v0.1.6: sync 2026-10-03..10-15 core corpus — kanban practice fully retired (#5745), review-artifact schema validation wiring (#5656 N-04/N-06), review-code batching (#4386) + worktree codegraph preamble (#4187), gitea adapter slimming, roles yaml first-line fix (octopus main-repo commits 86047c51d..de16e8704)

This commit is contained in:
2026-10-15 14:25:20 +08:00
parent 3d5f89301b
commit b987e2e62f
19 changed files with 128 additions and 103 deletions
+12 -5
View File
@@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
**Orchestrator actions**:
0. **Move the source issue to the `review` column** on the Pipeline Stages
board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5. Skip if no
source issue exists. The review stage is a single board column covering
all review targets (DAG single gate / code review / audit-process).
0.5. **Initialize the review-status file** (round 1 only). The Orchestrator
creates `<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/status.json` before dispatching
round 1, with the full schema-required field set
@@ -111,6 +106,13 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
`core/skills/_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md` — Default
Explorer Permissions).
- Temperature: 0.1 (deterministic output).
- StructuredOutput mount ([org-internal #5658]): pass `format: { type:
"json_schema", schema: <the reviewer-output.schema.json contents you
read at prompt build time> }` on the task dispatch — the reviewer's
final emission is schema-enforced (malformed verdict/severity/summary
args are rejected with field-path repair feedback inside the reviewer's
own loop). The findings FILE remains the canonical Tier-1 artifact; the
structured output mirrors it as a self-check.
4. Wait for all {REVIEWER_OR_AUDITOR}s to complete. Each reviewer writes its
dimension result to the skill's configured findings sink:
@@ -171,6 +173,11 @@ in `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`.
`tier1-local` skills; `/tmp/octopus/...` for `tier2-comment` skills)
- `permissions`: read + write + edit + bash + glob + grep (all allow)
- `temperature`: 0.1
- `format` ([org-internal #5658]): `{ type: "json_schema", schema: <the
synthesis.schema.json contents you read> }` — the Synthesizer's final
emission is schema-enforced (malformed verdict/dimension args rejected
with field-path repair feedback in-loop). The posted fenced JSON block
remains the canonical artifact; the structured output mirrors it.
- Foreground (the Orchestrator waits for completion).
3. The Synthesizer:
@@ -32,6 +32,18 @@ Label: {DIMENSION_NAME}
## Instructions
### Gate records are deterministic inputs ([org-internal #5656] N-04)
When the work item carries gate records (`gate` tool results — metadata
`exit_code`, `duration_ms`, `ci_run_id`), those records ARE the command
outcomes for mechanical questions (tests/typecheck/lint): cite the exit code
verbatim (`gate <id> (<tier>): exit_code=<n> -> green|red` — canonical block
in `packages/octopus/src/gate/consume.ts`) and never substitute a model's
narration of command output. A claim that disagrees with a record's
exit_code is a finding (record wins); a mechanical claim with no record is
unverifiable — request the citation. A green verdict-cache hit
(`metadata.verdict_cache.key`) counts the same as a fresh run.
{READ_FIRST_STEPS}
4. For each checklist item, determine whether the {ARTIFACT_NOUN} satisfies it.
Every checklist item must receive a PASS or FAIL verdict.
@@ -46,6 +58,21 @@ Label: {DIMENSION_NAME}
(reviewer_count > 1), use the slot-prefixed form {DIM}R{k}-F{NNN} with your
1-based slot k (e.g. TOPOR1-F001) so parallel slot files never collide on id.
{CONTRADICTION_RULE}
6b. Code graph availability (worktree sessions): if `codegraph_status` is
unavailable or reports no index for the tree under review (typical when
reviewing from a session worktree whose per-worktree `.codegraph/` index
has not finished building — see `<instance-root>/rules/code-graph.md`), do NOT
silently substitute grep+read for structural questions ("who calls /
what depends on / where defined"). Instead:
- For symbols on the MAIN branch side (baselines, design refs, cross-session
frozen contracts), you MAY query the main checkout's index (path given in
your dispatch preamble) and cite `main:<path>:<line>`.
- If no index is reachable at all, mark the affected checklist items NA
with reason "codegraph unavailable — structural check degraded to grep"
and emit one INFO finding (id `{DIM}-F001`-style, in your dimension's own
code) recording the degradation, so the Synthesizer can surface it.
Findings derived purely from grep+read when a graph query was required are
treated as low-confidence and may be waived in synthesis.
7. Assign severity strictly:
{SEVERITY_DEFINITIONS}
8. Count every PASS and FAIL. Compute pass_rate = passed / total_checks.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
# > Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
name: Coordinator
purpose: >
Pool dispatch coordinator (billing-v2 [org-internal #4041] §7, REQ-F-012): a wake-driven,
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
# > Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
name: Producer
purpose: >
Write production artifacts — requirements, design, plans, code, fixes,
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
# > Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
name: Reviewer
purpose: >
Review one dimension of an artifact against its checklist, read-only.
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
# > Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
name: Tool
purpose: >
Specialized tool agent for image interpretation and other vision/utility
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
# > Core 中立版(Increment 6a 改写,原 deferHard verbatim)。编号与条目结构严格不变(C-2 不变量);实例术语按 `core/adapters/TERMINOLOGY.md` 绑定。
name: Verifier
purpose: >
Run the iteration's DoD matrix, integration tests, NFR validation, and
+13
View File
@@ -198,6 +198,14 @@
- **Rule 4 — Aggregation, not reinterpretation**: You MUST NOT soften, rephrase,
or downgrade reviewer findings. If a reviewer writes "BLOCKER", it stays
"BLOCKER" in synthesis.
1c. **Pass-rate recalc post-check (MANDATORY, [org-internal #5658])**: for
every dimension, recompute `pass_rate = passed / total_checks` from its
`quantitative_summary` and compare with the reported value. On a mismatch:
keep the raw file unchanged, use the RECOMPUTED value in the synthesis
digest, and note the mismatch — a reviewer-output whose `pass_rate` does
not match its own counts is a malformed artifact (the schema description
says exactly this; this step is the enforcement).
- **Rule 5 — Anonymous findings preservation**: If two reviewers independently
flag the same issue from different dimensions, preserve both entries. Do not
deduplicate by discarding one — cross-dimension agreement is itself a signal.
@@ -209,6 +217,11 @@
Return ONLY this summary as your final message. Do NOT include the full
synthesis JSON — it is already posted to the pipeline PR / source issue
comment (for audit-process runs, the wiki page `audit/{date}/round{N}/synthesis`).
When your dispatch carries `format` (StructuredOutput mount, [org-internal
[org-internal #5658]]): the structured output is the MIRROR self-check of this summary (same
schema, schema-enforced), not a second artifact — the posted fenced JSON block
and this summary remain canonical.
Persist this summary verbatim to
`<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/{stage}/round{N}/synthesis-return.md` before
returning (step 9 above — worker-report persistence [org-internal #2847]).
+2 -21
View File
@@ -1,33 +1,14 @@
---
name: codegraph-setup
description: >
Use ONLY when installing, configuring, initializing, or troubleshooting CodeGraph
(@colbymchenry/codegraph — https://github.com/colbymchenry/codegraph) in the
octopus environment. Covers global CLI install, per-project `.codegraph/`
indexing, and maintenance commands (status, sync, upgrade, uninstall). MCP
wiring into octopus.jsonc is handled by the kickoff pipeline
(`octopus kickoff` or `/kickoff`). Also use when a project session reports a
missing/stale `.codegraph/` index.
Use ONLY when installing, configuring, initializing, or troubleshooting
CodeGraph (@colbymchenry/codegraph) in the octopus environment.
triggers:
- codegraph
- code graph
- codegraph setup
- codegraph install
- codegraph init
- .codegraph
- codegraph_explore
- codegraph_node
- codegraph_callers
- codegraph_status
- install codegraph
# Chinese — bare nouns for code-graph concepts. The English "codegraph" brand
# name above already covers mixed-language phrasings; these cover pure Chinese.
- 代码图
- 代码图谱
- 代码索引
- 索引代码
- 装代码图
- 初始化代码图
role: Producer
---
@@ -179,10 +179,6 @@ Available work items:
#### Phase 1 — Parse Context
> **Pipeline stage**: if the source issue exists, move it to the `implement`
> column on the Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`
> Pattern 7.5. Skip if no source issue exists.
Read the upstream artifacts to build a complete implementation context.
Resolve inputs per the DAG-route read map (Preconditions above); standalone
modes read the request/bug report instead:
@@ -499,11 +495,6 @@ issue exists.
retired — each one re-triggered the full CI surface for near-zero re-tested
risk.
> **Kanban column lifecycle**: manual — move the source issue across board
> columns explicitly as the pipeline stage changes (Pattern 7.5 in
> `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`); column semantics: wiki
> `kanban-lifecycle`.
---
#### Phase 5 — Report
+1 -4
View File
@@ -97,10 +97,7 @@ The stage IDs remain as-is — they are used by the stage registry and auto-appr
This skill follows the standardized parallel-review pipeline. The full mechanics are in:
- `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md -->` — Phase A through Phase E
- **Phase A step 0**: move the source issue to the `review` column on the
Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5
(see `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` for the canonical orchestrator
actions — step 0 is now part of the shared flow).
(canonical orchestrator actions for the shared flow)
- `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-orchestrator-rules.md -->` — mandatory orchestrator rules
- `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-final-report-template.md -->` — final report format
- `<!-- inject: ../_shared/review-revision-prompt.md -->` — Phase C revision prompt template
+23 -1
View File
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ table).
<!-- section:phase-a -->
## Phase A — Parallel Review
> **Canonical mechanics**: `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` — keep this section in sync with the canonical Phase A–E flow. This section adds review-code-specific constants (10 dimensions, severity definitions, risk tiers, output mode, standalone-bugfix mode). Step 0 (move source issue to `review` column on Pipeline Stages board per Pattern 7.5) is inherited from the shared Phase A orchestrator actions; see `_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md`.
> **Canonical mechanics**: `core/skills/_shared/review-pipeline-phases.md` — keep this section in sync with the canonical Phase A–E flow. This section adds review-code-specific constants (10 dimensions, severity definitions, risk tiers, output mode, standalone-bugfix mode); orchestrator actions are inherited from the shared Phase A flow.
### Standalone Bugfix Mode — Orchestrator Dispatch
@@ -530,6 +530,13 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [org-internal #3072] phase 3):
emits the reviewer's output; it does NOT touch the code under review, so
rule #7 auditor independence holds.)
- Temperature: 0.1 (deterministic output).
- StructuredOutput mount ([org-internal #5658]): pass `format: { type: "json_schema",
schema: <the reviewer-output.schema.json contents you read at prompt
build time> }` on the Task dispatch — the reviewer's final emission is
schema-enforced (malformed verdict/severity/summary args are rejected
with field-path repair feedback inside the reviewer's own loop). The
findings FILE remains the canonical Tier-1 artifact; the structured
output mirrors it as a self-check.
**Worktree-path rule (mandatory)**: Every file path in the reviewer prompt
(`{FILE_SECTIONS}`, design reference paths, artifact paths) MUST be the
@@ -545,6 +552,21 @@ fallback is retired with the design pipeline, [org-internal #3072] phase 3):
observed in the 2026-07 auto-approve retrospective (5-round convergence,
67.7% rework fraction).
**Code-graph availability preamble (worktree sessions, [org-internal #4187])**: the main
checkout's `.codegraph/` index does NOT cover a session worktree
([org-internal #2561]/TD-006). Before dispatch, the Orchestrator checks the worktree's
own index: run `codegraph_status` against the worktree root, or check for
`<worktree-root>/.codegraph/codegraph.db` (a bare `init.log` without the
db means the background `session-worktree.sh create` init is still running).
Include in each reviewer's dispatch preamble: (a) the worktree index state
(ready / building / absent), and (b) when absent or still building, the
ABSOLUTE path of the main checkout (which has its own `.codegraph/`) so
DGN/COR reviewers can query MAIN-side symbols (design baselines, frozen
cross-session contracts) from the main checkout's index and cite them as
`main:<path>:<line>`. Reviewers apply rule 6b of
`_shared/review-reviewer-prompt.md` (NA + INFO finding) when no index is
reachable at all — grep-only structural claims must never pass silently.
4. Wait for all reviewers to complete. Each reviewer writes its finding JSON to
`<runs-root>/{slug}/reviews/code/round{N}/findings-{DIMENSION_CODE}.json`
(Tier 1 local, validated by `core/schemas/reviewer-output.schema.json`). After all
+15 -8
View File
@@ -196,10 +196,6 @@ each missing item.
<!-- section:phase-1 -->
## Phase 1 — Load Verification Context
> **Pipeline stage**: if the source issue exists, move it to the `verify`
> column on the Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md`
> Pattern 7.5. Skip if no source issue exists.
Read the upstream artifacts. DAG task/milestone mode (the live path — see
the DAG branch below for its read map):
@@ -310,6 +306,20 @@ gate fingerprint is keyed on the working tree (SHA + uncommitted state +
untracked), so it covers pre-push/headless states the same-SHA CI clauses
cannot.
### 2.0b — Gate Records as Deterministic Inputs ([org-internal #5656] N-04)
Mechanical checks MUST be grounded in gate records (`gate` tool result
metadata), never in a model's transcription of command output:
- Cite `exit_code` verbatim — canonical block from
`packages/octopus/src/gate/consume.ts`: `gate <id> (<tier>):
exit_code=<n> -> green|red`, plus `duration_ms` / `ci_run_id` when present.
- `exit_code === null` (timeout/abort) is NO verdict — rerun required; a
pass claim cannot stand on it.
- A green verdict-cache hit (`metadata.verdict_cache.key`) satisfies the
check the same as a fresh run (content-addressed, same fingerprint).
- Narration drift (claim != record) is itself a verification finding.
### 2.1 Full Test Suite
```bash
@@ -1203,10 +1213,7 @@ If the user confirms, invoke the commit workflow per
An iteration is NOT Done until all code is committed in git history.
After the commit gate passes, move the source issue to the `done` column on
the Pipeline Stages board per `_shared/gitea-write-patterns.md` Pattern 7.5.
Skip if no source issue exists. `done` is a stage column marker; issue
closing follows the lifecycle per `issue-checklist-sync.md` 归档动作.
Issue closing follows the lifecycle per `issue-checklist-sync.md` 归档动作.
To notify workflow completion, call the `signal_stage_done` tool.