v0.1.6: sync 2026-10-03..10-15 core corpus — kanban practice fully retired (#5745), review-artifact schema validation wiring (#5656 N-04/N-06), review-code batching (#4386) + worktree codegraph preamble (#4187), gitea adapter slimming, roles yaml first-line fix (octopus main-repo commits 86047c51d..de16e8704)

core/adapters/gitea/patterns.md

@@ -138,31 +138,6 @@ curl -fsS -X PATCH "<gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/issues/comment
 
 单评论聚合不变量（工件索引、当前状态表等）的执行手段。
 
-## Pattern 7: move-issue-to-column
-
-看板列迁移（Todo → In Progress → Review → Done）。projects/columns
-发现用 REST；「把工单移到列」的操作端点语义复杂，经 swagger 查询后
-调用，不臆造路径：
-
-```bash
-# 列出 repo 级 projects（projects 仅 repo 级，无 org/user 级端点）
-curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
-  "<gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/projects"
-# 列某 project 的 columns
-curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
-  "<gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/projects/{project_id}/columns"
-# 移动工单到列：先经 swagger.v1.json 查询 projects 相关端点后调用
-curl -s <gitea-base-url>/swagger.v1.json -o /tmp/gitea-sw.json
-jq -r '.paths | keys[]' /tmp/gitea-sw.json | grep projects
-```
-
-## Pattern 7.5: move-issue-to-pipeline-stage
-
-管线阶段板列（Pipeline Stages board column）承载阶段迁移——阶段转移
-落到板列，**不落** `## 当前状态` 行（该表只承载 PR / 评审 / CI 行与
-非阶段阻塞项）。列序列按管线阶段定义；移动与 Pattern 7 同款
-（projects/columns 经 REST + swagger 发现，同上）。
-
 ## Pattern 8: post-commit-status
 
 commit status 直发 REST（评审综合的 Tier-2 落点）：
@@ -183,22 +158,6 @@ context 公式：`pipeline/review-{stage}`（`code` / `review-dag` /
 `audit-process`）。token 从实例配置读取（此处 `<token>` 占位）。
 merge 前读回验证：`GET /commits/{PR_SHA}/status`。
 
-## Pattern 9: create-iteration-board
-
-```bash
-# 建 project（board）：先经 swagger 查询 create 端点契约
-curl -s <gitea-base-url>/swagger.v1.json -o /tmp/gitea-sw.json
-jq '.paths["/repos/{owner}/{repo}/projects"].post' /tmp/gitea-sw.json
-# 随后 POST 建板（title="{slug} — Iteration {N}", description="…"）
-# 再对每列（Todo / In Progress / Review / Done）：
-jq '.paths["/repos/{owner}/{repo}/projects/{project_id}/columns"].post' /tmp/gitea-sw.json
-# 随后 POST 建列
-```
-
-projects 仅 repo 级。DAG 聚合 agent 在单门 PASS 后建板；工单正文模板带
-`## Node Reference`（指向 `{epic-slug}/dag`）、`## Acceptance Criteria`、
-`## Parent`。
-
 ## Pattern 10: artifact-index（工单 ↔ 工件索引）
 
 技能发布工件后，在源工单维护 **`## 工件索引` 评论**——单一原位编辑的

core/adapters/gitea/reading.md

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
 
 ## Pattern 4: read-project-column-issues
 
-看板列工单队列。project/column 发现：
+看板列工单队列（只读）。project/column 发现：
 
 ```
 curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
@@ -89,9 +89,7 @@ curl -fsS -H "Authorization: token <token>" \
   "<gitea-base-url>/api/v1/repos/Octopus/octopus/projects/{project_id}/columns"
 ```
 
-「把工单移到列」等复杂操作：经 `swagger.v1.json`
-（`jq '.paths | keys[]' | grep projects`）查询 projects 相关端点后调用，
-不要臆造具体端点路径。projects 仅 repo 级（无 org/user 级端点）。
+projects 仅 repo 级（无 org/user 级端点）。
 
 ## Pattern 5: read-review-status（CLI）
 

core/checklists/release.md

@@ -74,3 +74,24 @@
 | 6.1 | Tagged commit 可构建                | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 6.2 | 测试全部通过                        | ☐    | ☐      |      |
 | 6.3 | 回到了原始分支                      | ☐    | ☐      |      |
+
+---
+
+## 7. 产物发布（DIST — Artifact Distribution，octopus 项目）
+
+> 对应 `.octopus/skills/release/SKILL.md` Phase 4b（#2003 退役 CI publish
+> 管线后的手工发布流程）。**主仓库 tag + release 对象 ≠ 发布完成**——CLI
+> 二进制、公开镜像、桌面 feed 三层外圈全部就位才算。本清单从磁盘读取，
+> 作为技能注入被截断时的兜底事实源（v0.25.0 发布时技能注入截断恰好切掉
+> Phase 4b，导致外圈整层遗漏——本节由此设立）。
+
+| #   | 检查项                                   | 通过 | 不通过 | 备注 |
+| --- | ---------------------------------------- | ---- | ------ | ---- |
+| 7.1 | 12 平台 CLI 二进制已构建（tag 的干净 checkout，`bun packages/octopus/script/build.ts`），全部 smoke test 输出版本号 | ☐ | ☐ | Windows 无 `python3` 命令，zip 归档需垫 shim 或手动补齐 |
+| 7.2 | 12 个归档已挂到主仓库 release（zip×6 + tar.gz×6） | ☐ | ☐ | |
+| 7.3 | （可选，Gitea-only 口径可跳过）npm/docker/AUR 外部 registry 已发或明确跳过 | ☐ | ☐ | `OCTOPUS_GITEA_ONLY=true` |
+| 7.4 | `sync-public-assets.sh` 已跑：公共镜像 `Octopus/octopus-release` 的 `v{version}` release 有 12 资产 | ☐ | ☐ | 大 POST 出站不通时经服务器 localhost 中继 |
+| 7.5 | `sync-public-install.sh` 已跑：install/install.ps1/README 同步到镜像 main（注意 cp 目标是**根 README.md**，不是 scripts/ 副本） | ☐ | ☐ | |
+| 7.6 | `verify-public-sync.sh` PASSED | ☐ | ☐ | |
+| 7.7 | Desktop feed 双平台已派发（`desktop-feed.yml` dispatch ×2：beta/prod × win/linux），`latest.yml` 与 `latest-linux.yml` 的 `version:` == CLI 版本 | ☐ | ☐ | concurrency 组已按 platform 分离；资产字节数须与 feed 声明一致 |
+| 7.8 | README 下载链接抽查（install 脚本 raw、资产直链、docs 相对链接）匿名可达 | ☐ | ☐ | v0.18 遗留 wiki 坏链由此发现 |

core/rules/issue-checklist-sync.md

@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ Rules:
   surfaced by checklist annotations alone — do NOT add live-status rows for
   them. PR / review / CI transitions carry BOTH a checklist annotation AND
   a live-status row.
-- **Stage rows live on the board, not here**: pipeline stage transitions are
-  represented by the Pipeline Stages board column (shared write-patterns
-  Pattern 7.5), NOT by `## 当前状态` rows. Keep only the
+- **No stage rows here**: pipeline stage transitions are NOT represented by
+  `## 当前状态` rows — they surface through checklist annotations at skill
+  exits. Keep only the
   status-sync-automated rows (PR / 代码评审 / CI) and non-stage
   blockers/deferrals.
 - Update in place (same section heading `## 当前状态`), never append a second copy.

core/schemas/reviewer-output.schema.json

@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
     },
     "quantitative_summary": {
       "type": "object",
+      "description": "Every check the reviewer executed this round (PASS and FAIL counted in total_checks; NA reported via na_count). The verdict field must follow these counts per the thresholds documented on verdict — a synthesis consumer recalculates pass_rate from passed/total_checks and treats a mismatch as a malformed artifact.",
       "required": ["total_checks", "passed", "failed", "pass_rate"],
       "properties": {
         "total_checks": { "type": "integer", "minimum": 1 },
@@ -74,7 +75,8 @@
           },
           "severity": {
             "type": "string",
-            "enum": ["BLOCKER", "MAJOR", "MINOR", "INFO"]
+            "enum": ["BLOCKER", "MAJOR", "MINOR", "INFO"],
+            "description": "BLOCKER: breaks an acceptance criterion, hangs/leaks, or opens an abuse channel — the artifact must not land as-is. MAJOR: a real defect on a non-blocking path, or a test/lock blind to a plausible regression (a mutation would escape). MINOR: quality/drift issue with a cheap local fix (naming, duplication, small docs gap); no behavioral risk. INFO: observation, accepted-risk note, or follow-up ticket material — no action required this round. Calibration rule: severity grades the FINDING's impact, not the reviewer's confidence; low-confidence suspicions go to INFO with the evidence, never inflated to MAJOR."
           },
           "checklist_ref": {
             "type": "string",

core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md

@@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
 
 **Orchestrator actions**:
 
-0. **Move the source issue to the `review` column** on the Pipeline Stages
-   board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5. Skip if no
-   source issue exists. The review stage is a single board column covering
-   all review targets (DAG single gate / code review / audit-process).
-
 0.5. **Initialize the review-status file** (round 1 only). The Orchestrator
    creates `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/status.json` before dispatching
    round 1, with the full schema-required field set
@@ -111,6 +106,13 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
      `core/skills/_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md` — Default
      Explorer Permissions).
    - Temperature: 0.1 (deterministic output).
+   - StructuredOutput mount ([org-internal #5658]): pass `format: { type:
+     "json_schema", schema: <the reviewer-output.schema.json contents you
+     read at prompt build time> }` on the task dispatch — the reviewer's
+     final emission is schema-enforced (malformed verdict/severity/summary
+     args are rejected with field-path repair feedback inside the reviewer's
+     own loop). The findings FILE remains the canonical Tier-1 artifact; the
+     structured output mirrors it as a self-check.
 
 4. Wait for all {REVIEWER_OR_AUDITOR}s to complete. Each reviewer writes its
    dimension result to the skill's configured findings sink:
@@ -171,6 +173,11 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
      `tier1-local` skills; `/tmp/octopus/...` for `tier2-comment` skills)
    - `permissions`: read + write + edit + bash + glob + grep (all allow)
    - `temperature`: 0.1
+   - `format` ([org-internal #5658]): `{ type: "json_schema", schema: <the
+     synthesis.schema.json contents you read> }` — the Synthesizer's final
+     emission is schema-enforced (malformed verdict/dimension args rejected
+     with field-path repair feedback in-loop). The posted fenced JSON block
+     remains the canonical artifact; the structured output mirrors it.
    - Foreground (the Orchestrator waits for completion).
 
 3. The Synthesizer:

core/skills/_shared/review-reviewer-prompt.md

@@ -32,6 +32,18 @@ Label: {DIMENSION_NAME}
 
 ## Instructions
 
+### Gate records are deterministic inputs ([org-internal #5656] N-04)
+
+When the work item carries gate records (`gate` tool results — metadata
+`exit_code`, `duration_ms`, `ci_run_id`), those records ARE the command
+outcomes for mechanical questions (tests/typecheck/lint): cite the exit code
+verbatim (`gate <id> (<tier>): exit_code=<n> -> green|red` — canonical block
+in `packages/octopus/src/gate/consume.ts`) and never substitute a model's
+narration of command output. A claim that disagrees with a record's
+exit_code is a finding (record wins); a mechanical claim with no record is
+unverifiable — request the citation. A green verdict-cache hit
+(`metadata.verdict_cache.key`) counts the same as a fresh run.
+
 {READ_FIRST_STEPS}
 4. For each checklist item, determine whether the {ARTIFACT_NOUN} satisfies it.
    Every checklist item must receive a PASS or FAIL verdict.
@@ -46,6 +58,21 @@ Label: {DIMENSION_NAME}
    (reviewer_count > 1), use the slot-prefixed form {DIM}R{k}-F{NNN} with your
    1-based slot k (e.g. TOPOR1-F001) so parallel slot files never collide on id.
 {CONTRADICTION_RULE}
+6b. Code graph availability (worktree sessions): if `codegraph_status` is
+   unavailable or reports no index for the tree under review (typical when
+   reviewing from a session worktree whose per-worktree `.codegraph/` index
+   has not finished building — see `<instance-root>/rules/code-graph.md`), do NOT
+   silently substitute grep+read for structural questions ("who calls /
+   what depends on / where defined"). Instead:
+   - For symbols on the MAIN branch side (baselines, design refs, cross-session
+     frozen contracts), you MAY query the main checkout's index (path given in
+     your dispatch preamble) and cite `main:<path>:<line>`.
+   - If no index is reachable at all, mark the affected checklist items NA
+     with reason "codegraph unavailable — structural check degraded to grep"
+     and emit one INFO finding (id `{DIM}-F001`-style, in your dimension's own
+     code) recording the degradation, so the Synthesizer can surface it.
+   Findings derived purely from grep+read when a graph query was required are
+   treated as low-confidence and may be waived in synthesis.
 7. Assign severity strictly:
 {SEVERITY_DEFINITIONS}
 8. Count every PASS and FAIL. Compute pass_rate = passed / total_checks.

core/skills/_shared/roles/coordinator.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Coordinator
 purpose: >
   Pool dispatch coordinator (billing-v2 [org-internal #4041] §7, REQ-F-012): a wake-driven,

core/skills/_shared/roles/producer.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Producer
 purpose: >
   Write production artifacts — requirements, design, plans, code, fixes,

core/skills/_shared/roles/reviewer.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Reviewer
 purpose: >
   Review one dimension of an artifact against its checklist, read-only.

core/skills/_shared/roles/tool.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Tool
 purpose: >
   Specialized tool agent for image interpretation and other vision/utility

core/skills/_shared/roles/verifier.yaml

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-> Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
+# > Core 中立版（Increment 6a 改写，原 deferHard verbatim）。编号与条目结构严格不变（C-2 不变量）；实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
 name: Verifier
 purpose: >
   Run the iteration's DoD matrix, integration tests, NFR validation, and

core/skills/_shared/synthesis_task.md

@@ -198,6 +198,14 @@
 - **Rule 4 — Aggregation, not reinterpretation**: You MUST NOT soften, rephrase,
   or downgrade reviewer findings. If a reviewer writes "BLOCKER", it stays
   "BLOCKER" in synthesis.
+
+1c. **Pass-rate recalc post-check (MANDATORY, [org-internal #5658])**: for
+   every dimension, recompute `pass_rate = passed / total_checks` from its
+   `quantitative_summary` and compare with the reported value. On a mismatch:
+   keep the raw file unchanged, use the RECOMPUTED value in the synthesis
+   digest, and note the mismatch — a reviewer-output whose `pass_rate` does
+   not match its own counts is a malformed artifact (the schema description
+   says exactly this; this step is the enforcement).
 - **Rule 5 — Anonymous findings preservation**: If two reviewers independently
   flag the same issue from different dimensions, preserve both entries. Do not
   deduplicate by discarding one — cross-dimension agreement is itself a signal.
@@ -209,6 +217,11 @@
 Return ONLY this summary as your final message. Do NOT include the full
 synthesis JSON — it is already posted to the pipeline PR / source issue
 comment (for audit-process runs, the wiki page `audit/{date}/round{N}/synthesis`).
+
+When your dispatch carries `format` (StructuredOutput mount, [org-internal
+[org-internal #5658]]): the structured output is the MIRROR self-check of this summary (same
+schema, schema-enforced), not a second artifact — the posted fenced JSON block
+and this summary remain canonical.
 Persist this summary verbatim to
 `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/round{N}/synthesis-return.md` before
 returning (step 9 above — worker-report persistence [org-internal #2847]).

core/skills/codegraph-setup/SKILL.md

@@ -1,33 +1,14 @@
 ---
 name: codegraph-setup
 description: >
-  Use ONLY when installing, configuring, initializing, or troubleshooting CodeGraph
-  (@colbymchenry/codegraph — https://github.com/colbymchenry/codegraph) in the
-  octopus environment. Covers global CLI install, per-project `.codegraph/`
-  indexing, and maintenance commands (status, sync, upgrade, uninstall). MCP
-  wiring into octopus.jsonc is handled by the kickoff pipeline
-  (`octopus kickoff` or `/kickoff`). Also use when a project session reports a
-  missing/stale `.codegraph/` index.
+  Use ONLY when installing, configuring, initializing, or troubleshooting
+  CodeGraph (@colbymchenry/codegraph) in the octopus environment.
 triggers:
   - codegraph
   - code graph
-  - codegraph setup
-  - codegraph install
-  - codegraph init
-  - .codegraph
-  - codegraph_explore
-  - codegraph_node
-  - codegraph_callers
-  - codegraph_status
-  - install codegraph
-  # Chinese — bare nouns for code-graph concepts. The English "codegraph" brand
-  # name above already covers mixed-language phrasings; these cover pure Chinese.
   - 代码图
-  - 代码图谱
   - 代码索引
   - 索引代码
-  - 装代码图
-  - 初始化代码图
 role: Producer
 ---
 

core/skills/implement/reference/implement-mode.md

@@ -179,10 +179,6 @@ Available work items:
 
 #### Phase 1 — Parse Context
 
-> **Pipeline stage**: if the source issue exists, move it to the `implement`
-> column on the Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`
-> Pattern 7.5. Skip if no source issue exists.
-
 Read the upstream artifacts to build a complete implementation context.
 Resolve inputs per the DAG-route read map (Preconditions above); standalone
 modes read the request/bug report instead:
@@ -499,11 +495,6 @@ issue exists.
    retired — each one re-triggered the full CI surface for near-zero re-tested
    risk.
 
-> **Kanban column lifecycle**: manual — move the source issue across board
-> columns explicitly as the pipeline stage changes (Pattern 7.5 in
-> `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`); column semantics: wiki
-> `kanban-lifecycle`.
-
 ---
 
 #### Phase 5 — Report

core/skills/review-artifact/SKILL.md

@@ -97,10 +97,7 @@ The stage IDs remain as-is — they are used by the stage registry and auto-appr
 This skill follows the standardized parallel-review pipeline. The full mechanics are in:
 
 - `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md -->` — Phase A through Phase E
-  - **Phase A step 0**: move the source issue to the `review` column on the
-    Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5
-    (see `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` for the canonical orchestrator
-    actions — step 0 is now part of the shared flow).
+  (canonical orchestrator actions for the shared flow)
 - `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md -->` — mandatory orchestrator rules
 - `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-final-report-template.md -->` — final report format
 - `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-revision-prompt.md -->` — Phase C revision prompt template

core/skills/review-code/SKILL.md

@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ table).
 <!-- section:phase-a -->
 ## Phase A — Parallel Review
 
-> **Canonical mechanics**: `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` — keep this section in sync with the canonical Phase A–E flow. This section adds review-code-specific constants (10 dimensions, severity definitions, risk tiers, output mode, standalone-bugfix mode). Step 0 (move source issue to `review` column on Pipeline Stages board per Pattern 7.5) is inherited from the shared Phase A orchestrator actions; see `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md`.
+> **Canonical mechanics**: `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` — keep this section in sync with the canonical Phase A–E flow. This section adds review-code-specific constants (10 dimensions, severity definitions, risk tiers, output mode, standalone-bugfix mode); orchestrator actions are inherited from the shared Phase A flow.
 
 ### Standalone Bugfix Mode — Orchestrator Dispatch
 
@@ -530,6 +530,13 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [org-internal #3072] phase 3):
      emits the reviewer's output; it does NOT touch the code under review, so
      rule #7 auditor independence holds.)
    - Temperature: 0.1 (deterministic output).
+   - StructuredOutput mount ([org-internal #5658]): pass `format: { type: "json_schema",
+     schema: <the reviewer-output.schema.json contents you read at prompt
+     build time> }` on the Task dispatch — the reviewer's final emission is
+     schema-enforced (malformed verdict/severity/summary args are rejected
+     with field-path repair feedback inside the reviewer's own loop). The
+     findings FILE remains the canonical Tier-1 artifact; the structured
+     output mirrors it as a self-check.
 
    **Worktree-path rule (mandatory)**: Every file path in the reviewer prompt
    (`{FILE_SECTIONS}`, design reference paths, artifact paths) MUST be the
@@ -545,6 +552,21 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [org-internal #3072] phase 3):
    observed in the 2026-07 auto-approve retrospective (5-round convergence,
    67.7% rework fraction).
 
+   **Code-graph availability preamble (worktree sessions, [org-internal #4187])**: the main
+   checkout's `.codegraph/` index does NOT cover a session worktree
+   ([org-internal #2561]/TD-006). Before dispatch, the Orchestrator checks the worktree's
+   own index: run `codegraph_status` against the worktree root, or check for
+   `<worktree-root>/.codegraph/codegraph.db` (a bare `init.log` without the
+   db means the background `session-worktree.sh create` init is still running).
+   Include in each reviewer's dispatch preamble: (a) the worktree index state
+   (ready / building / absent), and (b) when absent or still building, the
+   ABSOLUTE path of the main checkout (which has its own `.codegraph/`) so
+   DGN/COR reviewers can query MAIN-side symbols (design baselines, frozen
+   cross-session contracts) from the main checkout's index and cite them as
+   `main:<path>:<line>`. Reviewers apply rule 6b of
+   `_shared/review-reviewer-prompt.md` (NA + INFO finding) when no index is
+   reachable at all — grep-only structural claims must never pass silently.
+
 4. Wait for all reviewers to complete. Each reviewer writes its finding JSON to
    `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json`
     (Tier 1 local, validated by `core/schemas/reviewer-output.schema.json`). After all

core/skills/verify/SKILL.md

@@ -196,10 +196,6 @@ each missing item.
 <!-- section:phase-1 -->
 ## Phase 1 — Load Verification Context
 
-> **Pipeline stage**: if the source issue exists, move it to the `verify`
-> column on the Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`
-> Pattern 7.5. Skip if no source issue exists.
-
 Read the upstream artifacts. DAG task/milestone mode (the live path — see
 the DAG branch below for its read map):
 
@@ -310,6 +306,20 @@ gate fingerprint is keyed on the working tree (SHA + uncommitted state +
 untracked), so it covers pre-push/headless states the same-SHA CI clauses
 cannot.
 
+### 2.0b — Gate Records as Deterministic Inputs ([org-internal #5656] N-04)
+
+Mechanical checks MUST be grounded in gate records (`gate` tool result
+metadata), never in a model's transcription of command output:
+
+- Cite `exit_code` verbatim — canonical block from
+  `packages/octopus/src/gate/consume.ts`: `gate <id> (<tier>):
+  exit_code=<n> -> green|red`, plus `duration_ms` / `ci_run_id` when present.
+- `exit_code === null` (timeout/abort) is NO verdict — rerun required; a
+  pass claim cannot stand on it.
+- A green verdict-cache hit (`metadata.verdict_cache.key`) satisfies the
+  check the same as a fresh run (content-addressed, same fingerprint).
+- Narration drift (claim != record) is itself a verification finding.
+
 ### 2.1 Full Test Suite
 
 ```bash
@@ -1203,10 +1213,7 @@ If the user confirms, invoke the commit workflow per
 
 An iteration is NOT Done until all code is committed in git history.
 
-After the commit gate passes, move the source issue to the `done` column on
-the Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5.
-Skip if no source issue exists. `done` is a stage column marker; issue
-closing follows the lifecycle per `issue-checklist-sync.md` 归档动作.
+Issue closing follows the lifecycle per `issue-checklist-sync.md` 归档动作.
 
 To notify workflow completion, call the `signal_stage_done` tool.
 

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "octopus-workflow",
-  "version": "0.1.5",
+  "version": "0.1.6",
   "description": "Standalone workflow core: provider-neutral agent workflow corpus (skills / rules / checklists / templates / schemas) with drift guards, extracted from the octopus agent platform.",
   "license": "MIT",
   "private": false,