweep to `{epic-slug}/05-verify-milestone-{M-id}`.
-2. **Do NOT fold/remove any Epic-body `## 当前状态` / `## DAG 状态` section** —
-   milestone verify is read-only on Epic body state.
-3. **SKIP archive-at-close** (the `## 工件索引` archive banner + row-level
-   `ARCHIVE`) and **SKIP issue close** — both belong to the aggregator agent at
-   Epic close.
-4. **SKIP Tier 1 run archive** (Phase 5.6 step 5, Tier 1 run archive sub-bullet) — the aggregator agent
-   performs it at Epic close.
-
-**Milestone verify execution context (pinned)**: run the
-integration/regression/contract-conformance/NFR suite on a checkout CONTAINING
-all fan-in nodes' merged code — the aggregator agent syncs main (containing the
-merged fan-in PRs) into the execution worktree, or builds a temp verify worktree
-from main HEAD, before triggering; the verify report
-`{epic-slug}/05-verify-milestone-{M-id}` records the actual execution commit
-SHA.
-
-**M→green status transition**: NOT done by milestone verify (read-only on Epic
-body). The aggregator agent (main session/Orchestrator) reads the verify report
-and sets the aggregator table M row 状态 = `green`, 重读 = `ON-DEMAND`, and
-syncs the frozen DAG copy `{epic-slug}/dag` node `status` to `green`.
-
-**Phase 6.5 milestone mode**: vacuous skip — a milestone has no implementation
-commit. Commit existence is evidenced by the fan-in node verify PASS + PR
-merged (already implied by `all_incoming_done_and_green`).
-
-**Milestone verify FAIL recovery**: FAIL → M `status` = `blocked`. Fix
-responsibility = the fan-in node owning the failing integration/regression item
-(the last-done fan-in node's session) or the Epic-level session (DAG author) if
-un-attributable. Re-run is triggered ONLY by a "fix-landed event" (fix commit
-merged + CI green, or an explicit re-done report from the owning session) —
-NOT status polling (done nodes are never reset; `all_incoming_done_and_green`
-stays true after FAIL). M stays `blocked` until a fix event, then returns to
-`pending` and verify re-runs. No review-dag re-run unless the fix changes a
-cross-session contract or the node/edge set.
-
-### Task mode (verify on a task node ticket, because `task_route.keep_gates` includes `verify`)
-
-Each task ticket closes only after its own verify run, but legacy verify
-preconditions do not hold in DAG mode — this node-level branch reuses the
-`verify` skill with the following node-scoped semantics (so the `verify` gate is
-not silently downgraded to CI-only).
-
-**Verification object**: the node's own `acceptance_criteria` → the `test_id`
-suite (`file-path::test-name` / `MANUAL` / `BENCH:`) all passing fresh + that
-node's review-code PASS recorded + CI green. NOT milestone fan-in
-integration/contract/regression items (those are milestone verify's). Spec
-authority = the node in the frozen DAG copy `{epic-slug}/dag`.
-
-**Precondition replacements** (task mode — mirror the milestone table, scoped to
-the node):
-
-| Legacy verify precondition                                   | Task-mode replacement                                                                                            |
-| ------------------------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
-| design-space review converged                                | review-dag converged (this Epic already passed the single gate; do NOT re-run it)                                |
-| iteration-plan review converged                              | REMOVED (DAG has no plan review)                                                                                 |
-| legacy iteration plan at `{slug}/04-plan-index`              | the node in the frozen DAG copy `{epic-slug}/dag` (no `04-plan-*` page)                                           |
-| legacy NFR targets from `{slug}/03-design-06-non-functional-design` | REMOVED (product NFRs live in node AC, handled by per-task review-code)                                            |
-| upstream roadmap chunk done+verified                         | this node's cross-session in-edge source nodes at terminal state (task source `done` / milestone source `green`) |
-| code review converged (`pipeline/review-code` success)       | this node's ticket review-code PASS + PR merged                                                                  |
-| code review final report exists                              | REMOVED (this node's review-code report lives on the task ticket)                                                |
-| carried items from previous iteration closed                 | REMOVED (vacuous — no iteration)                                                                                 |
-| `core/checklists/verification.md` accessible             | KEEP                                                                                                             |
-| Acceptance criteria exist                                    | from node AC + `test_id` suite                                                                                   |
-| `slug` matches the plan slug                                 | N/A (Tier 1 run slug = `{epic-slug}-task-{node-id}` — the same node-task run namespace review-code runs in and this mode's archive bundle uses below; the Phase 2 precondition-gate cache read MUST use this slug. Only the wiki output naming stays Epic-scoped: `{epic-slug}/05-verify-task-{node-id}`) |
-
-**Phase 1 read inputs** → the node's AC + `test_id` suite from the frozen DAG
-copy `{epic-slug}/dag`, generating the DoD matrix.
-
-**Output naming**: `{epic-slug}/05-verify-task-{node-id}`.
-
-**Phase 5 report index**: append a `VERIFY-TASK-{node-id}` row, 重读 =
-`ON-DEMAND` (NOT `ARCHIVE`), via the aggregator agent as single writer (task
-verify does not edit the comment directly).
-
-**Phase 5.5 task mode**: ACCEPTED_RISK source = this node's task-ticket
-review-code report (no Epic-level final report → no "does not exist" warn).
-tech-debt / baseline-failure / flaky-test registration proceeds as usual.
-
-**Phase 5.6 task mode**: only checklist final sweep — object = this ticket's
-5-row checklist (NOT row 6 `verify里程碑` — row 6 is flipped ONLY by the
-aggregator agent). SKIP archive-at-close (`## 工件索引` row-level `ARCHIVE`) and
-issue close (both belong to the aggregator agent). SKIP Tier 1 run archive — the
-aggregator agent collects it cross-worktree at task-ticket close (archive to
-`<runs-root>/archive/{epic-slug}-task-{node-id}.json` and commit to the
-workflow branch). Do NOT fold Epic body status sections.
-
-**Phase 6.5 task mode**: object = this node ticket's commit; semantics = "node
-implementation commit exists". Baseline = the task worktree's creation-commit
-SHA (`git log {creation-SHA}..HEAD`), NOT a generic base-branch (post-merge
-there are no new commits vs base). The task worktree is retained until ticket
-close (the aggregator agent removes it after collecting task-level Tier 1
-archive); the task session must NOT remove its own worktree.
-
-**commit status**: still `pipeline/verify` in both modes.
-
-### No-milestone DAG Epic-level verify gate
-
-When the routed Epic's DAG has NO milestone (no `cross_session_in ≥ 2`
-convergence point), the Epic-level `keep_gates: verify` is satisfied
-AGGREGATELY by all task-ticket verify runs (each with commit status
-`pipeline/verify` success) — NO independent Epic-level verify run, NO
-`{epic-slug}/05-verify-milestone-{M-id}` artifact, NO `VERIFY-M-{M-id}` index
-row. The Epic close condition degenerates to "all task nodes `done`".
-
----

core/skills/verify/reference/issue-filing.md

@@ -1,495 +0,0 @@
-> Extracted from verify/SKILL.md (phase 5.5 / 5.55 / 5.56 / 5.6) — moved
-> verbatim; read on-demand during Phase 5 execution, before PASS. Each phase
-> is mandatory-before-PASS in its trigger condition; the main flow stops at
-> each boundary until the referenced protocol reports completion.
-
-<!-- section:phase-5.5 -->
-### Phase 5.5 — Tech Debt Registry Filing (mandatory before PASS)
-
-Tech debt is filed **registry-first** (`core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`,
-[TT-3002] G1): new items become ROWS in the source ticket's `## TD 登记` comment;
-an independent ticket is created only at **promotion** (claim/schedule). There
-is no `tech-debt.md` file and no `{slug}/tech-debt` wiki page — both remain
-retired. The registry preserves the three guarantees of the old
-one-issue-per-item model: visible (the comment lives on a tracker ticket),
-individually closeable (row-level checkbox), de-duplicated across sessions
-(the TD index is stronger than title-keyword matching).
-
-**Sprint-mode override ([TT-3002] G5/[TT-3007])**: read `filing.sprint-mode` from
-`<instance-root>/workflow-routing.yaml` at the START of this phase (no caching). When
-`true`, ALL severities file registry-only — registration rows are written as
-normal (severity included, nothing lost) but promotion to standalone tickets
-is FROZEN until the switch returns to `false`. Rationale: the 2026-08-12
-sprint zeroed fix capacity while filing kept running (the 125-fragment
-backlog's direct trigger); an explicit debt-side downshift beats hoping for
-discipline. BF/FT phases 5.55/5.56 are NOT covered by this switch — failure
-evidence must stay immediately visible. Flipping the switch is a human
-decision recorded on the sprint tracker; semantics in
-`rules/workflow-routing.md` §立案降档.
-
-**Adjacency quota ([TT-3002] G3/[TT-3005])**: while collecting inputs, also check the
-AREAS this iteration touched (packages/modules with commits this iteration).
-If the source tickets for those areas carry applicable `## TD 登记` rows, at
-least ONE row must be taken along and disposed this iteration (fixed, or
-explicitly re-deferred with a reason — silence is not a disposition). Record
-`consumed X / applicable Y` (or `0 applicable`) in the TD report section;
-verification checklist §8.4 cross-checks it against the run's debt-quota
-record (historically the roadmap's per-chunk debt-quota line). This gives debt digestion a steady capacity source tied to
-touch, not to cleanup campaigns.
-
-**Promotion quota + pull event ([TT-3061])**: promotion to a standalone ticket
-requires (a) a **pull event** — the row's Reactivation Trigger fired (state
-the observed event) OR a named claimer/schedule; "it seemed important" is not
-a pull event — recorded in the promotion body's `## 拉动事件 / Pull Event`
-section; and (b) the origin module's OPEN promoted-TD count is below the
-quota (**default 10** — counted **per origin module**: resolve the row's
-module from the ticket body's `Origin` field, then count that module's OPEN
-`tech-debt` tickets; retro §2.10 reports breaches). At or above quota →
-register-only until the count drops; before each Phase 5.5 promotion
-re-check the owning module's count, and a row whose module is at or above
-quota is NOT promoted — defer it and annotate the registry row with
-`quota-held` (re-checked on the next verify run, retro 2026-08-21). A row
-marked `[COLD]` by retrospective §2.10
-(unclaimed >3 retro cycles) promotes only after the pull event clears the
-mark.
-
-**Collect inputs** — every tech-debt item to register this iteration:
-
-1. Every UNVERIFIABLE row in the DoD matrix (Phase 3), with its Reactivation
-   Trigger.
-2. Every ACCEPTED_RISK finding in the code-review final report
-   (`{slug}/reviews/code/final/report`), with its Recommended Reactivation
-   Trigger.
-3. Every `[OPEN: <short-id>]` marker the Developer left in code this iteration
-   (per implementation checklist POST-6.2).
-
-If the code-review final report does not exist, warn the user — ACCEPTED_RISK
-items cannot be captured. This is itself a process gap that must be flagged.
-
-**Step 1 — De-duplicate against the registry index and promoted issues.**
-
-1. Read the source ticket's `## TD 登记` comment (create the comment if this
-   is its first row) and match each candidate against existing rows by
-   `TD-NNN` and reactivation trigger. Same-source re-reporting is the
-   anti-pattern this step exists to prevent (the visual-cluster incident: 18
-   fragments from one source under the old keyword matching).
-2. Query OPEN promoted tech-debt issues for cross-source duplicates:
-
-```
-工单 API 检索（见 TERMINOLOGY）
-  （owner/repo 按实例绑定，labels="tech-debt", state="open")
-```
-
-**Step 2 — Assign `TD-NNN` via the ledger mutex ([TT-3322]).** One script call
-per batch: `bash script/td-alloc.sh <count = new items> <source-slug>
-[--ticket N]` returns a contiguous range from the TD allocation ledger
-(append-only comments, earliest-comment-id wins; the seed comment pins the
-historical floor). Split the returned range across the Step 3 rows in order.
-**Any allocation — manual included — must land a `**td-alloc**` comment on
-the ledger before the registry row is written; hand-computed `max + 1` is
-forbidden** (the 2026-08-24 three-way collision). On exit 5 (retry
-exhaustion) abort this phase's filing and retry — never hand-assign. The id is **reserved for life**: promotion reuses it, never
-renumbers. Run `--check` (reconciliation) here if the last check predates
-this batch.
-
-**Step 3 — Append one registry row per new item.** Append to the source
-ticket's `## TD 登记` comment (no source ticket → the owning Epic's tracker
-ticket; no Epic → the standing `TD 冷存档` tracker):
-
-```markdown
-- [ ] TD-{NNN} · {UNVERIFIABLE | ACCEPTED_RISK | DEFERRED} · {HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW}
-  · {origin chunk-id/iter-N} — {one-line summary}
-  · trigger: {objectively verifiable reactivation condition — never "when ready";
-    if no trigger can be defined this is NOT tech debt and the iteration verdict
-    becomes FAIL}
-```
-
-**Step 4 — Cross-link (adapted).** The registry comment already lives on the
-source issue — the source → debt navigation the old body-edit provided. When
-filing went to an Epic tracker or the 冷存档 (no source ticket), reference the
-originating slug in each row so the trail survives.
-
-**Step 5 — Record the mapping in the verification report.** The report's
-"Tech Debt" section records `TD-NNN → registry row` (source `#NNNN` +
-`## TD 登记` comment); promoted items record `TD-NNN → #NNNN` as before.
-
-**Promotion (认领升票) — when a row is scheduled or picked up.** Create the
-independent ticket THEN, carrying the reserved `TD-NNN`:
-
-```
-POST <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues
-  body: {"title":"[{origin}] Tech debt: {short description} (TD-{NNN})",
-         "body":<promotion template below>,
-         "labels":[tech_debt_label_id, severity_label_id]}
-```
-
-- **Severity → label** (reuse the existing exclusive Priority set):
-
-  | Severity | Label             |
-  | -------- | ----------------- |
-  | HIGH     | `Priority/High`   |
-  | MEDIUM   | `Priority/Medium` |
-  | LOW      | `Priority/Low`    |
-
-- **Promotion body template** (the pre-[TT-3002] issue template, now used only at
-  promotion):
-
-  ```markdown
-  ## Parent / 父级
-
-  {#source_issue carrying the ## TD 登记 row}
-
-  ## Summary
-
-  {one-paragraph description of the debt}
-
-  | Field    | Value                                       |
-  | -------- | ------------------------------------------- |
-  | TD ID    | TD-{NNN} (reserved at registration)         |
-  | Type     | {UNVERIFIABLE \| ACCEPTED_RISK \| DEFERRED} |
-  | Origin   | {chunk-id/iter-N/phase or slug}             |
-  | Severity | {HIGH \| MEDIUM \| LOW}                     |
-
-  ## Reactivation Trigger
-
-  {from the registry row}
-
-  ## 拉动事件 / Pull Event
-
-  {trigger fired: {observed event} | claimed by {who} for {when}}
-
-  ## Acceptance Criteria (how to close this issue)
-
-  - [ ] {specific action that resolves the debt}
-
-  ## Context
-
-  - Verification report: `{slug}/05-verify-iteration-{N}`
-  - Code review report: `{slug}/reviews/code/final/report` (if ACCEPTED_RISK)
-  ```
-
-- After creating the promoted ticket: tick the registry row (`- [x]`) and
-  append `→ #NNNN` to it.
-
-If no new tech-debt items were found this iteration, the phase is a no-op —
-record "0 tech-debt items" in the report and proceed.
-
-<!-- section:phase-5.55 -->
-### Phase 5.55 — Baseline-Failure Issue Registration (mandatory before PASS when pre-existing failures exist)
-
-Pre-existing test failures (BF) are tracked as **root-cause family umbrella
-tickets** (`core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`, [TT-3002] G1; precedents [TT-2585]
-umbrella + [TT-2925] cluster) — one `BF-NNN` ticket per failure-signature family,
-labeled `baseline-failure`, with each occurrence's evidence attached as
-comments. There is no `baseline-failures.md` file and no
-`{slug}/baseline-failures` wiki page. A pre-existing failure does not block
-the iteration that _discovered_ it (it pre-dates that work), but it MUST be
-filed against (or into) a family; an un-filed baseline failure is a process
-gap and the iteration is NOT Done.
-
-**Birth triage SLA ([TT-3061])**: a BF umbrella is born with `Kind/Bug` (it IS a
-bug — of the baseline) and must be triaged the SAME DAY it is filed:
-assigned, scheduled, or explicitly deferred with a reason on the ticket.
-Untriaged-next-day BF umbrellas are named individually in retro §2.10
-(compliance %), not averaged away.
-
-**Collect inputs** — every pre-existing failure to register this iteration:
-
-1. Every failure classified **pre-existing** in Phase 2.6 (fails on the base
-   branch / last-green commit too).
-2. Any baseline-run failures noted in the brownfield pre-check (Greenfield vs.
-   Brownfield section).
-
-**Step 1 — De-duplicate by failure SIGNATURE against existing families (open
-AND closed), per `core/rules/testing.md`** (de-duplicate BEFORE filing,
-retro [TT-2696]). Query `baseline-failure` issues in ALL states:
-
-```
-GET <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues?labels=baseline-failure&state=all&page=N&limit=50
-```
-
-Match each candidate by **failure signature** — the error/assertion signature
-plus the affected surface, not just `file::test-name` (one root-cause family
-may span several tests; several tests failing with the same assertion shape
-are ONE family). On a signature hit, do NOT create a new ticket: attach the
-new run evidence (run, commit, failing output, sibling tests observed) as a
-comment on the FAMILY umbrella ticket. Filing a second ticket inside a known
-root-cause family is the anti-pattern this phase exists to prevent. If a
-tracked family is now FIXED by this iteration's work, close its umbrella with
-a comment citing the fixing commit (a bonus, not a requirement). If the query
-itself errors (API failure — not "no matches"), retry once; on the second
-failure proceed to file with the literal marker `dedup-unverified` in the
-umbrella's first evidence comment (query-failure ruling, [TT-3383] — fail-open,
-visible; rationale in `core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`).
-
-**Step 2 — Assign the next `BF-NNN`** per `core/rules/testing.md`
-§ "Pre-existing test failures must be filed, not silently logged" (the L1 rule
-owns the repo-wide sequential numbering invariant — `max + 1`, duplicate ids
-forbidden incl. closed tickets). `BF-NNN` names the FAMILY; the Gitea issue
-number `#NNNN` is the tracker handle.
-
-**Step 3 — Create one umbrella ticket per NEW root-cause family.** Only when
-no existing family matches the signature:
-
-```
-POST <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues
-  body: {"title":"[{origin}] Baseline failure: {test identifier} (BF-{NNN})",
-         "body":<issue body template below>,
-         "labels":[baseline_failure_label_id, severity_label_id, kind_bug_label_id]}
-```
-
-- **Title**: `[{origin}] Baseline failure: {signature summary} (BF-{NNN})`
-  where `{origin}` is `chunk-{id}/iter-{N}` or the bugfix slug, and
-  `{signature summary}` is the family's error/assertion shape (not a single
-  test name — sibling tests observed later join this umbrella as evidence
-  comments).
-- **Severity → label** (reuse the existing exclusive Priority set; a failing
-  test defaults to at least MEDIUM, HIGH if on a critical path):
-
-  | Severity | Label             |
-  | -------- | ----------------- |
-  | HIGH     | `Priority/High`   |
-  | MEDIUM   | `Priority/Medium` |
-  | LOW      | `Priority/Low`    |
-
-- Also attach `Kind/Bug` so the failure is discoverable in the bug tracker
-  alongside manually-reported bugs.
-- **Issue body template**:
-
-  ````markdown
-  ## Parent / 父级
-
-  {#source_issue, or "no source issue — discovered during iteration baseline"}
-
-  ## Summary
-
-  A test was already failing before this iteration's work began. It does not
-  block the discovering iteration but must be tracked to closure.
-
-  | Field          | Value                                          |
-  | -------------- | ---------------------------------------------- |
-  | BF ID          | BF-{NNN} (family)                              |
-  | Signature      | {error/assertion shape}                        |
-  | Tests affected | `{file::test-name}`, … (initial members)       |
-  | Origin         | {chunk-id/iter-N or slug}                      |
-  | Severity       | {HIGH \| MEDIUM \| LOW}                        |
-  | First observed | {base commit / date the failure reproduces on} |
-
-  ## Reproduction
-
-  ```
-  git checkout {base commit}
-  (cd <harness-package> && bun test --timeout 120000 {test file})   # or project-equivalent
-  ```
-
-  Failing output:
-
-  ```
-  {paste the relevant assertion / error}
-  ```
-
-  ## Acceptance Criteria (how to close this issue)
-
-  - [ ] The named test passes on a clean checkout of the target branch.
-  - [ ] If the test is deleted/renamed, the replacement covers the same
-        behavior and passes.
-
-  ## Context
-
-  - Verification report: `{slug}/05-verify-iteration-{N}`
-  ````
-
-**Step 4 — Cross-link to the source issue (mandatory).** Per the
-issue-cross-linking rule, every baseline-failure issue MUST link back to its
-source:
-
-- The issue body already carries `## Parent` (above).
-- Update the source/parent issue body to reference each new baseline-failure
-  issue by `#NNNN` in its task list (e.g.
-  `- [ ] #NNNN — BF-{NNN} {test identifier}`), so reviewers can navigate from
-  source → failure.
-
-**Step 5 — Record the mapping in the verification report.** The
-`BF-NNN → #NNNN` mapping is written ONLY in the Phase 5 verification report's
-"Baseline Failures" section (and in the issue title itself). There is no local
-file to update.
-
-If no new baseline failures were found this iteration, the phase is a no-op —
-record "0 baseline failures" in the report and proceed.
-
-<!-- section:phase-5.56 -->
-### Phase 5.56 — Flaky-Test Issue Registration (mandatory before PASS when flaky tests are unfixed)
-
-Flaky tests (intermittent pass/fail) are tracked as **root-cause family
-umbrella tickets** (`core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`, [TT-3002] G1) — one
-`FT-NNN` ticket per failure-signature family, labeled `flaky-test`, with each
-occurrence's evidence (run count, failure rate, commit) attached as comments.
-A flaky test that is not fixed within this iteration MUST be filed against
-(or into) a family; otherwise it evaporates at iteration end and the
-"compare flaky count against baseline" check (TST-2.5) has no persistent
-register to compare against. Filing does not block the verdict, but an unfixed
-flaky test left un-filed is a process gap and the iteration is NOT Done.
-
-**Expiry SLA ([TT-3061])**: an FT umbrella is born with `Kind/Testing` and a
-**fix-or-isolate window** (default 7 days) recorded in its body (isolating =
-quarantining/skipping the test with the family id in the skip reason, which
-keeps the register comparable). Past the window without fix or isolation, the
-umbrella is escalated on the ticket (comment naming the owner); retro §2.10
-reports fix-or-isolate compliance per cycle.
-
-**Collect inputs** — every flaky test to register this iteration:
-
-1. Every flaky test surfaced in Phase 2.1 (intermittent pass/fail across
-   reruns) that was NOT fixed by the Developer this iteration.
-2. Any flaky test carried over from a prior iteration's report that is still
-   intermittently failing.
-
-**Step 1 — De-duplicate by failure SIGNATURE against existing families (open
-AND closed), per `core/rules/testing.md`** (de-duplicate BEFORE filing,
-retro [TT-2696]). Query `flaky-test` issues in ALL states:
-
-```
-GET <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues?labels=flaky-test&state=all&page=N&limit=50
-```
-
-Match each candidate by **failure signature** — the flakiness mode (timeout /
-race / order-dependence / env-leak) plus the affected surface, not just
-`file::test-name` (one root cause may flake several tests). On a signature
-hit, do NOT create a new ticket: attach the new run evidence (run count,
-failure rate, commit, sibling tests) as a comment on the FAMILY umbrella
-ticket. Filing a second ticket inside a known root-cause family is the
-anti-pattern this phase exists to prevent. If a tracked family now passes
-deterministically, close its umbrella citing the fixing commit. If the query
-itself errors (API failure — not "no matches"), retry once; on the second
-failure proceed to file with the literal marker `dedup-unverified` in the
-umbrella's first evidence comment (query-failure ruling, [TT-3383] — fail-open,
-visible; rationale in `core/rules/ticket-lifecycle.md`).
-
-**Step 2 — Assign the next `FT-NNN`** per `core/rules/testing.md`
-§ "Flaky tests must be filed, not silently tolerated" (the L1 rule owns the
-repo-wide sequential numbering invariant — `max + 1`, duplicate ids forbidden
-incl. closed tickets). `FT-NNN` names the FAMILY.
-
-**Step 3 — Create one umbrella ticket per NEW root-cause family.** Only when
-no existing family matches the signature:
-
-```
-POST <gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues
-  body: {"title":"[{origin}] Flaky test: {test identifier} (FT-{NNN})",
-         "body":<issue body template below>,
-         "labels":[flaky_test_label_id, severity_label_id, kind_testing_label_id]}
-```
-
-- **Title**: `[{origin}] Flaky test: {signature summary} (FT-{NNN})` — the
-  family's flakiness mode + surface (sibling tests join later as evidence
-  comments, not new tickets).
-- **Severity** → a flaky test defaults to MEDIUM (HIGH if on a critical path
-  or blocking CI); reuse the exclusive Priority set.
-- Also attach `Kind/Testing` so it is discoverable in the testing tracker.
-- **Issue body template**:
-
-  ````markdown
-  ## Parent / 父级
-
-  {#source_issue, or "no source issue — discovered during iteration verification"}
-
-  ## Summary
-
-  A test passes and fails intermittently across runs. It undermines the
-  reliability of the suite and must be stabilized or quarantined.
-
-  | Field        | Value                     |
-  | ------------ | ------------------------- |
-  | FT ID        | FT-{NNN} (family)          |
-  | Signature    | {flakiness mode + surface} |
-  | Tests affected | `{file::test-name}`, … (initial members) |
-  | Origin       | {chunk-id/iter-N or slug}  |
-  | Severity     | {HIGH \| MEDIUM \| LOW}   |
-  | Failure rate | {e.g. 3/10 runs}          |
-
-  ## Reproduction
-
-  ```
-  for i in $(seq 1 10); do (cd <harness-package> && bun test --timeout 120000 {test file}) || echo "run $i FAILED"; done
-  ```
-
-  ## Acceptance Criteria (how to close this issue)
-
-  - [ ] The test passes deterministically across 10 consecutive runs.
-  - [ ] If it cannot be stabilized, it is quarantined (`test.skip` /
-        `test.todo` with a comment citing FT-{NNN}) and a stable replacement
-        is filed as tech-debt (TD-NNN).
-
-  ## Context
-
-  - Verification report: `{slug}/05-verify-iteration-{N}`
-  ````
-
-**Step 4 — Cross-link to the source issue (mandatory).** Every flaky-test
-issue links back to its source via `## Parent`, and the source/parent issue
-task list references each by `#NNNN`
-(`- [ ] #NNNN — FT-{NNN} {test identifier}`).
-
-**Step 5 — Record the mapping in the verification report.** The
-`FT-NNN → #NNNN` mapping is written ONLY in the Phase 5 report's "Flaky Tests"
-section (and the issue title). No local file.
-
-If no unfixed flaky tests exist this iteration, the phase is a no-op — record
-"0 flaky tests" in the report and proceed.
-
-<!-- section:phase-5.6 -->
-### Phase 5.6 — Issue Checklist Sync (final sweep, mandatory before PASS)
-
-This is the **final** checklist sync — the last of the progressive sync
-points (requirements exit, design exit, plan exit, each iteration commit, PR
-creation, review convergence, CI transitions, and here — per the sync-point
-table in `core/rules/issue-checklist-sync.md`). Earlier syncs may have
-already checked off completed items; this phase catches everything remaining
-and ensures no `- [ ]` item is left without an annotation.
-
-1. **Identify the source issue** per `core/rules/issue-checklist-sync.md`
-   § "How to sync (each point)" step 1 (find `Closes #N` / `Fixes #N` in the
-   PR body or commit messages). If no source issue exists (e.g. standalone
-   bugfix with no tracking issue), skip this phase.
-2. **Fetch the issue body** via `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）get` (rule step 2).
-3. **Map every remaining `- [ ]` checklist item** to one of three states:
-   - **Done** (missed by earlier syncs) → mark `- [x]` and append
-     `_(PR #NNN: <file/component>)_`.
-   - **Deferred** → keep `- [ ]` and append `_(Deferred: TD-NNN <reason>)_`.
-   - **Pending** → keep `- [ ]` and append `_(Pending: <blocker>)_`.
-4. **Fold the `## 当前状态` live-status section** (if present). Rows that have
-   a checklist counterpart (review, process-ACs) are already reflected as
-   checklist annotations at their sync points. Rows with no checklist
-   counterpart in a non-Epic issue (PR opened/merged) are folded as follow-up
-   evidence on the issue narrative (e.g. `_(PR #NNN merged: <summary>)_` on the
-   item it delivered, or in the report). Once every row is accounted for,
-   remove the section from the issue body.
-5. **archive-at-close: mark the `## 工件索引` comment archived** (归档动作 — [TT-1929]). Issue
-   closing IS the archive-at-close action; it is explicit, not implicit. Edit the index
-   comment in place per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 10 Archive-at-close
-   (mechanism — banner + every row's 重读 → ARCHIVE + invariants — is defined there,
-   do not restate; sequence/actor per `rules/issue-checklist-sync.md` § 归档动作).
-   - Skip if no source issue exists.
-   - **Tier 1 run archive** ([TT-1988] two-tier artifacts — only if a Tier 1 run
-     workspace exists): if `<runs-root>/{slug}/` exists (a stage in this run
-     produced Tier 1 local artifacts, e.g. review-code findings), archive the
-     run workspace per `core/rules/two-tier-artifacts.md` § Archive-at-close
-     (the L1 rule is authoritative — do NOT restate its steps here).
-     The archived bundle must pass
-     `core/schemas/runs-bundle.schema.json` validation (the generator
-     validates by default; a red exit blocks close).
-     Verify deltas only: skip in milestone/task DAG mode (the aggregator agent
-     performs it at Epic/task-ticket close — see the DAG branch below).
-6. **Update the issue body** via `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）update` with the annotated
-   checklist. Preserve all non-checklist content unchanged.
-7. **Verify**: re-read the issue and confirm no `- [ ]` item lacks an
-   annotation. Every unchecked item MUST have a `(Deferred: ...)` or
-   `(Pending: ...)` note explaining why it is not done.
-8. **Close the issue** (completes the archive-at-close loop): if the flow has
-   no PR (no `Closes #N` on merge), the Verifier closes the issue after PASS
-   approval via `工单 API（见 TERMINOLOGY）update(state="closed")` — the banner date is
-   corrected to the actual close date if it differs from today. If a PR carries
-   `Closes #N`, the merge closes it; no further action.
-
-If a checklist item cannot be mapped to evidence, deferral, or pending
-status, the iteration is NOT Done — the item represents untracked scope.

core/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 name: writing-skills
 description: Use ONLY when creating, editing, or evaluating an octopus skill — writing the SKILL.md body, deciding whether a skill needs baseline testing, or running a blind A/B eval of a behavior-shaping technique. Use BEFORE first deployment of any skill that must hold a process gate under pressure.
 triggers:
-  # High-discrimination phrases only ([TT-4525]). We deliberately do NOT use:
+  # High-discrimination phrases only ([org-internal #4525]). We deliberately do NOT use:
   # - bare "skill" / 技能 — collides with every skill discussion. Worse: the
   #   hard skill gate folds the previous assistant turn into its match text on
   #   approval turns, so any model reply containing 技能 (e.g. a gate

core/templates/dag.md

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
 
 | 项 | 内容 |
 |---|---|
-| slug / 源 DAG 父级 | `{epic-slug}` / #N（`## 父级 / Parent`；DAG 父级 = `Kind/Epic` 或 `Kind/Feature`，[TT-3061] 阶段 2——文中「Epic scope」泛指源工单 scope） |
+| slug / 源 DAG 父级 | `{epic-slug}` / #N（`## 父级 / Parent`；DAG 父级 = `Kind/Epic` 或 `Kind/Feature`，[org-internal #3061] 阶段 2——文中「Epic scope」泛指源工单 scope） |
 | 单门 | `review-dag`（TOPO / REQMAP / RELEASE 三维，深度由 `dag_metrics` 导出） |
 | 评审深度 | `D1 | D2 | D3 | D4`（`dag_metrics.review_depth`） |
 
@@ -24,13 +24,13 @@
 > 仅登记功能性需求（Epic scope 项中的功能性条目）。产品 NFR 不占 `REQ-F` 编号、
 > 不登记入表、以 `NFR:` 前缀条目落节点 AC（见 §3 `acceptance_criteria`）。
 > 登记表登记的是「提出者写了什么」；§2.1 类目覆盖矩阵补上「还有什么该问的」
-> （[TT-2905]：legacy elicitation 广度扫描被折叠后的补偿层——`表 ↔ 现实` 完备性）。
+> （[org-internal #2905]：legacy elicitation 广度扫描被折叠后的补偿层——`表 ↔ 现实` 完备性）。
 
 | id | title | source | refs_by |
 |---|---|---|---|
 | REQ-F-001 | {需求标题} | {Epic scope 项} | {引用节点 id 集} |
 
-### 2.1 类目覆盖矩阵（[TT-2905] 方案 1）
+### 2.1 类目覆盖矩阵（[org-internal #2905] 方案 1）
 
 > 固定类目集（≤10 类，自 legacy `.octopus/archive/checklists/requirements-analysis.md` CMP/SAF 维抽取）。
 > 每类目状态 ∈ {已覆盖, 明确排除, 待确认}：
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
 | 错误与边界场景（CMP 1.11：空输入/边界值/异常状态，Epic 级；节点级路径覆盖由 REQMAP「AC 路径覆盖」承担） | {已覆盖/明确排除/待确认} | {证据/指针} |
 | 假设与依赖（CMP 1.9：列出并评估影响） | {已覆盖/明确排除/待确认} | {证据/指针} |
 
-### 2.2 排除账本（[TT-2905] 方案 1）
+### 2.2 排除账本（[org-internal #2905] 方案 1）
 
 > 「明确排除」的唯一凭证登记处。每行一条 `E-n`：条目 — out of scope、理由、确认人。
 > 排除可逆：重开时删行并把 §2.1 矩阵状态改为「已覆盖/待确认」，同一次修订内完成。

core/templates/runs-layout.md

@@ -5,17 +5,17 @@ Normative layout for **Tier 1 local structured artifacts**. Authoritative
 boundary rule: `core/rules/two-tier-artifacts.md`. Schemas that validate
 the structured files below live in `core/schemas/runs-*.schema.json`.
 
-This document is the **foundation** (MVP slice, [TT-1968]). It defines the
+This document is the **foundation** (MVP slice, [org-internal #1968]). It defines the
 container, the manifest, and the metadata. Stage-specific artifact schemas
 (design detail dumps, plan items, review dimension findings, synthesis
 prompts, draft contracts) are added incrementally as each skill migrates its
-transient output here — the follow-up iteration ([TT-1988]) has landed: `review-artifact` /
+transient output here — the follow-up iteration ([org-internal #1988]) has landed: `review-artifact` /
 `audit-process` raw findings and producer working drafts are now Tier 1.
-([TT-3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21: the legacy producer stages whose drafts are listed
+([org-internal #3072] phase 3, 2026-08-21: the legacy producer stages whose drafts are listed
 below were archived — their rows and artifact dirs are kept for reading
 historical run bundles.) See the migrated stages table below.
 
-## Kind/MVP mode ([TT-3061])
+## Kind/MVP mode ([org-internal #3061])
 
 `Kind/MVP` tickets write **nothing** to `<runs-root>/` by design — no stage
 dirs, no `index.json`, no manifest. The ticket body is the doc (`## 决策日志`
@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ for human-visible decisions.
 └── {active-slug}/            # GITIGNORED — one subdir per active run
     ├── meta.json             # run metadata        (runs-meta.schema.json)
     ├── index.json            # artifact manifest    (runs-index.schema.json)
-    ├── working-notes.md      # cross-stage narrative memory ([TT-2600], schema-less md)
-    ├── workers/              # worker final-return reports ([TT-2847], schema-less md —
+    ├── working-notes.md      # cross-stage narrative memory ([org-internal #2600], schema-less md)
+    ├── workers/              # worker final-return reports ([org-internal #2847], schema-less md —
     │   └── ...               #   see _shared/worker-report-persistence.md)
     └── {stage}/              # per-stage transient artifacts (added by skills)
         └── ...               #   json (structured) / md (prompt files)
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ for human-visible decisions.
 - **Gitignored** while active — subagents share the worktree, not the git
   history, so active-run content stays local (no repo bloat, no merge noise).
 - **Initialized at run start** by `bun <harness-package>/script/runs-init.ts
-  --slug {slug} --ticket N [--branch …] [--worktree …]` ([TT-3642]) — the
+  --slug {slug} --ticket N [--branch …] [--worktree …]` ([org-internal #3642]) — the
   producing role / Orchestrator runs the script (hand-writing the files is the
   legacy path): it creates the `{active-slug}/` workspace, writes `meta.json`
   with `state: "active"` and the run's slug/branch/worktree/ticket (branch
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ issue comment: the former is the agent's compact-recovery entry; the latter is
 the human-visible traceability hub. They are kept in sync by the producing
 role but serve different consumers.
 
-### `working-notes.md` — cross-stage narrative memory ([TT-2600])
+### `working-notes.md` — cross-stage narrative memory ([org-internal #2600])
 
 `index.json` is a MANIFEST: it records WHAT artifacts exist. It does not
 carry WHY code was written that way, which paths were tried and abandoned, or
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ is that narrative memory, in-file, append-only:
   decision ✓, never referenced cross-worktree ✓, archivable at close ✓ — all
   four Tier 1 conditions hold (`core/rules/two-tier-artifacts.md` 判据).
 
-### `workers/` — worker final-return reports ([TT-2847])
+### `workers/` — worker final-return reports ([org-internal #2847])
 
 Every worker sub-agent dispatch (`agent: worker` roles — Producer
 sub-roles, Verifier, Synthesizer) persists its **final return report**
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ generic name. `index.json` row: `type: "other"`, `schema: null`, `stage` =
 producing stage, `produced_by` = role. Full convention:
 `core/skills/_shared/worker-report-persistence.md`.
 
-### `browser/` — browser evidence packs ([TT-4497] N-03)
+### `browser/` — browser evidence packs ([org-internal #4497] N-03)
 
 A browser-debug session writes one evidence pack per session under
 `browser/{session-id}/` (contract `browser-evidence-4486/shared/pack-manifest-v1`,
@@ -204,20 +204,20 @@ Conventions established by this foundation:
 - A stage that has not yet migrated continues to write to Gitea (Tier 2) per its
   existing skill body — the two tiers coexist during the migration.
 
-**Migrated stages ([TT-1988]):**
+**Migrated stages ([org-internal #1988]):**
 
 | Stage | Skill | Tier 1 artifacts | Schema | Notes |
 |---|---|---|---|---|
 | `review-code` | review-code | `reviews/code/round{N}/findings-{DIM}.json` (raw dimension findings), `reviews/code/round{N}/task-synthesizer.md` (synthesis prompt) | `reviewer-output.schema.json` (findings) | synthesis comment + commit status stay Tier 2 |
-| `review-roadmap` | review | `reviews/roadmap/round{N}/findings-{DIM}.json` | `reviewer-output.schema.json` | legacy target archived ([TT-3072] phase 3) — row kept for historical bundles |
-| `review-design-space` | review | `reviews/design-space/round{N}/findings-{DIM}.json` | `reviewer-output.schema.json` | legacy target archived ([TT-3072] phase 3) — row kept for historical bundles |
-| `review-iteration-plan` | review | `reviews/plan/round{N}/findings-{DIM}.json` | `reviewer-output.schema.json` | legacy target archived ([TT-3072] phase 3) — row kept for historical bundles |
+| `review-roadmap` | review | `reviews/roadmap/round{N}/findings-{DIM}.json` | `reviewer-output.schema.json` | legacy target archived ([org-internal #3072] phase 3) — row kept for historical bundles |
+| `review-design-space` | review | `reviews/design-space/round{N}/findings-{DIM}.json` | `reviewer-output.schema.json` | legacy target archived ([org-internal #3072] phase 3) — row kept for historical bundles |
+| `review-iteration-plan` | review | `reviews/plan/round{N}/findings-{DIM}.json` | `reviewer-output.schema.json` | legacy target archived ([org-internal #3072] phase 3) — row kept for historical bundles |
 | `review-dag` | review | `reviews/review-dag/round{N}/findings-{DIM}.json` | `reviewer-output.schema.json` | synthesis comment + commit status stay Tier 2 |
 | `audit-process` | review | `reviews/audit-process/round{N}/findings-{DIM}.json` | `reviewer-output.schema.json` | synthesis wiki page + commit status stay Tier 2 |
-| `requirements` (drafts) | requirements-elicitation | `requirements/` (schema-less `.md`/`.json`) | — | legacy skill archived ([TT-3072] phase 3) — historical bundles only |
-| `design` (drafts) | design | `design/` (schema-less or `design-detail.schema.json`) | `design-detail.schema.json` (moved to `<instance-root>/archive/schemas/` [TT-3072] phase 3) | legacy skill archived ([TT-3072] phase 3) — historical bundles only |
-| `plan-iterations` (drafts) | plan-iterations | `plan-iterations/` (schema-less or `plan-items.schema.json`) | `plan-items.schema.json` (moved to `<instance-root>/archive/schemas/` [TT-3072] phase 3) | legacy skill archived ([TT-3072] phase 3) — historical bundles only |
-| `roadmap` (draft contracts) | roadmap | `roadmap/contracts/{name}.json` | `draft-contract.schema.json` (moved to `<instance-root>/archive/schemas/` [TT-3072] phase 3) | legacy skill archived ([TT-3072] phase 3) — historical bundles only |
+| `requirements` (drafts) | requirements-elicitation | `requirements/` (schema-less `.md`/`.json`) | — | legacy skill archived ([org-internal #3072] phase 3) — historical bundles only |
+| `design` (drafts) | design | `design/` (schema-less or `design-detail.schema.json`) | `design-detail.schema.json` (moved to `<instance-root>/archive/schemas/` [org-internal #3072] phase 3) | legacy skill archived ([org-internal #3072] phase 3) — historical bundles only |
+| `plan-iterations` (drafts) | plan-iterations | `plan-iterations/` (schema-less or `plan-items.schema.json`) | `plan-items.schema.json` (moved to `<instance-root>/archive/schemas/` [org-internal #3072] phase 3) | legacy skill archived ([org-internal #3072] phase 3) — historical bundles only |
+| `roadmap` (draft contracts) | roadmap | `roadmap/contracts/{name}.json` | `draft-contract.schema.json` (moved to `<instance-root>/archive/schemas/` [org-internal #3072] phase 3) | legacy skill archived ([org-internal #3072] phase 3) — historical bundles only |
 
 Every review/audit stage additionally maintains a per-stage lifecycle file
 `reviews/{stage}/status.json` (schema `review-status.schema.json`) — live
@@ -241,24 +241,24 @@ enters git history:
 2. Write `archive/{slug}.json` — a compact bundle carrying `meta` + the
    `index.json` manifest (the durable trace; bulk artifacts are summarized by
    digest, not copied wholesale, to keep the archive small). One exception
-   ([TT-2600]): when `working-notes.md` exists, its final content is inlined as
+   ([org-internal #2600]): when `working-notes.md` exists, its final content is inlined as
    the bundle's top-level `working_notes` field — the narrative memory is the
    single artifact whose content (not just digest) rides in the bundle,
    feeding later retro probes and the notes-injection degradation path
-   ([TT-2601]). The bundle is validated by `runs-bundle.schema.json`.
-   Offline review verifiability (TD/TRC-F006, [TT-2688]): for each review stage
+   ([org-internal #2601]). The bundle is validated by `runs-bundle.schema.json`.
+   Offline review verifiability (TD/TRC-F006, [org-internal #2688]): for each review stage
    the run executed, also embed a top-level `review_history` entry in the
    bundle — `{stage, rounds, final_verdict, per_round[]}` (per-round:
    round/overall_verdict/blockers/majors/minors) — derived from that stage's
    live `reviews/{stage}/status.json` `history[]`. Closed-run probes can then
    reconstruct round counts and verdicts from the bundle alone, without the
-   removed workspace or artifact-path reconstruction ([TT-2591]).
+   removed workspace or artifact-path reconstruction ([org-internal #2591]).
 3. `git add archive/{slug}.json` and commit on the workflow branch (rides into
    main via the `--no-ff` merge).
 4. Remove the `{active-slug}/` workspace from the worktree (its durable record
    now lives in the archive bundle).
 
-Steps 1–4 collapse into ONE command ([TT-3642]): `bash script/archive-run.sh
+Steps 1–4 collapse into ONE command ([org-internal #3642]): `bash script/archive-run.sh
 {slug} [--pr N]` — run from the session worktree, it resolves the PR by branch
 head, generates + validates the bundle via `gen-run-bundle.ts` (recording
 `closed_at` / `close_commit_sha` and the `--branch` workflow branch), commits
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ Gitea tax.
 
 ## Relationship to existing mechanisms
 
-- **`/tmp/octopus/` embryo** — `review-code` ([TT-1988] MVP) now writes its
+- **`/tmp/octopus/` embryo** — `review-code` ([org-internal #1988] MVP) now writes its
   synthesis prompt under `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/` instead of
   `/tmp/octopus/synthesis_task_*`. Other skills still using the `/tmp/octopus/`
   embryo coexist until their own migration iteration.

guards/check-core-cohesion.ts

@@ -3,9 +3,7 @@
 import fs from "node:fs"
 import path from "node:path"
 
-const scriptDir = (import.meta as { dir?: string }).dir
-  ?? new URL(".", import.meta.url).pathname
-const ROOT = path.resolve(scriptDir, "..")
+const ROOT = path.resolve(import.meta.dir, "..")
 const MANIFEST_PATH = path.join(ROOT, "core", "CORE-MANIFEST.json")
 const CORE_ROOT = path.join(ROOT, "core")
 

guards/check-core-p1.ts

@@ -3,9 +3,7 @@
 import fs from "node:fs"
 import path from "node:path"
 
-const scriptDir = (import.meta as { dir?: string }).dir
-  ?? new URL(".", import.meta.url).pathname
-const ROOT = path.resolve(scriptDir, "..")
+const ROOT = path.resolve(import.meta.dir, "..")
 const CORE_ROOT = path.join(ROOT, "core")
 const EXEMPT = new Set(["core/schemas/id-aliases.json"])
 

guards/check-encoding-health.ts

@@ -3,9 +3,7 @@
 import fs from "node:fs"
 import path from "node:path"
 
-const scriptDir = (import.meta as { dir?: string }).dir
-  ?? new URL(".", import.meta.url).pathname
-const ROOT = path.resolve(scriptDir, "..")
+const ROOT = path.resolve(import.meta.dir, "..")
 const CORE_DIR = path.join(ROOT, "core")
 
 const SCAN_EXTENSIONS = new Set([".md", ".json", ".ts", ".tsx", ".js", ".mjs", ".cjs", ".yaml", ".yml", ".txt"])

guards/delink-core.ts

@@ -3,20 +3,12 @@
 import fs from "node:fs"
 import path from "node:path"
 
-// Runtime-neutral: works under bun and node>=20.9 (--experimental-strip-types).
-const scriptDir = (import.meta as { dir?: string }).dir
-  ?? new URL(".", import.meta.url).pathname
-const ROOT = path.resolve(scriptDir, "..")
+const ROOT = path.resolve(import.meta.dir, "..")
 const MANIFEST_PATH = path.join(ROOT, "core", "CORE-MANIFEST.json")
 const CHECK = process.argv.includes("--check")
-// --strip: rewrite remaining `[org-internal #NNNN]` annotations to a compact
-// provenance form `[TT-NNNN]` (org ticket id, non-navigable in the standalone
-// repo) and fold the wordy placeholder away. Idempotent like the base pass.
-const STRIP = process.argv.includes("--strip")
 
 const REF_RE = /\B#(\d{3,5})\b/g
 const PLACEHOLDER = "org-internal"
-const STRIP_RE = /\[org-internal[ \t]*#(\d{3,5})\]/g
 
 interface Mapping {
   core: string
@@ -69,16 +61,6 @@ function transformContent(content: string): { next: string; count: number } {
   return { next, count }
 }
 
-// --strip pass: `[org-internal #NNNN]` → `[TT-NNNN]` (provenance-only ticket id).
-function stripContent(content: string): { next: string; count: number } {
-  let count = 0
-  const next = content.replace(STRIP_RE, (_match, digits: string) => {
-    count++
-    return `[TT-${digits}]`
-  })
-  return { next, count }
-}
-
 export function transformContentForTest(content: string): { next: string; count: number } {
   return transformContent(content)
 }
@@ -91,8 +73,7 @@ let replacedTotal = 0
 for (const rel of files) {
   const fullRel = `core/${rel}`
   const content = fs.readFileSync(path.join(ROOT, "core", rel), "utf8")
-  const result = STRIP ? stripContent(content) : transformContent(content)
-  const { next, count } = result
+  const { next, count } = transformContent(content)
   if (count === 0) continue
   if (byteLocked.has(fullRel)) {
     deferredLocked.push({ file: fullRel, count })
@@ -120,8 +101,7 @@ if (CHECK) {
   process.exit(0)
 }
 
-const mode = STRIP ? "stripped" : "replaced"
-console.log(`delink-core: ${mode} ${replacedTotal} refs across ${perFile.length} file(s)`)
+console.log(`delink-core: replaced ${replacedTotal} refs across ${perFile.length} file(s)`)
 const top = [...perFile, ...deferredLocked].sort((a, b) => b.count - a.count).slice(0, 10)
 for (const p of top) console.log(`  ${p.file}: ${p.count}`)
 process.exit(0)

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "octopus-workflow",
-  "version": "0.1.4",
+  "version": "0.1.7",
   "description": "Standalone workflow core: provider-neutral agent workflow corpus (skills / rules / checklists / templates / schemas) with drift guards, extracted from the octopus agent platform.",
   "license": "MIT",
   "private": false,

retrospectives/wechat-ops-20260929.md

@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
-# 项目复盘 — wechat-ops 个人微信 GUI 自动化值守 Agent
-
-> 迭代周期:2026-09-29 一天(迭代0 环境搭建 → 迭代1 五功能 → 迭代2 DAG 就位)
-> 方法:Loong Workflow 复盘清单(DATA / ANAL / ACT / LOOP / SAFE)
-> 复盘人:kenyang + ZCode Agent
-
----
-
-## 0. 项目快照
-
-| 项 | 值 |
-|---|---|
-| 交付物 | GitHub + Loong Gitea 双远端 wechat-ops(skILL 包 + 服务器部署版,md5 一致) |
-| 代码规模 | agent.py ~650 行 + vision.py + setup-server.sh + 守卫脚本 |
-| 运行状态 | 阿里云 2核2G,auto/draft 值守中,可用内存 ~720Mi |
-| 版本轨迹 | v0.1.0 初版 → v0.2.x 安全加固 → v0.3.x ima 知识库 → v0.4.x Loong 工作流捆绑 |
-
-## 1. 数据(DATA)
-
-**功能交付**:迭代1 五项全部实现并验证(独立Prompt/记忆/群@检测/链接阅读/图标模板匹配);ima OpenAPI 当天逆向对接(官方文档缺字段不一致,实测修正)。
-
-**真实流量拦截记录**(守卫闸门的实战证据):
-- 标题核验拦截误发:6+ 次(误定位到 第一财经/大刘家/杨家小极客/张秀英/纯臻群/刘家四兄弟姐妹)
-- 白名单外跳过:9+ 次(张秀英门店运营群、2组1号、Service Accounts 等)
-- 群 @ 闸门:未@消息全部仅记录不响应
-
-**事故清单**(每条有日志/截图证据):
-1. 私聊消息误发 227 人群(坐标偏移+无核验,用户手动撤回)
-2. Escape 键打崩微信渲染→透明壳→自愈误判重启→登录会话丢失(被迫重扫码 3 次)
-3. 定时任务队列被清空且重复触发 20 秒循环(FT 收到 ~50 条测试消息)
-4. 工单误关 4 张(#6/#7/#8/#9 号映射错误,事后纠正)
-5. linux-server.md 被存根覆盖丢失 90 行(git 历史恢复)
-6. ima 官方文档字段与实际 API 不一致(id/name vs kb_id/kb_name)
-
-## 2. 优点(可复用模式)
-
-1. **安全闸门代码化且实战有效**:标题核验(空标题拒绝)、白名单、限速、静默、敏感词回退——全部误发被拦,零事故外泄。模式:闸门必须写成函数,不写成散文。
-2. **自愈状态机**:托盘隐匿/透明壳/登录过期/过渡态保护,一夜之间无人工干预恢复值守。模式:每种故障先做"最坏情况审查"再加处理分支。
-3. **像素级兜底 + 自学习模板**:FT 图标颜色候选 + 9×9 模板最小距离(校准:真身<10万,误配 270万+),核验成功后自学习存模板。
-4. **知识库两级接入**:文件导出兜底 + OpenAPI 直连优先,当天完成无官方文档接口的逆向对接(实测修正字段名)。
-5. **诚实文化**:幻觉试答拒绝发送;错误关票发状态修正评论;证据分级表述(已验证:证据 / 未验证:待确认)。
-6. **真实用户即时反馈**:群里演示后,当晚有成员尝试部署、有成员购入服务器——开源定位(纯视觉替代付费 Proxy API)得到验证。
-
-## 3. 缺点与根因(归因流程/工具,不归因个人)
-
-| # | 缺点 | 根因(流程/工具缺口) |
-|---|---|---|
-| 1 | GUI 自动化固有脆弱:窗口自发隐匿、渲染透明壳、Escape 打崩渲染,全天 5+ 次异常 | 微信 Qt 客户端不可控;缺"故障注入"式预防测试,只有事后补丁 |
-| 2 | 免费视觉模型定位误读(臻→甄、槽位名字偏差),需模板/模糊匹配补丁补偿 | 无离线评测集:视觉提示词从未做过基线测试,每个误读都是第一次见 |
-| 3 | 定时任务重复触发 20 秒循环,根因未明(run_due_tasks 曾将未到期任务判为 due) | 缺"决策日志→断言"的最小复现方法论;护栏先于根因分析上线,护栏自身又制造新循环 |
-| 4 | 群发误投事故 | 无"发送目标 dry-run"预检步骤;核验闸门是事故后补的 |
-| 5 | 工单误关 4 张(映射错误) | 关票动作无"工单号↔标题"双重校验;单人无评审 |
-| 6 | 文档被存根覆盖 90 行 | 文件同步用 cp 而非 git,缺 pre-commit 保护 |
-| 7 | 测试污染真实会话(FT ~50 条消息) | 无测试专用会话/账号隔离机制 |
-
-## 4. 行动项(ACT,≤5,每条有文件路径与完成判据)
-
-| # | 行动项 | 文件 | 完成判据 |
-|---|---|---|---|
-| 1 | N-04:定时任务重复触发复现(利用 save_tasks([]) 溯源栈日志) | scripts/agent.py run_due_tasks | 同一任务 3 次评估仅触发 1 次发送 |
-| 2 | N-05:白名单 difflib≥0.6 模糊匹配(已实现待回归) + 群名 OCR 变体测试用例集 | scripts/agent.py handle_trigger | 「纯甄AI赋能1688」命中白名单 |
-| 3 | N-01:图片发送链路(表情包前置) | scripts/agent.py send_image | 测试图片送达 File Transfer |
-| 4 | 上架前置:守卫脚本增加"凭证/隐私 HARD 扫描"进 CI(双远端推送前自动跑) | scripts/check-skill.sh + Loong Gitea workflow | push 即自动扫描 |
-| 5 | ima 检索评测集:收集 10 条真实问题-期望文档对,做召回率基线 | references/ima-eval.md(新建) | 召回率报告存在且 ≥8/10 |
-
-## 5. 闭环(LOOP)
-
-- 本文写入 loong-workflow 仓库 retrospectives/
-- ACT#1/#2 相关坑已沉淀 pitfalls-linux.md(#18/#19/#20)
-- 迭代2 DAG 已发布 Loong Gitea wiki(wechat-ops-iter2/dag),N-01 工单已建(#14)
-
-## 6. 无指责声明(SAFE)
-
-所有失误(群发误投、误关工单、文档覆盖、护栏制造循环)归因于:**流程缺口**(无 dry-run、无双人评审、无离线测试集、护栏先于根因分析),不归因于任何人的能力或态度。相应修复均已落入上述 ACT 项。
-
-## 7. 一句话总结
-
-**一天内从裸机到开源值守 Agent,安全闸门零失效,但稳定性工程(故障注入测试、离线评测集、双人评审)仍是单人项目的最大短板——这三样是迭代2 的主攻方向。**